First Regular Session 117th General Assembly (2011)
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana
Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type,
additions will appear in
this style type, and deletions will appear in
this style type.
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional
provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in
this style type. Also, the
word
NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds
a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in
this style type or
this style type reconciles conflicts
between statutes enacted by the 2010 Regular Session of the General Assembly.
SENATE ENROLLED ACT No. 67
AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning state offices and administration.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-3-1; (11)SE0067.1.1. -->
SECTION 1. IC 4-21.5-3-1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 1. (a) This section
applies to:
(1) the giving of any notice;
(2) the service of any motion, ruling, order, or other filed item; or
(3) the filing of any document with the ultimate authority;
in an administrative proceeding under this article.
(b) Except as
provided in subsection (c) or as otherwise provided
by law, a person shall serve papers by:
(1) United States mail;
or
(2) personal service;
(3) electronic mail; or
(4) any other method approved by the Indiana Rules of Trial
Procedure.
(c) The following shall be served by United States mail or
personal service:
(1) The initial notice of a determination under section 4, 5, or
6 of this chapter.
(2) A petition for review of an agency action under section 7
of this chapter.
(3) A complaint under section 8 of this chapter.
(d) If
an agency mails or personally serves a paper, The agency shall
keep a record of the time, date, and circumstances of the service under
subsection (b) or (c).
(c) (e) Service shall be made on a person or on the person's counsel
or other authorized representative of record in the proceeding. Service
on an artificial person or a person incompetent to receive service shall
be made on a person allowed to receive service under the rules
governing civil actions in the courts. If an ultimate authority consists
of more than one (1) individual, service on that ultimate authority must
be made on the chairperson or secretary of the ultimate authority. A
document to be filed with that ultimate authority must be filed with the
chairperson or secretary of the ultimate authority.
(d) (f) If the current address of a person is not ascertainable, service
shall be mailed to the last known address where the person resides or
has a principal place of business. If the identity, address, or existence
of a person is not ascertainable, or a law other than a rule allows,
service shall be made by a single publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in:
(1) the county in which the person resides, has a principal place
of business, or has property that is the subject of the proceeding;
or
(2) Marion County, if the place described in subdivision (1) is not
ascertainable or the place described in subdivision (1) is outside
Indiana and the person does not have a resident agent or other
representative of record in Indiana.
(e) (g) A notice given by publication must include a statement
advising a person how the person may receive written notice of the
proceedings.
(f) (h) The filing of a document with an ultimate authority is
complete on the earliest of the following dates that apply to the filing:
(1) The date on which the document is delivered to the ultimate
authority under subsection (b), (c), or e.
(2) The date of the postmark on the envelope containing the
document, if the document is mailed to the ultimate authority by
United States mail.
(3) The date on which the document is deposited with a private
carrier, as shown by a receipt issued by the carrier, if the
document is sent to the ultimate authority by private carrier.
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-3-2; (11)SE0067.1.2. -->
SECTION 2. IC 4-21.5-3-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 2. (a) In computing any
period of time under this article, the day of the act, event, or default
from which the designated period of time begins to run is not included.
The last day of the computed period is to be included unless it is:
(1) a Saturday;
(2) a Sunday;
(3) a legal holiday under a state statute; or
(4) a day that the office in which the act is to be done is closed
during regular business hours.
(b) A period runs until the end of the next day after a day described
in subdivisions (1) subsection (a)(1) through (4). (a)(4). If the period
allowed is less than seven (7) days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays,
state holidays, and days on which the office in which the act is to be
done is closed during regular business hours are excluded from the
calculation.
(c) A period of time under this article that commences when a
person is served with a paper, including the period in which a person
may petition for judicial review, commences with respect to a
particular person on the earlier of the date that:
(1) the person is personally served with the notice; or
(2) a notice for the person is deposited in the United States mail.
(d) If section 1(d) 1(f) of this chapter applies, a period of time under
this article commences when a notice for the person is published in a
newspaper.
(e) If a notice is served through the United States mail, three (3)
days must be added to a period that commences upon service of that
notice.
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-3-10; (11)SE0067.1.3. -->
SECTION 3. IC 4-21.5-3-10 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 10. (a) Any individual
serving or designated to serve alone or with others as an administrative
law judge is subject to disqualification for:
(1) bias, prejudice, or interest in the outcome of a proceeding;
(2) failure to dispose of the subject of a proceeding in an orderly
and reasonably prompt manner after a written request by a party;
(3) unless waived or extended with the written consent of all
parties or for good cause shown, failure to issue an order not
later than ninety (90) days after the latest of:
(A) the filing of a motion to dismiss or a motion for
summary judgment under section 23 of this chapter that is
filed after June 30, 2011;
(B) the conclusion of a hearing that begins after June 30,
2011; or
(C) the completion of any schedule set for briefing or for
submittal of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of
law for a disposition under clauses (A) or (B); or
(3) (4) any cause for which a judge of a court may be disqualified.
Nothing in this subsection prohibits an individual who is an employee
of an agency from serving as an administrative law judge.
(b) This subsection does not apply to a proceeding concerning
a regulated occupation (as defined in IC 25-1-7-1), except for a
proceeding concerning a water well driller (as described in
IC 25-39-3) or an out of state mobile health care entity regulated
by the state department of health. An individual who is disqualified
under subsection (a)(2) or (a)(3) shall provide the parties a list of
at least three (3) special administrative law judges who meet the
requirements of:
(1) IC 4-21.5-7-6, if the case is pending in the office of
environmental adjudication;
(2) IC 14-10-2-2, if the case is pending before the division of
hearings of the natural resources commission; or
(3) any other statute or rule governing qualification to serve
an agency other than those described in subdivision (1) or (2).
Subject to subsection (c), the parties may agree to the selection of
one (1) individual from the list.
(c) If the parties do not agree to the selection of an individual as
provided in subsection (b) not later than ten (10) days after the
parties are provided a list of judges under subsection (b), a special
administrative law judge who meets the requirements of subsection
(b) shall be selected under the procedure set forth in Trial Rule
79(D), 79(E), or 79(F).
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-3-14; (11)SE0067.1.4. -->
SECTION 4. IC 4-21.5-3-14 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 14. (a) An
administrative law judge conducting a proceeding shall keep a record
of the administrative law judge's proceedings under this article.
(b) If a motion is based on facts not otherwise appearing in the
record for the proceeding, the administrative law judge may hear the
matter on affidavits presented by the respective parties or the
administrative law judge may direct that the matter be heard wholly or
partly on oral testimony or depositions.
(c) At each stage of the proceeding, the agency or other person
requesting that an agency take action or asserting an affirmative
defense specified by law has the burden of persuasion and the burden
of going forward with the proof of the request or affirmative defense.
Before the hearing on which the party intends to assert it, a party shall,
to the extent possible, disclose any affirmative defense specified by law
on which the party intends to rely. If a prehearing conference is held in
the proceeding, a party notified of the conference shall disclose the
party's affirmative defense in the conference.
(d) The proceedings before an administrative law judge are de
novo.
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-3-23; (11)SE0067.1.5. -->
SECTION 5. IC 4-21.5-3-23 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 23. (a) A party may, at
any time after a matter is assigned to an administrative law judge, move
for a summary judgment in the party's favor as to all or any part of the
issues in a proceeding.
The motion must be supported with affidavits
or other evidence permitted under this section and set forth specific
facts showing that there is not a genuine issue in dispute.
(b) The motion must be served at least five (5) days before the time
fixed for the hearing on the motion. The adverse party may serve
opposing affidavits before the day of hearing. The administrative law
judge may direct the parties to give oral argument on the motion. The
judgment sought shall be rendered immediately if the pleadings,
depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together
with the affidavits and testimony, if any, show that a genuine issue as
to any material fact does not exist and that the moving party is entitled
to a judgment as a matter of law. A summary judgment may be
rendered upon fewer than all the issues or claims (such as the issue of
penalties alone) although there is a genuine issue as to damages or
liability, as the case may be. A summary judgment upon fewer than all
the issues involved in a proceeding or with respect to fewer than all the
claims or parties is not a final order. The administrative law judge shall
designate the issues or claims upon which the judge finds no genuine
issue as to any material facts. Summary judgment may not be granted
as a matter of course because the opposing party fails to offer opposing
affidavits or evidence, but the administrative law judge shall make a
determination from the affidavits and testimony offered upon the
matters placed in issue by the pleadings or the evidence. If it appears
from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that the party cannot
for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify the
party's opposition, the administrative law judge may make any order
that is just.
(c) If on motion under this section no order is rendered upon the
whole case or for all the relief asked and a hearing is necessary, the
administrative law judge at the hearing of the motion, by examining the
pleadings and the evidence before it and by interrogating any person,
shall if practicable ascertain:
(1) what material facts exist without substantial controversy; and
(2) what material facts are actually and in good faith controverted.
The administrative law judge shall then make an order specifying the
facts that appear without substantial controversy, including the extent
to which the amount of damages or other relief is not in controversy,
and directing further proceedings in the action as are just. Upon the
hearing of the action, the facts specified are established in the judge's
order under this subsection.
(d) Supporting and opposing affidavits must:
(1) be made on personal knowledge;
(2) set forth facts that are admissible in evidence; and
(3) show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to
the matters stated in the affidavit.
(e) The administrative law judge may permit affidavits to be
supplemented or opposed by depositions, answers to interrogatories,
further affidavits, or testimony of witnesses.
(f) If a motion for summary judgment is made and supported under
this section, an adverse party may not rely upon the mere allegations or
denials made in the adverse party's pleadings as a response to the
motion. The adverse party shall respond to the motion with affidavits
or other evidence permitted under this section and set forth specific
facts showing that there is a genuine issue in dispute. If the adverse
party does not respond as required by this subsection, the
administrative law judge may enter summary judgment against the
adverse party.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in this section, an
administrative law judge shall consider a motion filed under
subsection (a) as would a court that is considering a motion for
summary judgment filed under Trial Rule 56 of the Indiana Rules
of Trial Procedure.
(c) Service of the motion and any response to the motion,
including supporting affidavits, shall be performed as provided in
this article.
(d) Sections 28 and 29 of this chapter apply to an order granting
summary judgment that disposes of all issues in a proceeding.
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-3-34; (11)SE0067.1.6. -->
SECTION 6. IC 4-21.5-3-34 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 34.
(a) An agency is
encouraged to develop informal procedures that are consistent with this
article and make unnecessary more elaborate proceedings under this
article.
(b) An agency may adopt rules, under IC 4-22-2, setting specific
procedures to facilitate informal settlement of matters.
The procedures
must be consistent with this article.
(c) This section does not require any person to settle a matter under
the agency's informal procedures.
(d) This subsection does not apply to a proceeding before the
state ethics commission (created by IC 4-2-6-2) or a proceeding
concerning a regulated occupation (as defined in IC 25-1-7-1),
except for a proceeding concerning a water well driller (as
described in IC 25-39-3) or an out of state mobile health care entity
regulated by the state department of health. When a matter is
settled without the need for more elaborate proceedings under this
section, the ultimate authority or its designee shall issue the order
agreed to by the parties as a final order under this article.
(e) When the final order referred to in subsection (d) involves
the modification of a permit issued under IC 13, the administrative
law judge:
(1) shall remand the permit to the issuing agency with
instructions to modify the permit in accordance with the final
order; and
(2) retains jurisdiction over any appeals of the modified
permit.
Only those terms of the permit that are the subject of the final
order shall be modified and subject to public notice and comment.
(f) Any petition for administrative review under this chapter
concerning permit modification under subsection (e) is limited to
only those terms of the permit modified in accordance with the
final order issued under subsection (d).
SOURCE: IC 4-21.5-7-5; (11)SE0067.1.7. -->
SECTION 7. IC 4-21.5-7-5, AS AMENDED BY P.L.84-2008,
SECTION 1, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 5. (a) Except as provided in IC 14-10-2-2.5, an
environmental law judge is the ultimate authority under this article for
reviews of agency actions of the department of environmental
management, actions of a board described in IC 13-14-9-1, and
challenges to rulemaking actions by a board described in IC 13-14-9-1
made pursuant to IC 4-22-2-44 or IC 4-22-2-45.
(b) An environmental law judge under this chapter has the same
authority and responsibilities as an administrative law judge.
SOURCE: IC 14-25-4-14; (11)SE0067.1.8. -->
SECTION 8. IC 14-25-4-14 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 14. (a) A declaration
of a ground water emergency under this chapter is effective when a
copy of a declaration is served under IC 4-21.5-3-1 upon a person who
owns the significant ground water withdrawal facility that is reasonably
believed to have caused the failure of the complainant's water well.
(b) As soon as possible after a declaration of a ground water
emergency has been made, copies of the declaration shall be given to
the newspapers of general circulation located in the affected county.
The notification to newspapers required by this subsection is in
addition to the minimum procedural duties required of the department
under IC 4-21.5 and does not satisfy service of process by publication
under IC 4-21.5-3-1(d). IC 4-21.5-3-1(f).
(c) If the emergency requires action before service can be completed
under subsection (a), oral notification in person by a representative of
the department and authorized by the director is sufficient until service
can be completed. Oral notification is effective for not more than
ninety-six (96) hours.
SEA 67
Figure
Graphic file number 0 named seal1001.pcx with height 58 p and width 72 p Left aligned