Bill Text: MI HB5731 | 2013-2014 | 97th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Administrative procedure; rules; adoption of rules; enact requirements for rules that are more stringent than federal regulations. Amends secs. 32 & 45 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.232 & 24.245).
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 7-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-09-09 - Printed Bill Filed 08/28/2014 [HB5731 Detail]
Download: Michigan-2013-HB5731-Introduced.html
HOUSE BILL No. 5731
August 27, 2014, Introduced by Reps. Haveman, Rogers, VerHeulen, Hooker, Leonard, Poleski and Denby and referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform.
A bill to amend 1969 PA 306, entitled
"Administrative procedures act of 1969,"
by amending sections 32 and 45 (MCL 24.232 and 24.245), section 32
as amended by 2011 PA 270 and section 45 as amended by 2013 PA 200.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec. 32. (1) Definitions of words and phrases and rules of
construction prescribed in any statute that are made applicable to
all statutes of this state also apply to rules unless clearly
indicated to the contrary.
(2)
A rule or exception to a rule shall must not discriminate
in favor of or against any person. A person affected by a rule is
entitled to the same benefits as any other person under the same or
similar circumstances.
(3)
The violation of a rule is a crime when so if provided
by
statute.
A Unless provided by
statute, a rule shall must not
make
designate
an act or omission to act as a
crime or prescribe a
criminal penalty for violation of a rule.
(4)
An agency may adopt , by
reference in its rules and
without
publishing the adopted matter in full
, all or any part of
a code, standard, or regulation that has been adopted by an agency
of the United States or by a nationally recognized organization or
association.
The reference shall must fully identify the adopted
matter
by date and otherwise. The reference shall must not
cover
any later amendments and editions of the adopted matter, but if the
agency
wishes to incorporate them in its rule, it shall amend do so
by
amending the rule or promulgate promulgating a new rule.
therefor.
The agency shall have available copies
of the adopted
matter for inspection and distribution to the public at cost and
the
rules shall must state where copies of the adopted matter are
available from the agency and the agency of the United States or
the national organization or association and the cost of a copy as
of the time the rule is adopted.
(5) A guideline, operational memorandum, bulletin,
interpretive statement, or form with instructions is not
enforceable
by an agency, is considered merely advisory, and shall
must not be given the force and effect of law. An agency shall not
rely upon a guideline, operational memorandum, bulletin,
interpretive statement, or form with instructions to support the
agency's decision to act or refuse to act if that decision is
subject to judicial review. A court shall not rely upon a
guideline, operational memorandum, bulletin, interpretive
statement, or form with instructions to uphold an agency decision
to act or refuse to act.
(6)
Where If a statute provides that an agency may proceed by
rule-making or by order and an agency proceeds by order in lieu of
rule-making,
the agency shall not give the order shall not be given
general applicability to persons who were not parties to the
proceeding or contested case before the issuance of the order,
unless the order was issued after public notice and a public
hearing.
(7)
A rule shall must not exceed the rule-making delegation
contained in the statute authorizing the rule-making.
(8) Except for an emergency rule promulgated under section 48,
if the federal government has mandated that this state promulgate
rules, an agency shall not adopt or promulgate a rule more
stringent than the applicable federally mandated standard unless
the director of the agency determines that there is a clear and
convincing need to exceed the applicable federal standard.
(9) Except for an emergency rule promulgated under section 48,
if the federal government has not mandated that this state
promulgate rules, an agency shall not adopt or promulgate a rule
more stringent than an applicable federal standard unless the
director of the agency determines that there is a clear and
convincing need to exceed the applicable federal standard.
Sec. 45. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection,
an agency shall electronically submit a proposed rule to the
legislative service bureau for its formal certification. If
requested by the legislative service bureau, the office of
regulatory reinvention shall also transmit up to 4 paper copies of
the proposed rule. The legislative service bureau shall promptly
issue a certificate of approval indicating whether the proposed
rule is proper as to all matters of form, classification, and
arrangement. If the legislative service bureau fails to issue a
certificate of approval within 21 calendar days after receipt of
the submission for formal certification, the office of regulatory
reinvention may issue a certificate of approval. If the legislative
service bureau returns the submission to the agency before the
expiration of the 21-calendar-day time period, the 21-calendar-day
time period is tolled until the rule is resubmitted by the agency.
The legislative service bureau shall have the remainder of the 21-
calendar-day time period or 6 calendar days, whichever is longer,
to consider the formal certification of the rule. The office of
regulatory reinvention may approve a proposed rule if it considers
the proposed rule to be legal and appropriate.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (6), after notice is
given as provided in this act and before the agency proposing the
rule has formally adopted the rule, the agency shall prepare an
agency report containing a synopsis of the comments contained in
the public hearing record, a copy of the request for rule-making,
and the regulatory impact statement required under subsection (3).
In the report, the agency shall describe any changes in the
proposed rules that were made by the agency after the public
hearing. The office of regulatory reinvention shall transmit by
notice of transmittal to the committee copies of the rule, the
agency reports containing the request for rule-making, a copy of
the regulatory impact statement, and certificates of approval from
the legislative service bureau and the office of regulatory
reinvention. The office of regulatory reinvention shall also
electronically submit to the committee a copy of the rule, any
agency reports required under this subsection, any regulatory
impact statements required under subsection (3), and any
certificates of approval required under subsection (1). The agency
shall electronically transmit to the committee the records
described in this subsection within 1 year after the date of the
last public hearing on the proposed rule unless the proposed rule
is a resubmission under section 45a(7).
(3) Except as provided in subsection (6), an agency shall
prepare and include with a notice of transmittal under subsection
(2) the request for rule-making and the response from the office of
regulatory reinvention, a small business impact statement prepared
under section 40(1), and a regulatory impact statement. The
regulatory impact statement shall contain all of the following
information:
(a) A comparison of the proposed rule to parallel federal
rules or standards set by a state or national licensing agency or
accreditation association, if any exist.
(b) If section 32(8) applies and the proposed rule is more
stringent than the applicable federally mandated standard, a
statement of the specific facts that establish the clear and
convincing need to adopt the more stringent rule and an explanation
of the unique characteristics of this state that necessitate the
more stringent standard.
(c) If section 32(9) applies and the proposed rule is more
stringent than the applicable federal standard, a statement of the
specific facts that establish the clear and convincing need to
adopt the more stringent rule and an explanation of the unique
characteristics of this state that necessitate the more stringent
standard.
(d) (b)
If requested by the office of
regulatory reinvention
or the committee, a comparison of the proposed rule to standards in
similarly situated states, based on geographic location,
topography, natural resources, commonalities, or economic
similarities.
(e) (c)
An identification of the behavior
and frequency of
behavior that the rule is designed to alter.
(f) (d)
An identification of the harm
resulting from the
behavior that the rule is designed to alter and the likelihood that
the harm will occur in the absence of the rule.
(g) (e)
An estimate of the change in the
frequency of the
targeted behavior expected from the rule.
(h) (f)
An identification of the
businesses, groups, or
individuals who will be directly affected by, bear the cost of, or
directly benefit from the rule.
(i) (g)
An identification of any reasonable
alternatives to
regulation pursuant to the proposed rule that would achieve the
same or similar goals.
(j) (h)
A discussion of the feasibility of
establishing a
regulatory program similar to that proposed in the rule that would
operate through market-based mechanisms.
(k) (i)
An estimate of the cost of rule
imposition on the
agency promulgating the rule.
(l) (j)
An estimate of the actual statewide
compliance costs of
the proposed rule on individuals.
(m) (k)
A demonstration that the proposed
rule is necessary
and suitable to achieve its purpose in proportion to the burdens it
places on individuals.
(n) (l) An
estimate of the actual statewide compliance costs of
the proposed rule on businesses and other groups.
(o) (m)
An identification of any
disproportionate impact the
proposed rule may have on small businesses because of their size.
(p) (n)
An identification of the nature of
any report required
and the estimated cost of its preparation by small businesses
required to comply with the proposed rule.
(q) (o)
An analysis of the costs of
compliance for all small
businesses affected by the proposed rule, including costs of
equipment, supplies, labor, and increased administrative costs.
(r) (p)
An identification of the nature and
estimated cost of
any legal consulting and accounting services that small businesses
would incur in complying with the proposed rule.
(s) (q)
An estimate of the ability of small
businesses to
absorb
the costs estimated under subdivisions (n) to (p) to (r)
without suffering economic harm and without adversely affecting
competition in the marketplace.
(t) (r)
An estimate of the cost, if any, to
the agency of
administering or enforcing a rule that exempts or sets lesser
standards for compliance by small businesses.
(u) (s)
An identification of the impact on
the public interest
of exempting or setting lesser standards of compliance for small
businesses.
(v) (t)
A statement describing the manner
in which the agency
reduced the economic impact of the rule on small businesses or a
statement describing the reasons such a reduction was not feasible.
(w) (u)
A statement describing how the
agency has involved
small businesses in the development of the rule.
(x) (v)
An estimate of the primary and
direct benefits of the
rule.
(y) (w)
An estimate of any cost reductions
to businesses,
individuals, groups of individuals, or governmental units as a
result of the rule.
(z) (x)
An estimate of any increase in
revenues to state or
local governmental units as a result of the rule.
(aa) (y)
An estimate of any secondary or
indirect benefits of
the rule.
(bb) (z)
An identification of the sources
the agency relied
upon in compiling the regulatory impact statement, including the
methodology utilized in determining the existence and extent of the
impact of a proposed rule and a cost-benefit analysis of the
proposed rule.
(cc) (aa)
A detailed recitation of the
efforts of the agency
to comply with the mandate to reduce the disproportionate impact of
the rule upon small businesses as described in section 40(1)(a) to
(d).
(dd) (bb)
Any other information required by
the office of
regulatory reinvention.
(4) The agency shall electronically transmit the regulatory
impact statement required under subsection (3) to the office of
regulatory reinvention at least 28 days before the public hearing
required
under section 42. 41. Before the public hearing can be
held, the regulatory impact statement must be reviewed and approved
by the office of regulatory reinvention. The agency shall also
electronically transmit a copy of the regulatory impact statement
to the committee before the public hearing and the agency shall
make copies available to the public at the public hearing. The
agency shall publish the regulatory impact statement on its website
at least 10 days before the date of the public hearing.
(5) The committee shall electronically transmit to the senate
fiscal agency and the house fiscal agency a copy of each rule and
regulatory impact statement filed with the committee and a copy of
the agenda identifying the proposed rules to be considered by the
committee. The senate fiscal agency and the house fiscal agency
shall analyze each proposed rule for possible fiscal implications
that, if the rule were adopted, would result in additional
appropriations in the current fiscal year or commit the legislature
to an appropriation in a future fiscal year. The senate fiscal
agency and the house fiscal agency shall electronically report
their findings to the senate and house appropriations committees
and to the committee before the date of consideration of the
proposed rule by the committee.
(6) Subsections (2), (3), and (4) do not apply to a rule that
is promulgated under section 33, 44, or 48.
Enacting section 1. This amendatory act takes effect February
1, 2015.