Bill Text: WV SB363 | 2018 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Removing requirement of finding of professional negligence concerning involuntary hospitalizations
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2018-01-24 - To Judiciary [SB363 Detail]
Download: West_Virginia-2018-SB363-Introduced.html
WEST virginia legislature
2018 regular session
Introduced
Senate Bill 363
By Senator Trump
[Introduced January
24, 2018; Referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary]
A BILL to amend and reenact §27-5-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to making a technical correction by removing a requirement of a finding of professional negligence as it concerns involuntary hospitalizations.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 5. INVOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATION.
§27-5-2. Institution of proceedings for involuntary custody for examination; custody; probable cause hearing; examination of individual.
(a) Any adult person may make an application for involuntary hospitalization for examination of an individual when the person making the application has reason to believe that the individual to be examined is addicted, as defined in §27-1-11 of this code, or is mentally ill and, because of his or her addiction or mental illness, the individual is likely to cause serious harm to himself, herself or to others if allowed to remain at liberty while awaiting an examination and certification by a physician or psychologist.
Notwithstanding any language in this subsection to the contrary, if the individual to be examined under the provisions of this section is incarcerated in a jail, prison or other correctional facility, then only the chief administrative officer of the facility holding the individual may file the application and the application must include the additional statement that the correctional facility itself cannot reasonably provide treatment and other services for the individual's mental illness or addiction.
(b) The person making the application shall make the application under oath.
(c) Application for involuntary custody for examination may be made to the circuit court or a Mental Hygiene Commissioner of the county in which the individual resides or of the county in which he or she may be found. When no circuit court judge or Mental Hygiene Commissioner is available for immediate presentation of the application, the application may be made to a magistrate designated by the chief judge of the judicial circuit to accept applications and hold probable cause hearings. A designated magistrate before whom an application or matter is pending may, upon the availability of a Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge for immediate presentation of an application or pending matter, transfer the pending matter or application to the Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge for further proceedings unless otherwise ordered by the chief judge of the judicial circuit.
(d) The person making the application shall give information and state facts in the application as may be required by the form provided for this purpose by the Supreme Court of Appeals.
(e) The circuit court, Mental
Hygiene Commissioner or designated magistrate may enter an order for the
individual named in the application to be detained and taken into custody for
the purpose of holding a probable cause hearing as provided in subsection (g)
of this section for the purpose of an examination of the individual by a
physician, psychologist, a licensed independent clinical social worker
practicing in compliance with §30-30-1 et seq. of this code, an advanced
nurse practitioner with psychiatric certification practicing in compliance with
§30-7-1 et seq. of this code a physician assistant practicing in
compliance with §30-3-1 et seq. of this code or a physician assistant
practicing in compliance with §30-14A-1 et seq. of this code:
Provided, That a licensed independent clinical social worker, a physician
assistant or an advanced nurse practitioner with psychiatric certification may
only perform the examination if he or she has previously been authorized by an
order of the circuit court to do so, the order having found that the licensed
independent clinical social worker, physician assistant or advanced nurse
practitioner with psychiatric certification has particularized expertise in the
areas of mental health and mental hygiene or addiction sufficient to make the
determinations as are required by the provisions of this section. The
examination is to be provided or arranged by a community mental health center
designated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources to
serve the county in which the action takes place. The order is to specify that
the hearing be held forthwith and is to provide for the appointment of counsel
for the individual: Provided, however, That the order may allow the
hearing to be held up to 24 hours after the person to be examined is taken into
custody rather than forthwith if the circuit court of the county in which the
person is found has previously entered a standing order which establishes
within that jurisdiction a program for placement of persons awaiting a hearing
which assures the safety and humane treatment of persons: Provided further,
That the time requirements set forth in this subsection only apply to persons
who are not in need of medical care for a physical condition or disease for
which the need for treatment precludes the ability to comply with the time
requirements. During periods of holding and detention authorized by this
subsection, upon consent of the individual or in the event of a medical or
psychiatric emergency, the individual may receive treatment. The medical
provider shall exercise due diligence in determining the individual's existing
medical needs and provide treatment the individual requires, including
previously prescribed medications. As used in this section, "psychiatric
emergency" means an incident during which an individual loses control and
behaves in a manner that poses substantial likelihood of physical harm to
himself, herself or others. Where a physician, psychologist, licensed
independent clinical social worker, physician assistant or advanced nurse
practitioner with psychiatric certification has within the preceding 72 hours
performed the examination required by the provisions of this subdivision, the
community mental health center may waive the duty to perform or arrange another
examination upon approving the previously performed examination.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, §27-5-4(r) of this code applies
regarding payment by the county commission for examinations at hearings. If the
examination reveals that the individual is not mentally ill or addicted or is
determined to be mentally ill or addicted but not likely to cause harm to
himself, herself or others, the individual shall be immediately released
without the need for a probable cause hearing and absent a finding of
professional negligence the examiner is not civilly liable for the
rendering of the opinion absent a finding of professional negligence. The
examiner shall immediately provide the Mental Hygiene Commissioner, circuit
court or designated magistrate before whom the matter is pending the results of
the examination on the form provided for this purpose by the Supreme Court of
Appeals for entry of an order reflecting the lack of probable cause.
(f) A probable cause hearing is to be held before a magistrate designated by the chief judge of the judicial circuit, the Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit judge of the county of which the individual is a resident or where he or she was found. If requested by the individual or his or her counsel, the hearing may be postponed for a period not to exceed 48 hours.
The individual must be present at the hearing and has the right to present evidence, confront all witnesses and other evidence against him or her and to examine testimony offered, including testimony by representatives of the community mental health center serving the area. Expert testimony at the hearing may be taken telephonically or via videoconferencing. The individual has the right to remain silent and to be proceeded against in accordance with the Rules of Evidence of the Supreme Court of Appeals, except as provided in §27-1-12 of this code. At the conclusion of the hearing, the magistrate, Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge shall find and enter an order stating whether or not there is probable cause to believe that the individual, as a result of mental illness or addiction, is likely to cause serious harm to himself or herself or to others.
(g) Probable cause hearings may occur in the county where a person is hospitalized. The judicial hearing officer may: Use videoconferencing and telephonic technology; permit persons hospitalized for addiction to be involuntarily hospitalized only until detoxification is accomplished; and specify other alternative or modified procedures that are consistent with the purposes and provisions of this article. The alternative or modified procedures shall fully and effectively guarantee to the person who is the subject of the involuntary commitment proceeding and other interested parties due process of the law and access to the least restrictive available treatment needed to prevent serious harm to self or others.
(h) If the magistrate, Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge at a probable cause hearing or at a final commitment hearing held pursuant to the provisions of §27-5-4 of this code finds that the individual, as a result of mental illness or addiction, is likely to cause serious harm to himself, herself or others and because of mental illness or addiction requires treatment, the magistrate, Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge may consider evidence on the question of whether the individual's circumstances make him or her amenable to outpatient treatment in a nonresidential or nonhospital setting pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement. The agreement is to be in writing and approved by the individual, his or her counsel and the magistrate, mental hygiene commissioner or circuit court judge. If the magistrate, Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge determines that appropriate outpatient treatment is available in a nonresidential or nonhospital setting, the individual may be released to outpatient treatment upon the terms and conditions of the voluntary treatment agreement. The failure of an individual released to outpatient treatment pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement to comply with the terms of the voluntary treatment agreement constitutes evidence that outpatient treatment is insufficient and, after a hearing before a magistrate, Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit judge on the issue of whether or not the individual failed or refused to comply with the terms and conditions of the voluntary treatment agreement and whether the individual as a result of mental illness or addiction remains likely to cause serious harm to himself, herself or others, the entry of an order requiring admission under involuntary hospitalization pursuant to the provisions of §27-5-3 of this code may be entered. In the event a person released pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement is unable to pay for the outpatient treatment and has no applicable insurance coverage, including, but not limited to, private insurance or Medicaid, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources may transfer funds for the purpose of reimbursing community providers for services provided on an outpatient basis for individuals for whom payment for treatment is the responsibility of the department: Provided, That the department may not authorize payment of outpatient services for an individual subject to a voluntary treatment agreement in an amount in excess of the cost of involuntary hospitalization of the individual. The secretary shall establish and maintain fee schedules for outpatient treatment provided in lieu of involuntary hospitalization. Nothing in the provisions of this article regarding release pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement or convalescent status may be construed as creating a right to receive outpatient mental health services or treatment or as obligating any person or agency to provide outpatient services or treatment. Time limitations set forth in this article relating to periods of involuntary commitment to a mental health facility for hospitalization do not apply to release pursuant to the terms of a voluntary treatment agreement: Provided, however, That release pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement may not be for a period of more than six months if the individual has not been found to be involuntarily committed during the previous two years and for a period of no more than two years if the individual has been involuntarily committed during the preceding two years. If in any proceeding held pursuant to this article the individual objects to the issuance or conditions and terms of an order adopting a voluntary treatment agreement, then the circuit judge, magistrate or Mental Hygiene Commissioner may not enter an order directing treatment pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement. If involuntary commitment with release pursuant to a voluntary treatment agreement is ordered, the individual subject to the order may, upon request during the period the order is in effect, have a hearing before a Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit judge where the individual may seek to have the order canceled or modified. Nothing in this section affects the appellate and habeas corpus rights of any individual subject to any commitment order.
(i) If the certifying physician or psychologist determines that a person requires involuntary hospitalization for an addiction to a substance which, due to the degree of addiction, creates a reasonable likelihood that withdrawal or detoxification from the substance of addiction will cause significant medical complications, the person certifying the individual shall recommend that the individual be closely monitored for possible medical complications. If the magistrate, Mental Hygiene Commissioner or circuit court judge presiding orders involuntary hospitalization, he or she shall include a recommendation that the individual be closely monitored in the order of commitment.
(j) The Supreme Court of Appeals and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources shall specifically develop and propose a statewide system for evaluation and adjudication of mental hygiene petitions which shall include payment schedules and recommendations regarding funding sources. Additionally, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources shall also immediately seek reciprocal agreements with officials in contiguous states to develop interstate/intergovernmental agreements to provide efficient and efficacious services to out-of-state residents found in West Virginia and who are in need of mental hygiene services.
NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to make a technical correction by removing a requirement of a finding of professional negligence as it concerns involuntary hospitalizations.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.