Bill Text: TX HB84 | 2023 | 88th Legislature 3rd Special Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to informed consent before provision of certain medical treatments and exemptions from COVID-19 vaccination requirements.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 7-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2023-10-06 - Filed [HB84 Detail]
Download: Texas-2023-HB84-Introduced.html
By: Cain | H.B. No. 84 |
|
||
|
||
relating to informed consent before provision of certain medical | ||
treatments and exemptions from COVID-19 vaccination requirements. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that: | ||
(1) this state is responsible for ensuring that | ||
individuals lawfully residing in this state have the right to | ||
provide or withhold consent for any medical treatment; | ||
(2) the decision in Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 | ||
(D.C. Cir. 1972), establishing the concept of informed consent, has | ||
become a bedrock principle of the laws of this country and of each | ||
state; | ||
(3) the American Medical Association's Code of Medical | ||
Ethics Opinion 2.1.1 recognizes the right of an individual to be | ||
fully informed of a recommended medical treatment to allow the | ||
individual to make an informed decision regarding the individual's | ||
course of treatment, including whether to obtain or decline a | ||
particular medical treatment; | ||
(4) under 42 C.F.R. Section 482.13, a hospital is | ||
required as a condition of participation in Medicare to have in | ||
place a process for obtaining the informed consent of a patient | ||
before providing treatment to the patient and to ensure "[ |
||
patient or his or her representative (as allowed under State law) | ||
has the right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care"; | ||
(5) the United States Supreme Court upheld mandatory | ||
vaccination policies imposed by state and local governments to | ||
combat smallpox in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), | ||
and acknowledged in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. | ||
74, 81 (1980), that a state may provide "individual liberties more | ||
expansive than those conferred by the Federal Constitution"; | ||
(6) persons inside and outside this state have sought | ||
or are seeking to compel or coerce individuals lawfully residing in | ||
this state into obtaining a COVID-19 vaccine contrary to the | ||
individuals' preferences; | ||
(7) any attempt to compel or coerce an individual | ||
lawfully residing in this state into obtaining a COVID-19 vaccine | ||
contrary to the individual's preference is inconsistent with the | ||
principles of informed consent; and | ||
(8) Section 161.0086, Health and Safety Code, as added | ||
by this Act, prohibits any person from compelling or coercing an | ||
individual lawfully residing in this state into obtaining medical | ||
treatments involving the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
SECTION 2. Subchapter A, Chapter 161, Health and Safety | ||
Code, is amended by adding Section 161.0086 to read as follows: | ||
Sec. 161.0086. INFORMED CONSENT AND MEDICAL TREATMENT | ||
EXEMPTIONS FOR COVID-19 VACCINATION. (a) In this section: | ||
(1) "COVID-19" means the 2019 novel coronavirus | ||
disease. | ||
(2) "Health care facility" means a facility that is a | ||
provider of services, as defined by Section 1861, Social Security | ||
Act (42 U.S.C. Section 1395x). | ||
(3) "Health care provider" means an individual | ||
licensed or otherwise authorized by this state to administer | ||
vaccines. | ||
(b) A person may not compel or coerce an individual lawfully | ||
residing in this state into obtaining a medical treatment involving | ||
the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine, including a COVID-19 | ||
vaccine approved or authorized by the United States Food and Drug | ||
Administration, contrary to the individual's vaccination | ||
preference. | ||
(c) A health care provider may not provide to an individual | ||
lawfully residing in this state a medical treatment involving the | ||
administration of a COVID-19 vaccine, including a COVID-19 vaccine | ||
approved or authorized by the United States Food and Drug | ||
Administration, unless the provider obtains the individual's | ||
informed consent before administering the COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
(d) For purposes of this section: | ||
(1) an individual lacks the capacity to provide | ||
informed consent for a medical treatment involving the | ||
administration of a COVID-19 vaccine if the individual has been | ||
compelled or coerced into obtaining a COVID-19 vaccine contrary to | ||
the individual's vaccination preference; and | ||
(2) a health care provider who advises or recommends | ||
the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine is not considered to have | ||
compelled or coerced an individual into obtaining a COVID-19 | ||
vaccine based solely on that advice or recommendation. | ||
(e) A person may not take an adverse action or impose a | ||
penalty of any kind against an individual lawfully residing in this | ||
state for the individual's refusal or failure to obtain a medical | ||
treatment involving the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
(f) The attorney general may bring an action for injunctive | ||
relief against a person to prevent the person from violating this | ||
section. In an injunction issued under this subsection, a court may | ||
include reasonable requirements to prevent further violations of | ||
this section. | ||
(g) A health care provider who violates Subsection (c) is | ||
liable to the individual who is the subject of the violation for | ||
damages in an amount of not less than $5,000. The prevailing party | ||
in an action brought under this subsection may recover reasonable | ||
expenses incurred as a result of the action, including court costs, | ||
reasonable attorney's fees, investigation costs, witness fees, and | ||
deposition expenses. | ||
(h) A health care provider may assert an affirmative defense | ||
to an action brought under Subsection (g) that the individual or an | ||
individual legally authorized to consent on behalf of the | ||
individual stated to the provider before the COVID-19 vaccine was | ||
administered that the informed consent was voluntarily provided. | ||
SECTION 3. Section 161.0086, Health and Safety Code, as | ||
added by this Act, applies only to conduct that occurs on or after | ||
the effective date of this Act. | ||
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Act or its application | ||
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does | ||
not affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be | ||
given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to | ||
this end the provisions of this Act are declared severable. | ||
SECTION 5. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives | ||
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as | ||
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this | ||
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this | ||
Act takes effect on the 91st day after the last day of the | ||
legislative session. |