Bill Text: NY A03558 | 2023-2024 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Adds additional offenses where there is concurrent jurisdiction of criminal and family courts; defines "unreciprocated offensive contact".

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 17-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2024-01-03 - referred to judiciary [A03558 Detail]

Download: New_York-2023-A03558-Introduced.html



                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________

                                          3558

                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions

                   IN ASSEMBLY

                                    February 3, 2023
                                       ___________

        Introduced  by  M. of A. GONZALEZ-ROJAS -- read once and referred to the
          Committee on Judiciary

        AN ACT to amend the family court act, in relation to  concurrent  juris-
          diction of criminal and family courts

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 812 of the family  court  act,  as
     2  amended  by  chapter  326  of the laws of 2008, the opening paragraph as
     3  amended by chapter 109 of the laws  of  2019,  is  amended  to  read  as
     4  follows:
     5    1.  Jurisdiction.  The family court and the criminal courts shall have
     6  concurrent jurisdiction over any proceeding concerning acts which  would
     7  constitute  disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of
     8  an intimate image, unlawful surveillance in the first  degree,  unlawful
     9  surveillance  in  the  second degree, unlawful surveillance in the third
    10  degree, dissemination of unlawful  surveillance  in  the  first  degree,
    11  dissemination  of  unlawful  surveillance in the second degree, criminal
    12  impersonation in the second degree, computer trespass, unauthorized  use
    13  of  a computer, harassment in the first degree, harassment in the second
    14  degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree,  sexual  misconduct,
    15  forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, sexual abuse in the
    16  second  degree  as set forth in subdivision one of section 130.60 of the
    17  penal law, stalking in the first degree, stalking in the second  degree,
    18  stalking  in  the  third degree, stalking in the fourth degree, criminal
    19  mischief, menacing in the second degree, menacing in the  third  degree,
    20  reckless endangerment, criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circu-
    21  lation,  strangulation  in the second degree, strangulation in the first
    22  degree, assault in the second degree, assault in the  third  degree,  an
    23  attempted assault, identity theft in the first degree, identity theft in
    24  the  second degree, identity theft in the third degree, grand larceny in
    25  the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third degree,  coercion  in  the

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD06938-01-3

        A. 3558                             2

     1  second  degree  or coercion in the third degree as set forth in subdivi-
     2  sions one, two and three of section 135.60  of  the  penal  law  between
     3  spouses  or  former  spouses,  or  between  parent  and child or between
     4  members  of  the  same family or household except that if the respondent
     5  would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant to section
     6  30.00 of the penal law, then  the  family  court  shall  have  exclusive
     7  jurisdiction  over  such  proceeding.    Notwithstanding a complainant's
     8  election to proceed in family court, the criminal  court  shall  not  be
     9  divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense proceeding pursuant to
    10  this  section. In any proceeding pursuant to this article, a court shall
    11  not deny an order of protection, or dismiss a petition,  solely  on  the
    12  basis that the acts or events alleged are not relatively contemporaneous
    13  with the date of the petition, the conclusion of the fact-finding or the
    14  conclusion  of  the dispositional hearing. For purposes of this article,
    15  "disorderly conduct" includes disorderly conduct not in a public  place.
    16  For  purposes of this article, "members of the same family or household"
    17  shall mean the following:
    18    (a) persons related by consanguinity or affinity;
    19    (b) persons legally married to one another;
    20    (c) persons formerly married to one another regardless of whether they
    21  still reside in the same household;
    22    (d) persons who have a child in  common  regardless  of  whether  such
    23  persons have been married or have lived together at any time; [and]
    24    (e)  persons  who are not related by consanguinity or affinity and who
    25  are or have been in an intimate relationship regardless of whether  such
    26  persons  have lived together at any time. Factors the court may consider
    27  in determining whether a  relationship  is  an  "intimate  relationship"
    28  include  but  are  not  limited  to: the nature or type of relationship,
    29  regardless of whether the relationship is sexual in nature; the frequen-
    30  cy of interaction between the persons; and the duration of the relation-
    31  ship. Neither a casual acquaintance nor ordinary fraternization  between
    32  two  individuals  in  business  or  social  contexts  shall be deemed to
    33  constitute an "intimate relationship"[.]; and
    34    (f) persons who are not related by consanguinity, affinity, or intima-
    35  cy and who are or have been party to unreciprocated  offensive  contact.
    36  "Unreciprocated  offensive  contact"  shall  be  defined as a pattern of
    37  communication or activity wherein one person (the respondent) is engaged
    38  in primarily one-sided assaultive or threatening conduct and/or a course
    39  of repeated, unwelcome communication at or  about  another  person  (the
    40  petitioner).  Factors  the  court may consider in determining whether an
    41  alleged offender is engaging in unreciprocated offensive contact include
    42  but are not limited to: the extent  to  which  the  petitioner  has  not
    43  consented  to  such contact, the volume and frequency of such contact by
    44  the respondent, the coercive, threatening, and/or harassing  content  of
    45  any  communications  sent  by the respondent, and the seriousness and/or
    46  one-sidedness of such contact.
    47    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
feedback