Bill Text: NY A09871 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Relates to the NYS Health Care Consumer and Provider Protection and Equity Act.

Spectrum: Moderate Partisan Bill (Democrat 4-1)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-02-04 - referred to insurance [A09871 Detail]

Download: New_York-2009-A09871-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         9871
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                   February 4, 2010
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by M. of A. PRETLOW -- read once and referred to the Commit-
         tee on Insurance
       AN ACT to amend the insurance  law,  in  relation  to  the  health  care
         consumer and provider protection and equity act
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. The insurance law is amended by adding a new article 57  to
    2  read as follows:
    3                                  ARTICLE 57
    4                HEALTH CARE CONSUMER AND PROVIDER PROTECTION
    5                               AND EQUITY ACT
    6  SECTION 5701. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.
    7          5702. COLLECTIVE ACTION BY COMPETING PHYSICIANS.
    8          5703. APPLICATION FOR HEARING.
    9          5704. FEE FOR REGISTRATION OF AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTIES.
   10          5705. REGULATIONS.
   11          5706. GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS.
   12          5707. PROHIBITION OF COLLECTIVE CESSATION OF SERVICES.
   13          5708. NO INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER STATUTORY RIGHTS.
   14          5709. DEFINITIONS.
   15    S 5701. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS. THE LEGISLATURE FINDS AND DECLARES THAT:
   16    (A)  UNDER  THE  MCCARRAN-FERGUSON  ACT  OF 1945, 15 U.S.C. S 1011, ET
   17  SEQ., INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL ANTI-TRUST  LAWS  THAT
   18  OTHERWISE APPLY TO MOST OTHER BUSINESSES;
   19    (B)  ACTIVE,  ROBUST AND FULLY COMPETITIVE MARKETS FOR HEALTH CARE AND
   20  DENTAL SERVICES PROVIDE THE BEST OPPORTUNITY FOR THE RESIDENTS  OF  THIS
   21  STATE  TO  RECEIVE  HIGH-QUALITY  HEALTH  CARE AND DENTAL SERVICES AT AN
   22  APPROPRIATE COST;
   23    (C) A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF HEALTH CARE AND DENTAL  SERVICES  IN  THIS
   24  STATE  IS  PURCHASED  FOR  THE  BENEFIT OF PATIENTS BY HEALTH AND DENTAL
   25  INSURANCE CARRIERS ENGAGED IN THE FINANCING OF HEALTH  CARE  AND  DENTAL
   26  SERVICES  OR  IS  OTHERWISE DELIVERED SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF AGREEMENTS
   27  BETWEEN CARRIERS AND PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS;
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD15660-01-0
       A. 9871                             2
    1    (D) CARRIERS ARE ABLE TO CONTROL THE FLOW OF  PATIENTS  TO  PHYSICIANS
    2  AND  DENTISTS  THROUGH  COMPELLING  FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR PATIENTS IN
    3  THEIR HEALTH AND DENTAL BENEFITS PLANS TO UTILIZE ONLY THE  SERVICES  OF
    4  PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS WITH WHOM THE CARRIERS HAVE CONTRACTED;
    5    (E) CARRIERS ALSO CONTROL THE HEALTH CARE AND DENTAL SERVICES RENDERED
    6  TO  PATIENTS THROUGH UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGED CARE TOOLS
    7  AND ASSOCIATED COVERAGE AND PAYMENT POLICIES;
    8    (F) CARRIERS ARE OFTEN ABLE TO VIRTUALLY  DICTATE  THE  TERMS  OF  THE
    9  CONTRACTS  THAT  THEY  OFFER  PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS AND COMMONLY OFFER
   10  THESE CONTRACTS ON A TAKE-IT-OR-LEAVE-IT BASIS;
   11    (G) THE POWER OF CARRIERS TO  UNILATERALLY  IMPOSE  PROVIDER  CONTRACT
   12  TERMS  JEOPARDIZES THE ABILITY OF PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS TO DELIVER THE
   13  SUPERIOR QUALITY HEALTH CARE AND DENTAL SERVICES TRADITIONALLY AVAILABLE
   14  IN THIS STATE;
   15    (H) PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS DO NOT HAVE  SUFFICIENT  MARKET  POWER  TO
   16  REJECT  UNFAIR  PROVIDER  CONTRACT TERMS OFFERED BY CARRIERS THAT IMPEDE
   17  THEIR ABILITY TO DELIVER MEDICALLY APPROPRIATE CARE WITHOUT UNDUE  DELAY
   18  OR DIFFICULTIES;
   19    (I) INADEQUATE REIMBURSEMENT AND OTHER UNFAIR PAYMENT TERMS OFFERED BY
   20  CARRIERS ADVERSELY AFFECT THE QUALITY OF PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS TO CARE
   21  BY  REDUCING  THE  RESOURCES  THAT PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS CAN DEVOTE TO
   22  PATIENT CARE AND DECREASING THE TIME THAT PHYSICIANS  AND  DENTISTS  ARE
   23  ABLE TO SPEND WITH THEIR PATIENTS;
   24    (J)  INEQUITABLE  REIMBURSEMENT  AND  OTHER  UNFAIR PAYMENT TERMS ALSO
   25  ENDANGER THE HEALTH CARE INFRASTRUCTURE AND MEDICAL PROGRESS BY  DIVERT-
   26  ING  CAPITAL NEEDED FOR REINVESTMENT IN THE HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM,
   27  CURTAILING THE PURCHASE OF STATE-OF-THE-ART TECHNOLOGY, THE  PURSUIT  OF
   28  MEDICAL  RESEARCH,  AND EXPANSION OF MEDICAL SERVICES, ALL TO THE DETRI-
   29  MENT OF THE RESIDENTS OF THIS STATE;
   30    (K) THE INEVITABLE COLLATERAL REDUCTION AND MIGRATION  OF  THE  HEALTH
   31  CARE  WORK FORCE WILL ALSO HAVE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ECONOMY OF
   32  THIS STATE;
   33    (L) EMPOWERING INDEPENDENT PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS TO JOINTLY  NEGOTI-
   34  ATE  WITH  CARRIERS  AS  PROVIDED  IN THIS ARTICLE WILL HELP RESTORE THE
   35  COMPETITIVE BALANCE AND IMPROVE COMPETITION IN THE  MARKETS  FOR  HEALTH
   36  CARE  AND  DENTAL SERVICES IN THIS STATE, THEREBY PROVIDING BENEFITS FOR
   37  CONSUMERS, PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS AND LESS DOMINANT CARRIERS;
   38    (M) THIS ARTICLE IS NECESSARY AND PROPER, AND CONSTITUTES AN APPROPRI-
   39  ATE EXERCISE OF THE AUTHORITY OF THIS STATE TO REGULATE THE BUSINESS  OF
   40  INSURANCE AND THE DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE AND DENTAL SERVICES;
   41    (N)  THE  PRO-COMPETITIVE AND OTHER BENEFITS OF THE JOINT NEGOTIATIONS
   42  AND RELATED JOINT ACTIVITY AUTHORIZED BY THIS  ARTICLE,  INCLUDING,  BUT
   43  NOT  LIMITED  TO,  RESTORING  THE  COMPETITIVE BALANCE IN THE MARKET FOR
   44  HEALTH CARE SERVICES, PROTECTING ACCESS TO QUALITY PATIENT CARE, PROMOT-
   45  ING THE HEALTH CARE INFRASTRUCTURE AND MEDICAL PROGRESS,  AND  IMPROVING
   46  COMMUNICATIONS,  OUTWEIGH ANY POTENTIAL ANTI-COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF THIS
   47  ARTICLE; AND
   48    (O) IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE  TO  AUTHORIZE  INDEPENDENT
   49  PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS TO JOINTLY NEGOTIATE WITH CARRIERS AND TO QUALI-
   50  FY  SUCH  JOINT  NEGOTIATIONS  AND  RELATED  JOINT  ACTIVITIES  FOR  THE
   51  STATE-ACTION EXEMPTION TO THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS THROUGH THE  ARTIC-
   52  ULATED STATE POLICY AND ACTIVE SUPERVISION PROVIDED UNDER THIS ARTICLE.
   53    S  5702.  COLLECTIVE  ACTION  BY  COMPETING  PHYSICIANS. (A) COMPETING
   54  PHYSICIANS MAY MEET AND COMMUNICATE IN ORDER TO  COLLECTIVELY  NEGOTIATE
   55  WITH  A  HEALTH  BENEFIT  PLAN  CONCERNING ANY OF THE CONTRACT TERMS AND
   56  CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS  SUBSECTION,  BUT  MAY  NOT  NEGOTIATE  THE
       A. 9871                             3
    1  EXCLUSION  OF PROVIDERS WHO ARE NON-PHYSICIANS FROM DIRECT REIMBURSEMENT
    2  BY A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, AND MAY NOT NEGOTIATE  THE  SETTING  IN  WHICH
    3  PROVIDERS  WHO ARE NON-PHYSICIANS DELIVER SERVICES. COMPETING PHYSICIANS
    4  MAY  NOT  ENGAGE  IN  A  BOYCOTT  RELATED TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
    5  COMPETING PHYSICIANS MAY MEET AND COMMUNICATE CONCERNING:
    6    (1) PHYSICIAN CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES AND COVERAGE CRITERIA;
    7    (2) THE RESPECTIVE LIABILITY OF PHYSICIANS AND THE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN
    8  FOR THE TREATMENT OR LACK OF TREATMENT OF INSURED OR ENROLLED PERSONS;
    9    (3) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, INCLUDING METHODS  AND  TIMING  OF  THE
   10  PAYMENT OF SERVICES TO PHYSICIANS;
   11    (4) PROCEDURES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN THE HEALTH BENE-
   12  FIT PLAN AND PHYSICIANS;
   13    (5) PATIENT REFERRAL PROCEDURES;
   14    (6) THE FORMULATION AND APPLICATION OF REIMBURSEMENT METHODOLOGY;
   15    (7) QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS;
   16    (8) HEALTH SERVICE UTILIZATION REVIEW PROCEDURES; AND
   17    (9)  CRITERIA TO BE USED BY HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS FOR THE SELECTION AND
   18  TERMINATION OF PHYSICIANS, INCLUDING  WHETHER  TO  ENGAGE  IN  SELECTIVE
   19  CONTRACTING.
   20    (B)  AN AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY THAT INTENDS TO NEGOTIATE WITH A HEALTH
   21  BENEFIT PLAN THE ITEMS IDENTIFIED UNDER SUBSECTION (A) OF  THIS  SECTION
   22  SHALL PROVIDE THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL, AS ESTABLISHED BY SUBSECTION
   23  (C)  OF  THIS  SECTION, WITH WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE INTENDED NEGOTIATIONS
   24  BEFORE THE NEGOTIATIONS BEGIN.
   25    (C) THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL CONSIST OF THREE MEMBERS:
   26    (1) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR  HIS  OR  HER  DESIGNEE  WHO  SHALL  HAVE
   27  PARTICULAR EXPERTISE IN THE AREA OF ANTITRUST LAW;
   28    (2) THE STATE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH, OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE; AND
   29    (3) THE STATE COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE.
   30    (D)  IN  EXERCISING THE COLLECTIVE RIGHTS GRANTED BY SUBSECTION (A) OF
   31  THIS SECTION:
   32    (1) PHYSICIANS MAY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER  WITH  RESPECT  TO  THE
   33  CONTRACTUAL  TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO BE NEGOTIATED WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT
   34  PLAN;
   35    (2) PHYSICIANS MAY COMMUNICATE WITH AN AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY  REGARD-
   36  ING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACTS ALLOWED UNDER THIS SECTION;
   37    (3) THE AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY IS THE SOLE PARTY AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTI-
   38  ATE  WITH  A  HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN ON BEHALF OF A DEFINED GROUP OF PHYSI-
   39  CIANS;
   40    (4) PHYSICIANS CAN BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS NEGOTIATED  BY
   41  THE AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY THAT REPRESENTS THEIR INTERESTS;
   42    (5)  A  HEALTH  BENEFIT  PLAN  COMMUNICATING  OR  NEGOTIATING WITH THE
   43  AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY MAY CONTRACT WITH, OR  OFFER  DIFFERENT  CONTRACT
   44  TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO, INDIVIDUAL COMPETING PHYSICIANS;
   45    (6)  AN  AUTHORIZED  THIRD  PARTY  MAY  NOT REPRESENT MORE THAN THIRTY
   46  PERCENT OF THE MARKET OF PRACTICING  PHYSICIANS  FOR  THE  PROVISION  OF
   47  SERVICES  IN  THE GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA OR PROPOSED GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE
   48  AREA, IF THE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN HAS LESS THAN  A  FIVE  PERCENT  MARKET
   49  SHARE  AS  DETERMINED  BY THE NUMBER OF COVERED LIVES AS REPORTED BY THE
   50  SUPERINTENDENT  OF  THE  INSURANCE  DEPARTMENT  FOR  THE  MOST  RECENTLY
   51  COMPLETED  CALENDAR YEAR OR BY THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF CONSUMERS OF PREPAID
   52  COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICES; IN THIS PARAGRAPH, "COVERED LIVES"  MEANS
   53  THE  TOTAL  NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE
   54  HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN;
   55    (7) THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL MAY LIMIT THE PERCENTAGE OF  PRACTIC-
   56  ING  PHYSICIANS  REPRESENTED  BY AN AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY; HOWEVER, THE
       A. 9871                             4
    1  LIMITATION MAY NOT BE LESS THAN THIRTY PERCENT OF THE MARKET OF PRACTIC-
    2  ING PHYSICIANS IN THE GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE  AREA  OR  PROPOSED  GEOGRAPHIC
    3  SERVICE  AREA; WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER TO IMPOSE A LIMITATION DESCRIBED
    4  UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL CONSIDER THE PROVISIONS
    5  DESCRIBED UNDER SUBSECTIONS (F), (G) AND (H) OF THIS SECTION; THIS PARA-
    6  GRAPH  DOES  NOT  APPLY  IF  THE  MARKET OF PRACTICING PHYSICIANS IN THE
    7  GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA OR PROPOSED GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA CONSISTS  OF
    8  FORTY OR FEWER INDIVIDUALS; AND
    9    (8)  THE  AUTHORIZED  THIRD  PARTY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
   10  SUBSECTION (E) OF THIS SECTION.
   11    (E) A PERSON ACTING OR PROPOSING TO ACT AS AN AUTHORIZED  THIRD  PARTY
   12  UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL:
   13    (1)  BEFORE  ENGAGING IN COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT
   14  PLAN:
   15    (A) FILE WITH THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL THE INFORMATION THAT  IDEN-
   16  TIFIES  THE  AUTHORIZED  THIRD  PARTY, THE PHYSICIANS REPRESENTED BY THE
   17  THIRD PARTY, THE AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY'S PLAN  OF  OPERATION,  AND  THE
   18  AUTHORIZED  THIRD  PARTY'S  PROCEDURES  TO  ENSURE  COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
   19  SECTION;
   20    (B) FURNISH TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL FOR ITS APPROVAL, A  BRIEF
   21  REPORT  THAT  IDENTIFIES THE PROPOSED SUBJECT MATTER OF THE NEGOTIATIONS
   22  OR DISCUSSIONS WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN AND THAT CONTAINS AN  EXPLANA-
   23  TION  OF  THE  EFFICIENCIES OR BENEFITS THAT ARE EXPECTED TO BE ACHIEVED
   24  THROUGH THE COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS, PRODUCT AND GEOGRAPHIC MARKET DEFI-
   25  NITION, CURRENT PRICE LEVELS, AVAILABILITY OF SUBSTITUTES, AND  EASE  OF
   26  ENTRY FOR NEW COMPETING PHYSICIANS;
   27    (C) THE PANEL SHALL REVIEW WHETHER THE GROUP OF PHYSICIANS REPRESENTED
   28  BY  THE AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY IS APPROPRIATE TO REPRESENT THE INTERESTS
   29  INVOLVED IN THE NEGOTIATIONS; THE PANEL MAY NOT APPROVE  THE  REPORT  IF
   30  THE  GROUP  OF  PHYSICIANS IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO REPRESENT THE INTERESTS
   31  INVOLVED IN THE NEGOTIATIONS OR IF THE PROPOSED NEGOTIATIONS EXCEED  THE
   32  AUTHORITY  GRANTED  IN THIS CHAPTER AND, IF THE GROUP IS NOT APPROPRIATE
   33  OR THE NEGOTIATIONS EXCEED THE GRANTED AUTHORITY, SHALL PROVIDE  WRITTEN
   34  NOTICE PROHIBITING THE COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS FROM PROCEEDING, AT WHICH
   35  TIME  THE PROPOSED AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY MAY REQUEST A HEARING PURSUANT
   36  TO SECTION 5703 OF THIS ARTICLE;
   37    (D) THE AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY SHALL PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL  INFORMATION
   38  TO  THE  PANEL  AS NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE THAT INDICATES THAT
   39  THE SUBJECT MATTER OF NEGOTIATIONS WITH  THE  HEALTH  BENEFIT  PLAN  HAS
   40  CHANGED  OR WILL CHANGE; THE PANEL MAY, AS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE, REQUEST
   41  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN ORDER TO ASSESS THE LIKELY COMPETITIVE EFFECTS
   42  OF NEGOTIATION; THE PANEL MAY ALSO SOLICIT INPUT FROM OTHER  PHYSICIANS,
   43  AFFECTED  HEALTH PLANS, AND PATIENTS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL COMPETITIVE
   44  EFFECTS OF NEGOTIATIONS;
   45    (E) WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN'S DECI-
   46  SION TO DECLINE TO NEGOTIATE OR TO  TERMINATE  NEGOTIATIONS,  OR  WITHIN
   47  FOURTEEN  DAYS  AFTER REQUESTING NEGOTIATIONS WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN
   48  THAT FAILS TO RESPOND WITHIN THAT TIME, REPORT TO THE  ATTORNEY  GENERAL
   49  THAT NEGOTIATIONS HAVE ENDED OR HAVE BEEN DECLINED;
   50    (2) WHILE NEGOTIATING WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN:
   51    (A)  PROVIDE THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL, UPON THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW
   52  PANEL'S REQUEST, WITH COPIES OF  ALL  WRITTEN  COMMUNICATIONS  THAT  ARE
   53  RELEVANT  TO THE NEGOTIATIONS, THAT ARE IN THE POSSESSION OF THE AUTHOR-
   54  IZED THIRD PARTY, AND THAT ARE BETWEEN:
   55    I. PHYSICIANS AND THE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN,
   56    II. PHYSICIANS AND AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTIES,
       A. 9871                             5
    1    III. AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTIES AND HEALTH PLANS,
    2    IV. THE INDIVIDUAL PHYSICIANS, AND
    3    V. AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTIES;
    4    (B) BEFORE REPORTING THE RESULTS OF NEGOTIATIONS WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT
    5  PLAN  AND  BEFORE GIVING PHYSICIANS AN EVALUATION OF ANY OFFER MADE BY A
    6  HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, PROVIDE TO THE INDEPENDENT  REVIEW  PANEL  FOR  ITS
    7  APPROVAL,  A COPY OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO BE MADE TO PHYSICIANS RELATED
    8  TO THE NEGOTIATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN OFFERS.
    9    (3) MUST BE AN ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS BOTH CONSUMERS AND PROVID-
   10  ERS OF HEALTH CARE.
   11    (F) THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL EITHER  APPROVE  OR  DISAPPROVE
   12  THE  CONTRACT  THAT WAS THE SUBJECT OF THE COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATION WITHIN
   13  SIXTY DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE REPORTS REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (D)  OF
   14  THIS  SECTION.  IF  THE  CONTRACT IS DISAPPROVED, THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW
   15  PANEL SHALL FURNISH A WRITTEN EXPLANATION.  UPON DISAPPROVAL, THE  INDE-
   16  PENDENT  REVIEW  PANEL SHALL DENOTE ANY DEFICIENCIES ALONG WITH A STATE-
   17  MENT OF SPECIFIC REMEDIAL MEASURES THAT  WOULD  CORRECT  ANY  IDENTIFIED
   18  DEFICIENCIES.  AN  AUTHORIZED  THIRD PARTY WHO FAILS TO OBTAIN THE INDE-
   19  PENDENT REVIEW PANEL'S APPROVAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE ACTING  OUTSIDE  THE
   20  AUTHORITY OF THIS SECTION.
   21    (G)  THE  INDEPENDENT  REVIEW PANEL SHALL APPROVE A COLLECTIVE NEGOTI-
   22  ATION CONTRACT IF:
   23    (1) THE COMPETITIVE AND OTHER BENEFITS OF THE CONTRACT TERMS  OUTWEIGH
   24  ANY ANTICOMPETITIVE EFFECTS; AND
   25    (2)  THE  CONTRACT TERMS ARE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS AND
   26  REGULATIONS.
   27    (H) THE COMPETITIVE AND OTHER BENEFITS OF JOINT NEGOTIATIONS OR  NEGO-
   28  TIATED PROVIDER CONTRACT TERMS MUST INCLUDE:
   29    (1)  RESTORATION  OF  THE COMPETITIVE BALANCE IN THE MARKET FOR HEALTH
   30  CARE SERVICES;
   31    (2) PROTECTIONS FOR ACCESS TO QUALITY PATIENT CARE;
   32    (3) PROMOTION OF HEALTH CARE INFRASTRUCTURE AND  MEDICAL  ADVANCEMENT;
   33  OR
   34    (4)  IMPROVED  COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AND HEALTH
   35  CARE INSURERS.
   36    (I) WHEN WEIGHING THE ANTICOMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF CONTRACT  TERMS,  THE
   37  INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL CONSIDER WHETHER THE TERMS:
   38    (1) PROVIDE FOR EXCESSIVE PAYMENTS; OR
   39    (2)  CONTRIBUTE TO THE ESCALATION OF THE COST OF PROVIDING HEALTH CARE
   40  SERVICES.
   41    (J) THIS SECTION DOES NOT AUTHORIZE COMPETING  PHYSICIANS  TO  ACT  IN
   42  CONCERT  IN  RESPONSE  TO  A  REPORT ISSUED BY AN AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY
   43  RELATED TO THE AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY'S DISCUSSION OR NEGOTIATIONS  WITH
   44  A  HEALTH  BENEFIT  PLAN.  THE  AUTHORIZED  THIRD PARTY SHALL ADVISE THE
   45  PHYSICIANS OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION AND SHALL WARN  THEM  OF
   46  THE POTENTIAL FOR LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THOSE WHO VIOLATE STATE OR FEDER-
   47  AL ANTITRUST LAWS BY EXCEEDING THE AUTHORITY GRANTED UNDER THIS SECTION.
   48    (K)  A  CONTRACT  ALLOWED  UNDER THIS SECTION MAY NOT EXCEED A TERM OF
   49  FIVE YEARS.
   50    (L) THE DOCUMENTS RELATING TO A COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATION DESCRIBED UNDER
   51  THIS SECTION THAT ARE IN THE POSSESSION OF THE  DEPARTMENT  OF  LAW  ARE
   52  CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT OPEN TO PUBLIC INSPECTION.
   53    (M)  NOTHING  IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS EXEMPTING FROM THE
   54  APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS THE CONDUCT OF  PROVIDERS  OR  NEGOTI-
   55  ATIONS  OR AGREEMENTS BETWEEN PROVIDERS AND A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN IF THE
   56  PURPOSE OR EFFECT OF THE CONDUCT, NEGOTIATIONS, OR AGREEMENTS WOULD  BE,
       A. 9871                             6
    1  DIRECTLY   OR   INDIRECTLY,  TO  EXCLUDE,  LIMIT  THE  PARTICIPATION  OR
    2  REIMBURSEMENT OF, OR  OTHERWISE  LIMIT  THE  SCOPE  OF  SERVICES  TO  BE
    3  PROVIDED  BY  SEPARATE OR COMPETING CLASSES OF PROVIDERS WHO PRACTICE OR
    4  SEEK  TO  PRACTICE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES HELD BY
    5  THE PROVIDERS.
    6    (N) IN THIS SECTION, "GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA"  MEANS  THE  GEOGRAPHIC
    7  AREA OF THE PHYSICIANS SEEKING TO JOINTLY NEGOTIATE.
    8    S 5703. APPLICATION FOR HEARING. (A) WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE MAIL-
    9  ING  BY  THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL OF THE NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF AN
   10  APPLICATION BY A PROPOSED AUTHORIZED THIRD  PARTY  REPRESENTATIVE  UNDER
   11  SUBSECTION  (E) OF SECTION FIFTY-SEVEN HUNDRED TWO OF THIS ARTICLE, SAID
   12  REPRESENTATIVE MAY MAKE A WRITTEN APPLICATION TO THE INDEPENDENT  REVIEW
   13  PANEL  FOR  A  HEARING, THE SOLE PURPOSE OF WHICH WOULD BE TO REVIEW THE
   14  INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL'S DISAPPROVAL.
   15    (B) UPON RECEIPT OF A TIMELY APPLICATION FOR A HEARING, THE  INDEPEND-
   16  ENT  REVIEW  PANEL SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING.
   17  THE HEARING SHALL BE HELD WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE  APPLICATION  UNLESS
   18  THE REPRESENTATIVE SEEKS AN EXTENSION.
   19    (C) THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL APPOINT A NEUTRAL HEARING OFFI-
   20  CER TO PRESIDE OVER THE HEARING.
   21    S  5704.  FEE  FOR  REGISTRATION  OF AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTIES. (A) THE
   22  INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL  ADOPT  REGULATIONS  THAT  ESTABLISH  THE
   23  AMOUNT  AND MANNER OF PAYMENT OF A REGISTRATION FEE FOR AUTHORIZED THIRD
   24  PARTIES. THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL ESTABLISH THE FEE  LEVEL  SO
   25  THAT  THE  TOTAL  AMOUNT OF FEES COLLECTED FROM AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTIES
   26  APPROXIMATELY EQUALS THE ACTUAL REGULATORY COSTS FOR  THE  OVERSIGHT  OF
   27  JOINT  NEGOTIATIONS  BETWEEN  PHYSICIANS  AND  HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS. THE
   28  INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL ANNUALLY REVIEW THE FEE LEVEL  TO  DETER-
   29  MINE  WHETHER  THE  REGULATORY  COSTS  ARE  APPROXIMATELY  EQUAL  TO FEE
   30  COLLECTIONS. IF THE REVIEW INDICATES THAT THE FEE COLLECTIONS AND  REGU-
   31  LATORY  COSTS  ARE NOT APPROXIMATELY EQUAL, THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL
   32  SHALL  CALCULATE  FEE  ADJUSTMENTS  AND  ADOPT  REGULATIONS  UNDER  THIS
   33  SUBSECTION  TO  IMPLEMENT  THE ADJUSTMENTS. IN JANUARY OF EACH YEAR, THE
   34  INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL SHALL REPORT ON THE FEE LEVEL AND REVISIONS FOR
   35  THE PREVIOUS YEAR UNDER THIS SUBSECTION TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT  AND
   36  BUDGET.
   37    (B) IN THIS SECTION, "REGULATORY COSTS" MEANS COSTS OF THE INDEPENDENT
   38  REVIEW  PANEL  THAT  ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO OVERSIGHT OF JOINT NEGOTIATIONS
   39  BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS.
   40    S 5705. REGULATIONS. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY PROMULGATE ANY RULES AND
   41  REGULATIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THIS ARTICLE.
   42    S 5706. GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS. A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN AND AN  AUTHOR-
   43  IZED  THIRD  PARTY SHALL NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH REGARDING THE TERMS AND
   44  CONDITIONS OF PHYSICIAN OR DENTIST CONTRACTS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE.
   45    S  5707.  PROHIBITION  OF  COLLECTIVE  CESSATION  OF   SERVICES.   THE
   46  PROVISIONS  OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT TWO OR MORE
   47  PHYSICIANS OR DENTISTS TO JOINTLY ENGAGE  IN  A  COORDINATED  CESSATION,
   48  REDUCTION  OR  LIMITATION  OF  THE  HEALTH  CARE OR DENTAL SERVICES THEY
   49  PROVIDE.
   50    S 5708. NO INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER STATUTORY RIGHTS. THE PROVISIONS OF
   51  THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT AFFECT THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHTS AN  INDI-
   52  VIDUAL  PROVIDER  MAY  OTHERWISE  HAVE  PURSUANT  TO  THE NATIONAL LABOR
   53  RELATIONS ACT, 29 U.S.C. S 151, ET SEQ.; NEW YORK STATE  PUBLIC  EMPLOY-
   54  EES'  FAIR  EMPLOYMENT  ACT,  ARTICLE 14 CIVIL SERVICE LAW; OR ANY OTHER
   55  STATUTE.
   56    S 5709. DEFINITIONS. IN THIS ARTICLE:
       A. 9871                             7
    1    (A) "AUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY" MEANS A PERSON AUTHORIZED BY  THE  PHYSI-
    2  CIANS TO NEGOTIATE ON THEIR BEHALF WITH A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN UNDER THIS
    3  CHAPTER; AND
    4    (B) "HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN" MEANS A HEALTH CARE INSURER SUBJECT TO ARTI-
    5  CLE  THIRTY-TWO  OR  FORTY-THREE  OF  THIS  CHAPTER, OR ANY ORGANIZATION
    6  LICENSED UNDER ARTICLE FORTY-THREE OF THIS CHAPTER, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE
    7  A SELF-INSURED HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN.
    8    S 2. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after
    9  it shall have become a law.
feedback