Bill Text: OR HJM6 | 2013 | Regular Session | Engrossed
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Urging Congress to propose constitutional amendment to limit certain political contributions.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 11-0)
Status: (Passed) 2013-07-08 - Filed with Secretary of State. [HJM6 Detail]
Download: Oregon-2013-HJM6-Engrossed.html
Bill Title: Urging Congress to propose constitutional amendment to limit certain political contributions.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 11-0)
Status: (Passed) 2013-07-08 - Filed with Secretary of State. [HJM6 Detail]
Download: Oregon-2013-HJM6-Engrossed.html
77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2013 Regular Session NOTE: Matter within { + braces and plus signs + } in an amended section is new. Matter within { - braces and minus signs - } is existing law to be omitted. New sections are within { + braces and plus signs + } . LC 1768 Minority Report B-Engrossed House Joint Memorial 6 Ordered by the Senate June 28 Including House Amendments dated June 19 and Senate Minority Report Amendments dated June 28 Sponsored by nonconcurring members of the Senate Committee on Rules: Senators STARR, FERRIOLI SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure. Urges Congress to propose constitutional amendment to limit certain political contributions. JOINT MEMORIAL To the President of the United States and the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled: We, your memorialists, the Seventy-seventh Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon, in legislative session assembled, respectfully represent as follows: Whereas free speech is a right held by natural persons, recognized and protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution; and Whereas corporations, unions, limited liability companies and partnerships, associations and other legal entities established under and granted privileges by local, state and federal laws make important contributions to our society but are not to be equated with natural persons; and Whereas the rights and privileges of legal entities are established and protected through existing statutes and judicial case law; and Whereas the decision to regulate corporate or union financial campaign contributions and expenditures is one that, historically, Congress and the states have been constitutionally allowed to address; and Whereas in 2010 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in { - Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - } (558 U.S. 310 (2010)), ruling that Congress and the states lack the constitutional right to ban independent corporate, association or union expenditures to political campaigns for public office; and Whereas in the { - Citizens - } decision the United States Supreme Court relied on its previously issued opinion in { - Buckley v. Valeo - } (424 U.S. 1 (1976)), equating the spending of money for electing candidates to public office with speech; and Whereas the { - Citizens - } decision has allowed for the creation of super political action committees in election campaigns for public office that have made unregulated campaign expenditures in unprecedented amounts; and Whereas the Seventy-seventh Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon has grave concerns regarding the implications of the United States Supreme Court's decision in its five-to-four ruling in { - Citizens - }; and Whereas the opinion of the four dissenting justices noted that corporations have certain privileges not enjoyed by natural persons, such as limited liability, perpetual life and favorable treatment of their accumulation and distribution of assets, which enables them to financially overwhelm individual natural persons in the political process; and Whereas Congress, state legislatures and local legislative bodies should have the authority to impose reasonable regulations on political contributions and expenditures; and Whereas based on the American values of fair play, leveling the playing field and ensuring that all citizens, regardless of wealth, have an opportunity for their political views to be heard, there is a valid rationale for regulating excessive political spending; and Whereas it is imperative that Congress and the state legislatures be allowed to exercise their authority to make their own decisions about the regulation of political expenditures by individuals and legal entities; and Whereas this policy requires that the United States Constitution be amended to authorize congressional or state regulation of political contributions and expenditures; now, therefore, Be It Resolved by the Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon: That we, the Seventy-seventh Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon, respectfully urge the Congress of the United States of America to propose and send to the states for ratification an amendment to the United States Constitution consistent with the findings of this memorial, clarifying the distinction between the rights of natural persons and the rights of corporations, unions and other legal entities; and be it further Resolved, That the proposed amendment to the United States Constitution should clarify that Congress and state legislatures may regulate all moneys raised and spent for political purposes; and be it further Resolved, That a copy of this memorial shall be sent to the President of the United States, to the Senate Majority Leader, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to each member of the Oregon Congressional Delegation. ----------