Bill Text: OR SB1543 | 2012 | Regular Session | Engrossed

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft

---

Bill Title: Relating to transportation; and declaring an emergency.

Sponsorship: Unknown

Status: (Passed) 2012-03-20 - Effective date, March 16, 2012. [SB1543 Detail]

Download: Oregon-2012-SB1543-Engrossed.html

---

     76th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2012 Regular Session

NOTE:  Matter within  { +  braces and plus signs + } in an
amended section is new. Matter within  { -  braces and minus
signs - } is existing law to be omitted. New sections are within
 { +  braces and plus signs + } .

LC 185

                           A-Engrossed

                        Senate Bill 1543
                Ordered by the Senate February 16
          Including Senate Amendments dated February 16

Printed pursuant to Senate Interim Rule 213.28 by order of the
  President of the Senate in conformance with presession filing
  rules, indicating neither advocacy nor opposition on the part
  of the President (at the request of Senate Interim Committee on
  Business, Transportation and Economic Development)

                             SUMMARY

The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the
measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to
consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's
brief statement of the essential features of the measure.

    { - Authorizes local government to approve quasi-judicial
zone change consistent with comprehensive plan map designation
for real property without determining whether zone change has
significant effect on existing or planned transportation
facility. - }
  Requires Oregon Transportation Commission to make annual report
to legislative committees about funding available for certain
transportation projects.
   { +  Specifies transportation projects to which moneys
remaining from completed transportation projects must be
reallocated.
  Prohibits maritime pilot licensee or trainee from piloting
vessel on Coos Bay bar pilotage ground or Yaquina Bay bar
pilotage ground if licensee or trainee, or family member of
licensee or trainee, has financial interest in boat or equipment
used to assist vessel in entering or exiting bay. + }
  Declares emergency, effective on passage.

                        A BILL FOR AN ACT
Relating to transportation; creating new provisions; amending
  section 64, chapter 865, Oregon Laws 2009; and declaring an
  emergency.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
  SECTION 1.  { + On or before November 1 of each year, the
Oregon Transportation Commission shall submit a report to the
interim legislative committees related to transportation issues.
The report must include the following components:
  (1) The amount of funding available for reallocation as a
result of completion of the transportation projects described in
section 64, chapter 865, Oregon Laws 2009, for less than the
amounts originally allocated for the projects.
  (2) A list of transportation projects, ranked in order of
priority by the commission, from the list of projects described

in section 64, chapter 865, Oregon Laws 2009, that require
additional funding to be completed. + }
  SECTION 2.  { + Section 1 of this 2012 Act becomes operative on
July 1, 2012. + }
  SECTION 3. Section 64, chapter 865, Oregon Laws 2009, is
amended to read:
   { +  Sec. 64. + } (1) Proceeds of the bonds, as defined in ORS
367.010, authorized under ORS 367.620 (3)(c) may be used to
finance all or any portion of the projects as listed in
subsection (2) of this section. The  { + Oregon
Transportation + } Commission shall determine the order of
completion for the projects listed in subsection (2) of this
section.
  (2) The following amounts are allocated for the projects listed
below:
_________________________________________________________________

____NOTE_TO_WEB_CUSTOMERS:__________________________________
THE FOLLOWING TABULAR TEXT MAY BE IRREGULAR.
FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE PRINTED MEASURE.
_______________________________________________________________

  (a)U.S. Highway 26 at the
     Glencoe Road Interchange$ 32 million
  (b)Interstate 84 at the
     257th Avenue Interchange$ 24 million
  (c)State Highway 212: Sunrise
     Corridor, Phase I, Units 1,
     2 and 3...........$100 million
  (d)U.S. Highway 26 at the Shute
     Road Interchange, Phase I$ 45 million
  (e)Interstate 5 at the Interstate
     205 Interchange...$ 11 million
  (f)U.S. Highway 26: 185th Avenue
     to Cornell Road...$ 20 million
  (g)Interstate 205 and State
     Highway 213 at the Washington
     Street Interchange$ 22 million
  (h)Interstate 84 at the Hood
     River Interchange.$ 10 million
  (i)State Highway 43 at the
     Sellwood Bridge Interchange$ 30 million
  (j)State Highway 6 at U.S.
     Highway 101.......$ 27 million
  (k)State Highway 99W: Newberg
     and Dundee Bypass, Phase I$192 million
  (L)Interstate 5 at the State Highway
     214 Interchange...$ 43 million
  (m)Interstate 5 at Beltline
     Highway, Units 3, 4, 5,
     6 and 7...........$ 80 million
  (n)Beltline Highway at
     Delta Highway.....$  2 million
  (o)Interstate 5 at Kuebler
     Road, Phase I.....$ 15 million
  (p)Interstate 5 at Kuebler
     Road, Phase II (Mill Creek)$  4 million
  (q)State Highway 42, county
     line curves.......$ 10 million
  (r)State Highway 62: Corridor
     Solution, Phase II$100 million
  (s)Interstate 5 at the Fern Valley
     Road Interchange..$ 25 million
  (t)Interstate 5 Sutherlin
     truck climbing lanes$4.1 million
  (u)Interstate 5 Sexton truck
     climbing lanes....$ 10 million
  (v)Interstate 84 at the U.S.
     Highway 97 Interchange$ 19 million
  (w)U.S. Highway 97: Crooked
     River Bridge to Redmond$  2 million
  (x)State Highway 140:
     Klamath Falls to the Nevada
     state line........$ 23 million
  (y)Murphy Road at the U.S.
     Highway 97 Interchange$ 25 million
  (z)U.S. Highway 97: Redmond
     reroute, Phase II.$  5 million
  (aa)Chico Road reconstruction
     in Baker County...$  1 million
  (bb)Chandler Lane reconstruction
     in Baker County...$4.6 million
  (cc)Interstate 84 Spring Creek
     climbing lane in
     Union County......$5.7 million
  (dd)Northwest Washington Avenue
     in Malheur County.$4.5 million
  (ee)Pierce Road improvements
     in Union County...$  5 million
  (ff)State Highway 82 alternate route
     in Wallowa County.$  5 million
  (gg)Westland Road in Umatilla
     County............$1.1 million
  (hh)State Highway 207 and State
     Highway 206 intersections$0.5 million
  (ii)Vehicle chain-up areas east
     of Pendleton on Interstate
     84................$4.7 million
  (jj)Izee-Paulina Highway in
     Grant County......$4.5 million
  (kk)Monroe Street and U.S.
     Highway 20 Intersection
     in Harney County..$0.9 million
____________________________________________________________
END OF POSSIBLE IRREGULAR TABULAR TEXT
____________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

   { +  (3)(a) When the commission determines that the project
described in subsection (2)(e) of this section is completed, the
commission shall reallocate any amount remaining from the
allocation made under subsection (2)(e) of this section to the
project described in subsection (2)(b) of this section.
  (b) When the commission determines that the project described
in subsection (2)(f) of this section is completed, the commission
shall reallocate any amount remaining from the allocation made
under subsection (2)(f) of this section to the project described
in subsection (2)(d) of this section. + }
    { - (3) - }  { +  (4) + } Prior to June 1, 2010, in addition
to the projects listed in subsection (2) of this section, if
projects are recommended to the Oregon Transportation Commission
by the applicable local area commission on transportation after
consultation with the local governments listed in this
subsection, the Oregon Transportation Commission may also approve
and allocate funds to the following local governments for
projects approved by the commission in the following amounts:
_________________________________________________________________

____NOTE_TO_WEB_CUSTOMERS:__________________________________
THE FOLLOWING TABULAR TEXT MAY BE IRREGULAR.
FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE PRINTED MEASURE.
_______________________________________________________________

  (a)Baker County......$4.5 million
  (b)Grant County......$1.1 million
  (c)Harney County.....$4.1 million
  (d)Malheur County....$5.8 million
  (e)Union County......$1.3 million
  (f)Umatilla County...$2.5 million
  (g)City of Nyssa.....$  1 million
  (h)City of Heppner...$  3 million
  (i)City of Milton-Freewater$  3 million
  (j)City of Ontario...$1.2 million
  (k)Port of Umatilla..$4.5 million
  (L)Port of Morrow....$10.7 million
____________________________________________________________
END OF POSSIBLE IRREGULAR TABULAR TEXT
____________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

  SECTION 4.  { + Section 5 of this 2012 Act is added to and made
a part of ORS chapter 776. + }
  SECTION 5.  { + (1)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of
this subsection, a licensee or trainee may not pilot a vessel on
the Coos Bay bar pilotage ground or the Yaquina Bay bar pilotage
ground if the licensee or trainee, or an immediate family member
of the licensee or trainee, has any financial interest in a boat
or equipment assisting the vessel in entering or exiting the bay.
  (b) The Oregon Board of Maritime Pilots shall adopt rules
allowing a licensee or trainee who is prohibited from piloting a
vessel under paragraph (a) of this subsection to pilot the vessel
in an emergency, and fixing rates for pilotage under this
paragraph.
  (2) This section does not prohibit a licensee or trainee from
piloting a vessel if the licensee or trainee, or an immediate
family member of the licensee or trainee, owns stock in a
corporation registered on a national securities exchange that
owns boats or equipment assisting ships on the Coos Bay bar
pilotage ground or the Yaquina Bay bar pilotage ground. + }
  SECTION 6.  { + (1) Section 5 of this 2012 Act becomes
operative on January 1, 2013.
  (2) The Oregon Board of Maritime Pilots may take any action on
or before the operative date specified in subsection (1) of this
section to enable the board to exercise, on and after the
operative date specified in subsection (1) of this section, all
the duties, functions and powers conferred on the board by
section 5 of this 2012 Act. + }
  SECTION 7.  { + This 2012 Act being necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency
is declared to exist, and this 2012 Act takes effect on its
passage. + }
                         ----------