Bill Text: NY S00306 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Authorizes and directs the department of education and the state board of real property services to undertake a study with the department of taxation and finance on the fiscal impact and implication of granting local school districts the authority to implement an income tax surcharge as a means of reducing local real property taxes and funding education.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-01-06 - REFERRED TO EDUCATION [S00306 Detail]

Download: New_York-2009-S00306-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
           S. 306                                                    A. 371
                              2009-2010 Regular Sessions
                             S E N A T E - A S S E M B L Y
                                      (PREFILED)
                                    January 7, 2009
                                      ___________
       IN SENATE -- Introduced by Sen. LAVALLE -- read twice and ordered print-
         ed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education
       IN  ASSEMBLY  --  Introduced  by  M.  of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- read once and
         referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
       AN ACT directing the New York State department  of  education,  the  New
         York  State  department of taxation and finance and the state board of
         real property services to study the fiscal impact  of  granting  local
         school  districts  authority  to implement an income tax surcharge and
         providing for the repeal of certain provisions upon expiration thereof
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1. Declaration of findings and legislative intent. The legis-
    2  lature hereby finds that the real property tax  is  an  inequitable  and
    3  regressive form of taxation wherein low- and middle-income taxpayers pay
    4  a  disproportionate percentage of their income in property taxes.  Under
    5  such a system, ability to pay is not a factor  in  calculating  property
    6  tax  liability.  Rather,  the  present system relies on an often-archaic
    7  system of property tax assessment that bears no  relation  to  household
    8  income.  Further,  such system of taxation has priced many people out of
    9  the housing market or forced them to sell their homes. In addition, such
   10  a taxing mechanism has a particularly negative impact on senior citizens
   11  and those living on a fixed income.
   12    The legislature hereby finds that the  collection  of  local  property
   13  taxes  constitutes the majority of education funding in school districts
   14  throughout the state utilizing such a system.  Presently,  approximately
   15  fifty-seven percent of school funding is derived from localities. As the
   16  state  continues  to  reduce  its share of the education-funding burden,
   17  school districts have been forced to increase their tax  rates,  thereby
   18  further increasing the unfair burden of such tax system.
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD02078-01-9
       S. 306                              2                             A. 371
    1    The  legislature  further finds that gross inequities exist throughout
    2  the state in terms of school districts' abilities to raise money  local-
    3  ly.    Under  the present system, wealthy and "property rich" districts,
    4  specifically those areas with commercial  property  and  other  entities
    5  with  high assessments, have a tremendous advantage over underprivileged
    6  and "property poor" districts. In some districts, state aid  constitutes
    7  less  than  ten  percent of the school budget. This occurs because these
    8  localities have the ability  to  raise  property  taxes  without  unduly
    9  burdening the community.
   10    The legislature also finds that continued reliance on the property tax
   11  has  contributed  to legal challenges to the state education system as a
   12  whole.
   13    The legislature finds that a tax scaled to income would  be  a  fairer
   14  and  more  progressive  form  of taxation under which residents would be
   15  taxed based on their ability to pay.
   16    Therefore, the legislature declares that the property tax, as a  means
   17  to  fund  education,  contains  gross  inequities and that a potentially
   18  fairer system, in income-tax surcharge, is worthy of study.
   19    S 2. The New York State department of education and the state board of
   20  real property services are hereby authorized and directed to assist  the
   21  New York State department of taxation and finance in preparing a compre-
   22  hensive  study  documenting  the  fiscal implications of authorizing the
   23  reduction of real property taxes  levied  for  the  purpose  of  funding
   24  education  costs  through  granting local school districts the option to
   25  implement an income tax surcharge.
   26    Such study shall consider the fiscal impacts on a  broad  spectrum  of
   27  incomes,  as  well  as  calculate  the  effects  of any state income tax
   28  reductions on tax receipts under such a surcharge. Such study shall also
   29  consider what level of surcharge would have to be imposed to bring about
   30  a dramatic reduction in the property tax. This study shall also document
   31  the effects of such a change on school districts,  taking  into  account
   32  their  relative wealth in terms of residents' income, property tax base,
   33  level of state education funding and other relevant factors.   In  addi-
   34  tion,  such study shall be so designed as to enable individual taxpayers
   35  to determine the effects of any change on their income tax and  property
   36  tax  liabilities.  The  results  of such study shall be submitted to the
   37  legislature no later than one year following the effective date of  this
   38  act.
   39    S 3. This act shall take effect immediately and shall remain in effect
   40  until  the  ninetieth  day  after  submission of the report specified in
   41  section two of this  act,  when  upon  such  date  it  shall  be  deemed
   42  repealed.
feedback