Bill Text: NC H173 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Omnibus Criminal Law Bill
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Passed) 2015-09-23 - Ch. SL 2015-247 [H173 Detail]
Download: North_Carolina-2015-H173-Amended.html
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2015
H 1
HOUSE BILL 173
|
Short Title: Omnibus Criminal Law Bill. |
(Public) |
|
|
Sponsors: |
Representatives Stam, Faircloth, Glazier, and R. Turner (Primary Sponsors). For a complete list of Sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly Web Site. |
|
|
Referred to: |
Judiciary II. |
|
March 10, 2015
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to amend various criminal laws for the purpose of improving trial court efficiency.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
PART I. EXTEND THE PERIOD OF TIME TO AVOID THE COURT COSTS FOR FAILURE TO PAY
SECTION 1.(a) G.S. 7A‑304(a) reads as rewritten:
"(a) In every criminal case in the superior or district court, wherein the defendant is convicted, or enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or when costs are assessed against the prosecuting witness, the following costs shall be assessed and collected. No costs may be assessed when a case is dismissed. Only upon entry of a written order, supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law, determining that there is just cause, the court may (i) waive costs assessed under this section or (ii) waive or reduce costs assessed under subdivision (7), (8), (8a), (11), (12), or (13) of this section.
…
(6) For support of the General Court of Justice, the
sum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) is payable by a defendant who fails to
appear to answer the charge as scheduled, unless within 20 days after the
scheduled appearance, the person either appears in court to answer the charge
or disposes of the charge pursuant to G.S. 7A‑146, and the sum of
fifty dollars ($50.00) is payable by a defendant who fails to pay a fine,
penalty, or costs within 20 days 40 days of the date specified in
the court's judgment. Upon a showing to the court that the defendant failed to
appear because of an error or omission of a judicial official, a prosecutor, or
a law‑enforcement officer, the court shall waive the fee for failure to
appear. These fees shall be remitted to the State Treasurer.
…."
SECTION 1.(b) G.S. 20‑24.2(a) reads as rewritten:
"(a) The court must report to the Division the name of any person charged with a motor vehicle offense under this Chapter who:
(1) Fails to appear to answer the charge as scheduled, unless within 20 days after the scheduled appearance, he either appears in court to answer the charge or disposes of the charge pursuant to G.S. 7A‑146; or
(2) Fails to pay a fine, penalty, or costs within 20
days 40 days of the date specified in the court's judgment."
SECTION 1.(c) This section becomes effective July 1, 2015, and applies to fees assessed on or after that date.
PART II. DIRECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS TO REPORT ON CERTAIN ORDERS OF REMAND FROM SUPERIOR COURT
SECTION 2. The Administrative Office of the Courts, in consultation with the Conference of Clerks of Superior Court, shall make any necessary modifications to its information systems to maintain records of all cases in which the defendant in a criminal case withdraws an appeal for trial de novo in superior court and the superior court judge has signed an order remanding the case to the district court and shall report on those remanded cases to the Chairs of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Justice and Public Safety, the Chairs of the House Appropriations Committee on Justice and Public Safety, and the Chairs of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Justice and Public Safety by February 1 of each year. The report shall (i) include the total number of remanded cases and also the total number of those cases for which the court has remitted costs and (ii) aggregate those totals by the district in which they were granted and by the name of each judge ordering remand. The Administrative Office of the Courts may obtain any information that may be needed from individual clerks of superior court in order to make the modifications necessary to maintain the records required under this section.
PART III. REVISE THE LAW AUTHORIZING A CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE TO DESIGNATE CERTAIN MAGISTRATES TO APPOINT COUNSEL/AUTHORIZE MAGISTRATES TO ACCEPT GUILTY PLEAS AND ENTER JUDGMENT FOR OFFENSE OF INTOXICATED AND DISRUPTIVE IN PUBLIC
SECTION 3.(a) G.S. 7A‑146 reads as rewritten:
"§ 7A‑146. Administrative authority and duties of chief district judge.
The chief district judge, subject to the general supervision of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, has administrative supervision and authority over the operation of the district courts and magistrates in his district. These powers and duties include, but are not limited to, the following:
…
(11) Designating certain magistrates to appoint counsel and
accept waivers of counsel pursuant to Article 36 of this Chapter. This
designation may only be given to magistrates who are duly licensed attorneys
and does not give any magistrate the authority to: (i) to
appoint counsel or accept waivers of counsel for potentially capital
offenses, as defined by rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services;
or (ii) accept a waiver of counsel.Services.
…."
SECTION 3.(b) G.S. 7A‑292 reads as rewritten:
"§ 7A‑292. Additional powers of magistrates.
In addition to the jurisdiction and powers assigned in this Chapter to the magistrate in civil and criminal actions, each magistrate has the following additional powers:
…
(15) When authorized by the chief district judge, as permitted in G.S. 7A‑146(11), to provide for appointment of counsel and acceptance of waivers of counsel pursuant to Article 36 of this Chapter.
…."
SECTION 3.(c) G.S. 14‑444 reads as rewritten:
"§ 14‑444. Intoxicated and disruptive in public.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person in a public place to be intoxicated and disruptive in any of the following ways:
(1) Blocking or otherwise interfering with traffic on a highway or public vehicular area, or
(2) Blocking or lying across or otherwise preventing or interfering with access to or passage across a sidewalk or entrance to a building, or
(3) Grabbing, shoving, pushing or fighting others or challenging others to fight, or
(4) Cursing or shouting at or otherwise rudely insulting others, or
(5) Begging for money or other property.
(b) Any person who violates this section shall be guilty
of a Class 3 misdemeanor.Notwithstanding the provisions of G.S. 7A‑273(1),
a magistrate is not empowered to accept a guilty plea and enter judgment for
this offense."
PART IV. AMEND THE LAW REGARDING ACCESS TO FEDERAL CRIMINAL INFORMATION BY CJLEADS
SECTION 4. G.S. 143B‑426.38A(g) reads as rewritten:
"(g) Provisions on Privacy and Confidentiality of Information.
(1) Status with respect to certain information. – The State CIO and the GDAC shall be deemed to be all of the following for the purposes of this section:
a. With respect to criminal information, and to the
extent allowed by federal law, a criminal justice agency (CJA), as defined
under Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy. The State
CJIS Systems Agency (CSA) shall ensure that CJLEADS receives access to federal
criminal information deemed to be essential in managing CJLEADS to support
criminal justice professionals.professionals and State‑appointed
public defenders who are permanent employees of the State of North Carolina.
However, in no event shall State‑appointed public defenders have access
to nonpublic information about unserved warrants, victims, or witnesses.
…"
PART V. CONFORM STATE LAW WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN HALL V. FLORIDA
SECTION 5. G.S. 15A‑2005 reads as rewritten:
"§ 15A‑2005.
Mentally retarded defendants; Intellectual disability; death
sentence prohibited.
(a) (1) The following definitions apply in this section:
a. Mentally retarded. Intellectual
disability. – A condition marked by Significantly significantly
subaverage general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with
significant limitations in adaptive functioning, both of which were manifested
before the age of 18.
b. Significant limitations in adaptive functioning. – Significant limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas: communication, self‑care, home living, social skills, community use, self‑direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure skills and work skills.
c. Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning. – An intelligence quotient of 70 or below.
(2) The defendant has the burden of proving
significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning, significant
limitations in adaptive functioning, and that mental retardation intellectual
disability was manifested before the age of 18. An intelligence quotient of
70 or below on an individually administered, scientifically recognized
standardized intelligence quotient test administered by a licensed psychiatrist
or psychologist is evidence of significantly subaverage general intellectual
functioning; however, it is not sufficient, without evidence of significant
limitations in adaptive functioning and without evidence of manifestation
before the age of 18, to establish that the defendant is mentally retarded.has
an intellectual disability. An intelligence quotient of 70, as described in
this subdivision, is approximate and a higher score resulting from the
application of the standard error of measurement to an intelligence quotient of
70 shall not preclude the defendant from being able to present additional
evidence of intellectual disability, including testimony regarding adaptive
deficits. Accepted clinical standards for diagnosing significant limitations in
intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior shall be applied in the
determination of intellectual disability.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the
contrary, no defendant who is mentally retarded with an intellectual
disability shall be sentenced to death.
(c) Upon motion of the defendant, supported by
appropriate affidavits, the court may order a pretrial hearing to determine if
the defendant is mentally retarded. has an intellectual disability. The
court shall order such a hearing with the consent of the State. The defendant
has the burden of production and persuasion to demonstrate mental
retardation intellectual disability by clear and convincing
evidence. If the court determines that the defendant to be mentally
retarded, has an intellectual disability, the court shall declare
the case noncapital, and the State may not seek the death penalty against the
defendant.
(d) The pretrial determination of the court shall not preclude the defendant from raising any legal defense during the trial.
(e) If the court does not find that the
defendant to be mentally retarded has an intellectual disability in
the pretrial proceeding, upon the introduction of evidence of the defendant's
mental retardation raising the issue of intellectual disability during
the sentencing hearing, the court shall submit a special issue to the jury as
to whether the defendant is mentally retarded has an intellectual
disability as defined in this section. This special issue shall be
considered and answered by the jury prior to the consideration of aggravating
or mitigating factors and the determination of sentence. If the jury determines
that the defendant to be mentally retarded, has an
intellectual disability, the court shall declare the case noncapital and
the defendant shall be sentenced to life imprisonment.
(f) The defendant has the burden of production and
persuasion to demonstrate mental retardation intellectual disability to
the jury by a preponderance of the evidence.
(g) If the jury determines that the defendant is
not mentally retarded does not have an intellectual disability as
defined by this section, the jury may consider any evidence of mental
retardation intellectual disability presented during the sentencing
hearing when determining aggravating or mitigating factors and the defendant's
sentence.
(h) The provisions of this section do not preclude the
sentencing of a mentally retardedan offender with an
intellectual disability to any other sentence authorized by G.S. 14‑17
for the crime of murder in the first degree."
PART VI. PROVIDE THAT THE REQUIREMENT FOR A PERSON CONVICTED OF SEXUAL BATTERY TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER IS DISCRETIONARY WITH THE COURT
SECTION 6.(a) G.S. 14‑27.5A is amended by adding a new subsection to read:
"(c) When a person is convicted of a violation of this section, the sentencing court shall consider whether the person is a danger to the community and whether requiring the person to register as a sex offender pursuant to Article 27A of this Chapter would further the purposes of that Article as stated in G.S. 14‑208.5. If the sentencing court finds that the person is a danger to the community and that the person shall register, then an order shall be entered requiring the person to register."
SECTION 6.(b) G.S. 14‑208.6(4) reads as rewritten:
"(4) "Reportable conviction" means:
…
f. A final conviction for a violation of G.S. 14‑27.5A, only if the court sentencing the individual issues an order pursuant to G.S. 14‑27.5A(c) requiring the individual to register."
SECTION 6.(c) G.S. 14‑208.6(5) reads as rewritten:
"(5) "Sexually violent offense" means a
violation of G.S. 14‑27.2 (first degree rape), G.S. 14‑27.2A
(rape of a child; adult offender), G.S. 14‑27.3 (second degree
rape), G.S. 14‑27.4 (first degree sexual offense), G.S. 14‑27.4A
(sex offense with a child; adult offender), G.S. 14‑27.5 (second
degree sexual offense), G.S. 14‑27.5A (sexual battery), former
G.S. 14‑27.6 (attempted rape or sexual offense), G.S. 14‑27.7
(intercourse and sexual offense with certain victims), G.S. 14‑27.7A(a)
(statutory rape or sexual offense of person who is 13‑, 14‑, or 15‑years‑old
where the defendant is at least six years older), G.S. 14‑43.11
(human trafficking) if (i) the offense is committed against a minor who is less
than 18 years of age or (ii) the offense is committed against any person with
the intent that they be held in sexual servitude, G.S. 14‑43.13
(subjecting or maintaining a person for sexual servitude), G.S. 14‑178
(incest between near relatives), G.S. 14‑190.6 (employing or permitting
minor to assist in offenses against public morality and decency), G.S. 14‑190.9(a1)
(felonious indecent exposure), G.S. 14‑190.16 (first degree sexual
exploitation of a minor), G.S. 14‑190.17 (second degree sexual
exploitation of a minor), G.S. 14‑190.17A (third degree sexual
exploitation of a minor), G.S. 14‑202.1 (taking indecent liberties
with children), G.S. 14‑202.3 (Solicitation of child by computer or
certain other electronic devices to commit an unlawful sex act), G.S. 14‑202.4(a)
(taking indecent liberties with a student), G.S. 14‑205.2(c) or (d)
(patronizing a prostitute who is a minor or a mentally disabled person), G.S. 14‑205.3(b)
(promoting prostitution of a minor or a mentally disabled person), G.S. 14‑318.4(a1)
(parent or caretaker commit or permit act of prostitution with or by a
juvenile), or G.S. 14‑318.4(a2) (commission or allowing of sexual
act upon a juvenile by parent or guardian). The term also includes the
following: a solicitation or conspiracy to commit any of these offenses; aiding
and abetting any of these offenses."
SECTION 6.(d) G.S. 50‑13.1(a1) reads as rewritten:
"(a1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person instituting an action or proceeding for custody ex parte who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense as defined in G.S. 14‑208.6(5) or who has been convicted of an offense under G.S. 14‑27.5A and ordered to register under Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes shall disclose the conviction in the pleadings."
SECTION 6.(e) This section becomes effective December 1, 2015, and applies to sentences imposed on or after that date.
PART VII. AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN LAWS REGARDING TRANSPORTATION OF AND CUSTODY ORDERS FOR PERSONS BEING INVOLUNTARILY COMMITTED
SECTION 7.(a) G.S. 122C‑251(d) reads as rewritten:
"(d) In To the extent feasible, in providing
transportation of a respondent, a city or county shall provide a driver or
attendant who is the same sex as the respondent, unless the law‑enforcement
officer allows a family member of the respondent to accompany the respondent in
lieu of an attendant of the same sex as the respondent."
SECTION 7.(b) Part 8 of Article 5 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
"§ 122C‑295. Electronic and facsimile transmission of custody orders.
A custody order entered by the clerk or magistrate pursuant to this Chapter may be delivered to the law enforcement officer by electronic or facsimile transmission."
PART VIII. PETITION AND ORDER TO DISPOSE OF FIREARM MAY BE TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY OR BY FACSIMILE
SECTION 8.(a) G.S. 14‑269.1 reads as rewritten:
"§ 14‑269.1. Confiscation and disposition of deadly weapons.
(a) Upon conviction of any person for violation of G.S. 14‑269, G.S. 14‑269.7, or any other offense involving the use of a deadly weapon of a type referred to in G.S. 14‑269, the deadly weapon with reference to which the defendant shall have been convicted shall be ordered confiscated and disposed of by the presiding judge at the trial in one of the following ways in the discretion of the presiding judge.
(1) By ordering the weapon returned to its rightful owner, but only when such owner is a person other than the defendant and has filed a petition for the recovery of such weapon with the presiding judge at the time of the defendant's conviction, and upon a finding by the presiding judge that petitioner is entitled to possession of same and that he was unlawfully deprived of the same without his consent.
(2), (3) Repealed by Session Laws 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 16, s. 2.
(4) By ordering such weapon turned over to the sheriff of the county in which the trial is held or his duly authorized agent to be destroyed if the firearm does not have a legible, unique identification number or is unsafe for use because of wear, damage, age, or modification. The sheriff shall maintain a record of the destruction thereof.
(4a) Repealed by Session Laws 2005‑287, s. 3, effective August 22, 2005.
(4b) By ordering the weapon turned over to a law enforcement agency in the county of trial for (i) the official use of the agency or (ii) sale, trade, or exchange by the agency to a federally licensed firearm dealer in accordance with all applicable State and federal firearm laws. The court may order a disposition of the firearm pursuant to this subdivision only upon the written request of the head or chief of the law enforcement agency and only if the firearm has a legible, unique identification number. If the law enforcement agency sells the firearm, then the proceeds of the sale shall be remitted to the appropriate county finance officer as provided by G.S. 115C‑452 to be used to maintain free public schools. The receiving law enforcement agency shall maintain a record and inventory of all firearms received pursuant to this subdivision.
(5) By ordering such weapon turned over to the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory's weapons reference library for official use by that agency. The Laboratory shall maintain a record and inventory of all such weapons received.
(6) By ordering such weapons turned over to the North Carolina Justice Academy for official use by that agency. The North Carolina Justice Academy shall maintain a record and inventory of all such weapons received.
(b) Any petition or order to dispose of a weapon may entered pursuant to this section may be transmitted electronically or by facsimile to the appropriate person, sheriff, or agency."
SECTION 8.(b) G.S. 15‑11.1(b1) reads as rewritten:
"(b1) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of this section or any other provision of law, if the property seized is a firearm and the district attorney determines the firearm is no longer necessary or useful as evidence in a criminal trial, the district attorney, after notice to all parties known or believed by the district attorney to have an ownership or a possessory interest in the firearm, including the defendant, shall apply to the court for an order of disposition of the firearm. The judge, after hearing, may order the disposition of the firearm in one of the following ways:
(1) By ordering the firearm returned to its rightful owner, when the rightful owner is someone other than the defendant and upon findings by the court (i) that the person, firm, or corporation determined by the court to be the rightful owner is entitled to possession of the firearm and (ii) that the person, firm, or corporation determined by the court to be the rightful owner of the firearm was unlawfully deprived of the same or had no knowledge or reasonable belief of the defendant's intention to use the firearm unlawfully.
(2) By ordering the firearm returned to the defendant, but only if the defendant is not convicted of any criminal offense in connection with the possession or use of the firearm, the defendant is the rightful owner of the firearm, and the defendant is not otherwise ineligible to possess such firearm.
(3) By ordering the firearm turned over to be destroyed by the sheriff of the county in which the firearm was seized or by his duly authorized agent if the firearm does not have a legible, unique identification number or is unsafe for use because of wear, damage, age, or modification. The sheriff shall maintain a record of the destruction of the firearm.
(4) By ordering the firearm turned over to a law enforcement agency in the county of trial for (i) the official use of the agency or (ii) sale, trade, or exchange by the agency to a federally licensed firearm dealer in accordance with all applicable State and federal firearm laws. The court may order a disposition of the firearm pursuant to this subdivision only if the firearm has a legible, unique identification number. If the law enforcement agency sells the firearm, then the proceeds of the sale shall be remitted to the appropriate county finance officer as provided by G.S. 115C‑452 to be used to maintain free public schools. The receiving law enforcement agency shall maintain a record and inventory of all firearms received pursuant to this subdivision.
This subsection (b1) is not applicable to seizures pursuant to G.S. 113‑137 of firearms used only in connection with a violation of Article 22 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes or any local wildlife hunting ordinance. Any petition or order to dispose of a firearm made pursuant to this subsection may be transmitted electronically or by facsimile to the appropriate person, sheriff, or law enforcement agency."
PART IX. EXPUNCTION INFORMATION MAY BE TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY OR BY FACSIMILE
SECTION 9. G.S. 15A‑150 reads as rewritten:
"§ 15A‑150. Notification requirements.
(a) Notification to AOC. – The clerk of superior court in each county in North Carolina shall, as soon as practicable after each term of court, file with the Administrative Office of the Courts the names of the following:
(1) Persons granted an expunction under this Article.
(2) Persons granted a conditional discharge under G.S. 14‑50.29.
(3) Persons granted a conditional discharge under G.S. 90‑96 or G.S. 90‑113.14.
(4) Repealed by Session Laws 2010‑174, s. 7, effective October 1, 2010.
(5) Persons granted a conditional discharge under G.S. 14‑204.
(b) Notification to Other State and Local Agencies. – The
Unless otherwise instructed by the Administrative Office of the Courts
pursuant to an agreement entered into under subsection (e) of this section for
the electronic or facsimile transmission of information, the clerk of
superior court in each county in North Carolina shall send a certified copy of
an order granting an expunction to a person named in subsection (a) of this
section to all of the agencies listed in this subsection. An agency receiving
an order under this subsection shall expunge from its records all entries made
as a result of the charge or conviction ordered expunged, except as provided in
G.S. 15A‑151. The list of agencies is as follows:
(1) The sheriff, chief of police, or other arresting agency.
(2) When applicable, the Division of Motor Vehicles and the Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety.
(3) Any State or local agency identified by the petition as bearing record of the offense that has been expunged.
(4) The Department of Public Safety.
(c) Notification to FBI. – The Department of Public Safety shall forward the order received under this section to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(d) Notification to Private Entities. – A State agency that receives a certified copy of an order under this section shall notify any private entity with which it has a licensing agreement for bulk extracts of data from the agency criminal record database to delete the record in question. The private entity shall notify any other entity to which it subsequently provides in a bulk extract data from the agency criminal database to delete the record in question from its database.
(e) The Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts may enter into an agreement with any of the State agencies listed in subsection (b) of this section for electronic or facsimile transmission of any information that must be provided under this section."
PART X. DOUBLING OF BOND IS PERMISSIVE RATHER THAN MANDATORY FOR CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
SECTION 10.(a) G.S. 15A‑534(d1) reads as rewritten:
"(d1) When conditions of pretrial release are being
imposed on a defendant who has failed on one or more prior occasions to appear
to answer one or more of the charges to which the conditions apply, the
judicial official shall at a minimum impose the conditions of pretrial release
that are recommended in any order for the arrest of the defendant that was
issued for the defendant's most recent failure to appear. If no conditions are
recommended in that order for arrest, the judicial official shall may
require the execution of a secured appearance bond in an amount at least
double the amount of the most recent previous secured or unsecured bond for the
charges or, if no bond has yet been required for the charges, in the amount of
at least one thousand dollars ($1,000). The judicial official shall also impose
such restrictions on the travel, associations, conduct, or place of abode of
the defendant as will assure that the defendant will not again fail to appear.
The judicial official shall indicate on the release order that the defendant
was arrested or surrendered after failing to appear as required under a prior
release order. If the information available to the judicial official indicates
that the defendant has failed on two or more prior occasions to appear to
answer the charges, the judicial official shall indicate that fact on the
release order."
SECTION 10.(b) This section becomes effective July 1, 2015, and applies to conditions of pretrial release imposed on or after that date.
PART XI. DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THAT MAY CONTAIN BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
SECTION 11.(a) G.S. 15A‑268(a5) reads as rewritten:
"(a5) The duty to preserve may not be waived
knowingly and voluntarily by a defendant, without a court proceeding.hearing,
which may include any other hearing associated with the disposition of the
case."
SECTION 11.(b) G.S. 15A‑268(a6) reads as rewritten:
"(a6) The evidence described by subsection (a1) of this section shall be preserved for the following period:
(1) For conviction resulting in a sentence of death, until execution.
(2) For conviction resulting in a sentence of life without parole, until the death of the convicted person.
(3) For conviction of any homicide, sex offense, assault, kidnapping, burglary, robbery, arson or burning, for which a Class B1‑E felony punishment is imposed, the evidence shall be preserved during the period of incarceration and mandatory supervised release, including sex offender registration pursuant to Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes, except in cases where the person convicted entered and was convicted on a plea of guilty, in which case the evidence shall be preserved for the earlier of three years from the date of conviction or until released.
(4) Biological evidence collected as part of a criminal
investigation of any homicide or rape, in which no charges are filed, shall be
preserved for the period of time that the crime remains unsolved.
unsolved, unless the State certifies that charges will not be brought even if a
perpetrator can be identified. At any time, after collection and prior to the
filing of charges, the State may seek a judicial determination as to whether
the evidence collected has biological evidence value and should be preserved,
but is of a size, bulk, or physical character as to render retention
impracticable or should be returned to its rightful owner. Upon such finding,
the court may order that the collecting agency take reasonable measures to
remove or preserve, for retention, portions of evidence likely to contain
biological evidence related to the offense through cuttings, swabs, or other
means consistent with Crime Laboratory minimum guidelines in a quantity
sufficient to permit DNA testing before returning or disposing of the evidence.
(5) A custodial agency in custody of biological evidence unrelated to a criminal investigation or prosecution referenced by subdivision (1), (2), (3), or (4) of this subsection may dispose of the evidence in accordance with the rules of the agency.
(6) At any time after a defendant is charged and prior to disposition, if the evidence collected as part of the criminal investigation is of a size, bulk, or physical character as to render retention impracticable or should be returned to its rightful owner, then the State and the defendant may enter into a consent motion providing for the retention of swabs or other items used for processing evidence in lieu of the actual physical evidence and the court may order that the collecting agency take reasonable measures to remove or preserve for retention portions of evidence likely to contain biological evidence related to the offense through cuttings, swabs, or other means consistent with Crime Laboratory minimum guidelines in a quantity sufficient to permit DNA testing before returning or disposing of the evidence.
(7) Notwithstanding the foregoing preservation requirements, at the time of conviction, the State and the defendant may enter into a consent motion providing for the destruction or return of physical evidence not offered or admitted into evidence during the criminal proceeding. The consent motion shall include an inventory of the evidence. The court may order destruction or return of any items of physical evidence inventoried in the consent motion."
SECTION 11.(c) This section becomes effective October 1, 2015.
PART XII. AMEND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE TO ALLOW A CERTIFICATION BY THE CUSTODIAN OF A BUSINESS RECORD TO SHOW THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE RECORD IN LIEU OF OFFERING THE CUSTODIAN'S IN‑PERSON TESTIMONY
SECTION 12.(a) Rule 803(6) of the Rules of Evidence, Chapter 8C of the General Statutes, reads as rewritten:
"Rule 803. Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial.
The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness:
…
(6) Records of Regularly Conducted Activity. – A
memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events,
conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information
transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if (i) kept in the course of a
regularly conducted business activity, activity and if (ii)
it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the
memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony
of the custodian or other qualified witness, witness or by a
certification made by the custodian or witness, unless the source of
information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of
trustworthiness. The proponent shall give advance notice of intent to offer
such records to all other parties. The method of authenticating evidence
allowed under this subdivision shall be confined to the records of non‑parties.
The term "business" as used in this paragraph includes business,
institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind,
whether or not conducted for profit."
SECTION 12.(b) This section becomes effective October 1, 2015.
PART XIII. CLARIFY ENHANCED PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
SECTION 13. G.S. 50B‑4.1(d) reads as rewritten:
"(d) Unless covered under some other provision of
law providing greater punishment, a person who commits a felony at a time when
the person knows the behavior is prohibited by a valid protective order as
provided in subsection (a) of this section shall be guilty of a felony one
class higher than the principal felony described in the charging document. This
subsection shall not apply to a person who is charged with or convicted convictions
of a Class A or B1 felony or to a person charged under convictions
of the offenses set forth in subsection (f) or subsection (g) of this
section."
PART XIV. ALLOW EXTENSION OF ORDER ENTERED IN STREET GANG NUISANCE ABATEMENT CASE AFTER COURT HEARING
SECTION 14. G.S. 14‑50.43(d) reads as rewritten:
"(d) An order entered under this section shall
expire one year after entry; however, the entry unless extended by
the Court for good cause established by the plaintiff after a hearing. The order
may be modified, rescinded, or vacated at any time prior to its expiration date
upon the motion of any party if it appears to the court that one or more of the
defendants is no longer engaging in criminal street gang activities."
PART XV. AMEND CERTIFICATE OF RELIEF
SECTION 15.(a) G.S. 15A‑173.2(a) reads as rewritten:
"(a) An individual who is convicted of no more
than two Class G, H, or I felonies or misdemeanors in one session of court, and
who has no other convictions for a felony or misdemeanor other than a traffic
violation, criminal offenses no higher than a Class G felony, may
petition the court where the individual was convicted of his or her most
serious offense for a Certificate of Relief relieving collateral
consequences as permitted by this Article. Except as otherwise provided in this
subsection, the petition shall be heard by the senior resident superior court
judge if the convictions were in superior court, or the chief district court
judge if the convictions were in district court. The senior resident superior
court judge and chief district court judge in each district may delegate their
authority to hold hearings and issue, modify, or revoke Certificates of Relief
to judges, clerks, or magistrates in that district."
SECTION 15.(b) This section becomes effective October 1, 2015, and applies to certificates issued on or after that date.
PART XVI. EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 16. Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law.
