Bill Text: NY A07028 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Revises the procedures regulating the release of persons charged with criminal offenses pending trial.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2016-01-06 - referred to codes [A07028 Detail]

Download: New_York-2015-A07028-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         7028
                              2015-2016 Regular Sessions
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                    April 20, 2015
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  LENTOL -- (at request of the Office of Court
         Administration) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes
       AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the  issuance
         of securing orders
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. Legislative findings. The legislature  finds  and  declares
    2  that  there is a present need to revise New York's procedures regulating
    3  release of persons charged with criminal offenses pending  trial.  These
    4  procedures,  which  are  set  forth in title P of the criminal procedure
    5  law, require criminal courts  to issue securing  orders  releasing  such
    6  persons on their own recognizance, fixing bail upon the payment of which
    7  they  must be released from custody, or remanding them to the custody of
    8  corrections officials.
    9    Experience has shown that these procedures are  ill-designed  to  meet
   10  today's  community needs. First, New York remains one of very few states
   11  nationally that fails to require judges, in making  bail  decisions,  to
   12  weigh  defendant's  threat  to public safety. This makes little sense in
   13  modern American life where we as a state need to do all  we  can  to  be
   14  effective  and  principled  in  protecting  communities  from  dangerous
   15  persons charged with crime who may otherwise  be  eligible  for  release
   16  pending  trial.  Second, as many have recognized, New York's bail rules,
   17  as applied, can be particularly unfair to poor persons and  their  fami-
   18  lies as bail beyond the financial wherewithal of a criminal defendant is
   19  frequently  ordered  in low-level offenses even where such defendant may
   20  pose little risk of flight.
   21    Accordingly, this act has two purposes. First, it seeks  to  recognize
   22  what most other state jurisdictions and the federal government have long
   23  accepted  -  that a defendant's danger to the community is a factor that
   24  must be considered by a court  charged  with  determining  whether  that
   25  defendant  should  be  released  pending trial. Second, this act aims to
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD07847-01-5
       A. 7028                             2
    1  ensure that the state's bail statutes are implemented  fairly  and  that
    2  poor  persons  charged with crime should not be at any special disadvan-
    3  tage when it comes to decisions regarding release pending trial.
    4    S  2.  The  opening  paragraph  of  paragraph  (a) of subdivision 2 of
    5  section 510.30 of the criminal procedure  law  is  amended  to  read  as
    6  follows:
    7    With  respect  to  any principal, the court must consider the kind and
    8  degree of control or restriction that is necessary to secure his OR  HER
    9  court  attendance  when  required  AND TO ASSURE THE SAFETY OF ANY OTHER
   10  PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY.  In determining [that  matter]  THESE  MATTERS,
   11  the court must, on the basis of available information, consider and take
   12  into account:
   13    S  3.  The section heading of section 510.40 of the criminal procedure
   14  law is amended and a new subdivision 1-a is added to read as follows:
   15  Application for recognizance  or  bail;  determination  thereof,  FIXING
   16               CONDITIONS  THEREFOR,  form of securing order and execution
   17               thereof.
   18    1-A. THE COURT MAY MAKE ANY SECURING ORDER SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH  (A)
   19  OR  (B)  OF  SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO ANY CONDITION OR
   20  CONDITIONS THAT,  IN  ITS  DETERMINATION,  WILL  REASONABLY  ASSURE  THE
   21  APPEARANCE  OF THE PRINCIPAL IN COURT WHEN REQUIRED OR THAT WILL REASON-
   22  ABLY ASSURE THE SAFETY OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY. SUCH CONDI-
   23  TION OR CONDITIONS MAY INCLUDE ANY THAT TO THE  COURT  SEEM  APPROPRIATE
   24  PROVIDED  THAT  THEY REPRESENT THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE CONDITION OR CONDI-
   25  TIONS NECESSARY.  NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THIS SUBDIVISION  SHALL
   26  NOT AFFECT A COURT'S AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 530.12 AND 530.13 OF
   27  THIS TITLE.
   28    S  4.  Subdivision  1  and  the  opening paragraph of subdivision 2 of
   29  section 530.20 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter  531
   30  of the laws of 1975, are amended to read as follows:
   31    1. When the defendant is charged[, by information, simplified informa-
   32  tion,  prosecutor's  information  or  misdemeanor  complaint,]  with  an
   33  offense or offenses [of less  than  felony  grade  only]  OTHER  THAN  A
   34  VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSE AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 70.02 OF
   35  THE  PENAL  LAW  OR  THE COMMISSION OR ATTEMPTED COMMISSION OF A CLASS A
   36  FELONY OR MANSLAUGHTER IN THE  SECOND  DEGREE  AS  PROVIDED  IN  SECTION
   37  125.15  OF  THE  PENAL  LAW, the court must order recognizance [or bail]
   38  UNLESS THE COURT DETERMINES THAT SUCH A SECURING ORDER WILL NOT  REASON-
   39  ABLY  SECURE  THE  DEFENDANT'S  COURT  ATTENDANCE  WHEN REQUIRED OR WILL
   40  ENDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH  EVENT
   41  THE COURT MUST ORDER BAIL.
   42    When  the  defendant  is  charged, by felony complaint, with a VIOLENT
   43  felony OFFENSE AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF  SECTION  70.02  OF  THE
   44  PENAL  LAW OR THE COMMISSION OR ATTEMPTED COMMISSION OF A CLASS A FELONY
   45  OR MANSLAUGHTER IN THE SECOND DEGREE AS PROVIDED IN  SECTION  125.15  OF
   46  THE  PENAL  LAW, the court may, in its discretion, order recognizance or
   47  bail except as otherwise provided in this subdivision:
   48    S 5. Subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 of section 530.40 of the criminal  proce-
   49  dure  law,  subdivision 3 as amended by chapter 264 of the laws of 2003,
   50  are amended to read as follows:
   51    1. When the defendant is charged with an offense or offenses [of  less
   52  than  felony  grade only] OTHER THAN A VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSE AS DEFINED
   53  IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 70.02 OF THE PENAL LAW OR  THE  COMMISSION
   54  OR  ATTEMPTED  COMMISSION  OF  A  CLASS  A FELONY OR MANSLAUGHTER IN THE
   55  SECOND DEGREE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 125.15 OF THE PENAL LAW, the  court
   56  must  order recognizance [or bail] UNLESS THE COURT DETERMINES THAT SUCH
       A. 7028                             3
    1  A SECURING ORDER  WILL  NOT  REASONABLY  SECURE  THE  DEFENDANT'S  COURT
    2  ATTENDANCE WHEN REQUIRED OR WILL ENDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANY OTHER PERSON
    3  OR  THE  COMMUNITY  IN  WHICH EVENT THE COURT MUST ORDER RECOGNIZANCE OR
    4  BAIL.
    5    2.  When  the  defendant  is  charged with a VIOLENT felony OFFENSE AS
    6  DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 70.02 OF  THE  PENAL  LAW  OR  THE
    7  COMMISSION  OR  ATTEMPTED COMMISSION OF A CLASS A FELONY OR MANSLAUGHTER
    8  IN THE SECOND DEGREE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 125.15 OF THE PENAL LAW, the
    9  court may, in its discretion, order recognizance or bail.  In  any  such
   10  case  in  which  an indictment (a) has resulted from an order of a local
   11  criminal court holding the defendant for the action of the  grand  jury,
   12  or  (b)  was  filed  at a time when a felony complaint charging the same
   13  conduct was pending in a local criminal court, and in which  such  local
   14  criminal court or a superior court judge has issued an order of recogni-
   15  zance  or  bail which is still effective, the superior court's order may
   16  be in the form of a direction continuing the effectiveness of the previ-
   17  ous order.
   18    3. Notwithstanding the provisions of  [subdivision]  SUBDIVISIONS  ONE
   19  AND  two OF THIS SECTION, a superior court may not order recognizance or
   20  bail, or permit a defendant to remain at liberty pursuant to an existing
   21  order, after he OR SHE has been convicted of either: (a) a class A felo-
   22  ny or (b) any class B or class C felony defined in article  one  hundred
   23  thirty  of  the  penal  law  committed or attempted to be committed by a
   24  person eighteen years of age or older against a person less  than  eigh-
   25  teen  years  of  age. In either case the court must commit or remand the
   26  defendant to the custody of the sheriff.
   27    S 6. The criminal procedure law is amended by  adding  a  new  section
   28  530.42 to read as follows:
   29  S 530.42 ORDER OF RECOGNIZANCE OR BAIL: REVIEW OF SECURING ORDER.
   30    NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 510.20 OF
   31  THIS  TITLE,  UPON  A DEFENDANT'S FIRST APPEARANCE BEFORE THE COURT IN A
   32  CRIMINAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN WHICH HE OR SHE IS CHARGED WITH ONE  OR
   33  MORE  OFFENSES,  OCCURRING NOT LESS THAN THIRTY DAYS AFTER HE OR SHE WAS
   34  ARRAIGNED THEREON, THE  COURT  MUST  ENTERTAIN  AN  APPLICATION  BY  THE
   35  DEFENDANT  FOR  A  CHANGE  IN ANY SECURING ORDER THEN APPLICABLE TO SUCH
   36  DEFENDANT IN SUCH ACTION  OR  PROCEEDING.  UPON  SUCH  APPLICATION,  THE
   37  DEFENDANT  MUST  BE  ACCORDED  AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD, AND THE COURT
   38  MUST DETERMINE THE APPLICATION DE NOVO, WITHOUT REGARD TO  THE  EXISTING
   39  SECURING  ORDER AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS IT WOULD DETERMINE AN APPLICA-
   40  TION FOR RECOGNIZANCE OR BAIL MADE BY A DEFENDANT WHEN HE OR  SHE  FIRST
   41  COMES  UNDER  THE  CONTROL  OF THE COURT. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING,
   42  THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY WHERE (I) A DEFENDANT IS CHARGED  WITH  ONE
   43  OR  MORE  OFFENSES  IN  A SUPERIOR COURT BY INDICTMENT OR SUPERIOR COURT
   44  INFORMATION FILED AFTER THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN HELD FOR  ACTION  OF  THE
   45  GRAND  JURY  BY  A  LOCAL CRIMINAL COURT BEFORE WHICH A FELONY COMPLAINT
   46  CHARGING DEFENDANT WITH COMMISSION OF ONE OR MORE OFFENSES WAS  PENDING,
   47  AND  (II)  WHILE  SUCH FELONY COMPLAINT WAS PENDING, SUCH LOCAL CRIMINAL
   48  COURT RECEIVED AND DETERMINED AN APPLICATION BY  DEFENDANT  PURSUANT  TO
   49  THIS  SECTION  IN RELATION TO A SECURING ORDER ISSUED BY SUCH COURT UPON
   50  DEFENDANT'S ARRAIGNMENT ON SUCH FELONY COMPLAINT.
   51    S 7. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed-
   52  ing the date on which it shall have become a law.
feedback