US HR99 | 2017-2018 | 115th Congress

Status

Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 1)
Status: Introduced on February 7 2017 - 25% progression, died in chamber
Action: 2017-02-14 - Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Text: Latest bill text (Engrossed) [PDF]

Summary

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.B. 428) to survey the gradient boundary along the Red River in the States of Oklahoma and Texas, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants. Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.B. 428) to survey the gradient boundary along the Red River in the States of Oklahoma and Texas, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants.

Tracking Information

Register now for our free OneVote public service or GAITS Pro trial account and you can begin tracking this and other legislation, all driven by the real-time data of the LegiScan API. Providing tools allowing you to research pending legislation, stay informed with email alerts, content feeds, and share dynamic reports. Use our new PolitiCorps to join with friends and collegaues to monitor & discuss bills through the process.

Monitor Legislation or view this same bill number from multiple sessions or take advantage of our national legislative search.

Title

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.B. 428) to survey the gradient boundary along the Red River in the States of Oklahoma and Texas, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants.

Sponsors

Rep. Tom Cole [R-OK]

Roll Calls

2017-02-14 - House - On ordering the previous question RC# 88 (Y: 225 N: 189 NV: 17 Abs: 0) [PASS]
2017-02-14 - House - On agreeing to the resolution RC# 89 (Y: 225 N: 187 NV: 19 Abs: 0) [PASS]
Senate - On the Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 42 (Y: 51 N: 48 NV: 1 Abs: 0) [PASS]

History

DateChamberAction
2017-02-14HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2017-02-14HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 225 - 187 (Roll no. 89). (text: CR H1145)
2017-02-14HouseOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - 189 (Roll no. 88). (consideration: CR H1151-1152)
2017-02-14HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1151-1152)
2017-02-14HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 99, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Hastings demanded the yeas and nays, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day.
2017-02-14HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 99.
2017-02-14HouseConsidered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1145-1151)
2017-02-07HousePlaced on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 10.
2017-02-07HouseRule provides for one hour of debate on each bill, the previous question shall be ordered on each bill without intervening motions except one motion to recommit. Both bills are closed to amendments.
2017-02-07HouseThe House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 115-10, by Mr. Cole.

Same As/Similar To

HB428 (Related) 2017-03-07 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
HJR42 (Related) 2017-03-31 - Became Public Law No: 115-17. (TXT | PDF)

Subjects


US Congress State Sources


feedback