Bill Text: NH HB1673 | 2022 | Regular Session | Enrolled
Bill Title: Relative to certain provisions of the fetal life protection act requiring an ultrasound examination.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 12-0)
Status: (Passed) 2022-05-24 - Signed by Governor Sununu 05/20/2022; Chapter ; Eff. 05/20/2022 [HB1673 Detail]
Download: New_Hampshire-2022-HB1673-Enrolled.html
HB 1673-FN - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES
16Mar2022... 0688h
2022 SESSION
22-2031
05/10
HOUSE BILL 1673-FN
AN ACT relative to certain provisions of the fetal life protection act requiring an ultrasound examination.
SPONSORS: Rep. M. Smith, Straf. 6; Rep. Cushing, Rock. 21; Rep. Simpson, Rock. 36; Rep. Altschiller, Rock. 19; Rep. Toll, Ches. 16; Rep. Kenney, Straf. 6; Rep. Amanda Bouldin, Hills. 12; Rep. Rogers, Merr. 28; Rep. K. Murray, Rock. 24; Sen. Rosenwald, Dist 13; Sen. Whitley, Dist 15; Sen. Sherman, Dist 24
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMENDED ANALYSIS
This bill construes the obstetric ultrasound examination requirement to determine probable gestational age prior to an abortion.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
16Mar2022... 0688h 22-2031
05/10
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Two
AN ACT relative to certain provisions of the fetal life protection act requiring an ultrasound examination.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 Fetal Life Protection Act; Prohibitions; Ultrasound Examination Requirement. Amend RSA 329:44, I to read as follows:
I. Except in the case of a medical emergency as specifically defined in paragraph III, no abortion shall be performed, induced, or attempted by any health care provider unless a health care provider has first made a determination of the probable gestational age of the fetus. In making such a determination, the health care provider shall make such inquiries of the pregnant woman and perform or cause to be performed all such medical examinations, imaging studies, and tests as a reasonably prudent health care provider in the community, knowledgeable about the medical facts and conditions of both the woman and the fetus involved, would consider necessary to perform and consider in making an accurate diagnosis with respect to gestational age, provided, however, that the health care provider shall conduct an obstetric ultrasound examination of the patient for the purpose of making the determination. This subdivision shall be construed to require the performance of an ultrasound only if the provider either knows that the fetus has a gestational age of at least 24 weeks or is conscious of a substantial risk that the fetus has a gestational age of at least 24 weeks.
2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.
22-2031
12/20/21
HB 1673-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED
AN ACT relative to women's health privacy and repealing the fetal health protection act.
FISCAL IMPACT: [ X ] State [ X ] County [ ] Local [ ] None
|
| |||
| Estimated Increase / (Decrease) | |||
STATE: | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 |
Appropriation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Expenditures | Indeterminable decrease | Indeterminable decrease | Indeterminable decrease | Indeterminable decrease |
Funding Source: | [ X ] General [ ] Education [ ] Highway [ ] Other | |||
|
|
|
|
|
COUNTY: |
|
|
|
|
Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Expenditures | Indeterminable decrease | Indeterminable decrease | Indeterminable decrease | Indeterminable decrease |
METHODOLOGY:
This bill repeals RSA 329:43 through 329:50, relative to the fetal health protection act. Since the bill removes a felony offense from statute, it may decrease costs for the judicial and correctional systems. There is no method to determine how many fewer charges may be brought as a result of the changes contained in the bill. However, the entities impacted have provided the costs associated with felony cases below.
Judicial Council | FY 2022 | FY 2023 |
Public Defender Program | Has contract with State to provide services. | Has contract with State to provide services. |
Contract Attorney – Felony | $825/Case | $825/Case |
Assigned Counsel – Felony. Homicide (Including capital cases) | $100/Hour up to $20,000 | $100/Hour up to $20,000 |
Assigned Counsel – Felony | $60/Hour up to $4,100 | $60/Hour up to $4,100 |
Assigned Counsel – Misdemeanor | $60/Hour up to $1,400 | $60/Hour up to $1,400 |
It should be noted that a person needs to be found indigent and have the potential of being incarcerated to be eligible for indigent defense services. Historically, approximately 85% of the indigent defense caseload has been handled by the public defender program, with the remaining cases going to contract attorneys (14%) or assigned counsel (1%). Beginning in March of 2021, the public defender program has had to close intake to new cases due to excessive caseloads. Due to these closures, the contract and assigned counsel program have had to absorb significantly more cases. The system is experiencing significant delays in appointing counsel and the costs of representation have increased due to travel time and multiple appointments. | ||
Department of Corrections | FY 2022 | FY 2023 |
FY 2021 Average Cost of Incarcerating an Individual | $54,386 | $54,386 |
FY 2021 Annual Marginal Cost of a General Population Inmate | $5,715 | $5,715 |
FY 2021 Average Cost of Supervising an Individual on Parole/Probation | $603 | $603 |
NH Association of Counties | FY 2022 | FY 2023 |
County Prosecution Costs | Indeterminable | Indeterminable |
Estimated Average Daily Cost of Incarcerating an Individual | $105 to $125 | $105 to $125 |
With respect to the Judicial Branch, the fiscal impact is indeterminable. In the past the Judicial Branch has used averaged caseload data based on time studies to estimate the fiscal impact of proposed legislation. The per case data on costs for routine criminal cases currently available to the Judicial Branch are based on studies of judicial and clerical weighted caseload times for processing average routine criminal cases that are more than fifteen years old so the data does not have current validity. A new case study is being conducted and updated estimates will be available in the future.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Judicial Branch, Judicial Council, Department of Corrections and New Hampshire Association of Counties