Bill Text: FL S1742 | 2010 | Regular Session | Comm Sub


Bill Title: Growth Management [EPSC]

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Failed) 2010-04-30 - Died in Committee on Policy & Steering Committee on Ways and Means [S1742 Detail]

Download: Florida-2010-S1742-Comm_Sub.html
 
Florida Senate - 2010                             CS for SB 1742 
 
By the Committee on Community Affairs; and Senator Bennett 
578-02515-10                                          20101742c1 
1                        A bill to be entitled 
2         An act relating to growth management; amending s. 
3         163.3164, F.S.; defining the term “transit oriented 
4         development”; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; providing 
5         for the expedited review of comprehensive plan 
6         amendments that implement transportation concurrency 
7         exception areas; accounting for the time value of 
8         money for phased projects; providing for the sharing 
9         of costs of mitigation for transportation concurrency; 
10         amending s. 163.3182, F.S.; revising provisions 
11         relating to transportation concurrency backlog 
12         authorities; providing for certain landowners or 
13         developers to request a transportation concurrency 
14         backlog area for a development area; amending s. 
15         380.06, F.S.; exempting transit oriented developments 
16         from review of transportation impacts in the 
17         development-of-regional-impact process; providing a 
18         legislative declaration of important state interest; 
19         providing an effective date. 
20 
21  Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 
22 
23         Section 1. Subsection (35) is added to section 163.3164, 
24  Florida Statutes, to read: 
25         163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land 
26  Development Regulation Act; definitions.—As used in this act: 
27         (35)“Transit oriented development” means a project or 
28  projects in areas that may be served by existing or anticipated 
29  transit service and are compact, mixed-use, interconnected, and 
30  pedestrian and bicycle friendly communities designed to reduce 
31  per capita greenhouse gas emissions and vehicular trips and 
32  include the densities, intensities, and amenities needed to 
33  support frequent transit service on identified or dedicated 
34  transit facilities that enable an individual to live, work, 
35  play, and shop in a community without the need to rely solely on 
36  a motor vehicle for mobility. 
37         Section 2. Paragraph (a) of subsection (12) of section 
38  163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (h) is 
39  added to subsection (5) of that section and subsection (18) is 
40  added that section, to read: 
41         163.3180 Concurrency.— 
42         (5) 
43         (h)Any proposed comprehensive plan amendment directly 
44  related to the creation of a transportation concurrency 
45  exception area is exempt from s. 163.3187(1) and may use the 
46  alternative state review process in s. 163.32465. 
47         (12)(a) A development of regional impact may satisfy the 
48  transportation concurrency requirements of the local 
49  comprehensive plan, the local government’s concurrency 
50  management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate 
51  share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic 
52  impacts, if: 
53         1. The development of regional impact which, based on its 
54  location or mix of land uses, is designed to encourage 
55  pedestrian or other nonautomotive modes of transportation; 
56         2. The proportionate-share contribution for local and 
57  regionally significant traffic impacts is sufficient to pay for 
58  one or more required mobility improvements that will benefit a 
59  regionally significant transportation facility; 
60         3. The owner and developer of the development of regional 
61  impact pays or assures payment of the proportionate-share 
62  contribution; and 
63         4. If the regionally significant transportation facility to 
64  be constructed or improved is under the maintenance authority of 
65  a governmental entity, as defined by s. 334.03(12), other than 
66  the local government with jurisdiction over the development of 
67  regional impact, the developer is required to enter into a 
68  binding and legally enforceable commitment to transfer funds to 
69  the governmental entity having maintenance authority or to 
70  otherwise assure construction or improvement of the facility. 
71 
72  The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any 
73  transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this 
74  subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the 
75  purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate 
76  share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative 
77  number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach 
78  roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a 
79  stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak 
80  hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from 
81  construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted 
82  level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the 
83  time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to 
84  maintain the adopted level of service. If the number of trips 
85  used to calculate the proportionate-share contribution includes 
86  trips from an earlier phase of the development, the 
87  determination of mitigation for the subsequent phase of 
88  development shall account for any mitigation required by the 
89  development order and provided by the developer for the earlier 
90  phase, calculated at present value. For purposes of this 
91  paragraph, the term “present value” means the fair market value 
92  of a right-of-way at the time of contribution and, if 
93  applicable, the actual dollar value of the construction 
94  improvements on the date of completion as adjusted by the 
95  Consumer Price Index. For purposes of this subsection, 
96  “construction cost” includes all associated costs of the 
97  improvement. Proportionate-share mitigation shall be limited to 
98  ensure that a development of regional impact meeting the 
99  requirements of this subsection mitigates its impact on the 
100  transportation system but is not responsible for the additional 
101  cost of reducing or eliminating backlogs. This subsection also 
102  applies to Florida Quality Developments pursuant to s. 380.061 
103  and to detailed specific area plans implementing optional sector 
104  plans pursuant to s. 163.3245. 
105         (18)The costs of mitigation for transportation impacts 
106  shall be distributed to all affected jurisdictions by the local 
107  government having jurisdiction over project or development 
108  approval. Distribution shall be proportionate to the percentage 
109  of the total transportation mitigation costs incurred by an 
110  affected jurisdiction unless otherwise agreed to by the effected 
111  jurisdictions. Any dispute between jurisdictions shall be 
112  resolved pursuant to the governmental dispute process in chapter 
113  164. 
114         Section 3. Present paragraphs (b) and (c) of subsection (2) 
115  of section 163.3182, Florida Statutes, are redesignated as 
116  paragraphs (c) and (d), respectively, and a new paragraph (b) is 
117  added to that subsection, to read: 
118         163.3182 Transportation concurrency backlogs.— 
119         (2) CREATION OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY BACKLOG 
120  AUTHORITIES.— 
121         (b)A landowner or developer within a transit oriented 
122  development of 100 or more cumulative acres or a large-scale 
123  development area of 500 cumulative acres or more may request 
124  that the local government establish a transportation concurrency 
125  backlog area for roadways significantly affected by traffic 
126  impacts resulting from the development if those roadways are or 
127  will be backlogged as defined by s. 163.3180(12)(b) and (16)(i). 
128  The local government shall designate the transportation 
129  concurrency backlog area by ordinance if a development order is 
130  issued or a comprehensive plan amendment is approved within the 
131  development area and the funding provided is sufficient to 
132  address one or more transportation mobility improvements 
133  necessary to satisfy the additional deficiencies coexisting or 
134  anticipated as a result of the new development. The 
135  transportation concurrency backlog area shall be used to satisfy 
136  all proportionate-share or proportionate fair-share 
137  transportation concurrency contributions of the development not 
138  otherwise satisfied by impact fees. The local government shall 
139  manage the area by acting as a transportation concurrency 
140  backlog authority. The applicable provisions of this section 
141  shall apply except that the tax increment shall be used to 
142  satisfy transportation concurrency requirements not otherwise 
143  satisfied by impact fees. 
144         Section 4. Paragraph (u) is added to subsection (24) of 
145  section 380.06, Florida Statutes, to read: 
146         380.06 Developments of regional impact.— 
147         (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.— 
148         (u)Any transit oriented development as defined in s. 
149  163.3164 incorporated into the county or municipality 
150  comprehensive plan that has adopted land use and transportation 
151  strategies to support and fund mobility, including alternative 
152  modes of transportation, is exempt from review for 
153  transportation impacts conducted pursuant to this section. This 
154  paragraph does not apply to areas: 
155         1.Within the boundary of any area of critical state 
156  concern designated pursuant to s. 380.05; 
157         2.Within the boundary of the Wekiva Study Area as 
158  described in s. 369.316; or 
159         3.Within 2 miles of the boundary of the Everglades 
160  Protection Area as described in s. 373.4592(2). 
161 
162  If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional 
163  impact under paragraphs (a)-(s), but will be part of a larger 
164  project that is subject to review as a development of regional 
165  impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included in the 
166  review of the larger project, unless such exempt use involves a 
167  development of regional impact that includes a landowner, 
168  tenant, or user that has entered into a funding agreement with 
169  the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development under the 
170  Innovation Incentive Program and the agreement contemplates a 
171  state award of at least $50 million. 
172         Section 5. The Legislature finds that this act fulfills an 
173  important state interest. 
174         Section 6. This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. 
feedback