Bill Text: TX HB3351 | 2023-2024 | 88th Legislature | Engrossed


Bill Title: Relating to standards required for certain rankings of physicians by health benefit plan issuers.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2023-05-11 - Referred to Health & Human Services [HB3351 Detail]

Download: Texas-2023-HB3351-Engrossed.html
  88R23304 CJD-F
 
  By: Harris of Williamson H.B. No. 3351
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to standards required for certain rankings of physicians
  by health benefit plan issuers.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Section 1460.003, Insurance Code, is amended by
  amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1) to read as
  follows:
         (a)  A health benefit plan issuer, including a subsidiary or
  affiliate, may not rank physicians or[,] classify physicians into
  tiers based on performance[, or publish physician-specific
  information that includes rankings, tiers, ratings, or other
  comparisons of a physician's performance against standards,
  measures, or other physicians,] unless:
               (1)  the standards used by the health benefit plan
  issuer to rank or classify are propagated or developed by an
  organization designated by the commissioner through rules adopted
  under Section 1460.005;
               (2)  the ranking, comparison, or evaluation:
                     (A)  is disclosed to each affected physician at
  least 45 days before the date the ranking, comparison, or
  evaluation is released, published, or distributed to enrollees by
  the health benefit plan issuer; and
                     (B)  identifies which products or networks
  offered by the health benefit plan issuer the ranking, comparison,
  or evaluation will be used for; and
               (3)  each affected physician is given an easy-to-use
  process to identify discrepancies between the standards and the
  ranking, comparison, or evaluation as propagated by the health
  benefit plan issuer [the standards used by the health benefit plan
  issuer conform to nationally recognized standards and guidelines as
  required by rules adopted under Section 1460.005;
               [(2)  the standards and measurements to be used by the
  health benefit plan issuer are disclosed to each affected physician
  before any evaluation period used by the health benefit plan
  issuer; and
               [(3)  each affected physician is afforded, before any
  publication or other public dissemination, an opportunity to
  dispute the ranking or classification through a process that, at a
  minimum, includes due process protections that conform to the
  following protections:
                     [(A)  the health benefit plan issuer provides at
  least 45 days' written notice to the physician of the proposed
  rating, ranking, tiering, or comparison, including the
  methodologies, data, and all other information utilized by the
  health benefit plan issuer in its rating, tiering, ranking, or
  comparison decision;
                     [(B)  in addition to any written fair
  reconsideration process, the health benefit plan issuer, upon a
  request for review that is made within 30 days of receiving the
  notice under Paragraph (A), provides a fair reconsideration
  proceeding, at the physician's option:
                           [(i)  by teleconference, at an agreed upon
  time; or
                           [(ii)  in person, at an agreed upon time or
  between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday;
                     [(C)  the physician has the right to provide
  information at a requested fair reconsideration proceeding for
  determination by a decision-maker, have a representative
  participate in the fair reconsideration proceeding, and submit a
  written statement at the conclusion of the fair reconsideration
  proceeding; and
                     [(D)  the health benefit plan issuer provides a
  written communication of the outcome of a fair reconsideration
  proceeding prior to any publication or dissemination of the rating,
  ranking, tiering, or comparison.  The written communication must
  include the specific reasons for the final decision].
         (a-1)  If a physician submits information to a health benefit
  plan issuer under Subsection (a)(3) sufficient to establish a
  discrepancy, the health benefit plan issuer must remedy the
  discrepancy by the later of:
               (1)  publication; or
               (2)  the 30th day after the date the health benefit plan
  issuer receives the information.
         SECTION 2.  Section 1460.005(c), Insurance Code, is amended
  to read as follows:
         (c)  In adopting rules under this section, the commissioner
  may only designate [shall consider the standards, guidelines, and
  measures prescribed by nationally recognized] organizations that
  meet the following requirements:
               (1)  the prescribing organization is bona fide and
  unbiased toward or against any medical provider;
               (2)  the standards to be used in rankings, comparisons,
  or evaluations:
                     (A)  are nationally recognized, or based on
  expert-provider consensus or leading clinical evidence-based
  scholarship;
                     (B)  have a publicly transparent methodology; and
                     (C)  if based on clinical outcomes, are
  risk-adjusted; and
               (3)  the prescribing organization has an easy-to-use
  process by which a medical provider may report data, evidentiary,
  factual, or mathematical errors for prompt investigation and, if
  appropriate, correction [establish or promote guidelines and
  performance measures emphasizing quality of health care, including
  the National Quality Forum and the AQA Alliance. If neither the
  National Quality Forum nor the AQA Alliance has established
  standards or guidelines regarding an issue, the commissioner shall
  consider the standards, guidelines, and measures prescribed by the
  National Committee on Quality Assurance and other similar national
  organizations. If neither the National Quality Forum, nor the AQA
  Alliance, nor other national organizations have established
  standards or guidelines regarding an issue, the commissioner shall
  consider standards, guidelines, and measures based on other bona
  fide nationally recognized guidelines, expert-based physician
  consensus quality standards, or leading objective clinical
  evidence and scholarship].
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
  a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
  provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
  Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
  Act takes effect September 1, 2023.
feedback