Bill Text: NY A05221 | 2023-2024 | General Assembly | Amended


Bill Title: Requires the department of environmental conservation to authorize and encourage the use of nature-based solutions as the preferred alternative for stabilizing tidal shorelines in the state; provides such solutions should be considered when promulgating and implementing rules and regulations relating to such.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 6-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2023-06-21 - substituted by s5186a [A05221 Detail]

Download: New_York-2023-A05221-Amended.html



                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                         5221--A

                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions

                   IN ASSEMBLY

                                      March 7, 2023
                                       ___________

        Introduced  by M. of A. OTIS, BENEDETTO, SIMON -- read once and referred
          to  the  Committee  on   Environmental   Conservation   --   committee
          discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
          to said committee

        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  environmental  conservation law, in relation to
          requiring the department of environmental  conservation  to  implement
          permit regulations and guidance regarding shoreline management

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1.  Section 1-0303 of the environmental  conservation  law  is
     2  amended by adding a new subdivision 26 to read as follows:
     3    26.  "Nature-based  solution"  shall  mean  a project that utilizes or
     4  mimics nature or natural processes and functions and that may also offer
     5  environmental, economic, and social benefits, while  increasing  resili-
     6  ence.  Nature-based solutions include both green and natural infrastruc-
     7  ture.
     8    § 2. Section 3-0301 of the environmental conservation law  is  amended
     9  by adding a new subdivision 2-a to read as follows:
    10    2-a.  a. To further assist in carrying out the policy of this state as
    11  provided in section 1-0101 of  this  chapter,  the  department,  by  and
    12  through the commissioner shall:
    13    (1)  authorize  and encourage the use of nature-based solutions as the
    14  preferred alternative, where appropriate, for stabilizing  tidal  shore-
    15  lines  in  the  state when promulgating and implementing rules and regu-
    16  lations relating thereto, specifically including, but  not  limited  to,
    17  those  promulgated and implemented for articles fifteen, twenty-five and
    18  thirty-four of this chapter.  The  department  shall  consult  with  the
    19  United  States  army  corps  of  engineers to ensure the minimization of
    20  conflicts with federal law and regulation.
    21    (2) continue developing integrated  guidance  for  the  management  of
    22  tidal  shoreline  systems  to  provide a technical basis for the coordi-

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD05011-03-3

        A. 5221--A                          2

     1  nation of permit decisions required by any regulatory entity  exercising
     2  authority over a shoreline management project. Such guidance shall:
     3    (i)  communicate to stakeholders and regulatory authorities that it is
     4  the policy of the state that some shorelines shall remain natural unless
     5  stabilization is necessary, and when stabilization is deemed  necessary,
     6  it shall support nature-based solutions as the preferred alternative for
     7  stabilizing tidal shorelines;
     8    (ii) identify preferred shoreline management approaches for the shore-
     9  line and community types found in the state;
    10    (iii) explain the risks and benefits of protection provided by various
    11  shoreline system elements associated with each management option; and
    12    (iv)  recommend  procedures to achieve efficiency and effectiveness by
    13  the various regulatory entities exercising authority  over  a  shoreline
    14  management project.
    15    (3) give preference to a permit application for a shoreline management
    16  project  based  on  nature-based  solution  design unless an alternative
    17  analysis containing a review of nature-based solutions  that  have  been
    18  evaluated   using   the  best  available  information  shows  that  such
    19  approaches are not suitable. If this analysis shows that a  nature-based
    20  solution  approach  is  unsuitable  or  inconsistent with land-use regu-
    21  lations, the department shall require the applicant to  incorporate,  to
    22  the  maximum  extent  possible, elements of a nature-based solution that
    23  are suitable for the project where appropriate.
    24    b. (1) For the purposes of this subdivision,  "nature-based  solution"
    25  shall  have  the  same  meaning  as defined in subdivision twenty-six of
    26  section 1-0303 of this chapter and shall  specifically  mean  techniques
    27  applied  within  the  tidal zone that incorporate natural, native living
    28  features.
    29    (2) When considering a nature-based  solution  the  department  should
    30  prioritize techniques, including but not limited to those that:
    31    (i)  control  or  reduce  shoreline erosion while maintaining benefits
    32  comparable to the natural  shoreline  including,  but  not  limited  to,
    33  allowing for natural sediment movement;
    34    (ii)  improve,  restore, or maintain the connection between the upland
    35  and water habitats; and
    36    (iii) incorporate habitat enhancement and natural elements,  including
    37  but  not  limited  to native re-vegetation or establishment of new vege-
    38  tation consistent with a natural shoreline typical of the  current  site
    39  location either:
    40    (A) under current conditions, or
    41    (B)  as  adjusted  for science-based state sea-level rise projections,
    42  utilizing the appropriate projection scenario at a time interval  appro-
    43  priate  for  the  anticipated  lifespan of the project but not less than
    44  twenty years after  the  anticipated  project  completion,  pursuant  to
    45  section 3-0319 of this title for such location.
    46    § 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback