Bill Text: IN SB0067 | 2011 | Regular Session | Enrolled
Bill Title: Procedures in administrative proceedings.
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 2-1)
Status: (Passed) 2011-05-18 - Effective 07/01/2011 [SB0067 Detail]
Download: Indiana-2011-SB0067-Enrolled.html
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type, additions will appear in this style type, and deletions will appear in
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in this style type. Also, the word NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in this style type or
AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning state offices and administration.
(1) the giving of any notice;
(2) the service of any motion, ruling, order, or other filed item; or
(3) the filing of any document with the ultimate authority;
in an administrative proceeding under this article.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) or as otherwise provided by law, a person shall serve papers by:
(1) United States mail;
(2) personal service;
(3) electronic mail; or
(4) any other method approved by the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure.
(c) The following shall be served by United States mail or personal service:
(1) The initial notice of a determination under section 4, 5, or 6 of this chapter.
(2) A petition for review of an agency action under section 7 of this chapter.
(3) A complaint under section 8 of this chapter.
(d)
keep a record of the time, date, and circumstances of the service under
subsection (b) or (c).
(c) (e) Service shall be made on a person or on the person's counsel
or other authorized representative of record in the proceeding. Service
on an artificial person or a person incompetent to receive service shall
be made on a person allowed to receive service under the rules
governing civil actions in the courts. If an ultimate authority consists
of more than one (1) individual, service on that ultimate authority must
be made on the chairperson or secretary of the ultimate authority. A
document to be filed with that ultimate authority must be filed with the
chairperson or secretary of the ultimate authority.
(d) (f) If the current address of a person is not ascertainable, service
shall be mailed to the last known address where the person resides or
has a principal place of business. If the identity, address, or existence
of a person is not ascertainable, or a law other than a rule allows,
service shall be made by a single publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in:
(1) the county in which the person resides, has a principal place
of business, or has property that is the subject of the proceeding;
or
(2) Marion County, if the place described in subdivision (1) is not
ascertainable or the place described in subdivision (1) is outside
Indiana and the person does not have a resident agent or other
representative of record in Indiana.
(e) (g) A notice given by publication must include a statement
advising a person how the person may receive written notice of the
proceedings.
(f) (h) The filing of a document with an ultimate authority is
complete on the earliest of the following dates that apply to the filing:
(1) The date on which the document is delivered to the ultimate
authority under subsection (b), (c), or e.
(2) The date of the postmark on the envelope containing the
document, if the document is mailed to the ultimate authority by
United States mail.
(3) The date on which the document is deposited with a private
carrier, as shown by a receipt issued by the carrier, if the
document is sent to the ultimate authority by private carrier.
(1) a Saturday;
(2) a Sunday;
(3) a legal holiday under a state statute; or
(4) a day that the office in which the act is to be done is closed during regular business hours.
(b) A period runs until the end of the next day after a day described in
(c) A period of time under this article that commences when a person is served with a paper, including the period in which a person may petition for judicial review, commences with respect to a particular person on the earlier of the date that:
(1) the person is personally served with the notice; or
(2) a notice for the person is deposited in the United States mail.
(d) If section
(e) If a notice is served through the United States mail, three (3) days must be added to a period that commences upon service of that notice.
(1) bias, prejudice, or interest in the outcome of a proceeding;
(2) failure to dispose of the subject of a proceeding in an orderly and reasonably prompt manner after a written request by a party;
(3) unless waived or extended with the written consent of all parties or for good cause shown, failure to issue an order not later than ninety (90) days after the latest of:
(A) the filing of a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment under section 23 of this chapter that is filed after June 30, 2011;
(B) the conclusion of a hearing that begins after June 30, 2011; or
(C) the completion of any schedule set for briefing or for submittal of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for a disposition under clauses (A) or (B); or
Nothing in this subsection prohibits an individual who is an employee of an agency from serving as an administrative law judge.
(b) This subsection does not apply to a proceeding concerning a regulated occupation (as defined in IC 25-1-7-1), except for a proceeding concerning a water well driller (as described in IC 25-39-3) or an out of state mobile health care entity regulated by the state department of health. An individual who is disqualified under subsection (a)(2) or (a)(3) shall provide the parties a list of at least three (3) special administrative law judges who meet the requirements of:
(1) IC 4-21.5-7-6, if the case is pending in the office of environmental adjudication;
(2) IC 14-10-2-2, if the case is pending before the division of hearings of the natural resources commission; or
(3) any other statute or rule governing qualification to serve an agency other than those described in subdivision (1) or (2).
Subject to subsection (c), the parties may agree to the selection of one (1) individual from the list.
(c) If the parties do not agree to the selection of an individual as provided in subsection (b) not later than ten (10) days after the parties are provided a list of judges under subsection (b), a special administrative law judge who meets the requirements of subsection (b) shall be selected under the procedure set forth in Trial Rule 79(D), 79(E), or 79(F).
(b) If a motion is based on facts not otherwise appearing in the record for the proceeding, the administrative law judge may hear the matter on affidavits presented by the respective parties or the administrative law judge may direct that the matter be heard wholly or partly on oral testimony or depositions.
(c) At each stage of the proceeding, the agency or other person requesting that an agency take action or asserting an affirmative defense specified by law has the burden of persuasion and the burden of going forward with the proof of the request or affirmative defense. Before the hearing on which the party intends to assert it, a party shall, to the extent possible, disclose any affirmative defense specified by law on which the party intends to rely. If a prehearing conference is held in the proceeding, a party notified of the conference shall disclose the party's affirmative defense in the conference.
(d) The proceedings before an administrative law judge are de novo.
to which the amount of damages or other relief is not in controversy,
and directing further proceedings in the action as are just. Upon the
hearing of the action, the facts specified are established in the judge's
order under this subsection.
(d) Supporting and opposing affidavits must:
(1) be made on personal knowledge;
(2) set forth facts that are admissible in evidence; and
(3) show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to
the matters stated in the affidavit.
(e) The administrative law judge may permit affidavits to be
supplemented or opposed by depositions, answers to interrogatories,
further affidavits, or testimony of witnesses.
(f) If a motion for summary judgment is made and supported under
this section, an adverse party may not rely upon the mere allegations or
denials made in the adverse party's pleadings as a response to the
motion. The adverse party shall respond to the motion with affidavits
or other evidence permitted under this section and set forth specific
facts showing that there is a genuine issue in dispute. If the adverse
party does not respond as required by this subsection, the
administrative law judge may enter summary judgment against the
adverse party.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in this section, an
administrative law judge shall consider a motion filed under
subsection (a) as would a court that is considering a motion for
summary judgment filed under Trial Rule 56 of the Indiana Rules
of Trial Procedure.
(c) Service of the motion and any response to the motion,
including supporting affidavits, shall be performed as provided in
this article.
(d) Sections 28 and 29 of this chapter apply to an order granting
summary judgment that disposes of all issues in a proceeding.
(b) An agency may adopt rules, under IC 4-22-2, setting specific procedures to facilitate informal settlement of matters. The procedures must be consistent with this article.
(c) This section does not require any person to settle a matter under the agency's informal procedures.
(d) This subsection does not apply to a proceeding before the
state ethics commission (created by IC 4-2-6-2) or a proceeding
concerning a regulated occupation (as defined in IC 25-1-7-1),
except for a proceeding concerning a water well driller (as
described in IC 25-39-3) or an out of state mobile health care entity
regulated by the state department of health. When a matter is
settled without the need for more elaborate proceedings under this
section, the ultimate authority or its designee shall issue the order
agreed to by the parties as a final order under this article.
(e) When the final order referred to in subsection (d) involves
the modification of a permit issued under IC 13, the administrative
law judge:
(1) shall remand the permit to the issuing agency with
instructions to modify the permit in accordance with the final
order; and
(2) retains jurisdiction over any appeals of the modified
permit.
Only those terms of the permit that are the subject of the final
order shall be modified and subject to public notice and comment.
(f) Any petition for administrative review under this chapter
concerning permit modification under subsection (e) is limited to
only those terms of the permit modified in accordance with the
final order issued under subsection (d).
(b) An environmental law judge under this chapter has the same authority and responsibilities as an administrative law judge.
(b) As soon as possible after a declaration of a ground water emergency has been made, copies of the declaration shall be given to the newspapers of general circulation located in the affected county. The notification to newspapers required by this subsection is in
addition to the minimum procedural duties required of the department
under IC 4-21.5 and does not satisfy service of process by publication
under IC 4-21.5-3-1(d). IC 4-21.5-3-1(f).
(c) If the emergency requires action before service can be completed
under subsection (a), oral notification in person by a representative of
the department and authorized by the director is sufficient until service
can be completed. Oral notification is effective for not more than
ninety-six (96) hours.
Graphic file number 0 named seal1001.pcx with height 58 p and width 72 p Left aligned