Bill Text: FL H0441 | 2011 | Regular Session | Introduced

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Scrutinized Companies

Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 6-1-1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-05-03 - Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 444 (Ch. [H0441 Detail]

Download: Florida-2011-H0441-Introduced.html
HB 441

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act relating to scrutinized companies; creating s.
3287.135, F.S.; prohibiting a state agency or local
4governmental entity from contracting for goods and
5services of more than a certain amount with a company that
6is on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan
7List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the
8Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List; providing exceptions;
9providing for a civil action; providing penalties;
10providing a statute of repose; prohibiting a private right
11of action; requiring the Department of Management Services
12to notify the Attorney General after the act becomes law;
13providing that the act becomes inoperative if federal law
14ceases to authorize states to enact such contracting
15prohibitions; providing an effective date.
16
17Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
18
19     Section 1.  Section 287.135, Florida Statutes, is created
20to read:
21     287.135  Prohibition against contracting with scrutinized
22companies.-
23     (1)  DEFINITIONS.-In addition to the terms defined in ss.
24287.012 and 215.473, as used in this section, the term:
25     (a)  "Awarding body" means, for purposes of state
26contracts, an agency or the department, and for purposes of
27local contracts, the governing body of the local governmental
28entity.
29     (b)  "Local governmental entity" means a county,
30municipality, special district, or other political subdivision
31of the state.
32     (2)  A company that, at the time of bidding or submitting a
33proposal for a new contract or renewal of an existing contract,
34is on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or
35the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum
36Energy Sector List, created pursuant to s. 215.473, is
37ineligible for, and may not bid on, submit a proposal for, or
38enter into or renew, a contract with an agency or local
39governmental entity for goods or services of $1 million or more.
40     (3)  Notwithstanding subsection (2), an agency or local
41governmental entity, on a case-by-case basis, may permit a
42company on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan
43List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran
44Petroleum Energy Sector List to be eligible for, bid on, submit
45a proposal for, or enter into or renew a contract for goods or
46services of $1 million or more under either of the following
47conditions:
48     (a)  All of the following occur:
49     1.  The scrutinized business operations were made before
50July 1, 2010.
51     2.  The scrutinized business operations have not been
52expanded or renewed after July 1, 2010.
53     3.  The agency or local governmental entity determines that
54it is in the best interest of the state or local community to
55contract with the company.
56     4.  The company has adopted, has publicized, and is
57implementing a formal plan to cease scrutinized business
58operations and to refrain from engaging in any new scrutinized
59business operations.
60     (b)  One of the following occurs:
61     1.  The local governmental entity makes a public finding
62that, absent such an exemption, the local governmental entity
63would be unable to obtain the goods or services for which the
64contract is offered.
65     2.  For a contract with an executive agency, the Governor
66makes a public finding that, absent such an exemption, the
67agency would be unable to obtain the goods or services for which
68the contract is offered.
69     3.  For a contract with an office of a state constitutional
70officer other than the Governor, the state constitutional
71officer makes a public finding that, absent such an exemption,
72the office would be unable to obtain the goods or services for
73which the contract is offered.
74     (4)  An agency or a local governmental entity shall require
75a company that submits a bid or proposal for, or that otherwise
76proposes to enter into or renew, a contract with the agency or
77governmental entity for goods or services of $1 million or more
78to certify, at the time the bid or proposal is submitted or
79before the contract is executed or renewed, that the company is
80not a scrutinized business operation under s. 215.473.
81     (a)  If, after the agency or the local governmental entity
82determines, using credible information available to the public,
83that the company has submitted a false certification and has
84provided the company with written notice and 90 days to respond
85in writing to such determination, the company fails to
86demonstrate that it has ceased its engagement in scrutinized
87business operations, the following applies:
88     1.  The awarding body shall report the company to the
89Attorney General, together with information demonstrating the
90false certification, and the Attorney General shall determine
91whether to bring a civil action against the company. The
92awarding body of a local governmental entity may also report the
93company to the municipal attorney, county attorney, or district
94attorney, together with information demonstrating the false
95certification, and the municipal attorney, county attorney, or
96district attorney may determine whether to bring a civil action
97against the company. If a civil action is brought and the court
98determines that the company submitted a false certification, the
99company shall pay the penalty described in subparagraph 2. and
100all reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including any costs
101for investigations that led to the finding of false
102certification. Only one civil action for false certification per
103contract may be brought against a company.
104     2.  Pursuant to subparagraph 1., a civil penalty equal to
105the greater of $250,000 or twice the amount of the contract for
106which the false certification was submitted shall be imposed.
107     3.  An existing contract with the company shall be
108terminated at the option of the awarding body.
109     4.  The company is ineligible to bid on any contract with
110an agency or a local governmental entity for 3 years after the
111date of determining that the company submitted a false
112certification.
113     (b)  A civil action to collect the penalties described in
114paragraph (a) must commence within 3 years after the date the
115false certification is made.
116     (5)  Only the awarding body may cause a civil action to be
117brought under this section. This section does not create or
118authorize a private right of action or enforcement of the
119penalties provided in this section. An unsuccessful bidder, or
120any other person other than the awarding body, may not protest
121the award of a contract or contract renewal on the basis of a
122false certification.
123     (6)  This section preempts any ordinance or rule of any
124local governmental entity involving public contracts for goods
125or services of $1 million or more with a company engaged in
126scrutinized business operations.
127     (7)  The department shall submit to the Attorney General of
128the United States a written notice describing this section
129within 30 days after July 1, 2011. This section becomes
130inoperative on the date that federal law ceases to authorize the
131states to adopt and enforce the contracting prohibitions of the
132type provided for in this section.
133     Section 2.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2011.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
feedback