Bill Text: NY A09709 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Authorizes an attending physician to make decisions regarding hospice on behalf of an incapable adult without a surrogate.

Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-06-09 - reported referred to rules [A09709 Detail]

Download: New_York-2013-A09709-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         9709
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                     May 16, 2014
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  GOTTFRIED  --  read once and referred to the
         Committee on Health
       AN ACT to amend the public health law, in relation to  providing  for  a
         decision  regarding hospice care on behalf of a hospice-eligible inca-
         pable adult patient without a surrogate; and to repeal  paragraph  (c)
         of subdivision 5 of section 2994-g of such law relating thereto
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. Section 2994-g of the  public  health  law  is  amended  by
    2  adding a new subdivision 5-a to read as follows:
    3    5-A. DECISIONS REGARDING HOSPICE CARE. AN ATTENDING PHYSICIAN SHALL BE
    4  AUTHORIZED  TO  MAKE DECISIONS REGARDING HOSPICE CARE AND EXECUTE APPRO-
    5  PRIATE DOCUMENTS FOR SUCH DECISIONS (INCLUDING A HOSPICE ELECTION  FORM)
    6  FOR  AN  ADULT  PATIENT  UNDER  THIS  SECTION WHO IS HOSPICE ELIGIBLE IN
    7  ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS.
    8    (A) THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN SHALL MAKE DECISIONS UNDER THIS SECTION IN
    9  CONSULTATION WITH STAFF DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PATIENT'S CARE, AND
   10  SHALL BASE HIS OR HER DECISIONS ON THE STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS
   11  SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISIONS FOUR AND FIVE OF SECTION  TWENTY-NINE  HUNDRED
   12  NINETY-FOUR-D OF THIS ARTICLE;
   13    (B) THERE IS A CONCURRING OPINION AS FOLLOWS:
   14    (I)  IN A GENERAL HOSPITAL, AT LEAST ONE OTHER PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY
   15  THE HOSPITAL MUST INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE OR  SHE  CONCURS  THAT
   16  THE RECOMMENDATION IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECI-
   17  SIONS;
   18    (II)  IN  A  RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY, THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF
   19  THE FACILITY, OR A PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY THE  MEDICAL  DIRECTOR,  MUST
   20  INDEPENDENTLY  DETERMINE  THAT HE OR SHE CONCURS THAT THE RECOMMENDATION
   21  IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS; PROVIDED THAT
   22  IF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR IS THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, A  DIFFER-
   23  ENT  PHYSICIAN  DESIGNATED  BY THE RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY MUST
   24  MAKE THIS INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION; OR
   25    (III) IN SETTINGS OTHER THAN A GENERAL HOSPITAL OR RESIDENTIAL  HEALTH
   26  CARE  FACILITY,  THE  MEDICAL  DIRECTOR  OF  THE HOSPICE, OR A PHYSICIAN
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD14910-02-4
       A. 9709                             2
    1  DESIGNATED BY THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, MUST INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE
    2  OR SHE CONCURS THAT THE  RECOMMENDATION  IS  MEDICALLY  APPROPRIATE  AND
    3  CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS; PROVIDED THAT IF
    4  THE  MEDICAL  DIRECTOR IS THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, A DIFFERENT
    5  PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY THE HOSPICE MUST MAKE THIS INDEPENDENT  DETERMI-
    6  NATION; AND
    7    (C)  THE  ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL HOSPITAL, RESIDENTIAL
    8  HEALTH CARE FACILITY OR HOSPICE, AS APPLICABLE, INCLUDING AT  LEAST  ONE
    9  PHYSICIAN  WHO  IS  NOT THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, OR A COURT OF
   10  COMPETENT JURISDICTION, MUST REVIEW THE DECISION AND DETERMINE  THAT  IT
   11  IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS.
   12    S  2.  Paragraph  (c) of subdivision 5 of section 2994-g of the public
   13  health law is REPEALED.
   14    S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback