Bill Text: CA AB253 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session | Amended


Bill Title: Remote court reporting.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Engrossed) 2019-08-12 - In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file. [AB253 Detail]

Download: California-2019-AB253-Amended.html

Amended  IN  Senate  June 21, 2019
Amended  IN  Senate  June 13, 2019

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2019–2020 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill No. 253


Introduced by Assembly Member Mark Stone

January 23, 2019


An act to add and repeal Section 69959 of the Government Code, relating to courts.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 253, as amended, Mark Stone. Remote court reporting.
Existing law authorizes a superior court to appoint official court reporters and specifies the fees for court reporting services.
This bill would authorize, only until January 1, 2022, the Santa Clara Superior Court to conduct a pilot project to study the potential use of remote court reporting, as defined, to make the verbatim record of certain court proceedings. The bill would require, if the court elects to conduct the pilot project, the remote court reporting to be performed only by official reporters of the Santa Clara Superior Court who have at least 5 years of courtroom experience and only in certain types of cases, including child support and misdemeanor cases. The bill would require the presiding judge of the Santa Clara Superior Court to appoint a committee to prepare a report to the Legislature on the results of the pilot project and would require the committee’s report to be presented to the Legislature within 6 months of the conclusion of the pilot project. The bill would require the pilot project to terminate no later than December 31, 2020.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 69959 is added to the Government Code, to read:

69959.
 (a) For purposes of this section, “remote court reporting” means the use of a phonographic reporter who is not present in the courtroom to take down a verbatim record of court proceedings that are transmitted by audio or audiovisual means to the reporter.
(b) The Santa Clara Superior Court is authorized to conduct a pilot project to study the potential use of remote court reporting to make the verbatim record of certain court proceedings. If the court elects to conduct this pilot project, the pilot project shall comply with all of the following requirements:
(1) The remote court reporting shall be performed only by official reporters of the Santa Clara Superior Court who have at least five years of courtroom experience.
(2) The official reporters shall be physically located in Santa Clara Superior Court facilities while performing the remote court reporting. After 180 days of meaningful remote court reporting testing, the Santa Clara Superior Court and the exclusive representative of the official reporters of the Santa Clara Superior Court may, by mutual agreement, agree to include an additional off-site offsite location to test remote court reporting.
(3) A maximum of two courtrooms may be equipped to participate in the pilot project.
(4) Remote court reporting may be used only to report proceedings in limited civil cases and child support, misdemeanor, and infraction cases.
(5) Transcripts created through remote court reporting as part of the pilot project may be used whenever a transcript of court proceedings is required. The fees of the official reporter and costs of transcript preparation for remote court reporting shall be the same as when an official reporter is present in the courtroom.
(6) The presiding judge of the Santa Clara Superior Court shall appoint a committee to prepare a report to the Legislature on the results of the pilot project. The committee shall include at least two judicial officers who participated in the pilot project, at least two official reporters chosen by the exclusive bargaining representative of the official reporters of the Santa Clara Superior Court, and at least two attorneys who regularly practice in the Santa Clara Superior Court. The committee’s report shall be presented to the Legislature, in accordance with Section 9795, within six months of the conclusion of the pilot project.
(7) The pilot project shall terminate by no later than December 31, 2020. The Santa Clara Superior Court shall terminate the pilot project earlier if the court determines that the use of remote court reporting is prejudicing the rights of litigants or the interests of justice.
(c) Except as authorized by this section, remote court reporting shall not be used by courts to make the record of any court proceedings, and courts shall not expend any funds to purchase equipment or software to facilitate the use of remote court reporting.
(d) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2022, and as of that date is repealed.

feedback