US Congress House Resolution 1017 (Prior Session Legislation)

---

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: Introduced on January 19 2010 - 25% progression, died in chamber
Action: 2010-01-20 - Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Text: Latest bill text (Engrossed) [PDF]

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.B. 3254) to approve the Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement Agreement, and for other purposes; for consideration of the bill (H.B. 3342) to authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, to develop water infrastructure in the Rio Grande Basin, and to approve the settlement of the water rights claims of the Pueblos of Nambe, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque; and for consideration of the bill (H.B. 1065) to resolve water rights claims of the White Mountain Apache Tribe in the State of Arizona.

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.B. 3254) to approve the Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement Agreement, and for other purposes; for consideration of the bill (H.B. 3342) to authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, to develop water infrastructure in the Rio Grande Basin, and to approve the settlement of the water rights claims of the Pueblos of Nambe, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque; and for consideration of the bill (H.B. 1065) to resolve water rights claims of the White Mountain Apache Tribe in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes.

Rep. James McGovern [D-MA]

Date	Chamber	Action
2010-01-20		Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2010-01-20		On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H206-207)
2010-01-20		On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 239 - 175 (Roll no. 9). (consideration: CR H210, H229-230)
2010-01-20		Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H229-230)
2010-01-20		POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 1017, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day.
2010-01-20		DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1017.
2010-01-20		Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H206-211)
2010-01-19		Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 149.
2010-01-19		Each bill is allowed 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered, in each instance, without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measures will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order, in each instance. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources, in each instance,
2010-01-19		The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-399, by Mr. McGovern.

HB1065 (Related) 2010-03-26 - Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 340.
HB3254 (Related) 2010-02-01 - Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 266.
HB3342 (Related) 2010-02-01 - Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 265.

Type	Source
Summary	https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-resolution/1017/all-info
Text	https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/hres1017/BILLS-111hres1017eh.pdf
Text	https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/hres1017/BILLS-111hres1017rh.pdf