Bill Text: CA AB1112 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Micromobility devices: relocation.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2020-07-22 - From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on TRANS. [AB1112 Detail]
Download: California-2019-AB1112-Amended.html
Amended
IN
Senate
June 19, 2019 |
Amended
IN
Senate
June 03, 2019 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
May 07, 2019 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 08, 2019 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 28, 2019 |
Assembly Bill | No. 1112 |
Introduced by Assembly Member Friedman |
February 21, 2019 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Division 16.8 (commencing with Section 39050) is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:DIVISION 16.8. Local Regulation of Motorized Scooters
39050.
The Legislature finds and declares that a basic level of statewide standards for local regulation of shared mobility devices encourages innovation and ensures basic expectations for consumers. Except as expressly stated, it is not the intent of the Legislature that this division limit regulations a local authority may otherwise implement beyond the minimum standards outlined in this division.39051.
For the purposes of this division, the following definitions apply, unless the context requires otherwise:(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
39052.
All shared mobility devices operated in the state shall include a single unique alphanumeric ID assigned by the provider that is visible from a distance of39056.
A local authority may require a shared mobility device provider, including as a condition for operating a shared mobility device program, to provide to the local authority trip data for all trips in which any part occurs within the jurisdiction of the local authority on any shared mobility(a)In regulating shared mobility devices and providers, a local authority shall not impose any unduly restrictive requirements that have the effect of prohibiting the operation of all shared mobility providers in its jurisdiction. A local authority may require a shared mobility provider, as a condition for operating a shared mobility device fleet, to deploy shared devices in accordance with the following requirements, including, but not limited to:
(1)Fleet caps that reasonably limit the number of shared mobility devices permitted to operate within its jurisdiction.
(2)Reasonable insurance and indemnification requirements.
(3)Required or incentivized deployment in specific regions of the local authority’s jurisdiction, based on factors including, but not limited to, economic indicators, in order to ensure equitable access to shared mobility devices, provided that the local authority correspondingly reduces or eliminates associated fees and costs.
(4)Limits on maximum device speed, provided that these limits on roads and bicycle lanes are not below applicable statewide speed limits.
(b)The local authority may impose fees based on the reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the local authority as a result of administering shared mobility device programs within its jurisdiction.
In regulating shared mobility devices and providers, a local authority shall not subject the users of shared mobility devices to requirements more restrictive than those applicable to users of personally owned similar transportation devices,
including, but not limited to, personally owned electric bicycles and electric scooters.