Bill Text: NY S09362 | 2023-2024 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Directs the Department of Transportation to conduct a study of certain bridges spanning bodies of water connected to deep water ports in the state to determine whether such bridges have the structural integrity to withstand an impact from large vessels such as cargo ships, oil tankers and cruise ships; requires a report and recommendations; provides for the repeal of such provisions upon the expiration thereof.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2024-05-14 - REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION [S09362 Detail]

Download: New_York-2023-S09362-Introduced.html



                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                          9362

                    IN SENATE

                                      May 14, 2024
                                       ___________

        Introduced  by  Sen.  COONEY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Transportation

        AN ACT directing the Department of Transportation to conduct a study  of
          certain bridges spanning bodies of water connected to deep water ports
          in  the  state  to  determine whether such bridges have the structural
          integrity to withstand an impact from a large  vessel;  and  providing
          for the repeal of such provisions upon the expiration thereof

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Legislative intent and findings.  1. On March 26, 2024, the
     2  commercial container ship, the "Dali", lost power  and  slammed  into  a
     3  support  piling  of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, resulting
     4  in the immediate and near-total collapse of the bridge. Six  individuals
     5  who  were  working on the bridge died in the collapse. The bodies of two
     6  of those victimes have not been recovered. The Dali was  984  feet  long
     7  and weighed approximately 95,000 tons.  As a result of the collision and
     8  collapse,  trade through the Port of Baltimore has been severely compro-
     9  mised and will remain so for some time,  costing  an  estimated  fifteen
    10  million  dollars in lost economic activity each day.  The estimated cost
    11  to repair the bridge will be $4,000,000,000. The repairs  are  estimated
    12  to take several years.
    13    In  addition  to  being a part of a sea passage for trade, the Francis
    14  Scott Key Bridge was also a major part of the  Baltimore  transportation
    15  system  for  commercial, commuter and personal travel.  Until the bridge
    16  repairs are completed, a key part of  the  Baltimore  infrastructure  is
    17  closed  not only to sea-going traffic, but also to vehicular traffic, as
    18  well.  The current and future financial impacts on Baltimore, its  resi-
    19  dents and the state of Maryland are profound.
    20    2.  Less  than two weeks after the Baltimore incident, the 89,000-ton,
    21  1,100-foot-long vessel "APL Qingdao" lost propulsion near  the  Verraza-
    22  no-Narrows  Bridge.  Fortunately,  there  was  no  collision between the
    23  vessel and the bridge.
    24    3. While these ships seem to be extremely large, Allan Post, the depu-
    25  ty superintendent at Texas A&M University's Maritime Academy states that

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD15209-04-4

        S. 9362                             2

     1  1,000 foot ships are now the standard size.   In  contrast,  the  Summit
     2  Venture,  a  cargo  vessel that caused the 1980 collapse of the Sunshine
     3  Skyway in Florida, was 600 feet long and weighed 35,000 tons.
     4    4. These recent incidents raise concerns about the condition of bridg-
     5  es  spanning waterways involved in seagoing commercial transportation in
     6  our state and the ability of such structures to withstand an impact from
     7  such a large vessel.  In most cases, New York bridges were designed  and
     8  built  long  before the advent of the enormous commercial vessels common
     9  now and most would likely not be able to sustain a direct collision with
    10  such a vessel.  The occurrence of such an accident would have  a  devas-
    11  tating  impact  on  our  state and local economies and, depending on the
    12  bridge involved, our local transportation.   In addition, there  is  the
    13  potential for enormous loss of life when a bridge collapses.
    14    5.  In view of these considerations, the legislature declares it to be
    15  in the best interest of the state and its people to proactively  conduct
    16  a  study  of  bridges  spanning  bodies of water connected to deep water
    17  ports in the state to determine whether such bridges have the structural
    18  integrity to withstand an impact from a large vessel.
    19    § 2. 1. The Department of Transportation, in conjunction with the  New
    20  York  State Bridge Authority, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
    21  the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and the Buffalo and  Fort
    22  Erie  Public  Bridge  Authority, as applicable, shall conduct a study to
    23  determine the ability of certain bridges in the state  to  withstand  an
    24  impact  to  the  support  structures  of  the  bridges from large ships,
    25  including but not limited to, cargo vessels, oil tankers  and  passenger
    26  ships.    Upon  the  conclusion  of  the  study, the Commissioner of the
    27  Department of Transportation  ("the  Commissioner")  shall  prepare  and
    28  issue  a  comprehensive report of the study findings and recommendations
    29  for improvements to each bridge, if any.
    30    2. Bridges to be evaluated for the study shall include the following:
    31    a. the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge;
    32    b. the Cross Bay Veterans Memorial Bridge;
    33    c. the Henry Hudson Bridge;
    34    d. the Marine Parkway-Gil Hodges Memorial Bridge;
    35    e. the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge;
    36    f. the Throgs Neck Bridge;
    37    g. the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge;
    38    h. the Governor Mario M. Cuomo Bridge;
    39    i. the Bear Mountain Bridge;
    40    j. the Newburgh-Beacon Bridge;
    41    k. the Mid-Hudson Bridge;
    42    l. the Kingston-Rhinecliff Bridge;
    43    m. the Rip Van Winkle Bridge;
    44    n. the George Washington Bridge;
    45    o. the Bayonne Bridge;
    46    p. the Goethals Bridge;
    47    q. the Outerbridge Crossing Bridge;
    48    r. the Alfred H. Smith Memorial Bridge;
    49    s. the Castleton Bridge;
    50    t. the Dunn Memorial Bridge;
    51    u. the Patroon Island Bridge;
    52    v. the Peace Bridge;
    53    w. the Walkway over the Hudson Pedestrian Bridge;
    54    x. any bridge under the control of a New York entity spanning a  water
    55  shipping route through Lake Erie or Lake Ontario utilized by large cargo

        S. 9362                             3

     1  vessels  or  oil  tankers  to  access  commercial  shipping ports in the
     2  Niagara or Rochester areas of the state; and
     3    y. any other bridge the Commissioner deems necessary.
     4    3.  For  each bridge, the study shall include, at a minimum, an evalu-
     5  ation of the following:
     6    a. the age of the bridge;
     7    b. the amount of traffic traveling on top of and  through  the  waters
     8  below the bridge;
     9    c. the current condition of the bridge;
    10    d.  any  known  or  newly discovered chronic issue or problem with the
    11  bridge;
    12    e. the type, size, and construction of the support structures  of  the
    13  bridge;
    14    f.  the  type,  size  and construction of any barriers surrounding the
    15  base of the support structures of the bridge and  the  distance  between
    16  such surrounding structures and the water channels occupied by vessels;
    17    g. the width between the support structures of the bridge;
    18    h. the height of the bridge;
    19    i.  the  topography  near  the  bridge, including sand bars, shallows,
    20  cliffs, etc.;
    21    j. the area a vessel may safely access during a maneuver to avoid  the
    22  bridge in the event of a loss of power or propulsion or other emergency;
    23  and
    24    k. any other matters the Commissioner deems necessary.
    25    §  3. The report required by this act shall be submitted to the gover-
    26  nor, the speaker of the assembly, and the  temporary  president  of  the
    27  senate  no  later  than  January 1, 2026.   The report shall include the
    28  findings, conclusions and recommendations of  the  Commissioner  of  the
    29  Department  of  Transportation and other involved entities.  The Commis-
    30  sioner shall submit with this report such legislative proposals  as  the
    31  Commissioner  deems  necessary  to  implement  such recommendations. The
    32  report shall also be published on  the  website  of  the  Department  of
    33  Transportation no later than one month after it is completed.
    34    § 4. The Commissioner of the Department of Transportation may request,
    35  and  is  authorized  to receive, any information from any state agencies
    36  that is relevant and material  to  the  completion  of  this  study  and
    37  report.   Such information received by the Commissioner shall be subject
    38  to the same requirements for confidentiality and limitations on use,  if
    39  any,  as  are applicable to such state agency's use of such information.
    40  In addition to the entities listed in subdivision one of section two  of
    41  this  act, the Commissioner may consult with any additional entities the
    42  Commissioner deems necessary.
    43    § 5. This act shall take effect immediately and shall  expire  and  be
    44  deemed repealed April 1, 2026 or 3 months after the report is submitted,
    45  whichever is later.
feedback