Bill Text: NY S07150 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Amended


Bill Title: Authorizes an attending physician to make decisions regarding hospice on behalf of an incapable adult without a surrogate.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2014-06-10 - referred to codes [S07150 Detail]

Download: New_York-2013-S07150-Amended.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                        7150--A
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                      May 1, 2014
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  Sen.  HANNON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
         printed to be committed  to  the  Committee  on  Health  --  committee
         discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
         to said committee
       AN  ACT  to  amend the public health law, in relation to providing for a
         decision regarding hospice care on behalf of a hospice-eligible  inca-
         pable  adult  patient without a surrogate; and to repeal paragraph (c)
         of subdivision 5 of section 2994-g of such law relating thereto
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1.  Section  2994-g  of  the  public health law is amended by
    2  adding a new subdivision 5-a to read as follows:
    3    5-A. DECISIONS REGARDING HOSPICE CARE. AN ATTENDING PHYSICIAN SHALL BE
    4  AUTHORIZED TO MAKE DECISIONS REGARDING HOSPICE CARE AND  EXECUTE  APPRO-
    5  PRIATE  DOCUMENTS FOR SUCH DECISIONS (INCLUDING A HOSPICE ELECTION FORM)
    6  FOR AN ADULT PATIENT UNDER THIS  SECTION  WHO  IS  HOSPICE  ELIGIBLE  IN
    7  ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS.
    8    (A) THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN SHALL MAKE DECISIONS UNDER THIS SECTION IN
    9  CONSULTATION WITH STAFF DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PATIENT'S CARE, AND
   10  SHALL BASE HIS OR HER DECISIONS ON THE STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS
   11  SET  FORTH  IN SUBDIVISIONS FOUR AND FIVE OF SECTION TWENTY-NINE HUNDRED
   12  NINETY-FOUR-D OF THIS ARTICLE;
   13    (B) THERE IS A CONCURRING OPINION AS FOLLOWS:
   14    (I) IN A GENERAL HOSPITAL, AT LEAST ONE OTHER PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED  BY
   15  THE  HOSPITAL  MUST  INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE OR SHE CONCURS THAT
   16  THE RECOMMENDATION IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECI-
   17  SIONS;
   18    (II) IN A RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY, THE  MEDICAL  DIRECTOR  OF
   19  THE  FACILITY,  OR  A PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, MUST
   20  INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE OR SHE CONCURS THAT  THE  RECOMMENDATION
   21  IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS; PROVIDED THAT
   22  IF  THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR IS THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, A DIFFER-
   23  ENT PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL HEALTH  CARE  FACILITY  MUST
   24  MAKE THIS INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION; OR
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD14910-03-4
       S. 7150--A                          2
    1    (III)  IN SETTINGS OTHER THAN A GENERAL HOSPITAL OR RESIDENTIAL HEALTH
    2  CARE FACILITY, THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR  OF  THE  HOSPICE,  OR  A  PHYSICIAN
    3  DESIGNATED BY THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, MUST INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE
    4  OR  SHE  CONCURS  THAT  THE  RECOMMENDATION IS MEDICALLY APPROPRIATE AND
    5  CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS; PROVIDED THAT IF
    6  THE  MEDICAL  DIRECTOR IS THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, A DIFFERENT
    7  PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY THE HOSPICE MUST MAKE THIS INDEPENDENT  DETERMI-
    8  NATION; AND
    9    (C)  THE  ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL HOSPITAL, RESIDENTIAL
   10  HEALTH CARE FACILITY OR HOSPICE, AS APPLICABLE, INCLUDING AT  LEAST  ONE
   11  PHYSICIAN  WHO  IS  NOT THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, OR A COURT OF
   12  COMPETENT JURISDICTION, MUST REVIEW THE DECISION AND DETERMINE  THAT  IT
   13  IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS.
   14    S  2.  Paragraph  (c) of subdivision 5 of section 2994-g of the public
   15  health law is REPEALED.
   16    S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback