Bill Text: NY A04343 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Limits the use of subcontracting by public authorities or other entities when it would duplicate services of professional, maintenance, clerical or technical employees in a bargaining unit of the public authority or other entity; sets guidelines for permissible subcontracting, procedures, and appeal.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-0)

Status: (Vetoed) 2009-09-17 - tabled [A04343 Detail]

Download: New_York-2009-A04343-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         4343
                              2009-2010 Regular Sessions
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                   February 3, 2009
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by M. of A. BRODSKY -- read once and referred to the Commit-
         tee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
       AN ACT to amend the public authorities law, in relation to  subcontract-
         ing by public authorities
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. Article 9 of the  public  authorities  law  is  amended  by
    2  adding a new title 4-A to read as follows:
    3                                  TITLE 4-A
    4                    SUBCONTRACTING BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
    5  SECTION  2883.  CONTRACTS  FOR  PROFESSIONAL,  MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR
    6                  TECHNICAL SERVICES.
    7    S 2883. CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL, MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR  TECHNI-
    8  CAL SERVICES. 1. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS TITLE, THE FOLLOWING TERMS
    9  HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:
   10    (A)  "PUBLIC AUTHORITY" MEANS (1) ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, PUBLIC BENEFIT
   11  CORPORATION, OR COMMISSION CREATED BY OR EXISTING  UNDER  THIS  CHAPTER;
   12  (2)  ANY  PUBLIC AUTHORITY OR A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, AT LEAST ONE
   13  OF WHOSE MEMBERS IS APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR OR WHO SERVES AS A  MEMBER
   14  BY  VIRTUE  OF HOLDING A CIVIL OFFICE OF THE STATE; (3) A NOT-FOR-PROFIT
   15  CORPORATION AFFILIATED WITH, SPONSORED BY, OR CREATED BY A STATE AGENCY;
   16  (4) A NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION CREATED BY OR  EXISTING  UNDER  ARTICLE
   17  TWO  OF  THE RACING, PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING AND BREEDING LAW AND OPERATING
   18  UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE GRANTED  BY  THE  STATE;  (5)  A  MUNICIPAL
   19  INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OR OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION;
   20  OR (6) A SUBSIDIARY OR AFFILIATE OF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
   21    (B)  "CONTRACT"  MEANS  AN  ENFORCEABLE  AGREEMENT,  ENTERED INTO BY A
   22  CONTRACTOR AND A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, WHICH EXCEEDS TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOU-
   23  SAND DOLLARS. A SINGLE CONTRACT WHICH IS DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE CONTRACTS
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD08201-01-9
       A. 4343                             2
    1  SOLELY TO AVOID THE APPLICATION OF THIS TITLE SHALL BE DEEMED  A  SINGLE
    2  CONTRACT FOR PURPOSES OF THIS TITLE.
    3    (C)  "CONTRACTOR"  MEANS  ANY  PERSON, PARTNERSHIP, FIRM, CORPORATION,
    4  ASSOCIATION, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OR  OTHER  ENTITY  RENDERING  OR
    5  PROVIDING  PROFESSIONAL,  MAINTENANCE,  CLERICAL,  OR TECHNICAL SERVICES
    6  PURSUANT TO A CONTRACT WITH A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
    7    (D) "SERVICES" MEANS ANY PROFESSIONAL, MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR TECH-
    8  NICAL SERVICES CURRENTLY PERFORMED BY MEMBERS OF THE PROFESSIONAL, MAIN-
    9  TENANCE, CLERICAL, AND TECHNICAL BARGAINING UNIT OF A  PUBLIC  AUTHORITY
   10  OR  WHICH  COME  WITHIN  THE  SCOPE  OF THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF THE
   11  MEMBERS OF SUCH BARGAINING UNIT.
   12    (E) "CHANGE ORDER" MEANS A WRITTEN ORDER BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY DIRECT-
   13  ING THE CONTRACTOR TO MAKE CHANGES IN A CONTRACT.
   14    (F) "CONTRACT MODIFICATION" MEANS ANY WRITTEN ALTERATION TO SPECIFICA-
   15  TIONS, DELIVERY POINT, RATE OF DELIVERY, PERIOD OF  PERFORMANCE,  PRICE,
   16  QUALITY,  OR  OTHER  PROVISIONS  OF  ANY CONTRACT ACCOMPLISHED BY MUTUAL
   17  ACTION OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT.
   18    2. GUIDELINES  FOR  CONTRACTING  FOR  SERVICES.  NO  CONTRACT  WITH  A
   19  CONTRACTOR  FOR  SERVICES  SHALL  BE  ENTERED INTO BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY
   20  UNLESS CONTRACTING FOR SUCH SERVICES IS:
   21    (A) COST EFFECTIVE WHEN COMPARED  TO  THE  COST  OF  HAVING  A  PUBLIC
   22  AUTHORITY PERFORM THE WORK; OR
   23    (B)  REQUIRED  FOR  A  SHORT  DURATION,  MAKING IT IMPRACTICAL TO HIRE
   24  BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES TO PERFORM THE SERVICE; OR
   25    (C) REQUIRED FOR SPECIAL EXPERTISE  NOT  CURRENTLY  AVAILABLE  IN  THE
   26  BARGAINING UNIT; OR
   27    (D)  REQUIRED  DUE  TO  AN  URGENT  NEED SUCH THAT THE DELAY IN HIRING
   28  EMPLOYEES WOULD FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC INTEREST; OR
   29    (E) REQUIRED TO AVOID A CONFLICT OF INTEREST; OR
   30    (F) OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE SO CONTRACTED; OR
   31    (G) IN COMPLIANCE  WITH  THE  PUBLIC  AUTHORITY'S  AFFIRMATIVE  ACTION
   32  EFFORTS  AND  WILL  NOT  CAUSE  THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY TO FAIL TO MEET ITS
   33  AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GOALS. A CONTRACTOR MUST  ALSO  MEET  OR  EXCEED  THE
   34  PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S GOALS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION; OR
   35    (H)  IN  COMPLIANCE  WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE STATE, LOCAL,
   36  AND FEDERAL LAW.
   37    3. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS.  IN DETERMINING IF A CONTRACT IS COST EFFEC-
   38  TIVE, THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY SHALL PERFORM A COST BENEFIT  ANALYSIS  WHICH
   39  SHALL EVALUATE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
   40    (A) REIMBURSEMENT FROM OTHER SOURCES;
   41    (B) BOTH THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS OF PERFORMING THE WORK;
   42    (C)  WHETHER  OR  NOT THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDES WAGES AND SUPPLEMENTS TO
   43  ITS EMPLOYEES WHICH ARE COMPARABLE TO THOSE PAID  TO  SIMILAR  EMPLOYEES
   44  PERFORMING  SIMILAR  WORK IN THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA WHERE THE WORK IS TO BE
   45  PERFORMED. A CONTRACT MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED COST EFFECTIVE IF SUCH WAGES
   46  AND SUPPLEMENTS ARE SUBSTANTIALLY BELOW THOSE CUSTOMARILY  PAID  IN  THE
   47  AREA; AND
   48    (D) THE QUALITY OF SERVICE BEING PROVIDED.
   49    4. REVIEW OF CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES. (A) PRIOR TO EXECUTING A CONTRACT
   50  FOR  SERVICES,  A  PUBLIC  AUTHORITY  SHALL PREPARE A SPECIFIC STATEMENT
   51  WHICH SETS FORTH THE OBJECTIVE  DATA  SUPPORTING  THE  REASONS  WHY  THE
   52  PROPOSED CONTRACT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF
   53  THIS SECTION.
   54    (B)  (1)  PRIOR  TO  THE SCHEDULED AWARD OF A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES, A
   55  PUBLIC AUTHORITY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRES-
   56  ENTS  PUBLIC  AUTHORITY  EMPLOYEES  WHO  WOULD  OTHERWISE  PERFORM  SUCH
       A. 4343                             3
    1  SERVICES WITH COPIES OF THE STATEMENT RENDERED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A)
    2  OF  THIS  SUBDIVISION  AND  THE  PROPOSED CONTRACT SO THAT SUCH EMPLOYEE
    3  ORGANIZATION SHALL HAVE AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS TO OBJECT TO THE  PROPOSED
    4  CONTRACT.  AN EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHICH PROVIDES TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE
    5  OF OBJECTION AND THE REASONS THEREFOR SHALL, UNLESS THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY
    6  AGREES IN WRITING TO WITHDRAW THE PROPOSED CONTRACT, BE PERMITTED TO  BE
    7  HEARD  BY  THE  PUBLIC AUTHORITY ON ITS OBJECTIONS PRIOR TO THE AWARD OF
    8  THE CONTRACT. WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF ANY SUCH OBJECTIONS, THE
    9  PUBLIC AUTHORITY, AFTER  CONSIDERING  THE  OBJECTIONS  OF  THE  EMPLOYEE
   10  ORGANIZATION,  SHALL NOTIFY THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHETHER THE PUBLIC
   11  AUTHORITY  WILL  WITHDRAW  THE  PROPOSED  CONTRACT  OR  ENTER  INTO  THE
   12  CONTRACT.  IF  THE  PUBLIC AUTHORITY DECIDES TO ENTER INTO THE CONTRACT,
   13  AND THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION STILL BELIEVES THAT  THE  CONTRACT  IS  IN
   14  VIOLATION  OF  THE  GUIDELINES  IN  SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, THE
   15  EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO BRING A PROCEEDING  PURSU-
   16  ANT  TO  ARTICLE  SEVENTY-EIGHT  OF  THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES TO
   17  DETERMINE WHETHER OR  NOT  THE  APPROVAL  WAS  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH  THE
   18  PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
   19    (2)  NOTWITHSTANDING  THE PROVISIONS OF SUBPARAGRAPH ONE OF THIS PARA-
   20  GRAPH, THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION MAY BE PROVIDED LESS THAN THE  REQUIRED
   21  FIFTEEN  DAYS  TO  OBJECT  TO THE PROPOSED CONTRACT WHEN THE CONTRACT IS
   22  REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO AN EMERGENCY WITHIN THE SCOPE OF PARAGRAPH (D) OF
   23  SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION.
   24    5. CHANGE ORDERS AND CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS.  IF  A  PUBLIC  AUTHORITY
   25  INTENDS  TO CHANGE, BY USE OF A CHANGE ORDER OR CONTRACT MODIFICATION, A
   26  CONTRACT FOR SERVICES, AND SUCH CHANGE RESULTS IN CAUSING THE AMOUNT  OF
   27  THE  CONTRACT  TO EXCEED ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL
   28  CONTRACT AMOUNT, THEN APPROVAL OF SUCH CHANGES SHALL BE SUBJECT  TO  THE
   29  PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION.
   30    S  2. This act shall take effect on the first of April next succeeding
   31  the date on which it shall have become a law.
feedback