Bill Text: CA AB194 | 2013-2014 | Regular Session | Amended

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft

---

Bill Title: Open meetings: public criticism and comment.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Vetoed) 2014-09-27 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB194 Detail]

Download: California-2013-AB194-Amended.html

---

BILL NUMBER: AB 194	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  JANUARY 6, 2014

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Campos

                        JANUARY 28, 2013

   An act to amend Section 54960.1  of, and to add Section
54959.5, to,   of  the Government Code, relating to
local government.



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 194, as amended, Campos. Open meetings:  protections
for public criticism: penalties   actions  for
violations. 
   (1) The 
    The  Ralph M. Brown Act requires, with specified
exceptions, that all meetings of a legislative body of a local
agency, as those terms are defined, be open and public and that all
persons be permitted to attend and participate. The act 
prohibits a legislative body of a local agency from preventing public
criticism of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the
agency, or of the acts or omissions of the legislative body, as
specified.   requires every agenda for a regular meeting
or notice for a special meeting to provide an opportunity for
members of the public to address the legislative body on items being
considered by the legislative body, as specified. The act authorizes
a district attorney or any interested party to seek a judicial
determination that an action taken by a legislative body is null and
void if the legislative body violated certain provisions of the act.

   This bill would  make it a misdemeanor for a member of a
legislative body, while acting as the chairperson of a legislative
body of a local agency, to prohibit public criticism protected under
the act. This bill would authorize a district attorney or any
interested person to commence an action for the purpose of obtaining
a judicial determination that an action taken by a legislative body
of a local agency in violation of the protection for public criticism
is null and void, as specified.   expand the
authorization for a district attorney or interested party to seek a
judicial determination that an action taken by a legislative body is
null and void if the legislative body violated the requirement that
every agenda for a regular meeting or notice for a special meeting
provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the
legislative body on items being considered, as specified. 

   Because this bill would establish a new misdemeanor crime, the
bill would impose a state-mandated local program.  
   (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.  
   This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason. 
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee:  yes
  no  . State-mandated local program:  yes
  no  .


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
   
  SECTION 1.    Section 54959.5 is added to the
Government Code, to read:
   54959.5.  A member of a legislative body who, while acting as the
chairperson of that legislative body, prohibits public criticism of
the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the agency, or of
the acts or omissions of the legislative body, as protected under
subdivision (c) of Section 54954.3, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

   SEC. 2.   SECTION 1.   Section 54960.1
of the Government Code is amended to read:
   54960.1.  (a) The district attorney or any interested person may
commence an action by mandamus or injunction for the purpose of
obtaining a judicial determination that an action taken by a
legislative body of a local agency in violation of Section 54953,
54954.2, 54954.3, 54954.5, 54954.6, 54956, or 54956.5 is null and
void under this section. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed
to prevent a legislative body from curing or correcting an action
challenged pursuant to this section.
   (b) Prior to any action being commenced pursuant to subdivision
(a), the district attorney or interested person shall make a demand
of the legislative body to cure or correct the action alleged to have
been taken in violation of Section 54953, 54954.2, 54954.3, 54954.5,
54954.6, 54956, or 54956.5. The demand shall be in writing and
clearly describe the challenged action of the legislative body and
nature of the alleged violation.
   (c) (1) The written demand shall be made within 90 days from the
date the action was taken unless the action was taken in an open
session but in violation of Section 54954.2, in which case the
written demand shall be made within 30 days from the date the action
was taken.
   (2) Within 30 days of receipt of the demand, the legislative body
shall cure or correct the challenged action and inform the demanding
party in writing of its actions to cure or correct or inform the
demanding party in writing of its decision not to cure or correct the
challenged action.
   (3) If the legislative body takes no action within the 30-day
period, the inaction shall be deemed a decision not to cure or
correct the challenged action, and the 15-day period to commence the
action described in subdivision (a) shall commence to run the day
after the 30-day period to cure or correct expires.
   (4) Within 15 days of receipt of the written notice of the
legislative body's decision to cure or correct, or not to cure or
correct, or within 15 days of the expiration of the 30-day period to
cure or correct, whichever is earlier, the demanding party shall be
required to commence the action pursuant to subdivision (a) or
thereafter be barred from commencing the action.
   (d) An action taken that is alleged to have been taken in
violation of Section 54953, 54954.2, 54954.3, 54954.5, 54954.6,
54956, or 54956.5 shall not be determined to be null and void if any
of the following conditions exist:
   (1) The action taken was in substantial compliance with Sections
54953, 54954.2, 54954.3, 54954.5, 54954.6, 54956, and 54956.5.
   (2) The action taken was in connection with the sale or issuance
of notes, bonds, or other evidences of indebtedness or any contract,
instrument, or agreement thereto.
   (3) The action taken gave rise to a contractual obligation,
including a contract let by competitive bid other than compensation
for services in the form of salary or fees for professional services,
upon which a party has, in good faith and without notice of a
challenge to the validity of the action, detrimentally relied.
   (4) The action taken was in connection with the collection of any
tax.
   (5) Any person, city, city and county, county, district, or any
agency or subdivision of the state alleging noncompliance with
subdivision (a) of Section 54954.2, Section 54956, or Section
54956.5, because of any defect, error, irregularity, or omission in
the notice given pursuant to those provisions, had actual notice of
the item of business at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at which
the action was taken, if the meeting was noticed pursuant to Section
54954.2, or 24 hours prior to the meeting at which the action was
taken if the meeting was noticed pursuant to Section 54956, or prior
to the meeting at which the action was taken if the meeting is held
pursuant to Section 54956.5.
   (e) During any action seeking a judicial determination pursuant to
subdivision (a) if the court determines, pursuant to a showing by
the legislative body that an action alleged to have been taken in
violation of Section 54953, 54954.2, 54954.3, 54954.5, 54954.6,
54956, or 54956.5 has been cured or corrected by a subsequent action
of the legislative body, the action filed pursuant to subdivision (a)
shall be dismissed with prejudice.
   (f) The fact that a legislative body takes a subsequent action to
cure or correct an action taken pursuant to this section shall not be
construed or admissible as evidence of a violation of this chapter.

  SEC. 3.    No reimbursement is required by this
act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local
agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a
new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or
changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of
Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a
crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the
California Constitution.