Bill Text: NC S425 | 2011-2012 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Ecosystem Enhancement Program Changes
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 22-0)
Status: (Passed) 2011-06-27 - Ch. SL 2011-343 [S425 Detail]
Download: North_Carolina-2011-S425-Amended.html
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2011
S 1
SENATE BILL 425
|
Short Title: Ecosystem Enhancement Program Changes. |
(Public) |
|
|
Sponsors: |
Senators Hunt; Allran, Apodaca, Bingham, Blake, Brock, Brown, Brunstetter, Daniel, East, Forrester, Goolsby, Gunn, Hartsell, Hise, Jackson, Pate, Preston, Rouzer, Rucho, Tillman, and Tucker. |
|
|
Referred to: |
Agriculture/Environment/Natural Resources. |
|
March 28, 2011
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to direct the department of environment and natural resources to REORGANIZE the ecosystem enhancement program to improve OPERATIONAL efficiency, and TO MAKE CLARIFYING CHANGES TO THE STATUTES GOVERNING COMPENSATORY MITIGATION AND THE CLEAN WATER MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
Part I. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Changes.
SECTION 1.1. G.S. 143‑214.11 reads as rewritten:
"§ 143‑214.11. Ecosystem Enhancement Program: compensatory mitigation.
(a) Definitions. – The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) "Compensatory mitigation" means the Compensatory
mitigation. – The restoration, creation, enhancement, or preservation of
jurisdictional waters required as a condition of a permit issued by the
Department or by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
(2) "Government entity" means theGovernment
entity. – The State and its agencies and subdivisions, or the
federal government, and units of local government.government. "Government
entity" does not include a unit of local government.
(3) "Hydrologic area" means an Hydrologic
area. – An eight‑digit Cataloging Unit designated by the United
States Geological Survey.
(4) "Jurisdictional waters" means
wetlands,Jurisdictional waters. – Wetlands, streams, or other waters
of the State or of the United States.
(4a) Mitigation banking instrument. – A contract between the Ecosystem Enhancement Program or another State or federal agency with jurisdiction over wetlands mitigation and a private compensatory mitigation bank, stipulating the type and amount of compensatory mitigation credit available from one or more sites.
(4b) Private compensatory mitigation bank. – A commercial entity incorporated for the purpose of building private compensatory mitigation bank sites. No government entity or unit of local government shall be considered a "private compensatory mitigation bank."
(4c) Private compensatory mitigation bank site. – A site created by a private compensatory mitigation bank and approved for mitigation credit by State and federal regulatory authorities through execution of a mitigation banking instrument.
(5) "Unit of local government" means a Unit
of local government. – A "local government," "public
authority," or "special district" as defined in G.S. 159‑7.
(b) Department to Coordinate Compensatory Mitigation. – All compensatory mitigation required by permits or authorizations issued by the Department or by the United States Army Corps of Engineers shall be coordinated by the Department consistent with the basinwide restoration plans and rules developed by the Environmental Management Commission. All compensatory mitigation, whether performed by the Department or by permit applicants, shall be consistent with the basinwide restoration plans. All compensatory mitigation shall be consistent with rules adopted by the Commission for wetland and stream mitigation and for protection and maintenance of riparian buffers. The Department shall bid and award contracts for compensatory mitigation contracts in accordance with G.S. 143‑129.2A.
(c) Compensatory Mitigation Emphasis on Replacing Ecological Function Within Same River Basin. – The emphasis of compensatory mitigation is on replacing functions within the same river basin unless it is demonstrated that restoration of other areas would be more beneficial to the overall purposes of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
(d) Compensatory Mitigation Options Available to Government Entities. – A government entity may satisfy compensatory mitigation requirements by the following actions, if those actions are consistent with the basinwide restoration plans and also meet or exceed the requirements of the Department or of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, as applicable:
(1) Payment of a fee established by the Commission into the Ecosystem Restoration Fund established in G.S. 143‑214.12.
(2) Donation of land to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program or to other public or private nonprofit conservation organizations as approved by the Department.
(3) Participation in a compensatory mitigation bank that has been approved by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, provided that the Department or the United States Army Corps of Engineers, as applicable, approves the use of such bank for the required compensatory mitigation.
(4) Preparing and implementing a compensatory mitigation plan.
(d1) Compensatory Mitigation Options Available to Applicants Other than Government Entities. – An applicant other than a government entity may satisfy compensatory mitigation requirements by the following actions, if those actions meet or exceed the requirements of the United States Army Corps of Engineers:
(1) Participation in a compensatory mitigation bank that has been approved by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, provided that the Department or the United States Army Corps of Engineers, as applicable, approves the use of such bank for the required compensatory mitigation. This option is only available in a hydrologic area where there is at least one compensatory mitigation bank that has been approved by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
(2) Payment of a fee established by the Commission into the Ecosystem Restoration Fund established in G.S. 143‑214.12. – This option is only available to an applicant who demonstrates that the option under subdivision (1) of this subsection is not available.
(3) Donation of land to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program or to other public or private nonprofit conservation organizations as approved by the Department.
(4) Preparing and implementing a compensatory mitigation plan.
(d2) The Department shall purchase mitigation credits from private compensatory mitigation banks upon a finding that it is in the best interests of the State to do so.
…."
SECTION 1.2. Article 8 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
"§ 143‑129.2A. Design and construction of compensatory wetlands mitigation projects.
(a) All terms relating to compensatory mitigation as used in this section shall be defined as set forth in G.S. 143‑214.11.
(b) To acknowledge the highly complex and innovative nature of compensatory mitigation and the economic and technical utility of contracts for compensatory mitigation, which include in their scope particular techniques and expertise and combinations of design, construction, operation, management, and maintenance responsibilities over prolonged periods of time, it may be beneficial to the State to award a contract for compensatory wetlands mitigation on the basis of factors other than cost alone, including, but not limited to, design and operational experience, demonstrated past success in implementation of projects, avoidance of harmful environmental impact, and operational guarantees. Accordingly, and notwithstanding other provisions of this Article or any local law, a contract entered into between the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and any person pursuant to this section may be awarded in accordance with the following provisions for the evaluation of proposals submitted in response to a request for proposals and the award of a contract for compensatory mitigation design and construction.
(c) The Department of Natural Resources shall require in its request for proposals for compensatory wetlands mitigation projects that each proposal to be submitted shall include all of the following:
(1) Information relating to the experience of the proposer on the basis of which said proposer purports to be qualified to carry out all work required by a proposed contract; the ability of the proposer to secure adequate financing; and proposals for project staffing, implementation of work tasks, and the carrying out of all responsibilities required by a proposed contract.
(2) Any other information as the Department may determine to have a material bearing on its ability to evaluate any proposal in accordance with this section.
(d) Proposals received in response to a request for proposals may be evaluated on the basis of a technical analysis of mitigation design, operational experience of the elements utilized in the proposed mitigation, and any other factors and information that the Department determines to have a material bearing on its ability to evaluate any proposal, provided, however, that those additional factors were set forth in the request for proposal.
(e) The Department may make a contract award to any responsible proposer selected pursuant to this section based upon a determination that the selected proposal is more responsive to the request for proposals and may negotiate a contract with the proposer for the performance of the design and construction services set forth in the request for proposals. The Department's determination shall be deemed to be conclusive even if the contract is not awarded to the proposer submitting the lowest price bid."
SECTION 1.3. The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina General Assembly shall perform a review of the efficiency of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in meeting the State's mitigation needs. The review shall include an evaluation of the following:
(1) Whether it is in the best interest of the State to maintain the Ecosystem Enhancement Program as a State agency.
(2) Whether private mitigation banks could replace the Ecosystem Enhancement Program and meet the State's future mitigation needs.
SECTION 1.4. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall consolidate the positions of program director and deputy director of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program into one executive director position. All decision-making authority for the Program shall be vested with the executive director.
SECTION 1.5. The Department shall hold the mitigation provider harmless in the event of any shortfall of units of mitigation procured under a mitigation contract between the Program and the provider, provided that the shortfall is due to changes in State or federal regulatory policy that occur after the Program and provider have executed the mitigation contract.
Part II. Clean Water Management Trust Fund Changes.
SECTION 2.1. G.S. 113A‑254 reads as rewritten:
"§ 113A‑254. Grant requirements.
(a) Eligible Applicants. – Any of the following are eligible to apply for a grant from the Fund for the purpose of protecting and enhancing water quality:
(1) A State agency.
(2) A local government unit.
(3) A nonprofit corporation whose primary purpose is the conservation, preservation, and restoration of our State's environmental and natural resources.
(4) A corporation or other privately owned business with expertise in the conservation, preservation, and restoration of the State's environmental and natural resources.
...."
SECTION 2.2. G.S. 113A‑256 reads as rewritten:
"§ 113A‑256. Clean Water Management Trust Fund Board of Trustees: powers and duties.
(a) Allocate Grant Funds. – The Trustees shall allocate moneys from the Fund as grants. A grant may be awarded only for a project or activity that satisfies the criteria and furthers the purposes of this Article.
(b) Develop Grant Criteria. – The Trustees shall develop criteria for awarding grants under this Article. The criteria developed shall include consideration of the following:
(1) The significant enhancement and conservation of water quality in the State.
(2) The objectives of the basinwide management plans for the State's river basins and watersheds.
(3) The promotion of regional integrated ecological networks insofar as they affect water quality.
(4) The specific areas targeted as being environmentally sensitive.
(5) The geographic distribution of funds as appropriate.
(6) The preservation or restoration of water
resources with significant recreational ecological, recreational, or
economic value and uses.
(7) The development of a network of riparian buffer‑greenways bordering and connecting the State's waterways that will serve environmental, educational, and recreational uses.
(c) Develop Additional Guidelines. – The Trustees may develop guidelines in addition to the grant criteria consistent with and as necessary to implement this Article.
(d) Acquisition of Land. – The Trustees may acquire land by purchase, negotiation, gift, or devise. Any acquisition of land by the Trustees must be reviewed and approved by the Council of State and the deed for the land subject to approval of the Attorney General before the acquisition can become effective. In determining whether to acquire land as permitted by this Article, the Trustees shall consider whether the acquisition furthers the purposes of this Article and may also consider recommendations from the Council. Nothing in this section shall allow the Trustees to acquire land under the right of eminent domain.
(e) Exchange of Land. – The Trustees may exchange any land they acquire in carrying out the powers conferred on the Trustees by this Article.
(f) Land Management. – The Trustees may designate managers or managing agencies of the lands acquired under this Article.
(g) Tax Credit Certification. – The Trustees shall develop guidelines to determine whether land donated for a tax credit under G.S. 105‑130.34 or G.S. 105‑151.12 are suitable for one of the purposes under this Article and may be certified for a tax credit.
(h) Rule‑making Authority. – The Trustees may adopt rules to implement this Article. Chapter 150B of the General Statutes applies to the adoption of rules by the Trustees.
(i) Repealed by Session Laws 1999‑237, s. 15.11, effective July 1, 1999.
(j) Debt. – Of the funds credited annually to the Fund, the Trustees may authorize expenditure of a portion to reimburse the General Fund for debt service on special indebtedness to be issued or incurred under Article 9 of Chapter 142 of the General Statutes for the purposes provided in G.S. 113A‑253(c)(1) through (4). In order to authorize expenditure of funds for debt service reimbursement, the Trustees must identify to the State Treasurer and the Department of Administration the specific capital projects for which they would like special indebtedness to be issued or incurred and the annual amount they intend to make available, and request the State Treasurer to issue or incur the indebtedness. After special indebtedness has been issued or incurred for a capital project requested by the Trustees, the Trustees must direct the State Treasurer to credit to the General Fund each year the actual aggregate principal and interest payments to be made in that year on the special indebtedness, as identified by the State Treasurer.
(k) Balance in Grant Awards. – In awarding grants under this Article, the Trustees shall, as nearly as possible, award equal dollar amounts in each grant cycle for land preservation and land restoration. For purposes of this subsection, "land preservation" means the acquisition of real property or the imposition of a conservation easement on real property, and "restoration of land" means the design and construction of mitigative measures intended to restore the capacity of the land to preserve, protect, or improve water quality."
Part III. Enacting Provisions.
SECTION 3. This act is effective when it becomes law and applies to all projects and contracts awarded on or after that date.
