Bill Text: HI SB1115 | 2020 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating To The Uniform Information Practices Act.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-12-01 - Carried over to 2020 Regular Session. [SB1115 Detail]
Download: Hawaii-2020-SB1115-Introduced.html
|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
1115 |
|
THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE, 2019 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO THE UNIFORM INFORMATION PRACTICES ACT.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 92F-3, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending the definition of "agency" to read as follows:
""Agency" means any
unit of government in this State, any county, or any combination of counties;
department; institution; board; commission; district; council; bureau; office;
governing authority; other instrumentality of state or county government; or
corporation or other establishment owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf
of this State or any county[, but does not include the nonadministrative
functions of the courts of this State]."
SECTION 2. Section 92F-15, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§92F-15 Judicial enforcement. (a) A person aggrieved by a denial of access to a government record may bring an action in the supreme court against the agency at any time within two years after the agency denial to compel disclosure.
(b)
In an action to compel disclosure, the [circuit] supreme
court shall hear the matter de novo; provided that if the action to compel
disclosure is brought because an agency has not made a record available as
required by section 92F-15.5(b) after the office of information practices has
made a decision to disclose the record and the agency has not appealed that
decision within the time period provided by 92F-43, the decision of the office
of information practices shall not be subject to challenge by the agency in the
action to compel disclosure. Opinions
and rulings of the office of information practices shall be admissible and
shall be considered as precedent unless found to be palpably erroneous, except
that in an action to compel disclosure brought by an aggrieved person after the
office of information practices upheld the agency's denial of access to the person as provided in section
92F-15.5(b), the opinion or ruling upholding the agency's denial of access shall be reviewed de novo. The [circuit] supreme court may
examine the government record at issue, in camera, to assist in determining
whether it, or any part of it, may be withheld.
(c) The agency has the burden of proof to establish justification for nondisclosure.
(d) If the complainant prevails in an action brought under this section, the court shall assess against the agency reasonable attorney's fees and all other expenses reasonably incurred in the litigation.
[(e) The circuit court in the judicial circuit in
which the request for the record is made, where the requested record is
maintained, or where the agency's headquarters are located shall have
jurisdiction over an action brought under this section.
(f)] (e) Except as to cases the [circuit] supreme
court considers of greater importance, proceedings before the court, as
authorized by this section, [and appeals therefrom,] take precedence on
the docket over all cases and shall be assigned for hearing and trial or for
argument at the earliest practicable date and expedited in every way."
SECTION 3. Section 92F-15.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) When an agency denies a person access to a
government record, the person may appeal the denial to the office of
information practices in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to section
92F-42(12). A decision to appeal to the
office of information practices for review of the agency denial shall not prejudice
the person's right to appeal to the [circuit] supreme court after
a decision is made by the office of information practices."
SECTION 4. Section 92F-27, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended as follows:
1. By amending subsections (a) and (b) to read:
"(a) An individual may bring a civil action
against an agency in [a circuit] the supreme court [of the
State] whenever an agency fails to comply with any provision of this part,
and after appropriate administrative remedies under sections 92F-23, 92F-24,
and 92F-25 have been exhausted.
(b)
Opinions and rulings of the office of information practices shall be
admissible and shall be considered as precedent unless found to be palpably
erroneous, except that the opinion or ruling upholding the agency's denial of access to the
aggrieved person shall be reviewed de novo.
The [circuit] supreme court may examine the record at
issue, in camera, to assist in determining whether it, or any part of it, may
be withheld."
2. By amending subsection (f) to read:
"(f) [An action may be brought in the circuit
court where the complainant resides, the complainant's principal place of
business is situated, or the complainant's relevant personal record is
situated.] No action shall be
brought later than two years after notification of the agency denial[,]
or, where applicable, the date of receipt of the final determination of
the office of information practices."
SECTION 5. Section 92F-27.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) When an agency denies an individual access to
that individual's personal record, the individual may appeal the denial to the
office of information practices in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to
section 92F-42(12). A decision to appeal
to the office of information practices for review of the agency denial shall
not prejudice the individual's right to appeal to the [circuit] supreme
court after a decision is made by the office of information practices."
SECTION 6. Section 92F-43, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended as follows:
1. By amending subsection (a) to read:
"(a) An agency may not appeal a decision by the
office of information practices made under this chapter or part I of chapter
92, except as provided in this section.
Within thirty days of the date of the decision, an agency may seek
judicial review of a final decision rendered by the office of information
practices under this chapter or part I of chapter 92[,] by filing a
complaint to initiate a special proceeding in the [circuit court of the
judicial circuit in the State where:
(1) The request for
access to a record was made;
(2) The act the
office determined was prohibited under part I of chapter 92 occurred; or
(3) The agency's
principal place of business is located.] supreme court."
2. By
amending subsection (c) to read:
"(c) Within thirty days of service of the
complaint, the office of information practices shall file a certified copy of
the record that it compiled to make its decision in the [circuit] supreme
court and mail a copy of the index to that record to the appealing agency. The [circuit] court's review shall be limited to
the record that was before the office of information practices when it rendered
the decision, unless the [circuit] court finds that extraordinary
circumstances justify discovery and admission of additional evidence. The [circuit] court shall uphold a
decision of the office of information practices, unless the [circuit]
court concludes that the decision was palpably erroneous."
SECTION 7. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 8. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Report Title:
Uniform Information Practices Act; Judiciary; Exemption; Direct Appeal to Supreme Court
Description:
Includes
the nonadministrative functions of the Judiciary in the definition of "agency"
for purposes of the Uniform Information Practices Act. Allows persons to bring actions or make
appeals under the Uniform Information Practices Act directly in the Supreme
Court. Allows agencies to appeal
decisions of the Office of Information Practices to the Supreme Court.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
