Bill Text: NY S05553 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Provides for the detailing of the benefits and costs of proposed rules in the regulatory impact statements to ensure proper disclosure to the public of such information.

Spectrum: Moderate Partisan Bill (Republican 4-1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2013-06-10 - SUBSTITUTED BY A487A [S05553 Detail]

Download: New_York-2013-S05553-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         5553
                              2013-2014 Regular Sessions
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                     May 17, 2013
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  Sen. VALESKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
         printed to be committed to the Committee on Commerce, Economic  Devel-
         opment and Small Business
       AN  ACT  to amend the state administrative procedure act, in relation to
         detailing the benefits and  costs  of  proposed  rules  in  regulatory
         impact statements
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. The legislature finds that many  rules  of  state  agencies
    2  have  a  substantial  impact  on  the lives of the public, and therefore
    3  should be adopted through a process which provides for open and reasoned
    4  consideration of the potential costs and benefits of regulatory  action.
    5  To  this  end,  the  statutes governing the rulemaking process should be
    6  improved to ensure that agency assessments of the costs and the benefits
    7  of proposed rules are reasonably accurate and comprehensive.
    8    S 2. Paragraph (b) of subdivision 4-a of  section  202  of  the  state
    9  administrative  procedure  act,  as  added by chapter 335 of the laws of
   10  1992, is amended to read as follows:
   11    (b) Each agency shall publish and make  available  to  the  public  an
   12  assessment  of public comment for a rule revised pursuant to this subdi-
   13  vision. Such assessment shall be based upon any written comments submit-
   14  ted to the agency and any comments presented at any public hearing  held
   15  on  the proposed rule by the agency. The assessment shall contain: (i) a
   16  summary and an analysis of the issues raised  and  significant  alterna-
   17  tives  suggested  by  any such comments; (ii) a statement of the reasons
   18  why any significant alternatives were not incorporated  into  the  rule;
   19  and  (iii)  a description of any changes made in the rule as a result of
   20  such comments. IF ANY COMMENTS INCLUDED ESTIMATES OF PROJECTED COSTS  OR
   21  BENEFITS  OF  THE PROPOSED RULE TO THE STATE, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OR REGU-
   22  LATED OR OTHERWISE AFFECTED PERSONS OR ENTITIES, WHICH DIFFERED  SIGNIF-
   23  ICANTLY  FROM  THOSE  PRESENTED  BY  THE AGENCY IN ITS REGULATORY IMPACT
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD01500-04-3
       S. 5553                             2
    1  STATEMENT, REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS, OR  RURAL  AREA  FLEXIBILITY
    2  ANALYSIS, THE ASSESSMENT SHALL ALSO SUMMARIZE THE AGENCY'S ASSESSMENT OF
    3  SUCH  ESTIMATES. COPIES OF COMMENTS WHICH INCLUDE ESTIMATES OF PROJECTED
    4  COSTS OR BENEFITS WHICH DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE AGENCY'S ESTIMATES
    5  SHALL  ACCOMPANY  THE  ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC COMMENT DISTRIBUTED WITH THE
    6  RULE MAKING NOTICE PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A)  OF  SUBDIVISION  SIX-A  OF
    7  THIS  SECTION.  If no comments have been received, the notice of revised
    8  rule making shall state that no comments were received  by  the  agency.
    9  Any  subsequent assessment published pursuant to this paragraph or para-
   10  graph (b) of subdivision five of this section need only include comments
   11  not addressed in any previously published assessment of  public  comment
   12  for  the rule; provided, however, that the notice of revised rule making
   13  or adoption shall contain the date any previous notice of  revised  rule
   14  making  containing  an assessment of public comment was published in the
   15  state register.
   16    S 3. Paragraph (b) of subdivision 5 of section 202 of the state admin-
   17  istrative procedure act, as amended by chapter 171 of the laws of  1994,
   18  is amended to read as follows:
   19    (b)  Except  with  respect to any rule defined in subparagraph (ii) of
   20  paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section  one  hundred  two  of  this
   21  chapter,  each  agency shall publish and make available to the public an
   22  assessment of public comment for a rule adopted pursuant to this  subdi-
   23  vision or paragraph (e) of subdivision six of this section. Such assess-
   24  ment  shall  be  based upon any written comments submitted to the agency
   25  and any comments presented at any public hearing held  on  the  proposed
   26  rule  by  the agency. The assessment shall contain: (i) a summary and an
   27  analysis of the issues raised and significant alternatives suggested  by
   28  any  such  comments, (ii) a statement of the reasons why any significant
   29  alternatives were not incorporated into the rule and (iii) a description
   30  of any changes made in the rule as a result of  such  comments.  If  any
   31  comments  included  estimates  of  projected  costs  OR  BENEFITS of the
   32  proposed rule to the state, local governments or regulated OR  OTHERWISE
   33  AFFECTED  persons  OR  ENTITIES, which differed significantly from those
   34  presented by the agency in its regulatory impact  statement,  regulatory
   35  flexibility analysis, or rural area flexibility analysis, the assessment
   36  shall  also summarize the agency's assessment of such estimates.  COPIES
   37  OF COMMENTS WHICH INCLUDE ESTIMATES OF PROJECTED COSTS OR BENEFITS WHICH
   38  DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE AGENCY'S  ESTIMATES  SHALL  ACCOMPANY  THE
   39  ASSESSMENT  OF  PUBLIC  COMMENT  DISTRIBUTED WITH THE RULE MAKING NOTICE
   40  PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION SIX-A OF THIS  SECTION.  If  no
   41  comments  have been received, the notice of adoption shall state that no
   42  comments were received by the agency. Comments submitted or presented to
   43  the agency by a legislative committee or commission or by  a  member  or
   44  members of the senate or assembly shall be considered public comment and
   45  shall be summarized and analyzed in the assessment.
   46    S  4. Paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of subdivision 3 of section 202-a of
   47  the state administrative procedure act,  paragraph  (b)  as  amended  by
   48  chapter 229 of the laws of 2000 and paragraphs (c) and (d) as amended by
   49  chapter 520 of the laws of 1992, are amended to read as follows:
   50    (b)  Needs  and  benefits.  A  statement setting forth the purpose of,
   51  necessity for, and benefits derived from the rule[, a citation  for  and
   52  summary, not to exceed five hundred words, of each scientific or statis-
   53  tical  study,  report or analysis that served as the basis for the rule,
   54  an explanation of how it was used to determine  the  necessity  for  and
   55  benefits derived from the rule, and the name of the person that produced
   56  each study, report or analysis] WHICH SHALL INCLUDE:
       S. 5553                             3
    1    (I)  INFORMATION  IDENTIFYING THE CLASSES OF PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHICH
    2  WOULD BENEFIT FROM THE RULE;
    3    (II)  AN  ASSESSMENT,  INCLUDING  THE UNDERLYING ANALYSIS, OF BENEFITS
    4  ANTICIPATED FROM THE RULE; INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY DIRECT  OR
    5  INDIRECT  BENEFITS FOR THE ECONOMY AND PRIVATE MARKETS, HEALTH AND SAFE-
    6  TY, THE  NATURAL  ENVIRONMENT,  AND  THE  ELIMINATION  OR  REDUCTION  OF
    7  DISCRIMINATION  OR  BIAS,  AND  ANY  OTHER  SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS. TO THE
    8  EXTENT FEASIBLE, THE ASSESSMENT SHALL INCLUDE A QUANTIFICATION OF  THOSE
    9  BENEFITS  AND DESCRIBE THE SOURCES OF INFORMATION AND METHODOLOGY UNDER-
   10  LYING SUCH QUANTIFICATION. WHERE IT IS DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO  QUAN-
   11  TIFY  BENEFITS,  THE  ASSESSMENT SHALL INCLUDE A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF
   12  SUCH BENEFITS; AND
   13    (III) A CITATION FOR AND SUMMARY, NOT TO EXCEED FIVE HUNDRED WORDS, OF
   14  EACH SCIENTIFIC OR STATISTICAL STUDY, REPORT OR ANALYSIS THAT SERVED  AS
   15  THE  BASIS  FOR THE RULE, AN EXPLANATION OF HOW IT WAS USED TO DETERMINE
   16  THE NECESSITY FOR AND BENEFITS DERIVED FROM THE RULE, AND  THE  NAME  OF
   17  THE PERSON THAT PRODUCED EACH STUDY, REPORT OR ANALYSIS;
   18    (c) Costs. A statement detailing the projected [costs] COST IMPACTS of
   19  the rule[, which shall indicate:
   20    (i)  the  costs  for  the implementation of, and continuing compliance
   21  with, the rule to regulated persons;
   22    (ii) the costs for the implementation of, and continued administration
   23  of, the rule to the agency and to the state and its  local  governments;
   24  and
   25    (iii)  the information, including the source or sources of such infor-
   26  mation, and methodology upon which the cost analysis is based; or
   27    (iv) where an agency finds that it cannot fully provide a statement of
   28  such costs, a statement setting forth its  best  estimate,  which  shall
   29  indicate  the  information and methodology upon which such best estimate
   30  is based and the reason or reasons why a complete cost statement  cannot
   31  be  provided;]  ON  PERSONS  OR ENTITIES WHO WOULD BE DIRECTLY REGULATED
   32  UNDER THE RULE, PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO WOULD NOT BE REGULATED BUT WOULD
   33  OTHERWISE BE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY  THE  RULE,  AND  ON  THE  AGENCY
   34  PROPOSING  THE  RULE,  OTHER  STATE ENTITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. SUCH
   35  STATEMENT SHALL INCLUDE AN ASSESSMENT, INCLUDING THE  UNDERLYING  ANALY-
   36  SIS,  OF  INITIAL  AND  CONTINUING  COSTS ANTICIPATED TO RESULT FROM THE
   37  RULE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE DIRECT COSTS TO  GOVERNMENT  IN
   38  ADMINISTERING  THE  RULE  AND TO BUSINESSES AND OTHERS IN COMPLYING WITH
   39  THE RULE, AND ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE EFFICIENT  FUNCTIONING  OF  THE
   40  ECONOMY,   PRIVATE  MARKETS  (INCLUDING  PRODUCTIVITY,  EMPLOYMENT,  AND
   41  COMPETITIVENESS), HEALTH, SAFETY, AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, AND OTHER
   42  SIGNIFICANT COSTS. TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE, THE ASSESSMENT SHALL  INCLUDE
   43  A  QUANTIFICATION OF THOSE COSTS AND DESCRIBE THE SOURCES OF INFORMATION
   44  AND METHODOLOGY UNDERLYING SUCH QUANTIFICATION. WHERE IT IS DIFFICULT OR
   45  IMPOSSIBLE TO QUANTIFY COSTS, THE ASSESSMENT SHALL INCLUDE A QUALITATIVE
   46  ANALYSIS OF SUCH COSTS;
   47    (d) Paperwork. A statement  describing  the  need  for  any  reporting
   48  requirements,  including  forms and other paperwork AND ANY REPORTING BY
   49  ELECTRONIC MEDIA, which would be required as a result of the rule;
   50    S 5. This act shall  take  effect  on  the  first  of  September  next
   51  succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law, and shall apply
   52  to  any  rule  for which a notice of proposed rule making or a notice of
   53  emergency adoption is first prepared on or after such effective date.
feedback