Bill Text: HI SB592 | 2011 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Medical Torts; Medical Claim Conciliation Panel
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-02-18 - (S) Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to JDL. [SB592 Detail]
Download: Hawaii-2011-SB592-Amended.html
|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
592 |
|
TWENTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE, 2011 |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO MEDICAL TORTS.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Chapter 671, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part II to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§671‑ Sanctions for failing to prevail in subsequent litigation. (a) After the verdict or the court's decision in subsequent litigation under section 671-16, the court may impose sanctions against the nonprevailing party whose rejection of the medical claim conciliation panel decision resulted in trial. A party's rejection of the panel decision shall be deemed to have resulted in the trial regardless of whether both parties rejected the decision.
(b) The sanctions available to the court are as follows:
(1) Reasonable costs and fees, other than attorneys' fees actually incurred by the party but not otherwise taxable under the law, including expert witness fees, travel costs, and deposition costs;
(2) Costs of jurors; and
(3) Attorneys' fees.
(c) Sanctions imposed against a plaintiff shall be deducted from any judgment rendered at trial. If the plaintiff does not receive a judgment in the plaintiff's favor, or the judgment is insufficient to pay the sanctions, the plaintiff shall pay the amount of the deficiency. Sanctions imposed against a defendant shall be added to any judgment rendered at trial.
(d) In determining sanctions, if any, the court shall consider all the facts and circumstances of the case and the intent and purpose of this part."
SECTION 2. Section 671-1, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§671-1
Definitions. As used in this chapter[:], unless the context otherwise
requires:
"Health care provider" means a physician, osteopathic physician, surgeon, or physician assistant licensed under chapter 453, a podiatrist licensed under chapter 463E, a health care facility as defined in section 323D-2, and the employees of any of them. Health care provider shall not mean any nursing institution or nursing service conducted by and for those who rely upon treatment by spiritual means through prayer alone, or employees of the institution or service.
"Medical tort" means professional negligence, the rendering of professional service without informed consent, or an error or omission in professional practice, by a health care provider, which proximately causes death, injury, or other damage to a patient.
"Panel" means the medical claim conciliation panel.
"Prevailing party" means the party to a medical claim conciliation panel hearing who in subsequent litigation under section 671-16 resulting from a rejection of the panel's decision is:
(1) The plaintiff, if the judgment exclusive of any punitive damages increases the panel's award by thirty per cent or more; or
(2) The defendant, if the judgment exclusive of any punitive damages fails to improve upon the panel's award by thirty per cent or more."
SECTION 3. Section 671-12.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"[[]§671-12.5[]]
Certificate of consultation. (a) Any claim filed with the medical claim
conciliation panel under this chapter shall be accompanied by a certificate
which declares [one of the following:
(1) That] that the
claimant or the claimant's attorney has consulted with at least one physician
who is licensed to practice in this State or any other state, and who is
knowledgeable or experienced in the same medical specialty as the health care
professional against whom the claim is made, and that the claimant or
claimant's attorney has concluded on the basis of such consultation that there
is a reasonable and meritorious cause for filing the claim. If the claimant or
the claimant's attorney is not able to consult with a physician in the same
medical specialty as the health care professional against whom the claim is
made, the claimant or claimant's attorney may consult with a physician who is
licensed in this State or in any other state who is knowledgeable and
experienced in a medical specialty that is as closely related as practicable to
the medical specialty of the health care professional against whom the claim is
made. The physician or physicians consulted by the claimant or the claimant's
attorney may not be a party to the case, nor be compelled to testify or
otherwise participate in the hearing before the medical claim conciliation
panel[;
(2) That the claimant or the claimant's
attorney was unable to obtain the consultation required by paragraph (l)
because a statute of limitations would impair the action and that the
certificate required by paragraph (1) could not be obtained before the
impairment of the action. If a certificate is executed pursuant to this
paragraph, the certificate required by paragraph (1) shall be filed by the
claimant or the claimant's attorney within ninety days after filing the claim;
or
(3) That the claimant or the claimant's
attorney was unable to obtain the consultation required by paragraph (1) after
the claimant or the claimant's attorney had made a good faith attempt to obtain
such consultation and the physician contacted would not agree to such a
consultation. For purposes of this paragraph, "good faith attempt"
refers to the responsibility of a claimant or claimant's attorney to make
reasonable efforts to contact a physician for the purpose of reviewing the
circumstances upon which a claim is based. The claimant or claimant's attorney
may contact physicians by letter, telephone, facsimile, or other electronic
means of communication. If the physician does not respond within a reasonable
time, the claimant or claimant's attorney may submit its claim to the medical
claim conciliation panel along with a certificate declaring such nonresponse to
claimant's good faith attempt. A "good faith attempt" shall
ultimately be evaluated in light of the goal of having a qualified physician
assist the claimant or claimant's attorney in understanding the basis of the
claim, and such determination shall depend upon the circumstances of each
individual case.
(b) Where a claimant or the claimant's
attorney intends to rely solely on a failure to inform of the consequences of a
procedure (informed consent), this section shall be inapplicable. The claimant
or the claimant's attorney shall certify upon filing of the claim that the
claimant or the claimant's attorney is relying solely on the failure to inform
of the consequences of a procedure and for that reason is not filing a
certificate as required by this section].
[(c)] (b) For the purposes of
this section, the claimant or the claimant's attorney shall not be required to
disclose the names of any physician consulted to fulfill the requirements of
subsection (a) to any of the other parties to the claim. The medical claim
conciliation panel may require the claimant or the claimant's attorney to
disclose the name of any physician consulted to fulfill the requirements of
subsection (a). No disclosure of the name of any physician consulted to
fulfill the requirements of subsection (a) shall be made to any of the other
parties to the claim; provided that the medical claim conciliation panel may
contact any such physician to determine if the requirements of subsection (a)
were met.
[(d)] (c) Unless a certificate
is filed pursuant to subsection (a) [or (b)], the claim shall not be
received for filing by the medical claim conciliation panel."
SECTION 4. Section 671-16, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§671-16 Subsequent litigation; excluded evidence. The claimant may institute litigation based upon the claim in an appropriate court only after a party to a medical claim conciliation panel hearing rejects the decision of the panel, or after the twelve-month period under section 671-18 has expired. A party's rejection of the panel's decision shall be recorded with the panel before the litigation may be instituted.
No statement made in the course of the hearing
of the medical claim conciliation panel shall be admissible in evidence either
as an admission, to impeach the credibility of a witness, or for any other
purpose in any trial of the action; provided that [such] the
statements may be admissible for the [purpose] purposes of [section]
sections 671-19[, hereof.] and 671‑ . No
decision, conclusion, finding, or recommendation of the medical claim
conciliation panel on the issue of liability or on the issue of damages shall
be admitted into evidence in any subsequent trial, nor shall any party to the
medical claim conciliation panel hearing, or the counsel or other
representative of such party, refer or comment thereon in an opening statement,
an argument, or at any other time, to the court or jury; provided that such
decision, conclusion, finding, or recommendation may be admissible for the [purpose]
purposes of [section] sections 671-19[, hereof.] and
671‑ ."
SECTION 5. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
SECTION 6. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 7. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2050.
Report Title:
Medical Torts; Medical Claim Conciliation Panel
Description:
Authorizes the court, in medical tort litigation, to impose sanctions on a nonprevailing party whose rejection of the medical claim conciliation panel's decision resulted in the subsequent litigation. Amends requirements for the certificate accompanying any claim filed with the medical claim conciliation panel. Effective 7/1/2050. (SD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
