Bill Text: NY A10193 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Establishes a crime for unlawful surveillance through the use of GPS or similar technology.

Spectrum: Strong Partisan Bill (Democrat 62-5)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-10-27 - referred to codes [A10193 Detail]

Download: New_York-2013-A10193-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         10193
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                   October 27, 2014
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  COMMITTEE  ON  RULES  --  (at request of M. of A. Nolan,
         Peoples-Stokes, Silver, Morelle, Gottfried, Lentol, Weisenberg, Glick,
         Ortiz, Lifton, Kavanagh, Russell, Barrett, Mayer,  Arroyo,  Benedetto,
         Brennan,  Brindisi, Bronson, Brook-Krasny, Ceretto, Clark, Cook, Cres-
         po,  Crouch,  Cymbrowitz,  Davila,  DenDekker,  Englebright,  Farrell,
         Fitzpatrick, Galef, Gantt, Gjonaj, Hennessey, Jaffee, Lavine, Lupardo,
         Magee,  Magnarelli,  Markey, Miller, O'Donnell, Ramos, Roberts, Robin-
         son, Ryan, Scarborough, Schimminger,  Sepulveda,  Simotas,  Skartados,
         Solages,  Steck,  Stirpe, Sweeney, Thiele, Zebrowski) -- read once and
         referred to the Committee on Codes
       AN ACT to amend the penal law and the civil rights law, in  relation  to
         the  unlawful surveillance of an individual using GPS or similar tech-
         nology
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1. The penal law is amended by adding a new section 250.75 to
    2  read as follows:
    3  S 250.75 UNLAWFUL SURVEILLANCE BY GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM  OR  SIMILAR
    4             TECHNOLOGY.
    5    1.  A  PERSON IS GUILTY OF UNLAWFUL SURVEILLANCE BY GLOBAL POSITIONING
    6  SYSTEM OR SIMILAR TECHNOLOGY WHEN:
    7    (A) WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF THE AUTHORIZED OPERATOR  OF  A
    8  MOTOR  VEHICLE AND WITH INTENT TO MONITOR OR DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF A
    9  MOTOR VEHICLE, HE OR SHE INTENTIONALLY PLACES IN OR ON  SUCH  VEHICLE  A
   10  GLOBAL  POSITIONING SYSTEM DEVICE OR SIMILAR DEVICE AND THEREBY MONITORS
   11  OR DETERMINES THE LOCATION OF SUCH MOTOR  VEHICLE,  UNDER  CIRCUMSTANCES
   12  WHERE  SUCH  AUTHORIZED  OPERATOR  HAS  A  REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF THE
   13  PRIVACY OF SUCH INFORMATION. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH AND SUBDIVI-
   14  SION THREE OF THIS SECTION, A "REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY" IS NOT
   15  EXTINGUISHED BY THE MERE PRESENCE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE IN A PUBLIC  PLACE;
   16  OR
   17    (B)  WITHOUT  THE  KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF A PERSON AND WITH INTENT TO
   18  MONITOR OR DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF A PERSON, HE OR  SHE  INTENTIONALLY
   19  PLACES  ON  THE  BODY OF SUCH PERSON OR ON THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF SUCH
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD15867-01-4
       A. 10193                            2
    1  PERSON A GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM DEVICE OR SIMILAR DEVICE, AND THEREBY
    2  MONITORS OR DETERMINES THE LOCATION OF SUCH PERSON.
    3    2.  (A)  THIS  SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO CONDUCT BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT
    4  OFFICIAL PURSUANT TO A WARRANT ISSUED BY AN AUTHORIZED COURT OR THAT  IS
    5  AUTHORIZED BY LAWFUL EXCEPTION TO THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT.
    6    (B)  PARAGRAPH  (A) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY
    7  TO A PERSON WHO IS AN OWNER OF THE VEHICLE IN OR ON WHICH THE DEVICE WAS
    8  PLACED, WHEN THE OPERATOR OF SUCH VEHICLE IS THE  MINOR  CHILD  OF  SUCH
    9  OWNER.
   10    3.  IT  SHALL  BE  A DEFENSE UNDER PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF
   11  THIS SECTION THAT, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES,  THE  DEFENDANT  ENGAGED  IN
   12  SUCH  CONDUCT  FOR  A  LEGITIMATE PURPOSE AND SUCH AUTHORIZED OPERATOR'S
   13  REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY WAS MINIMAL.
   14    4. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO DIMINISH  OR  ENLARGE
   15  ANY  POWER  OF THE COURTS, OR ANY AUTHORITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL
   16  ENGAGED IN THE CONDUCT OF THEIR AUTHORIZED DUTIES, WITH RESPECT  TO  THE
   17  CONDUCT DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION.
   18    UNLAWFUL SURVEILLANCE BY GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM OR SIMILAR TECHNOL-
   19  OGY IS A CLASS B MISDEMEANOR.
   20    S  2.  The civil rights law is amended by adding a new section 50-f to
   21  read as follows:
   22    S 50-F. UNAUTHORIZED SURVEILLANCE  BY  GLOBAL  POSITIONING  SYSTEM  OR
   23  SIMILAR  TECHNOLOGY.    1. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS
   24  SECTION, ANY PERSON WHO:
   25    (A) WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF THE AUTHORIZED OPERATOR  OF  A
   26  MOTOR  VEHICLE AND WITH INTENT TO MONITOR OR DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF A
   27  MOTOR VEHICLE, INTENTIONALLY PLACES IN OR ON SUCH VEHICLE A GLOBAL POSI-
   28  TIONING SYSTEM DEVICE OR SIMILAR DEVICE AND THEREBY MONITORS  OR  DETER-
   29  MINES THE LOCATION OF SUCH MOTOR VEHICLE, UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE SUCH
   30  AUTHORIZED  OPERATOR HAS A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF THE PRIVACY OF SUCH
   31  INFORMATION; OR
   32    (B) WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF A PERSON AND  WITH  INTENT  TO
   33  MONITOR  OR  DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF A PERSON, HE OR SHE INTENTIONALLY
   34  PLACES ON THE BODY OF SUCH PERSON OR ON THE PERSONAL  PROPERTY  OF  SUCH
   35  PERSON A GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM DEVICE OR SIMILAR DEVICE, AND THEREBY
   36  MONITORS  OR DETERMINES THE LOCATION OF SUCH PERSON; MAY BE LIABLE, IN A
   37  CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION, FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES,  IF  ANY,  AS  WELL  AS
   38  EXEMPLARY  DAMAGES. THE COURT MAY ALSO AWARD REASONABLE COSTS AND ATTOR-
   39  NEYS FEES TO A PREVAILING PLAINTIFF. FOR PURPOSES OF  PARAGRAPH  (A)  OF
   40  THIS SUBDIVISION AND PARAGRAPH (B) OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, A
   41  "REASONABLE  EXPECTATION  OF  PRIVACY"  IS  NOT EXTINGUISHED BY THE MERE
   42  PRESENCE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE IN A PUBLIC PLACE.
   43    2. (A) THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO CONDUCT BY  A  LAW  ENFORCEMENT
   44  OFFICIAL  PURSUANT TO A WARRANT ISSUED BY AN AUTHORIZED COURT OR THAT IS
   45  AUTHORIZED BY LAWFUL EXCEPTION TO THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT.
   46    (B) PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT  APPLY:
   47  (I)  TO  A PERSON WHO IS AN OWNER OF THE VEHICLE ON WHICH THE DEVICE WAS
   48  PLACED, WHEN THE OPERATOR OF SUCH VEHICLE IS THE  MINOR  CHILD  OF  SUCH
   49  OWNER;  OR (II) WHEN, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE ACTOR ENGAGED IN SUCH
   50  CONDUCT FOR A LEGITIMATE PURPOSE AND SUCH AUTHORIZED OPERATOR'S  REASON-
   51  ABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY WAS MINIMAL.
   52    3. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO DIMINISH ANY POWER OF
   53  THE  COURTS,  OR TO DIMINISH OR ENLARGE ANY AUTHORITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
   54  PERSONNEL ENGAGED IN  THE  CONDUCT  OF  THEIR  AUTHORIZED  DUTIES,  WITH
   55  RESPECT TO THE CONDUCT DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION.
       A. 10193                            3
    1    4.  NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ABRIDGE OR LIMIT ANY
    2  OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY AN AGGRIEVED  PERSON  MAY  HAVE  UNDER  ANY  OTHER
    3  PROVISION OF LAW.
    4    S  3.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
    5  have become a law.
feedback