Bill Text: NY S07592 | 2011-2012 | General Assembly | Amended


Bill Title: Authorizes pilot program permitting use of electronic means for commencing actions in certain criminal and family court proceedings.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2012-06-21 - SUBSTITUTED BY A10706 [S07592 Detail]

Download: New_York-2011-S07592-Amended.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                        7592--A
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                     June 5, 2012
                                      ___________
       Introduced by Sen. SALAND -- (at request of the Office of Court Adminis-
         tration)  --  read  twice  and ordered printed, and when printed to be
         committed to the Committee on  Rules  --  committee  discharged,  bill
         amended,  ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said commit-
         tee
       AN ACT to amend chapter 367 of the laws  of  1999,  amending  the  civil
         practice law and rules and the judiciary law relating to authorization
         of  pilot  programs  permitting use of facsimile transmission or elec-
         tronic means to commence an action or special proceeding, in  relation
         to  authorization of pilot programs permitting use of electronic means
         in certain courts; and to amend chapter  416  of  the  laws  of  2009,
         amending  the  civil  practice  law  and  rules relating to service of
         papers by electronic means, in relation to development  of  a  program
         relating  to  the  use  of  electronic  means  for the commencement of
         certain actions; and providing for the repeal of certain provisions of
         chapter 367 of the laws of 1999 upon expiration thereof
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1.  Chapter 367 of the laws of 1999, amending the civil prac-
    2  tice law and rules and the judiciary law relating  to  authorization  of
    3  pilot  programs  permitting  use of facsimile transmission or electronic
    4  means to commence an action or special proceeding, is amended by  adding
    5  three new sections 6-a, 6-b and 6-c to read as follows:
    6    S  6-A.  (A)  NOTWITHSTANDING  ANY  OTHER  PROVISION OF LAW, THE CHIEF
    7  ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS, WITH THE  APPROVAL  OF  THE  ADMINISTRATIVE
    8  BOARD  OF  THE COURTS, MAY PROMULGATE RULES AUTHORIZING A PROGRAM IN THE
    9  USE OF ELECTRONIC MEANS IN THE SUPREME COURT AND  IN  THE  COUNTY  COURT
   10  FOR:  (1)  THE  FILING  WITH A COURT OF AN ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT FOR THE
   11  PURPOSE OF ACQUIRING JURISDICTION IN A SUPERIOR COURT,  AS  PROVIDED  BY
   12  ARTICLES  195  AND 200 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, AND (2) THE FILING
   13  AND SERVICE OF PAPERS IN PENDING CRIMINAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS.
   14    (B) (1) EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE  PROVIDED  IN  THIS  SUBDIVISION,  PARTIC-
   15  IPATION  IN THIS PROGRAM SHALL BE STRICTLY VOLUNTARY AND WILL TAKE PLACE
   16  ONLY UPON CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES IN THE CRIMINAL ACTION  OR  PROCEEDING;
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD15304-08-2
       S. 7592--A                          2
    1  EXCEPT  THAT A PARTY'S FAILURE TO CONSENT TO PARTICIPATION SHALL NOT BAR
    2  ANY OTHER PARTY TO THE ACTION FROM FILING AND SERVING  PAPERS  BY  ELEC-
    3  TRONIC  MEANS  UPON  THE  COURT  OR  ANY  OTHER  PARTY TO SUCH ACTION OR
    4  PROCEEDING  WHO  HAS  CONSENTED  TO  PARTICIPATION. FILING AN ACCUSATORY
    5  INSTRUMENT BY ELECTRONIC MEANS WITH THE COURT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFER-
    6  RING JURISDICTION OVER A CRIMINAL  ACTION  UPON  SUCH  COURT  SHALL  NOT
    7  REQUIRE  THE  CONSENT  OF  ANY OTHER PARTY; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT UPON
    8  SUCH FILING ANY PERSON WHO IS THE SUBJECT OF SUCH ACCUSATORY  INSTRUMENT
    9  AND  ANY  ATTORNEY  FOR  SUCH  PERSON  SHALL BE PERMITTED TO IMMEDIATELY
   10  REVIEW AND OBTAIN COPIES OF SUCH INSTRUMENT IF SUCH PERSON  OR  ATTORNEY
   11  WOULD  HAVE  BEEN AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO REVIEW OR COPY SUCH INSTRUMENT IF
   12  IT HAD BEEN FILED WITH THE COURT IN PAPER FORM.
   13    (2) THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR MAY ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT  OF  CONSENT
   14  TO  PARTICIPATION  IN  THIS  PROGRAM IN SUPREME AND COUNTY COURTS OF NOT
   15  MORE THAN SIX COUNTIES  PROVIDED  HE  OR  SHE  MAY  NOT  ELIMINATE  SUCH
   16  REQUIREMENT  FOR  A  COURT WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY,
   17  THE CONSENT OF THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR AS DEFINED IN SECTION  SIX-C  OF
   18  THIS ACT AND THE CONSENT OF THE COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH SUCH
   19  COURT  PRESIDES.  NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR
   20  MAY NOT ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT TO PARTICIPATION IN A COUN-
   21  TY HEREUNDER UNTIL HE OR SHE SHALL HAVE PROVIDED ALL PERSONS  OR  ORGAN-
   22  IZATIONS,  OR  THEIR  REPRESENTATIVE  OR  REPRESENTATIVES, WHO REGULARLY
   23  APPEAR IN CRIMINAL ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF  SUCH
   24  COUNTY WITH REASONABLE NOTICE AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT COMMENTS WITH
   25  RESPECT  THERETO  AND  SHALL  HAVE  GIVEN  DUE CONSIDERATION TO ALL SUCH
   26  COMMENTS, NOR UNTIL HE OR SHE SHALL HAVE CONSULTED WITH THE  MEMBERS  OF
   27  THE  ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONTINUED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (C) OF SECTION
   28  6 OF CHAPTER 416 OF THE LAWS OF 2009, AS AMENDED.
   29    (C) WHERE  THE  CHIEF  ADMINISTRATOR  ELIMINATES  THE  REQUIREMENT  OF
   30  CONSENT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH TWO OF SUBDIVISION (B) OF THIS SECTION,
   31  HE  OR  SHE  SHALL  AFFORD  COUNSEL  THE  OPPORTUNITY  TO OPT OUT OF THE
   32  PROGRAM, VIA PRESENTATION OF A PRESCRIBED FORM  TO  BE  FILED  WITH  THE
   33  COURT  WHERE  THE CRIMINAL ACTION IS PENDING. SAID FORM, WHICH SHALL NOT
   34  BE PART OF THE CASE RECORD, SHALL PERMIT  AN  ATTORNEY  TO  OPT  OUT  OF
   35  PARTICIPATION  IN  THE PROGRAM UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES,
   36  IN WHICH EVENT, HE OR SHE WILL NOT BE COMPELLED TO PARTICIPATE:
   37    (1) WHERE THE ATTORNEY CERTIFIES IN GOOD FAITH THAT HE  OR  SHE  LACKS
   38  APPROPRIATE  COMPUTER  HARDWARE AND/OR CONNECTION TO THE INTERNET AND/OR
   39  SCANNER OR OTHER DEVICE BY WHICH DOCUMENTS MAY BE CONVERTED TO AN  ELEC-
   40  TRONIC FORMAT; OR
   41    (2)  WHERE  THE  ATTORNEY CERTIFIES IN GOOD FAITH THAT HE OR SHE LACKS
   42  THE REQUISITE KNOWLEDGE IN THE OPERATION OF SUCH COMPUTERS AND/OR  SCAN-
   43  NERS  NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE.  FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH, THE
   44  KNOWLEDGE OF ANY EMPLOYEE OF AN ATTORNEY, OR ANY EMPLOYEE OF THE  ATTOR-
   45  NEY'S  LAW  FIRM,  OFFICE  OR BUSINESS WHO IS SUBJECT TO SUCH ATTORNEY'S
   46  DIRECTION, SHALL BE IMPUTED TO THE ATTORNEY.
   47    NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING: (I) WHERE A PARTY IS NOT REPRESENTED BY
   48  COUNSEL, HE OR SHE MAY NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM EXCEPT UPON HIS OR
   49  HER REQUEST AND PERMISSION OF THE COURT; (II) A PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
   50  COUNSEL WHO HAS OPTED IN SHALL BE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO OPT OUT OF
   51  THE PROGRAM FOR ANY REASON VIA PRESENTATION OF A PRESCRIBED FORM  TO  BE
   52  FILED  WITH  THE CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE PROCEEDING IS PENDING; AND
   53  (III) A COURT MAY EXEMPT ANY ATTORNEY FROM BEING REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE
   54  IN THE PROGRAM UPON APPLICATION FOR SUCH EXEMPTION, SHOWING  GOOD  CAUSE
   55  THEREFOR.
       S. 7592--A                          3
    1    (D)  FOR  PURPOSES  OF  THIS  SECTION,  "ELECTRONIC MEANS" SHALL BE AS
    2  DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION (F) OF RULE 2103 OF THE CIVIL  PRACTICE  LAW  AND
    3  RULES.
    4    (E)  (1)  NOTHING  IN THIS SECTION SHALL AFFECT OR CHANGE ANY EXISTING
    5  LAWS GOVERNING THE SEALING AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS IN CRIM-
    6  INAL PROCEEDINGS OR ACCESS TO COURT  RECORDS  BY  THE  PARTIES  TO  SUCH
    7  PROCEEDINGS,  NOR  SHALL  THIS SECTION BE CONSTRUED TO COMPEL A PARTY TO
    8  FILE A SEALED DOCUMENT BY ELECTRONIC MEANS.
    9    (2) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS CHAPTER, NO  PAPER  OR
   10  DOCUMENT  THAT  IS FILED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IN
   11  SUPREME COURT OR COUNTY COURT SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR  PUBLIC  INSPECTION
   12  ON-LINE.  SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF EXISTING LAWS GOVERNING THE SEAL-
   13  ING AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS, NOTHING HEREIN  SHALL  PREVENT
   14  THE  UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM FROM SHARING STATISTICAL INFORMATION THAT DOES
   15  NOT INCLUDE ANY PAPERS OR DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE ACTION; AND, PROVIDED
   16  FURTHER, THAT THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR,
   17  IN THE EXERCISE OF HIS OR HER DISCRETION, FROM POSTING PAPERS  OR  DOCU-
   18  MENTS  THAT  HAVE  NOT  BEEN  SEALED PURSUANT TO LAW ON A PUBLIC WEBSITE
   19  MAINTAINED BY THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM WHERE: (I) THE WEBSITE IS NOT THE
   20  WEBSITE ESTABLISHED BY THE RULES PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (A)
   21  OF THIS SECTION, AND (II) TO DO SO WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.  FOR
   22  PURPOSES  OF  THIS  SUBDIVISION, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, IN DETERMINING
   23  WHETHER POSTING PAPERS OR DOCUMENTS ON A PUBLIC WEBSITE IS IN THE PUBLIC
   24  INTEREST, SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FOR  EACH  POSTING  THE
   25  FOLLOWING  FACTORS:  (I)  THE  TYPE  OF CASE INVOLVED; (II) WHETHER SUCH
   26  POSTING WOULD CAUSE HARM TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING ESPECIALLY A MINOR  OR
   27  CRIME  VICTIM; (III) WHETHER SUCH POSTING WOULD INCLUDE LEWD OR SCANDAL-
   28  OUS MATTERS; AND (IV) THE POSSIBILITY THAT SUCH PAPERS OR DOCUMENTS  MAY
   29  ULTIMATELY BE SEALED.
   30    (3)  NOTHING  IN  THIS  SECTION  SHALL  AFFECT OR CHANGE EXISTING LAWS
   31  GOVERNING SERVICE OF PROCESS, NOR SHALL THIS  SECTION  BE  CONSTRUED  TO
   32  ABROGATE  EXISTING  PERSONAL  SERVICE  REQUIREMENTS  AS SET FORTH IN THE
   33  CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW.
   34    S 6-B. (A) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY  OTHER  PROVISION  OF  LAW,  THE  CHIEF
   35  ADMINISTRATOR  OF  THE  COURTS,  WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE
   36  BOARD OF THE COURTS, MAY PROMULGATE RULES AUTHORIZING A PROGRAM  IN  THE
   37  USE  OF ELECTRONIC MEANS IN THE FAMILY COURT FOR: (1) THE ORIGINATION OF
   38  PROCEEDINGS IN SUCH COURT, AND (2) THE FILING AND SERVICE OF  PAPERS  IN
   39  PENDING PROCEEDINGS.
   40    (B)  (1)  EXCEPT  AS  OTHERWISE  PROVIDED IN THIS SUBDIVISION, PARTIC-
   41  IPATION IN THIS PROGRAM SHALL BE STRICTLY VOLUNTARY AND WILL TAKE  PLACE
   42  ONLY  UPON CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES IN THE PROCEEDING; EXCEPT THAT FAILURE
   43  OF A PARTY OR OTHER PERSON WHO IS ENTITLED TO NOTICE OF THE  PROCEEDINGS
   44  TO  CONSENT  TO  PARTICIPATION SHALL NOT BAR ANY OTHER PARTY FROM FILING
   45  AND SERVING PAPERS BY ELECTRONIC MEANS UPON THE COURT OR ANY OTHER PARTY
   46  OR PERSON  ENTITLED  TO  RECEIVE  NOTICE  OF  SUCH  PROCEEDING  WHO  HAS
   47  CONSENTED  TO PARTICIPATION.   FILING A PETITION WITH THE COURT BY ELEC-
   48  TRONIC MEANS FOR THE PURPOSE  OF  ORIGINATING  A  PROCEEDING  SHALL  NOT
   49  REQUIRE  THE  CONSENT  OF ANY OTHER PARTY; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT, UPON
   50  SUCH FILING, A PARTY TO SUCH PROCEEDING AND ANY ATTORNEY FOR SUCH PERSON
   51  SHALL BE PERMITTED TO IMMEDIATELY REVIEW AND OBTAIN COPIES OF SUCH DOCU-
   52  MENTS AND PAPERS IF SUCH PERSON OR ATTORNEY WOULD HAVE  BEEN  AUTHORIZED
   53  BY  LAW  TO REVIEW OR OBTAIN COPIES OF SUCH DOCUMENTS AND PAPERS IF THEY
   54  HAD BEEN FILED WITH THE COURT IN PAPER FORM.
   55    (2) IN THE RULES PROMULGATED  PURSUANT  TO  SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF  THIS
   56  SECTION,  THE  CHIEF  ADMINISTRATOR  MAY  ELIMINATE  THE  REQUIREMENT OF
       S. 7592--A                          4
    1  CONSENT TO PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROGRAM IN FAMILY COURTS  OF  NOT  MORE
    2  THAN SIX COUNTIES FOR:
    3    (I)  THE  FILING  WITH  THE COURT OF A PETITION ORIGINATING A JUVENILE
    4  DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF THE  FAMILY  COURT  ACT  BY  A
    5  PRESENTMENT AGENCY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 301.2 OF SUCH ACT;
    6    (II)  THE FILING WITH THE COURT OF A PETITION ORIGINATING A PROCEEDING
    7  TO DETERMINE ABUSE OR NEGLECT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 10 OF THE FAMILY COURT
    8  ACT BY A CHILD PROTECTIVE AGENCY, AS DEFINED IN  SECTION  1012  OF  SUCH
    9  ACT; AND
   10    (III)  THE  FILING  AND  SERVICE OF PAPERS IN PROCEEDINGS SPECIFIED IN
   11  SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH  WHERE,  PURSUANT  TO  SUCH
   12  SUBPARAGRAPHS,  SUCH  PROCEEDINGS  WERE ORIGINATED IN THE COURT BY ELEC-
   13  TRONIC FILING.
   14    NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR MAY NOT  ELIMI-
   15  NATE  THE REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT TO PARTICIPATION WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF
   16  EACH AUTHORIZED  PRESENTMENT  AGENCY,  CHILD  PROTECTIVE  AGENCY  OF  AN
   17  AFFECTED  COUNTY,  THE  FAMILY  COURT  BAR  PROVIDING  REPRESENTATION TO
   18  PARENTS, AND THE FAMILY COURT BAR PROVIDING REPRESENTATION  TO  CHILDREN
   19  (AS  REPRESENTED BY THE HEAD OF EACH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION REPRES-
   20  ENTING PARENTS AND/OR CHILDREN, THE HEAD OF EACH PUBLIC DEFENDER  ORGAN-
   21  IZATION,  AND  PRESIDENT  OF THE LOCAL BAR ASSOCIATION AS APPLICABLE) IN
   22  ANY COUNTY IN WHICH SUCH ELIMINATION SHALL APPLY.
   23    NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR MAY NOT  ELIMI-
   24  NATE  THE  REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT TO PARTICIPATION IN A COUNTY HEREUNDER
   25  UNTIL HE OR SHE SHALL HAVE PROVIDED ALL  PERSONS  OR  ORGANIZATIONS,  OR
   26  THEIR   REPRESENTATIVE  OR  REPRESENTATIVES,  WHO  REGULARLY  APPEAR  IN
   27  PROCEEDINGS IN THE FAMILY COURT OF SUCH COUNTY, IN WHICH PROCEEDINGS THE
   28  REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT IS TO BE ELIMINATED, WITH REASONABLE  NOTICE  AND
   29  AN  OPPORTUNITY  TO  SUBMIT COMMENTS WITH RESPECT THERETO AND SHALL HAVE
   30  GIVEN DUE CONSIDERATION TO ALL SUCH COMMENTS, NOR UNTIL HE OR SHE  SHALL
   31  HAVE  CONSULTED  WITH  THE  MEMBERS  OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONTINUED
   32  PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 6 OF CHAPTER 416 OF THE  LAWS  OF
   33  2009, AS AMENDED.
   34    (C)  WHERE  THE  CHIEF  ADMINISTRATOR  ELIMINATES  THE  REQUIREMENT OF
   35  CONSENT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH TWO OF SUBDIVISION (B) OF THIS SECTION,
   36  HE OR SHE SHALL AFFORD  COUNSEL  THE  OPPORTUNITY  TO  OPT  OUT  OF  THE
   37  PROGRAM,  VIA  PRESENTATION  OF  A  PRESCRIBED FORM TO BE FILED WITH THE
   38  CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE PROCEEDING IS  PENDING.  SAID  FORM,  WHICH
   39  SHALL  NOT  BE  PART OF THE CASE RECORD, SHALL PERMIT AN ATTORNEY TO OPT
   40  OUT OF PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAM UNDER ANY OF THE  FOLLOWING  CIRCUM-
   41  STANCES, IN WHICH EVENT, HE OR SHE WILL NOT BE COMPELLED TO PARTICIPATE:
   42    (1)  WHERE  THE  ATTORNEY CERTIFIES IN GOOD FAITH THAT HE OR SHE LACKS
   43  APPROPRIATE COMPUTER HARDWARE AND/OR CONNECTION TO THE  INTERNET  AND/OR
   44  SCANNER  OR OTHER DEVICE BY WHICH DOCUMENTS MAY BE CONVERTED TO AN ELEC-
   45  TRONIC FORMAT; OR
   46    (2) WHERE THE ATTORNEY CERTIFIES IN GOOD FAITH THAT HE  OR  SHE  LACKS
   47  THE  REQUISITE KNOWLEDGE IN THE OPERATION OF SUCH COMPUTERS AND/OR SCAN-
   48  NERS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE.  FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH,  THE
   49  KNOWLEDGE  OF ANY EMPLOYEE OF AN ATTORNEY, OR ANY EMPLOYEE OF THE ATTOR-
   50  NEY'S LAW FIRM, OFFICE OR BUSINESS WHO IS  SUBJECT  TO  SUCH  ATTORNEY'S
   51  DIRECTION, SHALL BE IMPUTED TO THE ATTORNEY.
   52    NOTWITHSTANDING  THE FOREGOING: (I) WHERE A PARTY OR A PERSON ENTITLED
   53  TO NOTICE OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL,  HE  OR  SHE
   54  MAY  NOT  PARTICIPATE  IN THE PROGRAM EXCEPT UPON HIS OR HER REQUEST AND
   55  PERMISSION OF THE COURT; (II) A PARTY WHO IS NOT REPRESENTED BY  COUNSEL
   56  THAT  HAS  OPTED IN, SHALL BE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO OPT OUT OF THE
       S. 7592--A                          5
    1  PROGRAM FOR ANY REASON VIA PRESENTATION OF A PRESCRIBED FORM TO BE FILED
    2  WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE PROCEEDING IS PENDING; AND (III) A
    3  COURT MAY EXEMPT ANY ATTORNEY FROM BEING REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN  THE
    4  PROGRAM  UPON  APPLICATION FOR SUCH EXEMPTION, SHOWING GOOD CAUSE THERE-
    5  FOR.
    6    (D) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS  SECTION,  "ELECTRONIC  MEANS"  SHALL  BE  AS
    7  DEFINED  IN  SUBDIVISION  (F) OF RULE 2103 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND
    8  RULES.
    9    (E) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF THIS CHAPTER, NO PAPER  OR  DOCU-
   10  MENT  THAT  IS FILED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS IN A PROCEEDING IN FAMILY COURT
   11  SHALL BE  AVAILABLE  FOR  PUBLIC  INSPECTION  ON-LINE.  SUBJECT  TO  THE
   12  PROVISIONS OF EXISTING LAWS GOVERNING THE SEALING AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF
   13  COURT  RECORDS,  NOTHING  HEREIN  SHALL PREVENT THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM
   14  FROM SHARING STATISTICAL INFORMATION THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PAPERS OR
   15  DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE ACTION.
   16    (F) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL AFFECT OR CHANGE ANY  EXISTING  LAWS
   17  GOVERNING  THE  SEALING  AND  CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS IN FAMILY
   18  COURT PROCEEDINGS OR ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS  BY  THE  PARTIES  TO  SUCH
   19  PROCEEDINGS,  NOR  SHALL  THIS SECTION BE CONSTRUED TO COMPEL A PARTY TO
   20  FILE A SEALED DOCUMENT BY ELECTRONIC MEANS.
   21    (G) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION  SHALL  AFFECT  OR  CHANGE  EXISTING  LAWS
   22  GOVERNING  SERVICE  OF  PROCESS,  NOR SHALL THIS SECTION BE CONSTRUED TO
   23  ABROGATE EXISTING PERSONAL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS  AS  SET  FORTH  IN  THE
   24  FAMILY COURT ACT AND THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
   25    S  6-C. (A) FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION SIX-A OF THIS ACT, "CONSENT OF THE
   26  CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR" SHALL MEAN THAT CONSENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL
   27  PROVIDER OFFICES AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS IN  THE  COUNTY  THAT  REPRESENTED
   28  TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OR MORE OF THE PERSONS REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC DEFENSE
   29  PROVIDERS  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  722 OF THE COUNTY LAW, AS SHOWN IN THE
   30  MOST RECENT ANNUAL REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE OF  SECTION
   31  722-F  OF THE COUNTY LAW. SUCH CONSENT, WHEN GIVEN, MUST BE EXPRESSED IN
   32  A WRITTEN DOCUMENT THAT IS PROVIDED BY A PERSON  WHO  IS  AUTHORIZED  TO
   33  CONSENT  ON  BEHALF OF THE RELEVANT PUBLIC DEFENDER ORGANIZATION, AGENCY
   34  OR OFFICE.
   35    (B) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER LAW, NO PARTY  OR  HIS
   36  OR  HER  COUNSEL SHALL BE CHARGED A FEE FOR VIEWING INFORMATION FILED BY
   37  ELECTRONIC MEANS,  OR  FOR  DOWNLOADING  OR  PRINTING  SUCH  INFORMATION
   38  THROUGH  THE  USE  OF SUCH PARTY'S OR COUNSEL'S OWN EQUIPMENT. THE CHIEF
   39  ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL ENSURE THAT SUFFICIENT COMPUTER TERMI-
   40  NALS AND STAFF ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COURTHOUSE OF EACH COURT PARTICIPAT-
   41  ING IN THE PROGRAM IN THE USE OF ELECTRONIC MEANS, TO ENABLE PARTIES AND
   42  THEIR COUNSEL TO  ACCESS  INFORMATION,  SUBJECT  TO  THE  PROVISIONS  OF
   43  SECTIONS  SIX-A AND SIX-B OF THIS ACT AND LAWS GOVERNING THE SEALING AND
   44  CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS, FILED  BY  ELECTRONIC  MEANS  AT  SUCH
   45  COURTHOUSE IN A PROMPT AND CONVENIENT MANNER.
   46    S  2.  Subparagraphs  1  and  2 of paragraph (B) of subdivision (b) of
   47  section 6 of chapter 367 of the laws of 1999, amending the  civil  prac-
   48  tice  law  and  rules and the judiciary law relating to authorization of
   49  pilot programs permitting use of facsimile  transmission  or  electronic
   50  means to commence an action or special proceeding, are REPEALED, subpar-
   51  agraphs  3,  4  and 5 of paragraph (B) are renumbered subparagraphs 1, 2
   52  and 3 and subparagraph 1, as amended by chapter 543 of the laws of 2011,
   53  is amended to read as follows:
   54    1. One or more classes of  cases  (excluding  matrimonial  actions  as
   55  defined  by  the civil practice law and rules, election law proceedings,
   56  proceedings brought pursuant to article 78 of the civil practice law and
       S. 7592--A                          6
    1  rules, and proceedings brought pursuant to the mental  hygiene  law)  in
    2  supreme court in ERIE, Livingston, Monroe, Rockland, Tompkins, Allegany,
    3  Essex,  Onondaga,  SUFFOLK  and Westchester counties AND IN THE COUNTIES
    4  WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, and
    5    S  3. Subdivisions (c) and (d) of section 6 of chapter 416 of the laws
    6  of 2009, amending the civil practice law and rules relating  to  service
    7  of  papers  by  electronic means, as added by chapter 543 of the laws of
    8  2011, are amended to read as follows:
    9    (c)(1) The [chief administrator shall create an] advisory committee to
   10  consult with [him or her] THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR regarding the develop-
   11  ment of a program relating to  the  use  of  electronic  means  for  the
   12  commencement of criminal actions and the filing and service of papers in
   13  pending  criminal  actions  and  proceedings IS CONTINUED. The committee
   14  shall consist of such number of members as will enable the chief  admin-
   15  istrator to obtain input from those who ARE OR would be affected by such
   16  electronic filing program, and such members shall include county clerks;
   17  chief  clerks  of  supreme, county and other courts; district attorneys;
   18  not-for-profit legal service providers; public defenders; statewide  and
   19  local  specialty bar associations whose membership devotes a significant
   20  portion of their practice to assigned criminal cases pursuant to subpar-
   21  agraph (i) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 3 of section 722 of the coun-
   22  ty law; institutional providers of criminal defense services  and  other
   23  members  of the criminal defense bar; representatives of victims' rights
   24  organizations;  unaffiliated   attorneys   who   regularly   appear   in
   25  proceedings  that  ARE  OR  would  be affected by such electronic filing
   26  program and other interested members of the criminal justice  community.
   27  Such committee shall help the chief administrator to evaluate the impact
   28  of  such  electronic filing program on litigants including unrepresented
   29  parties, practitioners and the courts and to obtain input from those who
   30  ARE OR would be affected by such electronic  filing  program,  including
   31  district  attorneys,  not-for-profit  legal  service  providers,  public
   32  defenders, statewide and local specialty bar associations whose  member-
   33  ship  devotes a significant portion of their practice to assigned crimi-
   34  nal cases pursuant to subparagraph (i) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 3
   35  of section 722 of the county law, institutional  providers  of  criminal
   36  defense  services  and other members of the criminal defense bar, repre-
   37  sentatives of victims' rights organizations, unaffiliated attorneys  who
   38  regularly  appear  in  proceedings that ARE OR would be affected by such
   39  electronic filing program and other interested members of  the  criminal
   40  justice community.
   41    (2)  No  later than January 1, [2012] 2015, the chief administrator of
   42  the courts shall submit to the legislature, the governor and  the  chief
   43  judge  of the state a report of the evaluation including the entities or
   44  individuals consulted, the input received, ALL PROBLEMS  ENCOUNTERED  OR
   45  OTHERWISE  BROUGHT  TO  THE  ATTENTION OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
   46  COURTS OR HIS OR HER AGENTS, ALL SOLUTIONS DEVISED TO ADDRESS THE  PROB-
   47  LEMS,  PRESENTMENT  OF  ALL OUTSTANDING PROBLEMS, any recommendations of
   48  the advisory committee to the chief administrator, along with  recommen-
   49  dations for legislation [authorizing the development of a program relat-
   50  ing]  IN RELATION to the use of electronic means for the commencement of
   51  criminal actions and the filing and service of papers in pending  crimi-
   52  nal actions and proceedings. IN THE REPORT, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR ALSO
   53  SHALL  ADDRESS  ISSUES  THAT BEAR UPON THE NEED FOR THE COURTS, DISTRICT
   54  ATTORNEYS AND OTHERS TO RETAIN PAPERS FILED WITH COURTS OR  SERVED  UPON
   55  PARTIES  IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS WHERE ELECTRONIC MEANS CAN OR HAVE BEEN
   56  USED AND  MAKE  RECOMMENDATIONS  FOR  SUCH  CHANGES  IN  LAWS  REQUIRING
       S. 7592--A                          7
    1  RETENTION  OF  SUCH PAPERS AS TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR MAY SEEM APPRO-
    2  PRIATE.
    3    (d)  (1)  The [chief administrator shall create an] advisory committee
    4  to consult with [him or  her]  THE  CHIEF  ADMINISTRATOR  regarding  the
    5  development of a program relating to the use of electronic means for the
    6  origination  of  juvenile delinquency proceedings under article 3 of the
    7  family court act and abuse or neglect proceedings pursuant to article 10
    8  of the family court act in family court and the filing  and  service  of
    9  papers  in  such  pending  proceedings IS CONTINUED. The committee shall
   10  consist of such number of members as will enable the chief administrator
   11  to obtain input from those who ARE OR would be affected  by  such  elec-
   12  tronic  filing  [programs] PROGRAM, and such members shall include chief
   13  clerks of family courts; representatives of authorized  presentment  and
   14  child  protective agencies; other appropriate county and city government
   15  officials; institutional providers of legal services for children and/or
   16  parents;  not-for-profit  legal  service  providers;  public  defenders;
   17  attorneys assigned pursuant to article 18-B of the county law; and other
   18  members  of  the  family  court  bar; representatives of victims' rights
   19  organizations;  unaffiliated   attorneys   who   regularly   appear   in
   20  proceedings  that  ARE  OR  would  be affected by such electronic filing
   21  program; and other interested members of the family practice  community.
   22  Such committee shall help the chief administrator to evaluate the impact
   23  of  such  electronic filing program on litigants including unrepresented
   24  parties, practitioners and the courts and to obtain input from those who
   25  ARE OR would be affected by such electronic  filing  program,  including
   26  representatives of authorized presentment and child protective agencies,
   27  other  appropriate  county  and city government officials, institutional
   28  providers of legal services for children and/or parents,  not-for-profit
   29  legal  service  providers, public defenders, attorneys assigned pursuant
   30  to article 18-B of the county law and other members of the family  court
   31  bar,  representatives  of  victims'  rights  organizations, unaffiliated
   32  attorneys who regularly appear in  proceedings  that  ARE  OR  would  be
   33  affected by such electronic filing program, and other interested members
   34  of the criminal justice community.
   35    (2)  No  later than January 1, [2012] 2015, the chief administrator of
   36  the courts shall submit to the legislature, the governor and  the  chief
   37  judge  of the state a report of the evaluation including the entities or
   38  individuals consulted,  input  received,  ALL  PROBLEMS  ENCOUNTERED  OR
   39  OTHERWISE  BROUGHT  TO  THE  ATTENTION OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
   40  COURTS OR HIS OR HER AGENTS, ALL SOLUTIONS DEVISED TO ADDRESS THE  PROB-
   41  LEMS,  PRESENTMENT  OF  ALL OUTSTANDING PROBLEMS, any recommendations of
   42  the advisory committee to the chief administrator, along with  recommen-
   43  dations for legislation [authorizing the development of a program relat-
   44  ing]  IN  RELATION to the use of electronic means for the origination of
   45  juvenile delinquency proceedings under article 3 of the family court act
   46  and abuse or neglect proceedings pursuant to article 10  of  the  family
   47  court  act  in family court and the filing and service of papers in such
   48  pending proceedings.
   49    S 4. This act shall take effect immediately; provided,  however,  that
   50  sections  6-a, 6-b, and 6-c of chapter 367 of the laws of 1999, as added
   51  by section one of this act, shall expire and be deemed repealed  Septem-
   52  ber  1,  2015; and provided further that the amendments to paragraph (B)
   53  of subdivision (b) of section 6 of chapter 367 of the laws of 1999  made
   54  by  section  two  of  this  act  shall not affect the expiration of such
   55  provisions and shall be deemed to be repealed therewith.
feedback