Bill Text: FL S0718 | 2013 | Regular Session | Comm Sub
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Family Law
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 5-2-1)
Status: (Vetoed) 2013-05-01 - Vetoed by Governor [S0718 Detail]
Download: Florida-2013-S0718-Comm_Sub.html
Bill Title: Family Law
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 5-2-1)
Status: (Vetoed) 2013-05-01 - Vetoed by Governor [S0718 Detail]
Download: Florida-2013-S0718-Comm_Sub.html
Florida Senate - 2013 CS for SB 718 By the Committee on Judiciary; and Senators Stargel, Grimsley, Richter, Thrasher, Soto, and Altman 590-02284A-13 2013718c1 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to dissolution of marriage; amending 3 s. 61.071, F.S.; requiring that alimony pendente lite 4 be calculated in accordance with s. 61.08, F.S.; 5 amending s. 61.08, F.S.; defining terms; revising 6 factors to be considered for alimony awards; requiring 7 a court to make written findings regarding the basis 8 for awarding a combination of forms of alimony, 9 including the type of alimony and length of time for 10 which it is awarded; revising factors to be considered 11 when deciding whether to award alimony; providing that 12 an award of alimony granted automatically terminates 13 without further action under certain circumstances; 14 providing that the party seeking alimony has the 15 burden of proof of demonstrating a need for alimony 16 and that the other party has the ability to pay 17 alimony; requiring the court to consider specified 18 relevant factors when determining the proper type and 19 amount of alimony; revising provisions relating to the 20 protection of awards of alimony; revising provisions 21 for an award of durational alimony; specifying 22 criteria related to the rebuttable presumption to 23 award or not to award alimony; deleting a provision 24 authorizing permanent alimony; requiring written 25 findings regarding the incomes and standard of living 26 of the parties after dissolution of marriage; amending 27 s. 61.09, F.S.; providing for the calculation of 28 alimony; amending 61.13, F.S.; establishing a 29 presumption that it is in the best interests of the 30 child for the court to order equal time-sharing for 31 each minor child; providing exceptions; providing for 32 prospective application of the presumption in favor of 33 equal time-sharing; amending s. 61.14, F.S.; 34 authorizing a party to apply for an order to terminate 35 the amount of support, maintenance, or alimony; 36 requiring that an alimony order be modified upward 37 upon a showing by clear and convincing evidence of an 38 increased ability to pay alimony by the other party; 39 prohibiting an increase in an obligor’s income from 40 being considered permanent in nature until it has been 41 maintained for a specified period without 42 interruption; providing an exemption from the 43 reduction or termination of an alimony award in 44 certain circumstances; providing that there is a 45 rebuttable presumption that any modification or 46 termination of an alimony award is retroactive to the 47 date of the filing of the petition; providing for an 48 award of attorney fees and costs if it is determined 49 that an obligee unnecessarily or unreasonably 50 litigates a petition for modification or termination 51 of an alimony award; revising provisions relating to 52 the effect of a supportive relationship on an award of 53 alimony; providing that income and assets of the 54 obligor’s spouse or the person with whom the obligor 55 resides may not be considered in the redetermination 56 in a modification action; prohibiting an alimony award 57 from being modified providing that if the court orders 58 alimony concurrent with a child support order, the 59 alimony award may not be modified because of the later 60 modification or termination of child support payments; 61 providing that the attaining of retirement age is a 62 substantial change in circumstances; requiring the 63 court to consider certain factors in determining 64 whether the obligor’s retirement is reasonable; 65 requiring a court to terminate or reduce an alimony 66 award based on certain factors; amending s. 61.19, 67 F.S.; authorizing separate adjudication of issues in a 68 dissolution of marriage case in certain circumstances; 69 providing for retroactive application of the act to 70 alimony awards entered before July 1, 2013; providing 71 allowable dates for the modification of such awards; 72 providing an effective date. 73 74 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 75 76 Section 1. Section 61.071, Florida Statutes, is amended to 77 read: 78 61.071 Alimony pendente lite; suit money.—In every 79 proceeding for dissolution of the marriage, a party may claim 80 alimony and suit money in the petition or by motion, and if the 81 petition is well founded, the court shall allow alimony 82 calculated in accordance with s. 61.08 and a reasonable sum of 83 suit moneytherefor. If a party in any proceeding for 84 dissolution of marriage claims alimony or suit money in his or 85 her answer or by motion,and the answer or motion is well 86 founded, the court shall allow alimony calculated in accordance 87 with s. 61.08 and a reasonable sum of suit moneytherefor. 88 Section 2. Section 61.08, Florida Statutes, is amended to 89 read: 90 61.08 Alimony.— 91 (1) For purposes of this section, the term: 92 (a) “Alimony” means a court-ordered payment of support by 93 an obligor to an obligee after the dissolution of a marriage. 94 (b) “Long-term marriage” means a marriage having a duration 95 of 20 years or more, as measured from the date of the marriage 96 to the date of filing the petition for dissolution. 97 (c) “Mid-term marriage” means a marriage having a duration 98 of more than 10 years but less than 20 years, as measured from 99 the date of the marriage to the date of filing the petition for 100 dissolution. 101 (d) “Net income” means net income as determined in 102 accordance with s. 61.30. 103 (e) “Short-term marriage” means a marriage having a 104 duration equal to or less than 10 years, as measured from the 105 date of the marriage to the date of filing the petition for 106 dissolution. 107 (2)(a)(1)In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, the 108 court may grant alimony to either party in the form of, which109alimony may bebridge-the-gap, rehabilitative, or durational 110 alimony, or apermanent in nature or anycombination of these 111 forms of alimony, but shall prioritize an award of bridge-the 112 gap alimony, followed by rehabilitative alimony, over any other 113 form of alimony. In ananyaward of alimony, the court may order 114 periodic payments,orpayments in lump sum, or both. 115 (b) The court shall make written findings regarding the 116 basis for awarding a combination of forms of alimony, including 117 the type of alimony and length of time for which it is awarded. 118 The court may award only a combination of forms of alimony to 119 provide greater economic assistance in order to allow the 120 recipient to achieve rehabilitation. 121 (c) The court may consider the adultery of either party 122spouseand the circumstances thereof in determining the amount 123 of alimony, if any, to be awarded. 124 (d) In all dissolution actions, the court shall include 125 written findings of fact relative to the factors enumerated in 126 subsection (3)(2)supporting an award or denial of alimony. 127 (e) An award of alimony granted under this section 128 automatically terminates without further action of either party 129 or the court upon the earlier of: 130 1. The durational limits specified in this section; or 131 2. The obligor’s normal retirement age for social security 132 retirement benefits. 133 134 If the obligee proves by clear and convincing evidence that the 135 need for alimony continues to exist and the court determines 136 that the obligor continues to have the ability to pay, the court 137 shall issue written findings justifying an extension of alimony 138 consistent with the provisions of this section. 139 (f) The clerk of the court shall, upon request, indicate in 140 writing that an alimony obligation has terminated in accordance 141 with paragraph (e), unless there is a pending motion before the 142 court disputing the fulfillment of the alimony obligation. 143 (3)(2)The party seeking alimony has the burden of proof of 144 demonstrating a need for alimony in accordance with subsection 145 (8) and that the other party has the ability to pay alimony. In 146 determining whether to award alimonyor maintenance, the court 147 shallfirstmake, in writing, a specific factual determination 148 as to whether the othereitherpartyhas an actual need for149alimony or maintenance and whether either partyhas the ability 150 to pay alimonyor maintenance. If the court finds that thea151 party seeking alimony has met its burden of proof in 152 demonstrating a need for alimonyor maintenanceand that the 153 other party has the ability to pay alimonyor maintenance, then 154 in determining the proper type and amount of alimonyor155maintenanceunder subsections (5)-(9)(5)-(8), the court shall 156 consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to: 157(a) The standard of living established during the marriage.158 (a)(b)The duration of the marriage. 159 (b)(c)The age and the physical and emotional condition of 160 each party. 161 (c)(d)The financial resources of each party, including the 162 portion of nonmarital assets that were relied upon by the 163 parties during the marriage and the marital assets and 164 liabilities distributed to each. 165 (d)(e)The earning capacities, educational levels, 166 vocational skills, and employability of the parties and, when 167 applicable, the time necessary for either party to acquire 168 sufficient education or training to enable such party to find 169 appropriate employment. 170 (e)(f)The contribution of each party to the marriage, 171 including, but not limited to, services rendered in homemaking, 172 child care, education, and career building of the other party. 173 (f)(g)The responsibilities each party will have with 174 regard to any minor children that the partiestheyhave in 175 common. 176 (g)(h)The tax treatment and consequences to both parties 177 of ananyalimony award, which must be consistent with 178 applicable state and federal tax laws and may includeincluding179 the designation of all or a portion of the payment as a 180 nontaxable, nondeductible payment. 181 (h)(i)All sources of income available to either party, 182 including income available to either party through investments 183 of any asset held by that party which was acquired during the 184 marriage or acquired outside the marriage and relied upon during 185 the marriage. 186 (i) The net income and standard of living available to each 187 party after the application of the alimony award. There is a 188 rebuttable presumption that both parties will have a lower 189 standard of living after the dissolution of marriage than the 190 standard of living they enjoyed during the marriage. This 191 presumption may be overcome by a preponderance of the evidence. 192 (j) Any other factor necessary to do equity and justice 193 between the parties, if that factor is specifically identified 194 in the award with findings of fact justifying the application of 195 the factor. 196 (4)(3)To the extent necessary to protect an award of 197 alimony, the court may order any party who is ordered to pay 198 alimony to purchase or maintain a decreasing term life insurance 199 policy or a bond, or to otherwise secure such alimony award with 200 any other assets thatwhichmay be suitable for that purpose, in 201 an amount adequate to secure the alimony award. Any such 202 security may be awarded only upon a showing of special 203 circumstances. If the court finds special circumstances and 204 awards such security, the court must make specific evidentiary 205 findings regarding the availability, cost, and financial impact 206 on the obligated party. Any security may be modifiable in the 207 event that the underlying alimony award is modified and shall be 208 reduced in an amount commensurate with any reduction in the 209 alimony award. 210(4) For purposes of determining alimony, there is a211rebuttable presumption that a short-term marriage is a marriage212having a duration of less than 7 years, a moderate-term marriage213is a marriage having a duration of greater than 7 years but less214than 17 years, and long-term marriage is a marriage having a215duration of 17 years or greater. The length of a marriage is the216period of time from the date of marriage until the date of217filing of an action for dissolution of marriage.218 (5) Bridge-the-gap alimony may be awarded to assist a party 219 by providing support to allow the party to make a transition 220 from being married to being single. Bridge-the-gap alimony is 221 designed to assist a party with legitimate identifiable short 222 term needs, and the length of an award may not exceed 2 years. 223 An award of bridge-the-gap alimony terminates upon the death of 224 either party or upon the remarriage of the party receiving 225 alimony. An award of bridge-the-gap alimony isshallnotbe226 modifiable in amount or duration. 227 (6)(a) Rehabilitative alimony may be awarded to assist a 228 party in establishing the capacity for self-support through 229 either: 230 1. The redevelopment of previous skills or credentials; or 231 2. The acquisition of education, training, or work 232 experience necessary to develop appropriate employment skills or 233 credentials. 234 (b) In order to award rehabilitative alimony, there must be 235 a specific and defined rehabilitative plan which shall be 236 included as a part of any order awarding rehabilitative alimony. 237 (c) An award of rehabilitative alimony may be modified or 238 terminated only during the rehabilitative period in accordance 239 with s. 61.14 based upon a substantial change in circumstances, 240 upon noncompliance with the rehabilitative plan, or upon 241 completion of the rehabilitative plan. 242 (7) Durational alimony may be awardedwhen permanent243periodic alimony is inappropriate. The purpose of durational244alimony isto provide a party with economic assistance for a set 245 period of time following a short-term, mid-term, or long-term 246 marriageof short or moderate duration or following a marriage247of long duration if there is no ongoing need for support on a248permanent basis. When awarding durational alimony, the court 249 must make written findings that an award of another form of 250 alimony or a combination of the other forms of alimony is not 251 appropriate. An award of durational alimony terminates upon the 252 death of either party or upon the remarriage of the party 253 receiving alimony. The amount of an award of durational alimony 254 shallmaybe modified or terminated based upon a substantial 255 change in circumstances or upon the existence of a supportive 256 relationship in accordance with s. 61.14.However,The length of 257 an award of durational alimony may notbe modified except under258exceptional circumstances and may notexceed 50 percent of the 259 length of the marriage, unless the party seeking alimony proves 260 by clear and convincing evidence the circumstances justifying 261 the need for a longer award of alimony, which circumstances must 262 be set out in writing by the courtthe length of the marriage. 263 (8)(a) There is a rebuttable presumption against awarding 264 alimony for a short-term marriage. A party seeking alimony may 265 overcome this presumption by demonstrating by clear and 266 convincing evidence a need for alimony. If the court finds that 267 the party has met its burden in demonstrating a need for alimony 268 and that the other party has the ability to pay alimony, the 269 court shall determine a monthly award of alimony that may not 270 exceed 20 percent of the obligor’s monthly net income. 271 (b) There is no presumption in favor of either party to an 272 award of alimony for a mid-term marriage. A party seeking such 273 alimony must prove by a preponderance of the evidence a need for 274 alimony. If the court finds that the party has met its burden in 275 demonstrating a need for alimony and that the other party has 276 the ability to pay alimony, the court shall determine a monthly 277 alimony obligation that may not exceed 30 percent of the 278 obligor’s monthly net income. 279 (c) There is a rebuttable presumption in favor of awarding 280 alimony for a long-term marriage. A party against whom alimony 281 is sought may overcome this presumption by demonstrating by 282 clear and convincing evidence that there is no need for alimony. 283 If the court finds that the party against whom alimony is sought 284 fails to meet its burden to demonstrate that there is no need 285 for alimony and that the party has the ability to pay alimony, 286 the court shall determine a monthly alimony obligation that may 287 not exceed 33 percent of the obligor’s monthly net income. 288 (9) The court may order alimony exceeding the monthly net 289 income limits established in subsection (8) if the court 290 determines, in accordance with the factors in subsection (3), 291 that there is a need for additional alimony, which determination 292 must be set out in writing.Permanent alimony may be awarded to293provide for the needs and necessities of life as they were294established during the marriage of the parties for a party who295lacks the financial ability to meet his or her needs and296necessities of life following a dissolution of marriage.297Permanent alimony may be awarded following a marriage of long298duration if such an award is appropriate upon consideration of299the factors set forth in subsection (2), following a marriage of300moderate duration if such an award is appropriate based upon301clear and convincing evidence after consideration of the factors302set forth in subsection (2), or following a marriage of short303duration if there are written findings of exceptional304circumstances. In awarding permanentalimony, the court shall305include a finding that no other form of alimony is fair and306reasonable under the circumstances of the parties. An award of307permanent alimony terminates upon the death of either party or308upon the remarriage of the party receiving alimony. An award may309be modified or terminated based upon a substantial change in310circumstances or upon the existence of a supportive relationship311in accordance with s.61.14.312 (10) A party against whom alimony is sought who has met the 313 requirements for retirement in accordance with s. 61.14(12) 314 before the filing of the petition for dissolution is not 315 required to pay alimony unless the party seeking alimony proves 316 by clear and convincing evidence the other party has the ability 317 to pay alimony, in addition to all other requirements of this 318 section. 319 (11)(9)Notwithstanding any other law, alimony may not be 320 awarded to a party who has a monthly net income that is equal to 321 or more than the other party. Except in the case of a long-term 322 marriage, in awarding alimony, the court shall impute income to 323 the obligor and obligee as follows: 324 (a) In the case of the obligor, social security retirement 325 benefits may not be imputed to the obligor, as demonstrated by a 326 social security retirement benefits entitlement letter. 327 (b) In the case of the obligee, if the obligee: 328 1. Is unemployed at the time the petition is filed and has 329 been unemployed for less than 1 year before the time of the 330 filing of the petition, the obligee’s monthly net income shall 331 be imputed at 90 percent of the obligee’s prior monthly net 332 income. 333 2. Is unemployed at the time the petition is filed and has 334 been unemployed for at least 1 year but less than 2 years before 335 the time of the filing of the petition, the obligee’s monthly 336 net income shall be imputed at 80 percent of the obligee’s prior 337 monthly net income. 338 3. Is unemployed at the time the petition is filed and has 339 been unemployed for at least 2 years but less than 3 years 340 before the time of the filing of the petition, the obligee’s 341 monthly net income shall be imputed at 70 percent of the 342 obligee’s prior monthly net income. 343 4. Is unemployed at the time the petition is filed and has 344 been unemployed for at least 3 years but less than 4 years 345 before the time of the filing of the petition, the obligee’s 346 monthly net income shall be imputed at 60 percent of the 347 obligee’s prior monthly net income. 348 5. Is unemployed at the time the petition is filed and has 349 been unemployed for at least 4 years but less than 5 years 350 before the time of the filing of the petition, the obligee’s 351 monthly net income shall be imputed at 50 percent of the 352 obligee’s prior monthly net income. 353 6. Is unemployed at the time the petition is filed and has 354 been unemployed for at least 5 years before the time of the 355 filing of the petition, the obligee’s monthly net income shall 356 be imputed at 40 percent of the obligee’s prior monthly net 357 income, or the monthly net income of a minimum wage earner at 358 the time of the filing of the petition, whichever is greater. 359 7. Proves by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she 360 does not have the ability to earn the imputed income through 361 reasonable means, the court shall reduce the imputation of 362 income specified in this paragraph.The award of alimony may not363leave the payor with significantly less net income than the net364income of the recipient unless there are written findings of365exceptional circumstances.366 (12)(a)(10)(a)With respect to any order requiring the 367 payment of alimony entered on or after January 1, 1985, unless 368the provisions ofparagraph (c) or paragraph (d) appliesapply, 369 the court shall direct in the order that the payments of alimony 370 be made through the appropriate depository as provided in s. 371 61.181. 372 (b) With respect to any order requiring the payment of 373 alimony entered before January 1, 1985, upon the subsequent 374 appearance, on or after that date, of one or both parties before 375 the court having jurisdiction for the purpose of modifying or 376 enforcing the order or in any other proceeding related to the 377 order, or upon the application of either party, unlessthe378provisions ofparagraph (c) or paragraph (d) appliesapply, the 379 court shall modify the terms of the order as necessary to direct 380 that payments of alimony be made through the appropriate 381 depository as provided in s. 61.181. 382 (c) If there is no minor child, alimony payments need not 383 be directed through the depository. 384 (d)1. If there is a minor child of the parties and both 385 parties so request, the court may order that alimony payments 386 need not be directed through the depository. In this case, the 387 order of support mustshallprovide, or be deemed to provide, 388 that either party may subsequently apply to the depository to 389 require that payments be made through the depository. The court 390 shall provide a copy of the order to the depository. 391 2. Ifthe provisions ofsubparagraph 1. appliesapply, 392 either party may subsequently file with the depository an 393 affidavit alleging default or arrearages in payment and stating 394 that the party wishes to initiate participation in the 395 depository program. The party shall provide copies of the 396 affidavit to the court and the other party or parties. Fifteen 397 days after receipt of the affidavit, the depository shall notify 398 all parties that future payments shall be directed to the 399 depository. 400 3. In IV-D cases, the IV-D agency hasshall havethe same 401 rights as the obligee in requesting that payments be made 402 through the depository. 403 Section 3. Section 61.09, Florida Statutes, is amended to 404 read: 405 61.09 Alimony and child support unconnected with 406 dissolution.—If a person having the ability to contribute to the 407 maintenance of his or her spouse and support of his or her minor 408 child fails to do so, the spouse who is not receiving support 409 may apply to the court for alimony and for support for the child 410 without seeking dissolution of marriage, and the court shall 411 enter an order as it deems just and proper. Alimony awarded 412 under this section shall be calculated in accordance with s. 413 61.08. 414 Section 4. Paragraph (c) of subsection (2) of section 415 61.13, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 416 61.13 Support of children; parenting and time-sharing; 417 powers of court.— 418 (2) 419 (c) The court shall determine all matters relating to 420 parenting and time-sharing of each minor child of the parties in 421 accordance with the best interests of the child and in 422 accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and 423 Enforcement Act, except that modification of a parenting plan 424 and time-sharing schedule requires a showing of a substantial, 425 material, and unanticipated change of circumstances. 426 1. It is the public policy of this state that each minor 427 child has frequent and continuing contact with both parents 428 after the parents separate or the marriage of the parties is 429 dissolved and to encourage parents to share the rights and 430 responsibilities, and joys, of childrearing. There is no 431 presumption for or against the father or mother of the child or 432 for or against any specific time-sharing schedule when creating 433 or modifying the parenting plan of the child. Equal time-sharing 434 with a minor child by both parents is presumed to be in the best 435 interests of the child unless the court finds that: 436 a. The safety, well-being, and physical, mental, and 437 emotional health of the child would be endangered by equal time 438 sharing, that visitation would be presumed detrimental 439 consistent with s. 39.0139(3), or that supervised visitation is 440 appropriate, if any is appropriate; 441 b. Clear and convincing evidence of extenuating 442 circumstances justify a departure from equal time-sharing and 443 the court makes written findings justifying the departure from 444 equal time-sharing; 445 c. A parent is incarcerated; 446 d. The distance between parental residences makes equal 447 time-sharing impracticable; 448 e. A parent does not request at least 50 percent time 449 sharing; 450 f. A parent has been convicted of a misdemeanor of the 451 first degree or higher involving domestic violence; or 452 g. A parent is subject to an injunction for protection 453 against domestic violence. 454 2. The court shall order that the parental responsibility 455 for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court 456 finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental 457 to the child. Evidence that a parent has been convicted of a 458 misdemeanor of the first degree or higher involving domestic 459 violence, as defined in s. 741.28 and chapter 775, or meets the 460 criteria of s. 39.806(1)(d), creates a rebuttable presumption of 461 detriment to the child. If the presumption is not rebutted after 462 the convicted parent is advised by the court that the 463 presumption exists, shared parental responsibility, including 464 time-sharing with the child, and decisions made regarding the 465 child, may not be granted to the convicted parent. However, the 466 convicted parent is not relieved of any obligation to provide 467 financial support. If the court determines that shared parental 468 responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order 469 sole parental responsibility and make such arrangements for 470 time-sharing as specified in the parenting plan as will best 471 protect the child or abused spouse from further harm. Whether or 472 not there is a conviction of any offense of domestic violence or 473 child abuse or the existence of an injunction for protection 474 against domestic violence, the court shall consider evidence of 475 domestic violence or child abuse as evidence of detriment to the 476 child. 477 a. In ordering shared parental responsibility, the court 478 may consider the expressed desires of the parents and may grant 479 to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects 480 of the child’s welfare or may divide those responsibilities 481 between the parties based on the best interests of the child. 482 Areas of responsibility may include education, health care, and 483 any other responsibilities that the court finds unique to a 484 particular family. 485 b. The court shall order sole parental responsibility for a 486 minor child to one parent, with or without time-sharing with the 487 other parent if it is in the best interests of the minor child. 488 3. Access to records and information pertaining to a minor 489 child, including, but not limited to, medical, dental, and 490 school records, may not be denied to either parent. Full rights 491 under this subparagraph apply to either parent unless a court 492 order specifically revokes these rights, including any 493 restrictions on these rights as provided in a domestic violence 494 injunction. A parent having rights under this subparagraph has 495 the same rights upon request as to form, substance, and manner 496 of access as are available to the other parent of a child, 497 including, without limitation, the right to in-person 498 communication with medical, dental, and education providers. 499 Section 5. The amendment by this act to s. 61.13, Florida 500 Statutes, which creates a presumption in favor of equal time 501 sharing applies prospectively to initial final custody orders 502 made on or after July 1, 2013. The amendments do not constitute 503 a substantial change in circumstances which warrant the 504 modification of a final custody order entered before July 1, 505 2013. 506 Section 6. Subsection (1) of section 61.14, Florida 507 Statutes, is amended, paragraph (c) is added to subsection (11) 508 of that section, and subsection (12) is added to that section, 509 to read: 510 61.14 Enforcement and modification of support, maintenance, 511 or alimony agreements or orders.— 512 (1)(a) When the parties enter into an agreement for 513 payments for, or instead of, support, maintenance, or alimony, 514 whether in connection with a proceeding for dissolution or 515 separate maintenance or with any voluntary property settlement, 516 or when a party is required by court order to make any payments, 517 and the circumstances or the financial ability of either party 518 changes or the child who is a beneficiary of an agreement or 519 court order as described herein reaches majority after the 520 execution of the agreement or the rendition of the order, either 521 party may apply to the circuit court of the circuit in which the 522 parties, or either of them, resided at the date of the execution 523 of the agreement or reside at the date of the application, or in 524 which the agreement was executed or in which the order was 525 rendered, for an order terminating, decreasing, or increasing 526 the amount of support, maintenance, or alimony, and the court 527 has jurisdiction to make orders as equity requires, with due 528 regard to the changed circumstances or the financial ability of 529 the parties or the child, decreasing, increasing, or confirming 530 the amount of separate support, maintenance, or alimony provided 531 for in the agreement or order. A finding that medical insurance 532 is reasonably available or the child support guidelines schedule 533 in s. 61.30 may constitute changed circumstances. Except as 534 otherwise provided in s. 61.30(11)(c), the court may modify an 535 order of support, maintenance, or alimony by terminating, 536 increasing, or decreasing the support, maintenance, or alimony 537 retroactively to the date of the filing of the action or 538 supplemental action for modification as equity requires, giving 539 due regard to the changed circumstances or the financial ability 540 of the parties or the child. 541 (b)1. An alimony order shall be modified upward upon a 542 showing by clear and convincing evidence of an increased ability 543 to pay alimony. Clear and convincing evidence must include, but 544 need not limited to, federal tax returns. An increase in an 545 obligor’s income may not be considered permanent in nature 546 unless the increase has been maintained without interruption for 547 at least 2 years, taking into account the obligor’s ability to 548 sustain his or her income. 549 2.1.Notwithstanding subparagraph 1., the court shallmay550 reduce or terminate an award of alimony upon specific written 551 findings by the court that since the granting of a divorce and 552 the award of alimony, a supportive relationship has existed 553 between the obligee and anotheraperson, except upon a showing 554 by clear and convincing evidence by the obligee that his or her 555 long-term need for alimony, taking into account the totality of 556 the circumstances, has not been reduced by the supportive 557 relationshipwith whom the obligee resides. On the issue of 558 whether alimony should be reduced or terminated under this 559 paragraph, the burden is on the obligor to prove by a 560 preponderance of the evidence that a supportive relationship 561 exists. 562 3.2.In determining whether an existing award of alimony 563 should be reduced or terminated because of an alleged supportive 564 relationship between an obligee and a person who is not related 565 by consanguinity or affinity and with whom the obligee resides, 566 the court shall elicit the nature and extent of the relationship 567 in question. The court shall give consideration, without 568 limitation, to circumstances, including, but not limited to, the 569 following, in determining the relationship of an obligee to 570 another person: 571 a. The extent to which the obligee and the other person 572 have held themselves out as a married couple by engaging in 573 conduct such as using the same last name, using a common mailing 574 address, referring to each other in terms such as “my husband” 575 or “my wife,” or otherwise conducting themselves in a manner 576 that evidences a permanent supportive relationship. 577 b. The period of time that the obligee has resided with the 578 other person in a permanent place of abode. 579 c. The extent to which the obligee and the other person 580 have pooled their assets or income or otherwise exhibited 581 financial interdependence. 582 d. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has 583 supported the other, in whole or in part. 584 e. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has 585 performed valuable services for the other. 586 f. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has 587 performed valuable services for the other’s company or employer. 588 g. Whether the obligee and the other person have worked 589 together to create or enhance anything of value. 590 h. Whether the obligee and the other person have jointly 591 contributed to the purchase of any real or personal property. 592 i. Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the 593 other person have an express agreement regarding property 594 sharing or support. 595 j. Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the 596 other person have an implied agreement regarding property 597 sharing or support. 598 k. Whether the obligee and the other person have provided 599 support to the children of one another, regardless of any legal 600 duty to do so. 601 4.3.This paragraph does not abrogate the requirement that 602 every marriage in this state be solemnized under a license, does 603 not recognize a common law marriage as valid, and does not 604 recognize a de facto marriage. This paragraph recognizes only 605 that relationships do exist that provide economic support 606 equivalent to a marriage and that alimony terminable on 607 remarriage may be reduced or terminated upon the establishment 608 of equivalent equitable circumstances as described in this 609 paragraph. The existence of a conjugal relationship, though it 610 may be relevant to the nature and extent of the relationship, is 611 not necessary for the application of the provisions of this 612 paragraph. 613 5. There is a rebuttable presumption that any modification 614 or termination of an alimony award is retroactive to the date of 615 the filing of the petition. In an action under this section, if 616 it is determined that the obligee unnecessarily or unreasonably 617 litigated the underlying petition for modification or 618 termination, the court may award the obligor his or her 619 reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to s. 61.16 and 620 applicable case law. 621 (c) For each support order reviewed by the department as 622 required by s. 409.2564(11), if the amount of the child support 623 award under the order differs by at least 10 percent but not 624 less than $25 from the amount that would be awarded under s. 625 61.30, the department shall seek to have the order modified and 626 any modification shall be made without a requirement for proof 627 or showing of a change in circumstances. 628 (d) The department mayshall have authority toadopt rules 629 to administerimplementthis section. 630 (11) 631 (c) If the court orders alimony payable concurrent with a 632 child support order, the alimony award may not be modified 633 solely because of a later reduction or termination of child 634 support payments, unless the alimony award as determined by the 635 court at the time of dissolution is insufficient to meet the 636 needs of the obligee. 637 (12)(a) The fact that an obligor has reached a reasonable 638 retirement age for his or her profession, has retired, and has 639 no intent to return to work, or has reached the normal 640 retirement age for social security benefits, is considered a 641 substantial change in circumstances as a matter of law. An 642 obligor who has reached the normal retirement age for social 643 security benefits shall be considered to have reached a 644 reasonable retirement age. With regard to an obligor who has 645 retired before the normal retirement age for social security 646 benefits, the court shall consider the following in determining 647 whether the obligor’s retirement age is reasonable: 648 1. Age. 649 2. Health. 650 3. Type of work. 651 4. Normal retirement age for that type of work. 652 (b) In anticipation of retirement, the obligor may file a 653 petition for termination or modification of the alimony award 654 effective upon the earlier of the retirement date or the date 655 the obligor reaches the normal retirement age for social 656 security benefits. The court shall terminate the award or reduce 657 the award based on the circumstances of the parties after 658 retirement and based on the factors in s. 61.08, unless the 659 obligee proves by clear and convincing evidence that the need 660 for alimony at the present level continues to exist and that the 661 obligor’s ability to pay has not been diminished. 662 Section 7. Section 61.19, Florida Statutes, is amended to 663 read: 664 61.19 Entry of judgment of dissolution of marriage;,delay 665 period; separate adjudication of issues.— 666 (1) ANofinal judgment of dissolution of marriage may not 667 be entered until at least 20 days have elapsed from the date of 668 filing the original petition for dissolution of marriage,;but 669 the court, on a showing that injustice would result from this 670 delay, may enter a final judgment of dissolution of marriage at 671 an earlier date. 672 (2)(a) During the first 180 days after the date of service 673 of the original petition for dissolution of marriage, the court 674 may not grant a final dissolution of marriage with a reservation 675 of jurisdiction to subsequently determine all other substantive 676 issues unless the court makes written findings that there are 677 exceptional circumstances that make the use of this process 678 clearly necessary to protect the parties or their children and 679 that granting a final dissolution will not cause irreparable 680 harm to either party or the children. Before granting a final 681 dissolution of marriage with a reservation of jurisdiction to 682 subsequently determine all other substantive issues, the court 683 shall enter temporary orders necessary to protect the parties 684 and their children, which orders remain effective until all 685 other issues can be adjudicated by the court. The desire of one 686 party to remarry does not justify the use of this process. 687 (b) If more than 180 days have elapsed after the date of 688 service of the original petition for dissolution of marriage, 689 the court may grant a final dissolution of marriage with a 690 reservation of jurisdiction to subsequently determine all other 691 substantive issues only if the court enters temporary orders 692 necessary to protect the parties and their children, which 693 orders remain effective until such time as all other issues can 694 be adjudicated by the court, and makes a written finding that no 695 irreparable harm will result from granting a final dissolution. 696 (c) If more than 365 days have elapsed after the date of 697 service of the original petition for dissolution of marriage, 698 absent a showing by either party that irreparable harm will 699 result from granting a final dissolution, the court shall, upon 700 request of either party, immediately grant a final dissolution 701 of marriage with a reservation of jurisdiction to subsequently 702 determine all other substantive issues. Before granting a final 703 dissolution of marriage with a reservation of jurisdiction to 704 subsequently determine all other substantive issues, the court 705 shall enter temporary orders necessary to protect the parties 706 and their children, which orders remain effective until all 707 other issues can be adjudicated by the court. 708 (d) The temporary orders necessary to protect the parties 709 and their children entered before granting a dissolution of 710 marriage without an adjudication of all substantive issues may 711 include, but are not limited to, temporary orders that: 712 1. Restrict the sale or disposition of property. 713 2. Protect and preserve the marital assets. 714 3. Establish temporary support. 715 4. Provide for maintenance of health insurance. 716 5. Provide for maintenance of life insurance. 717 (e) The court is not required to enter temporary orders to 718 protect the parties and their children if the court enters a 719 final judgment of dissolution of marriage which adjudicates 720 substantially all of the substantive issues between the parties 721 but reserves jurisdiction to address ancillary issues such as 722 the entry of a qualified domestic relations order or the 723 adjudication of attorney fees and costs. 724 Section 8. (1) The amendments to chapter 61, Florida 725 Statutes, made by this act apply to all initial awards of, and 726 agreements for, alimony entered before July 1, 2013, and to all 727 modifications of such awards or agreements made before July 1, 728 2013, with the exception of agreements that are expressly 729 nonmodifiable. Such amendments may serve as a basis to modify 730 awards entered before July 1, 2013, or as a basis to change the 731 amount or duration of an award existing before July 1, 2013. 732 Such amendments also serve as a basis to modify an agreement for 733 alimony, unless the agreement is expressly nonmodifiable, if the 734 agreement is 25 percent or more in duration or amount than an 735 alimony award calculated under the amendments made by this act. 736 (2) An obligor whose initial award or modification of such 737 award was made before July 1, 2013, may file a modification 738 action according to the following schedule: 739 (a) An obligor who was married to the alimony recipient 8 740 years or less may file a modification action on or after July 1, 741 2013. 742 (b) An obligor who was married to the alimony recipient 8 743 years or more, but less than 15 years, may file a modification 744 action on or after July 1, 2014. 745 (c) An obligor who has agreed to durational alimony of less 746 than 10 years may file a modification action on or after July 1, 747 2015. 748 (3) An obligor whose initial agreement or modification of 749 such agreement was made before July 1, 2013, may file a 750 modification action according to the following schedule: 751 (a) An obligor who has agreed to permanent alimony may file 752 a modification action on or after July 1, 2013. 753 (b) An obligor who has agreed to durational alimony of 10 754 years or more may file a modification action on or after July 1, 755 2014. 756 (c) An obligor who has agreed to durational alimony of more 757 than 5 years but less than 10 years may file a modification 758 action on or after July 1, 2015. 759 Section 9. This act shall take effect July 1, 2013.