Bill Text: TX HB335 | 2017-2018 | 85th Legislature | Introduced

---

Bill Title: Relating to administrative and judicial review of certain Medicaid reimbursement disputes; authorizing a fee.

Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2017-02-15 - Referred to Human Services [HB335 Detail]

Download: Texas-2017-HB335-Introduced.html

---

85R1823 KFF-F
By: Collier H.B. No. 335

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to administrative and judicial review of certain Medicaid
reimbursement disputes; authorizing a fee.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 533, Government Code, is
amended by adding Section 533.0057 to read as follows:
Sec. 533.0057. CONFISCATORY REIMBURSEMENT RATES
PROHIBITED; ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CERTAIN
REIMBURSEMENT DISPUTES. (a) In this section, "confiscatory"
means, with respect to the reimbursement rate paid by a managed care
organization to a provider, a rate that is below the rate necessary
to:
(1) recover the provider's reasonable operating
expenses;
(2) realize a reasonable return on the provider's
costs; and
(3) ensure confidence in the provider's continued:
(A) financial integrity; and
(B) participation in Medicaid.
(b) A managed care organization may not pay a confiscatory
reimbursement rate to a provider under a Medicaid managed care
model or arrangement implemented under this chapter.
(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provider, including a
pharmacy provider, has the right to a contested case hearing under
Chapter 2001 to dispute the amount of a reimbursement rate paid to
the provider by a managed care organization or the organization's
pharmacy benefit manager if, subject to Subsection (f), the
provider believes the rate is confiscatory in violation of
Subsection (b), except that the decision of the hearing officer or
the administrative law judge, as applicable, is not subject to
judicial review under Chapter 2001. Solely for purposes of this
section, a managed care organization is to be treated as a state
agency under Chapter 2001.
(d) A contested case hearing under Subsection (c) shall be
conducted by an administrative law judge, unless the commission's
appeals division employs at least one full-time hearing officer
whose sole duty is to preside over contested cases. If the
commission's appeals division employs a hearing officer described
by this subsection, that officer shall conduct the contested case
hearing under Subsection (c).
(e) Parties to a contested case brought under this section:
(1) must include:
(A) the provider; and
(B) the managed care organization and any
appropriate agent of the organization, including a pharmacy benefit
manager; and
(2) may not include the commission.
(f) If the provider's contract with the managed care
organization or the organization's agent contains a process for
handling disputes relating to provider reimbursement, the provider
may request a contested case hearing under Subsection (c) only if:
(1) the provider first submits the dispute for
resolution through the contractual process; and
(2) the managed care organization or the
organization's agent, as appropriate, fails to resolve the dispute
through the contractual process not later than the 45th day after
the day the dispute is submitted, or if the provider is dissatisfied
with the resolution of the contractual process.
(g) In a contested case brought under this section, the
hearing officer or administrative law judge, as applicable, shall
determine whether the reimbursement rate is confiscatory and may
order the managed care organization or the organization's agent to
pay a rate that is not confiscatory. A hearing officer or
administrative law judge, as applicable, may not award an amount:
(1) to any one provider that, as a percentage of the
provider's average net income before taxes, exceeds the managed
care organization's percentage of net income before taxes that is
computed in accordance with the contract between the organization
and the commission and is authorized to be retained by the
organization under that contract, averaged over all financial
statistical reporting periods; or
(2) that, in the aggregate, exceeds the amount of
resources maintained by the managed care organization to reasonably
accommodate program changes at no additional cost to the commission
in accordance with the contract between the organization and the
commission.
(h) In a contested case brought under this section, the
hearing officer or administrative law judge, as applicable, has the
discretion:
(1) considering the interest of judicial economy and
efficiency, to combine cases wholly or partly that involve the same
type of provider and the same or substantially similar
reimbursement issues; or
(2) to impose part or all of the costs for the hearing
against the party or parties that do not substantially prevail.
(i) In awarding costs in a contested case brought under this
section, the hearing officer or administrative law judge, as
applicable:
(1) shall consider whether the position of the party
was taken in good faith and had a reasonable basis in fact and law;
and
(2) may not award attorney's fees.
(j) The commission or the State Office of Administrative
Hearings may impose a fee in an amount not to exceed $500 on each
party to a contested case brought under this section for the purpose
of offsetting the costs of the hearing.
SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only
to a reimbursement paid to a Medicaid provider on or after the
effective date of this Act.
SECTION 3. If before implementing any provision of this Act
a state agency determines that a waiver or authorization from a
federal agency is necessary for implementation of that provision,
the agency affected by the provision shall request the waiver or
authorization and may delay implementing that provision until the
waiver or authorization is granted.
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
Act takes effect September 1, 2017.