Bill Text: MI SB0529 | 2011-2012 | 96th Legislature | Engrossed

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Environmental protection; underground storage tanks; liability and cleanup procedures; modify. Amends sec. 20114e of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.20114e) & adds secs. 21332 & 21333. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0528'11, SB 0530'11, SB 0531'11, SB 0532'11, SB 0533'11

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 5-0)

Status: (Passed) 2012-05-03 - Assigned Pa 0109'12 With Immediate Effect [SB0529 Detail]

Download: Michigan-2011-SB0529-Engrossed.html

SB-0529, As Passed House, April 18, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR

 

SENATE BILL NO. 529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled

 

"Natural resources and environmental protection act,"

 

by amending section 20114e (MCL 324.20114e), as added by 2010 PA

 

227, and by adding sections 21332 and 21333.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 20114e. (1) The director shall establish a response

 

activity review panel to advise him or her on technical or

 

scientific disputes, including disputes regarding assessment of

 

risk, concerning response activity plans and no further action

 

reports under this part, and initial assessment reports, final

 

assessment reports, and closure reports under part 213.

 

     (2) The panel shall consist of 15 individuals, appointed by

 

the director. Each member of the panel shall meet all of the

 

following minimum requirements:

 

     (a) Meet 1 or more of the following:


 

     (i) Hold a current professional engineer's or professional

 

geologist's license or registration from a state, tribe, or United

 

States territory, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and have the

 

equivalent of 6 years of full-time relevant experience.

 

     (ii) Have a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution

 

of higher education in a discipline of engineering or science and

 

the equivalent of 10 years of full-time relevant experience.

 

     (iii) Have a master's degree from an accredited institution of

 

higher education in a discipline of engineering or science and the

 

equivalent of 8 years of full-time relevant experience.

 

     (b) Remain current in his or her field through participation

 

in continuing education or other activities.

 

     (3) An individual is not eligible to be a member of the panel

 

if any 1 of the following is true:

 

     (a) The individual is a current employee of any office,

 

department, or agency of the state.

 

     (b) The individual is a party to 1 or more contracts with the

 

department and the compensation paid under those contracts

 

represented more than 5% of the individual's annual gross revenue

 

in any of the preceding 3 years.

 

     (c) The individual is employed by an entity that is a party to

 

1 or more contracts with the department and the compensation paid

 

to the individual's employer under these contracts represented more

 

than 5% of the employer's annual gross revenue in any of the

 

preceding 3 years.

 

     (d) The individual was employed by the department within the

 

preceding 3 years.


 

     (4) An individual appointed to the panel shall serve for a

 

term of 3 years and may be reappointed for 1 additional 3-year

 

term. After serving 2 consecutive terms, the individual may shall

 

not be a member of the panel for a period of at least 2 years

 

before being eligible to be appointed to the panel again. The terms

 

for members first appointed shall be staggered so that not more

 

than 5 vacancies are scheduled to occur in a single year.

 

Individuals appointed to the panel shall serve without

 

compensation. However, members of the panel may be reimbursed for

 

their actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of

 

their official duties as members of the panel.

 

     (5) A vacancy on the panel shall be filled in the same manner

 

as the original appointment.

 

     (6) The business that the panel may perform shall be conducted

 

at a public meeting of the panel held in compliance with the open

 

meetings act, 1976 PA 267, MCL 15.261 to 15.275.

 

     (7) A person who submitted a response activity plan or a no

 

further action report under this part or an initial assessment

 

report, final assessment report, or closure report under part 213

 

may appeal a decision made by the department regarding a technical

 

or scientific dispute, including a dispute regarding assessment of

 

risk, concerning the response activity plan, or no further action

 

report, initial assessment report, final assessment report, or

 

closure report by submitting a petition to the director. However,

 

an issue that was addressed as part of the final decision of the

 

director under section 21332 or that is the subject of a contested

 

case hearing under section 21332 is not eligible for review by the


 

panel. The petition shall include the issues in dispute, the

 

relevant facts upon which the dispute is based, factual data,

 

analysis, opinion, and supporting documentation for the

 

petitioner's position. The petitioner shall also submit a fee of

 

$3,500.00. If the director believes that the dispute may be able to

 

be resolved without convening the panel, the director may contact

 

the petitioner regarding the issues in dispute and may negotiate a

 

resolution of the dispute. This negotiation period shall not exceed

 

45 days. If the dispute is resolved without convening the panel,

 

any fee that is submitted with the petition shall be returned.

 

     (8) If a dispute is not resolved pursuant to subsection (7),

 

the director shall schedule a meeting of 5 members of the panel,

 

selected on the basis of their relevant expertise, within 45 days

 

after receiving the original petition. If the dispute involves an

 

underground storage tank system, at least 3 of the members selected

 

shall have relevant experience in the American society for testing

 

and materials risk-based corrective action processes described in

 

part 213. A member selected for the dispute resolution process

 

shall agree not to accept employment by the person bringing the

 

dispute before the panel, or to undertake any employment concerning

 

the facility in question for a period of 1 year after the decision

 

has been rendered on the matter if that employment would represent

 

more than 5% of the member's gross revenue in any of the preceding

 

3 years. The director shall provide a copy of all supporting

 

documentation to members of the panel who will hear the dispute. An

 

alternative member may be selected by the director to replace a

 

member who is unable to participate in the dispute resolution


 

process. Any action by the members selected to hear the dispute

 

shall require a majority of the votes cast. The members selected

 

for the dispute resolution process shall elect a chairperson of the

 

dispute resolution process. At a meeting scheduled to hear the

 

dispute, representatives of the petitioner and the department shall

 

each be afforded an opportunity to present their positions to the

 

panel. The fee that is received by the director along with the

 

petition shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit into

 

the fund.

 

     (9) Within 45 days after hearing the dispute, the members of

 

the panel who were selected for and participated in the dispute

 

resolution process shall make a recommendation regarding the

 

petition and provide written notice of the recommendation to the

 

director of the department and the petitioner. The written

 

recommendation shall include the specific scientific or technical

 

rationale for the recommendation. The panel's recommendation

 

regarding the petition may be to adopt, modify, or reverse, in

 

whole or in part, the department's decision that is the subject of

 

the petition. If the panel does not make its recommendation within

 

this 45-day time period, the decision of the department is the

 

final decision of the director.

 

     (10) Within 60 days after receiving written notice of the

 

panel's recommendation, the director shall issue a final decision,

 

in writing, regarding the petition. However, this time period may

 

be extended by written agreement between the director and the

 

petitioner. If the director agrees with the recommendation of the

 

panel, the department shall incorporate the recommendation into its


 

response to the response activity plan, or the no further action

 

report, initial assessment report, final assessment report, or

 

closure report. If the director rejects the recommendation of the

 

panel, the director shall issue a written decision to the

 

petitioner with a specific rationale for rejecting the

 

recommendation of the panel. If the director fails to issue a final

 

decision within the time period provided for in this subsection,

 

the recommendation of the panel shall be considered the final

 

decision of the director. The final decision of the director under

 

this subsection is subject to review pursuant to section 631 of the

 

revised judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.631.

 

     (11) Upon request of the director, the panel shall make a

 

recommendation to the department on whether a member should be

 

removed from the panel. Prior to making this recommendation, the

 

panel may convene a peer review panel to evaluate the conduct of

 

the member with regard to compliance with this part.

 

     (12) A member of the panel shall not participate in the

 

dispute resolution process for any appeal in which that member has

 

a conflict of interest. The director shall select a member of the

 

panel to replace a member who has a conflict of interest under this

 

subsection. For purposes of this subsection, a member has a

 

conflict of interest if a petitioner has hired that member or the

 

member's employer on any environmental matter within the preceding

 

3 years.

 

     (13) As used in this section, "relevant experience" means

 

active participation in the preparation, design, implementation,

 

and assessment of remedial investigations, feasibility studies,


 

interim response activities, and remedial actions under this part

 

or experience in the American society for testing and materials

 

risk-based corrective action processes described in part 213. This

 

experience must demonstrate the exercise of sound professional

 

judgment and knowledge of the requirements of this part or part

 

213, or both.

 

     Sec. 21332. (1) Subject to subsection (2), an owner or

 

operator may petition the department for a contested case hearing

 

pursuant to the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306,

 

MCL 24.201 to 24.328, regarding any of the following:

 

     (a) Corrective action proposed, commenced, or completed.

 

     (b) The SSTLs proposed for a site.

 

     (c) The imposition of penalties pursuant to section 21313a.

 

     (d) The results of any audit performed under section 21315.

 

     (2) Upon receipt of a petition from an owner or operator

 

pursuant to this section, the department shall conduct the hearing

 

pursuant to chapter 4 of the administrative procedures act of 1969,

 

1969 PA 306, MCL 24.271 to 24.287. However, an issue that was

 

addressed as part of the final decision of the director under

 

section 20114e or that is being considered by the response activity

 

review panel under section 20114e is not eligible for review as

 

part of a contested case hearing under this section.

 

     Sec. 21333. An owner or operator may appeal a final agency

 

decision to affix a placard under section 21316a(2) or issue an

 

administrative order under section 21319a(2) to the circuit court

 

for the county where the underground storage tank system is located

 

or the Ingham county circuit court in the same manner as and


 

according to the same procedures provided for appeals to the

 

circuit court under section 631 of the revised judicature act of

 

1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.631. The court shall set aside the final

 

agency decision if substantial rights of the petitioner have been

 

prejudiced because the decision or order is any of the following:

 

     (a) In violation of the constitution or a statute.

 

     (b) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of

 

the agency.

 

     (c) Made upon unlawful procedure resulting in material

 

prejudice to a party.

 

     (d) Not supported by competent, material, and substantial

 

evidence on the whole record.

 

     (e) Arbitrary, capricious, or clearly an abuse or unwarranted

 

exercise of discretion.

 

     (f) Affected by other substantial and material error of law.

 

     Enacting section 1. This amendatory act does not take effect

 

unless all of the following bills of the 96th Legislature are

 

enacted into law:

 

     (a) Senate Bill No. 528.

 

     (b) Senate Bill No. 530.

 

     (c) Senate Bill No. 531.

 

     (d) Senate Bill No. 532.

 

     (e) Senate Bill No. 533.

feedback