Bill Text: NY S05875 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly | Amended


Bill Title: Relates to enhancing criminal investigations and prosecutions in relation to the integrity of statements of those accused of crimes and the integrity of eyewitness identifications.

Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 2-1)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2016-01-06 - REFERRED TO CODES [S05875 Detail]

Download: New_York-2015-S05875-Amended.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                        5875--A
                              2015-2016 Regular Sessions
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                     June 9, 2015
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by Sens. NOZZOLIO, GALLIVAN -- read twice and ordered print-
         ed, and when printed to be committed to  the  Committee  on  Rules  --
         committee  discharged,  bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and
         recommitted to said committee
       AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, the family court act and the
         executive law, in relation to statements of those  accused  of  crimes
         and eyewitness identifications, to enhance criminal investigations and
         prosecutions  and to promote confidence in the criminal justice system
         of this state
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1.  Section 60.45 of the criminal procedure law is amended by
    2  adding a new subdivision 3 to read as follows:
    3    3. (A) WHERE A PERSON IS  SUBJECT  TO  CUSTODIAL  INTERROGATION  BY  A
    4  PUBLIC  SERVANT  AT  A DETENTION FACILITY, THE ENTIRE CUSTODIAL INTERRO-
    5  GATION, INCLUDING THE GIVING OF ANY REQUIRED ADVICE OF THE RIGHTS OF THE
    6  INDIVIDUAL BEING QUESTIONED, AND THE WAIVER OF ANY RIGHTS BY  THE  INDI-
    7  VIDUAL,  SHALL  BE  RECORDED BY AN APPROPRIATE VIDEO RECORDING DEVICE IF
    8  THE INTERROGATION INVOLVES A CLASS A-1 FELONY,  EXCEPT  ONE  DEFINED  IN
    9  ARTICLE  TWO HUNDRED TWENTY OF THE PENAL LAW; FELONY OFFENSES DEFINED IN
   10  SECTION 130.95 AND 130.96 OF THE PENAL LAW; OR A FELONY OFFENSE  DEFINED
   11  IN  ARTICLE  ONE  HUNDRED  TWENTY-FIVE OR ONE HUNDRED THIRTY OF SUCH LAW
   12  THAT IS DEFINED AS A CLASS B VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSE IN SECTION 70.02  OF
   13  THE  PENAL  LAW.  FOR  PURPOSES  OF  THIS PARAGRAPH, THE TERM "DETENTION
   14  FACILITY" SHALL MEAN A POLICE STATION,  CORRECTIONAL  FACILITY,  HOLDING
   15  FACILITY  FOR  PRISONERS,  PROSECUTOR'S  OFFICE  OR OTHER FACILITY WHERE
   16  PERSONS ARE HELD IN DETENTION IN CONNECTION WITH CRIMINAL  CHARGES  THAT
   17  HAVE BEEN OR MAY BE FILED AGAINST THEM.
   18    (B)  NO CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A
   19  MOTION TO SUPPRESS PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION THREE OF  SECTION  710.20  OF
   20  THIS CHAPTER BASED SOLELY UPON THE FAILURE TO VIDEO RECORD SUCH INTERRO-
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD11568-02-5
       S. 5875--A                          2
    1  GATION  IN  A  DETENTION  FACILITY  AS  DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS
    2  SUBDIVISION. HOWEVER, WHERE THE PEOPLE OFFER INTO EVIDENCE A CONFESSION,
    3  ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT MADE BY A PERSON IN CUSTODY WITH RESPECT TO
    4  HIS  OR  HER PARTICIPATION OR LACK OF PARTICIPATION IN AN OFFENSE SPECI-
    5  FIED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS  SUBDIVISION,  THAT  HAS  NOT  BEEN  VIDEO
    6  RECORDED,  THE  COURT  SHALL CONSIDER THE FAILURE TO RECORD AS A FACTOR,
    7  BUT NOT AS THE SOLE FACTOR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH  PARAGRAPH  (C)  OF  THIS
    8  SUBDIVISION  IN  DETERMINING WHETHER SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER
    9  STATEMENT SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE.
   10    (C) NOTWITHSTANDING THE REQUIREMENT OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS  SUBDIVI-
   11  SION,  UPON  A  SHOWING  OF  GOOD CAUSE BY THE PROSECUTOR, THE CUSTODIAL
   12  INTERROGATION NEED NOT BE RECORDED. GOOD CAUSE SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE
   13  LIMITED TO:
   14    (I) IF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT MALFUNCTIONS.
   15    (II) IF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT IS NOT AVAILABLE BECAUSE IT WAS
   16  OTHERWISE BEING USED.
   17    (III) IF STATEMENTS  ARE  MADE  IN  RESPONSE  TO  QUESTIONS  THAT  ARE
   18  ROUTINELY ASKED DURING ARREST PROCESSING.
   19    (IV)  IF THE STATEMENT IS SPONTANEOUSLY MADE BY THE SUSPECT AND NOT IN
   20  RESPONSE TO POLICE QUESTIONING.
   21    (V) IF THE STATEMENT IS MADE DURING AN INTERROGATION THAT IS CONDUCTED
   22  WHEN THE INTERVIEWER IS UNAWARE THAT A QUALIFYING OFFENSE HAS OCCURRED.
   23    (VI) IF THE STATEMENT IS MADE AT A LOCATION OTHER THAN THE  "INTERVIEW
   24  ROOM"  BECAUSE  THE  SUSPECT  CANNOT  BE BROUGHT TO SUCH ROOM, E.G., THE
   25  SUSPECT IS IN A HOSPITAL OR THE SUSPECT IS OUT OF STATE AND  THAT  STATE
   26  IS NOT GOVERNED BY A LAW REQUIRING THE RECORDATION OF AN INTERROGATION.
   27    (VII)  IF THE STATEMENT IS MADE AFTER A SUSPECT HAS REFUSED TO PARTIC-
   28  IPATE IN THE INTERROGATION IF IT IS RECORDED, AND APPROPRIATE EFFORT  TO
   29  DOCUMENT SUCH REFUSAL IS MADE.
   30    (VIII) IF SUCH STATEMENT IS NOT RECORDED AS A RESULT OF AN INADVERTENT
   31  ERROR  OR  OVERSIGHT,  NOT  THE RESULT OF ANY INTENTIONAL CONDUCT BY LAW
   32  ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL.
   33    (IX) IF IT IS LAW ENFORCEMENT'S REASONABLE BELIEF THAT SUCH  RECORDING
   34  WOULD  JEOPARDIZE  THE  SAFETY OF ANY PERSON OR REVEAL THE IDENTITY OF A
   35  CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT.
   36    (X) IF SUCH STATEMENT IS MADE AT A LOCATION NOT EQUIPPED WITH A  VIDEO
   37  RECORDING  DEVICE  AND  THE  REASON  FOR  USING  THAT LOCATION IS NOT TO
   38  SUBVERT THE INTENT OF THE LAW. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS  SECTION,  THE  TERM
   39  "LOCATION"  SHALL  INCLUDE THOSE LOCATIONS SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH (B) OF
   40  SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION 305.2 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT.
   41    (D) IN THE EVENT THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE NOT  SHOWN  GOOD
   42  CAUSE  FOR  THE  NON-RECORDING  OF  THE  CONFESSION, ADMISSION, OR OTHER
   43  STATEMENT, BUT DETERMINES THAT A NON-RECORDED CONFESSION,  ADMISSION  OR
   44  OTHER  STATEMENT  IS  NEVERTHELESS ADMISSIBLE BECAUSE IT WAS VOLUNTARILY
   45  MADE THEN, UPON REQUEST OF THE DEFENDANT, THE COURT  MUST  INSTRUCT  THE
   46  JURY  THAT  THE  PEOPLE'S  FAILURE TO RECORD THE DEFENDANT'S CONFESSION,
   47  ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT AS REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION MAY BE  WEIGHED
   48  AS  A  FACTOR,  BUT  NOT AS THE SOLE FACTOR, IN DETERMINING WHETHER SUCH
   49  CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT WAS VOLUNTARILY  MADE,  OR  WAS
   50  MADE AT ALL.
   51    (E)  VIDEO RECORDING AS REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN
   52  ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY RULE OF THE DIVISION OF  CRIMI-
   53  NAL JUSTICE SERVICES.
   54    S  2. Subdivision 3 of section 344.2 of the family court act is renum-
   55  bered subdivision 4 and a new subdivision 3 is added to read as follows:
       S. 5875--A                          3
    1    3. WHERE A RESPONDENT IS  SUBJECT  TO  CUSTODIAL  INTERROGATION  BY  A
    2  PUBLIC  SERVANT  AT  A FACILITY SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION
    3  305.2 OF THIS ARTICLE, THE ENTIRE CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION, INCLUDING THE
    4  GIVING OF ANY REQUIRED ADVICE OF THE  RIGHTS  OF  THE  INDIVIDUAL  BEING
    5  QUESTIONED,  AND  THE  WAIVER  OF ANY RIGHTS BY THE INDIVIDUAL, SHALL BE
    6  RECORDED AND GOVERNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE  PROVISIONS  OF  PARAGRAPHS
    7  (A),  (B), (C), (D) AND (E) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF SECTION 60.45 OF THE
    8  CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW.
    9    S 3. Section 60.25 of the criminal procedure law, subparagraph (ii) of
   10  paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 as amended by chapter 479 of the laws  of
   11  1977, is amended to read as follows:
   12  S 60.25 Rules  of evidence; identification by means of previous recogni-
   13            tion, in absence of present identification.
   14    1. In any criminal proceeding in which the defendant's  commission  of
   15  an  offense is in issue, testimony as provided in subdivision two may be
   16  given by a witness when:
   17    (a) Such witness testifies that:
   18    (i) He OR SHE observed the person claimed by  the  people  to  be  the
   19  defendant  either at the time and place of the commission of the offense
   20  or upon some other occasion relevant to the case; and
   21    (ii) On a subsequent occasion he OR SHE observed, under  circumstances
   22  consistent  with  such  rights as an accused person may derive under the
   23  constitution of this state or of the United States, a person  OR,  WHERE
   24  THE  OBSERVATION  IS  MADE  PURSUANT  TO A BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE AS
   25  DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
   26  ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF A PERSON whom he OR
   27  SHE recognized as the same person whom he OR SHE  had  observed  on  the
   28  first or incriminating occasion; and
   29    (iii)  He OR SHE is unable at the proceeding to state, on the basis of
   30  present recollection, whether or not the  defendant  is  the  person  in
   31  question; and
   32    (b)  It  is  established that the defendant is in fact the person whom
   33  the witness observed and recognized OR  WHOSE  PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,
   34  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION THE WITNESS OBSERVED
   35  AND RECOGNIZED on the second occasion.  Such fact may be established  by
   36  testimony  of  another  person  or  persons to whom the witness promptly
   37  declared his OR HER recognition on such occasion AND BY SUCH  PICTORIAL,
   38  PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION.
   39    (C)  FOR  PURPOSES  OF THIS SECTION, A "BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE" IS
   40  ONE IN WHICH THE WITNESS IDENTIFIES A PERSON IN AN ARRAY  OF  PICTORIAL,
   41  PHOTOGRAPHIC,  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTIONS UNDER
   42  CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE, AT THE TIME THE IDENTIFICATION IS MADE, THE  PUBLIC
   43  SERVANT  ADMINISTERING SUCH PROCEDURE: (I) DOES NOT KNOW WHICH PERSON IN
   44  THE ARRAY IS THE SUSPECT, OR (II) DOES NOT KNOW WHERE THE SUSPECT IS  IN
   45  THE  ARRAY  VIEWED  BY  THE  WITNESS. THE FAILURE OF A PUBLIC SERVANT TO
   46  FOLLOW SUCH A PROCEDURE SHALL BE ASSESSED SOLELY FOR  PURPOSES  OF  THIS
   47  ARTICLE  AND  SHALL  RESULT IN THE PRECLUSION OF TESTIMONY REGARDING THE
   48  IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE AS EVIDENCE IN CHIEF, BUT SHALL NOT  CONSTITUTE
   49  A  LEGAL  BASIS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE MADE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION SIX OF
   50  SECTION 710.20 OF THIS CHAPTER. THIS ARTICLE NEITHER LIMITS NOR  EXPANDS
   51  SUBDIVISION SIX OF SECTION 710.20 OF THIS CHAPTER.
   52    2.  Under circumstances prescribed in subdivision one OF THIS SECTION,
   53  such witness may testify at the criminal proceeding that the person whom
   54  he OR SHE observed and  recognized  OR  WHOSE  PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,
   55  ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND
   56  RECOGNIZED  on  the  second  occasion  is the same person whom he OR SHE
       S. 5875--A                          4
    1  observed on the  first  or  incriminating  occasion.    Such  testimony,
    2  together with the evidence that the defendant is in fact the person whom
    3  the  witness  observed  and recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
    4  ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND
    5  RECOGNIZED on the second occasion, constitutes evidence in chief.
    6    S  4. Section 60.30 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap-
    7  ter 479 of the laws of 1977, is amended to read as follows:
    8  S 60.30 Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous  recogni-
    9            tion, in addition to present identification.
   10    In  any  criminal proceeding in which the defendant's commission of an
   11  offense is in issue, a witness who testifies that (a) he OR SHE observed
   12  the person claimed by the people to be the defendant either at the  time
   13  and  place  of the commission of the offense or upon some other occasion
   14  relevant to the case, and (b) on the basis of present recollection,  the
   15  defendant  is the person in question and (c) on a subsequent occasion he
   16  OR SHE observed the defendant, OR WHERE THE OBSERVATION IS MADE PURSUANT
   17  TO A BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE, AS DEFINED IN THE CLOSING PARAGRAPH  OF
   18  SUBDIVISION  ONE  OF  SECTION 60.25 OF THIS ARTICLE, A PICTORIAL, PHOTO-
   19  GRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR  VIDEO  RECORDED  REPRODUCTION  OF  THE
   20  DEFENDANT, under circumstances consistent with such rights as an accused
   21  person  may derive under the constitution of this state or of the United
   22  States, and then also recognized him OR HER  OR  THE  PICTORIAL,  PHOTO-
   23  GRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF HIM OR HER
   24  as  the same person whom he OR SHE had observed on the first or incrimi-
   25  nating occasion, may, in addition to making  an  identification  of  the
   26  defendant  at  the  criminal  proceeding  on the basis of present recol-
   27  lection as the person whom he OR SHE observed on the first  or  incrimi-
   28  nating  occasion,  also  describe his OR HER previous recognition of the
   29  defendant and testify that the person whom he OR SHE observed  OR  WHOSE
   30  PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPROD-
   31  UCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED on such second occasion  is  the  same  person
   32  whom  he  OR  SHE  had  observed on the first or incriminating occasion.
   33  Such testimony AND SUCH PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR
   34  VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION constitutes evidence in chief.
   35    S 5. Subdivision 6 of section 710.20 of the criminal procedure law, as
   36  amended  by  chapter  8 of the laws of 1976 and as renumbered by chapter
   37  481 of the laws of 1983, is amended to read as follows:
   38    6.  Consists of potential testimony regarding an  observation  of  the
   39  defendant  either  at the time or place of the commission of the offense
   40  or upon some other occasion relevant to the case, which potential testi-
   41  mony would not be admissible upon the prospective trial of  such  charge
   42  owing  to an improperly made previous identification of the defendant OR
   43  OF A PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR  VIDEO  RECORDED
   44  REPRODUCTION  OF THE DEFENDANT by the prospective witness.  A CLAIM THAT
   45  THE PREVIOUS IDENTIFICATION OF THE DEFENDANT OR OF A  PICTORIAL,  PHOTO-
   46  GRAPHIC,  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR  VIDEO  RECORDED  REPRODUCTION  OF THE
   47  DEFENDANT BY A PROSPECTIVE WITNESS DID NOT COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPH (C)  OF
   48  SUBDIVISION  ONE  OF  SECTION 60.25 OF THIS CHAPTER OR WITH THE PROTOCOL
   49  PROMULGATED IN ACCORDANCE  WITH  SUBDIVISION  TWENTY  OF  SECTION  EIGHT
   50  HUNDRED  THIRTY-SEVEN  OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL
   51  BASIS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION. A CLAIM THAT  A
   52  PUBLIC SERVANT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPH (C) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF
   53  SECTION  60.25 OF THIS CHAPTER OR OF SUBDIVISION TWENTY OF SECTION EIGHT
   54  HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW SHALL NEITHER EXPAND NOR LIMIT
   55  THE RIGHTS AN ACCUSED PERSON MAY DERIVE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION  OF  THIS
   56  STATE OR OF THE UNITED STATES.
       S. 5875--A                          5
    1    S 6. Subdivision 1 of section 710.30 of the criminal procedure law, as
    2  separately amended by chapters 8 and 194 of the laws of 1976, is amended
    3  to read as follows:
    4    1.  Whenever  the  people intend to offer at a trial (a) evidence of a
    5  statement made by a defendant to a public servant,  which  statement  if
    6  involuntarily  made  would render the evidence thereof suppressible upon
    7  motion pursuant to subdivision three of section 710.20, or (b) testimony
    8  regarding an observation of the defendant either at the time or place of
    9  the commission of the offense or upon some other  occasion  relevant  to
   10  the  case, to be given by a witness who has previously identified him OR
   11  HER OR A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR  VIDEO  RECORDED
   12  REPRODUCTION OF HIM OR HER as such, they must serve upon the defendant a
   13  notice  of  such  intention,  specifying  the  evidence  intended  to be
   14  offered.
   15    S 7. Section 343.3 of the family court act, as added by chapter 920 of
   16  the laws of 1982, is amended to read as follows:
   17    S 343.3. Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recog-
   18  nition in absence of present identification. 1. In any  juvenile  delin-
   19  quency  proceeding in which the respondent's commission of a crime is in
   20  issue, testimony as provided in  subdivision  two  may  be  given  by  a
   21  witness when:
   22    (a) such witness testifies that:
   23    (i) he OR SHE observed the person claimed by the presentment agency to
   24  be  the respondent either at the time and place of the commission of the
   25  crime or upon some other occasion relevant to the case; and
   26    (ii) on a subsequent occasion he OR SHE observed, under  circumstances
   27  consistent  with  such  rights as an accused person may derive under the
   28  constitution of this state or of the United States, a person, OR,  WHERE
   29  THE  OBSERVATION  IS  MADE  PURSUANT  TO A BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE AS
   30  DEFINED HEREIN, A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED  OR  VIDEO
   31  RECORDED  REPRODUCTION OF A PERSON whom he OR SHE recognized as the same
   32  person whom he OR SHE had observed on the first incriminating  occasion;
   33  and
   34    (iii)  he OR SHE is unable at the proceeding to state, on the basis of
   35  present recollection, whether or not the respondent  is  the  person  in
   36  question; and
   37    (b)  it  is established that the respondent is in fact the person whom
   38  the witness observed and recognized OR  WHOSE  PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,
   39  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION THE WITNESS OBSERVED
   40  AND RECOGNIZED on the second occasion. Such fact may be  established  by
   41  testimony  of  another  person  or  persons to whom the witness promptly
   42  declared his OR HER recognition on such occasion AND BY SUCH  PICTORIAL,
   43  PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION.
   44    (C)  FOR  PURPOSES  OF THIS SECTION, A "BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE" IS
   45  ONE IN WHICH THE WITNESS IDENTIFIES A PERSON IN AN ARRAY  OF  PICTORIAL,
   46  PHOTOGRAPHIC,  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTIONS UNDER
   47  CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE, AT THE TIME THE IDENTIFICATION IS MADE, THE  PUBLIC
   48  SERVANT  ADMINISTERING SUCH PROCEDURE: (I) DOES NOT KNOW WHICH PERSON IN
   49  THE ARRAY IS THE SUSPECT, OR (II) DOES NOT KNOW WHERE THE SUSPECT IS  IN
   50  THE  ARRAY  VIEWED  BY  THE  WITNESS. THE FAILURE OF A PUBLIC SERVANT TO
   51  FOLLOW SUCH A PROCEDURE SHALL BE ASSESSED SOLELY FOR  PURPOSES  OF  THIS
   52  ARTICLE  AND  SHALL  RESULT IN THE PRECLUSION OF TESTIMONY REGARDING THE
   53  IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE AS EVIDENCE IN CHIEF, BUT SHALL NOT  CONSTITUTE
   54  A  LEGAL  BASIS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE MADE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION SIX OF
   55  SECTION 710.20 OF THE  CRIMINAL  PROCEDURE  LAW.  THIS  ARTICLE  NEITHER
       S. 5875--A                          6
    1  LIMITS  NOT  EXPANDS  SUBDIVISION  SIX OF SECTION 710.20 OF THE CRIMINAL
    2  PROCEDURE LAW.
    3    2. Under circumstances prescribed in subdivision one, such witness may
    4  testify  at  the  proceeding that the person whom he OR SHE observed and
    5  recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO
    6  RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND RECOGNIZED  on  the  second
    7  occasion  is  the  same  person  whom he OR SHE observed on the first or
    8  incriminating occasion. Such testimony, together with the evidence  that
    9  the  respondent  is  in  fact  the  person whom the witness observed and
   10  recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO
   11  RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND RECOGNIZED  on  the  second
   12  occasion, constitutes evidence in chief.
   13    S 8. Section 343.4 of the family court act, as added by chapter 920 of
   14  the laws of 1982, is amended to read as follows:
   15    S 343.4. Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recog-
   16  nition,  in  addition  to present identification. In any juvenile delin-
   17  quency proceeding in which the respondent's commission of a crime is  in
   18  issue,  a  witness who testifies that: (a) he OR SHE observed the person
   19  claimed by the presentment agency to be the  respondent  either  at  the
   20  time  and  place of the commission of the crime or upon some other occa-
   21  sion relevant to the case, and (b) on the basis of present recollection,
   22  the respondent is the person in question, and (c) on a subsequent  occa-
   23  sion  he  OR  SHE  observed the respondent, OR, WHERE THE OBSERVATION IS
   24  MADE PURSUANT TO A BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE, A PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPH-
   25  IC,  ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF THE RESPONDENT
   26  under circumstances consistent with such rights as an accused person may
   27  derive under the constitution of this state or of the United States, and
   28  then also recognized him OR HER OR THE  PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,  ELEC-
   29  TRONIC,  FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF HIM OR HER as the same
   30  person whom he OR SHE had observed on the first or  incriminating  occa-
   31  sion,  may, in addition to making an identification of the respondent at
   32  the delinquency proceeding on the basis of present recollection  as  the
   33  person  whom  he OR SHE observed on the first or incriminating occasion,
   34  also describe his OR HER previous  recognition  of  the  respondent  and
   35  testify  that  the  person  whom  he OR SHE observed OR WHOSE PICTORIAL,
   36  PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED  REPRODUCTION  HE  OR
   37  SHE  OBSERVED  on such second occasion is the same person whom he OR SHE
   38  had observed on the first or incriminating occasion. Such testimony  AND
   39  SUCH  PICTORIAL,  PHOTOGRAPHIC,  ELECTRONIC,  FILMED  OR  VIDEO RECORDED
   40  REPRODUCTION  constitutes  evidence  in  chief.  FOR  PURPOSES  OF  THIS
   41  SECTION, A "BLIND OR BLINDED PROCEDURE" SHALL BE AS DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH
   42  (C) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 343.3 OF THIS PART.
   43    S  9.  Section  837  of  the  executive law is amended by adding a new
   44  subdivision 20 to read as follows:
   45    20. PROMULGATE A STANDARDIZED AND DETAILED WRITTEN  PROTOCOL  THAT  IS
   46  GROUNDED  IN  EVIDENCE-BASED PRINCIPLES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF PHOTO-
   47  GRAPHIC ARRAY AND LIVE LINEUP IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR POLICE AGEN-
   48  CIES AND STANDARDIZED FORMS FOR USE BY SUCH AGENCIES  IN  THE  REPORTING
   49  AND  RECORDING  OF  SUCH  IDENTIFICATION  PROCEDURE.  THE PROTOCOL SHALL
   50  ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
   51    (A) THE SELECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHIC ARRAY AND LIVE LINEUP FILLER  PHOTO-
   52  GRAPHS OR PARTICIPANTS;
   53    (B)  INSTRUCTIONS  GIVEN TO A WITNESS BEFORE CONDUCTING A PHOTOGRAPHIC
   54  ARRAY OR LIVE LINEUP IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE;
   55    (C) THE DOCUMENTATION AND PRESERVATION OF RESULTS  OF  A  PHOTOGRAPHIC
   56  ARRAY OR LIVE LINEUP IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE;
       S. 5875--A                          7
    1    (D)  PROCEDURES FOR ELICITING AND DOCUMENTING THE WITNESS'S CONFIDENCE
    2  IN HIS OR HER IDENTIFICATION FOLLOWING  A  PHOTOGRAPHIC  ARRAY  OR  LIVE
    3  LINEUP  IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE, IN THE EVENT THAT AN IDENTIFICATION IS
    4  MADE; AND
    5    (E)  PROCEDURES  FOR ADMINISTERING A PHOTOGRAPHIC ARRAY OR LIVE LINEUP
    6  IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE IN A MANNER DESIGNED TO  PREVENT  OPPORTUNITIES
    7  TO INFLUENCE THE WITNESS.
    8    S  10. Subdivision 4 of section 840 of the executive law is amended by
    9  adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
   10    (C) DISSEMINATE THE WRITTEN POLICIES  AND  PROCEDURES  PROMULGATED  IN
   11  ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION TWENTY OF SECTION EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN
   12  OF  THIS ARTICLE TO ALL POLICE DEPARTMENTS IN THIS STATE AND IMPLEMENT A
   13  TRAINING PROGRAM FOR ALL CURRENT AND NEW POLICE OFFICERS  REGARDING  THE
   14  POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SUCH SUBDIVISION.
   15    S  11.  This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
   16  have become a law; provided, however, sections one and two of  this  act
   17  shall  take  effect June 1, 2017 and apply to confessions, admissions or
   18  statements made on or after  such  effective  date;  provided,  further,
   19  sections  three  through  ten  of this act shall take effect November 1,
   20  2015.
feedback