Bill Text: MN HF1386 | 2011-2012 | 87th Legislature | Introduced


Bill Title: Unfair business practices prevented by credit and debit card companies.

Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-05-04 - Author added Dettmer [HF1386 Detail]

Download: Minnesota-2011-HF1386-Introduced.html

1.1A bill for an act
1.2relating to commerce; preventing unfair business practices by credit and debit
1.3card companies;proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter
1.4325O.
1.5BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

1.6    Section 1. TITLE.
1.7This act may be cited as the Minnesota Credit and Debit Card Fairness Act.

1.8    Sec. 2. [325O.01] DEFINITIONS.
1.9    Subdivision 1. Terms. For purposes of sections 2 to 8, the terms defined in this
1.10section have the meanings given.
1.11    Subd. 2. Debit card. "Debit card" means a card or payment device issued by a
1.12financial institution and containing a magnetic stripe, microprocessor chip, or other means
1.13for storage of or access to information that allows the user to obtain, purchase, or receive
1.14credit, money, a good, a service, or anything of value through the transfer of funds from
1.15the transaction account associated with the device.
1.16    Subd. 3. Electronic payment system. "Electronic payment system" means an
1.17entity that: (1) directly, or through licensed members, processors, or agents, provides
1.18the proprietary services, infrastructure, and software that route information and data to
1.19facilitate transaction authorization, clearance, and settlement; and (2) merchants access
1.20in order to accept a specific brand of general purpose credit cards, charge cards, debits
1.21cards, or store-value cards or devices as payment for goods or services. A merchant is
1.22not an electronic payment system.
2.1    Subd. 4. Financial institution. "Financial institution" means an office of a bank,
2.2bank and trust, trust company with banking powers, savings bank, industrial loan
2.3company, savings association, credit union, or regulated lender.
2.4    Subd. 5. Merchant. "Merchant" means a person or entity doing business in this
2.5state that offers goods or services for sale in this state.
2.6    Subd. 6. PIN. "PIN" means a personal identification code that identifies the
2.7cardholder.
2.8    Subd. 7. PIN-enabled debit card. "PIN-enabled debit card" means a debit card
2.9that enables a person or entity that accepts such cards in connection with a transaction
2.10to prompt the cardholder to provide the PIN associated with the card when conducting a
2.11transaction and to conduct the transaction as a PIN debit transaction. To comply with this
2.12section, a PIN-enabled debit card must be physically and electronically identifiable as a
2.13PIN-enabled debit card, and have the capability to access at least one regional PIN debit
2.14network that is widely available statewide.
2.15    Subd. 8. Signature-enabled debit card. "Signature-enabled debit card" means a
2.16debit card that: (1) enables a person or entity that accepts such cards in connection with a
2.17transaction to authorize the transaction by means of an approved signature; (2) is physically
2.18and electronically identifiable as a signature-enabled debit card; and (3) has the capability
2.19to access at least one regional signature debit network that is widely available statewide.

2.20    Sec. 3. [325O.02] PROTECTION OF RETAIL COMPETITION FROM CREDIT
2.21AND DEBIT CARD UNFAIR PRACTICES.
2.22With respect to transactions involving merchants in this state, no electronic payment
2.23system may, directly or through any agent, acquirer, processor, or member of the system:
2.24(1) impose a requirement, condition, penalty, or fine in a contract with a merchant
2.25relating to the display of pricing for goods or services for sale by the merchant;
2.26(2) inhibit the ability of a merchant to offer its customers discounts or in-kind
2.27incentives for using, or to otherwise express a preference for or promote the use of, a
2.28form of payment such as cash, check, debit card, or credit card or any other form of
2.29payment device;
2.30(3) inhibit the ability of a merchant to offer its customers discounts or in-kind
2.31incentives for using, or to otherwise express a preference for or promote the use of, a
2.32payment card of another electronic payment system;
2.33(4) inhibit the ability of a merchant to offer its customers discounts or in-kind
2.34incentives for using, or to otherwise express a preference for or promote the use of, a
3.1particular product over another within the electronic payment system product suite, such
3.2as a standard credit card as opposed to a rewards or platinum credit card;
3.3(5) prevent a merchant from setting a minimum or maximum dollar value for its
3.4acceptance of a payment card product;
3.5(6) inhibit the ability of a merchant to decide not to accept the products of an
3.6electronic payment system at one or more of its locations;
3.7(7) prevent a merchant from deciding not to accept certain products of an electronic
3.8payment system while still accepting other products of that electronic payment system;
3.9(8) prevent a merchant from choosing how to route a transaction; or
3.10(9) inhibit the ability of a merchant to communicate to consumers the cost incurred
3.11by the merchant when a consumer uses a particular electronic payment system, type of
3.12product within that electronic payment system, or other form of payment.

3.13    Sec. 4. [325O.03] DEBIT CARDS; PIN-ENABLED AND
3.14SIGNATURE-ENABLED REQUIREMENT.
3.15(a) A financial institution shall not issue a debit card to a resident of this state unless
3.16the card is both a PIN-enabled debit card and a signature-enabled debit card. Nothing
3.17in this section prohibits an issuer from disabling the PIN functionality or the signature
3.18functionality on a debit card at the cardholder's request.
3.19(b) A financial institution shall not impose a surcharge, fee, or other penalty on
3.20a cardholder in connection with a debit card transaction for the purchase of goods or
3.21services that discriminates between PIN and signature transactions.
3.22(c) A person or entity that accepts an access device in connection with a transaction
3.23may choose to use either PIN or signature processing.
3.24EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective 30 days after final enactment.

3.25    Sec. 5. [325O.04] PENALTIES.
3.26(a) An electronic payment system found to have violated section 325O.02 shall
3.27reimburse all affected merchants for all fines related to the prohibitions described in
3.28section 325O.02 which were collected from affected merchants directly or through
3.29any agent, processor, or member of the system during the period of time in which the
3.30electronic payment system was in violation, and is liable for a civil penalty of $10,000 per
3.31fine levied in violation of section 325O.02.
3.32(b) A financial institution found to have violated section 325O.03 is liable for a civil
3.33penalty of $10,000 per debit card issued in violation of section 325O.03.
4.1(c) A merchant whose rights under section 325O.02 have been violated may
4.2maintain a civil action for damages or equitable relief as provided for in this section,
4.3including the costs of the action, together with attorney fees, if any.
4.4(d) A merchant or cardholder whose rights under section 325O.03 have been violated
4.5may maintain a civil action for damages or equitable relief as provided for in this section,
4.6including the costs of the action, together with attorney fees, if any.
4.7(e) The attorney general may investigate any alleged violation of section 325O.02 or
4.8325.03 and, having reasonable cause to believe that a violation is imminent, is occurring,
4.9or has occurred, the attorney general may institute on behalf of the state, any of its
4.10departments and agencies, or any of its political subdivisions a court action seeking
4.11appropriate relief. The investigatory authority of the attorney general under section
4.12325O.04 includes, but is not limited to, the authority provided for in section 8.31.
4.13(f) In determining the amount of award in a class action, the court shall consider,
4.14among other relevant factors, the amount of any actual damages awarded, the frequency
4.15and persistence of failures of compliance by the issuer, the resources of the issuer, the
4.16number of persons adversely affected, and the extent to which the issuer's failure of
4.17compliance was intentional.
4.18(g) The remedies under this section are cumulative and do not restrict any other right
4.19or remedy otherwise available.
feedback