Bill Text: NY S01153 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Authorizes an attending physician to make decisions regarding hospice on behalf of an incapable adult without a surrogate.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2015-06-15 - SUBSTITUTED BY A2150 [S01153 Detail]

Download: New_York-2015-S01153-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         1153
                              2015-2016 Regular Sessions
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                    January 9, 2015
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  Sen.  HANNON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
         printed to be committed to the Committee on Health
       AN ACT to amend the public health law, in relation to  providing  for  a
         decision  regarding hospice care on behalf of a hospice-eligible inca-
         pable adult patient without a surrogate; and to repeal  paragraph  (c)
         of subdivision 5 of section 2994-g of such law relating thereto
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. Section 2994-g of the  public  health  law  is  amended  by
    2  adding a new subdivision 5-a to read as follows:
    3    5-A. DECISIONS REGARDING HOSPICE CARE. AN ATTENDING PHYSICIAN SHALL BE
    4  AUTHORIZED  TO  MAKE DECISIONS REGARDING HOSPICE CARE AND EXECUTE APPRO-
    5  PRIATE DOCUMENTS FOR SUCH DECISIONS (INCLUDING A HOSPICE ELECTION  FORM)
    6  FOR  AN  ADULT  PATIENT  UNDER  THIS  SECTION WHO IS HOSPICE ELIGIBLE IN
    7  ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS.
    8    (A) THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN SHALL MAKE DECISIONS UNDER THIS SECTION IN
    9  CONSULTATION WITH STAFF DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PATIENT'S CARE, AND
   10  SHALL BASE HIS OR HER DECISIONS ON THE STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS
   11  SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISIONS FOUR AND FIVE OF SECTION  TWENTY-NINE  HUNDRED
   12  NINETY-FOUR-D OF THIS ARTICLE;
   13    (B) THERE IS A CONCURRING OPINION AS FOLLOWS:
   14    (I)  IN A GENERAL HOSPITAL, AT LEAST ONE OTHER PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY
   15  THE HOSPITAL MUST INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE OR  SHE  CONCURS  THAT
   16  THE RECOMMENDATION IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECI-
   17  SIONS;
   18    (II)  IN  A  RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY, THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF
   19  THE FACILITY, OR A PHYSICIAN DESIGNATED BY THE  MEDICAL  DIRECTOR,  MUST
   20  INDEPENDENTLY  DETERMINE  THAT HE OR SHE CONCURS THAT THE RECOMMENDATION
   21  IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS; PROVIDED THAT
   22  IF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR IS THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, A  DIFFER-
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD02741-01-5
       S. 1153                             2
    1  ENT  PHYSICIAN  DESIGNATED  BY THE RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY MUST
    2  MAKE THIS INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION; OR
    3    (III)  IN SETTINGS OTHER THAN A GENERAL HOSPITAL OR RESIDENTIAL HEALTH
    4  CARE FACILITY, THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR  OF  THE  HOSPICE,  OR  A  PHYSICIAN
    5  DESIGNATED BY THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, MUST INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE THAT HE
    6  OR  SHE  CONCURS  THAT  THE  RECOMMENDATION IS MEDICALLY APPROPRIATE AND
    7  CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS; PROVIDED THAT IF
    8  THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR IS THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN,  A  DIFFERENT
    9  PHYSICIAN  DESIGNATED BY THE HOSPICE MUST MAKE THIS INDEPENDENT DETERMI-
   10  NATION; AND
   11    (C) THE ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL  HOSPITAL,  RESIDENTIAL
   12  HEALTH  CARE  FACILITY OR HOSPICE, AS APPLICABLE, INCLUDING AT LEAST ONE
   13  PHYSICIAN WHO IS NOT THE PATIENT'S ATTENDING PHYSICIAN, OR  A  COURT  OF
   14  COMPETENT  JURISDICTION,  MUST REVIEW THE DECISION AND DETERMINE THAT IT
   15  IS CONSISTENT WITH SUCH STANDARDS FOR SURROGATE DECISIONS.
   16    S 2. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 5 of section 2994-g  of  the  public
   17  health law is REPEALED.
   18    S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback