Bill Text: HI HCR182 | 2024 | Regular Session | Amended


Bill Title: Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct A Study Of Statutes And Regulations Related To Prior Authorization Requirements And The Timely Delivery Of Health Care Services In The State And Include An Analysis Of Prior Authorization Reform, With Input Of Data And Feedback From Stakeholders, Including Patient Advocates, Providers, Facilities, And Payers.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 6-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2024-03-28 - Report adopted. referred to the committee(s) on FIN as amended in HD 1 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Gates, Ichiyama, Kila, Lowen, Tam excused (5). [HCR182 Detail]

Download: Hawaii-2024-HCR182-Amended.html

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

H.C.R. NO.

182

THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2024

H.D. 1

STATE OF HAWAII

 

 

 

 

 

HOUSE CONCURRENT

RESOLUTION

 

 

REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BUREAU TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF STATUTES AND REGULATIONS RELATED TO PRIOR AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENTS AND THE TIMELY DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN THE STATE AND INCLUDE AN ANALYSIS OF PRIOR AUTHORIZATION REFORM, WITH INPUT OF DATA AND FEEDBACK FROM STAKEHOLDERS, INCLUDING PATIENT ADVOCATES, PROVIDERS, FACILITIES, AND PAYERS.

 

 

 


     WHEREAS, patients face continued challenges in accessing health care due to the burdens of prior authorization requirements, which serves as an upfront bottleneck to the delivery of many commonly indicated diagnostic tests and medical treatments; and

 

     WHEREAS, prior authorization further compounds the increased costs and administrative demands on providers and staff, which are made worse by the health care workforce shortages in the State; and

 

     WHEREAS, recent June 2023 changes to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rules on prior authorization are a step in the right direction, but it is necessary to address the prior authorization inconsistencies and concerns for all payers so that Hawaii residents can receive the timely medical care that they need; and

 

     WHEREAS, time-consuming prior authorization processes encumber family physicians, divert valuable resources from direct patient care, and delay the start or continuation of necessary treatment, leading to lower rates of patient adherence to treatment and negative clinical outcomes; and

 

     WHEREAS, administrative complexity in the United States health care system has been identified as a source of enormous spending and should be further examined for cost-saving opportunities; and

 

     WHEREAS, although payers use prior authorization and claims processes to reduce medical costs and design custom benefit designs to achieve a specific premium price, the misapplication of prior authorization often leads to inappropriate and dangerous delays in diagnosis and treatment and may result in abandoned care; and

 

     WHEREAS, the misapplication of prior authorization increases the already substantial barriers to health care for patients in rural and underserved areas; and

 

     WHEREAS, recent CMS rules have mandated changes to reform prior authorization that, taken together, will reduce overall payer and provider burden and improve patient access in federal programs; however, these changes do not apply to private insurers; and

 

     WHEREAS, Hawaii health care private payers still require prior authorization for common inpatient, residential treatment center, and partial hospitalization admissions that are not directly from an emergency department, as well as for commonly indicated diagnostic testing and treatment of urgent cases for mental health, surgery, gynecology, and oncology; and

 

     WHEREAS, the timeline is substantially variable and inconsistent for private payers in terms of prior authorization turnaround, and this complexity leads to confusion, additional paperwork, cost for staff, and contributes to significant provider team burnout; and

 

     WHEREAS, an analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau is a necessary first step to facilitate collaboration on prior authorization reform, with input of data and feedback from all stakeholders including patient advocates, providers, facilities, and payers; now, therefore,

 

     BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-second Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2024, the Senate concurring, that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to conduct a study of state and federal statutes and regulations related to prior authorization requirements in the State which shall include:

 

     (1)  A summary and analysis of the current state and federal statutes and regulations governing prior authorizations in the State across all health insurance plans offered in the state; and

 

     (2)  A comparison of Hawaii's statutes and regulations governing prior authorization to the statutes and regulations of at least five other states identified through the input and feedback from stakeholders including patient advocates, providers, and payers; and

 

     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study is requested to evaluate whether there are statutes and regulations that establish the following:

 

     (1)  Reasonable and appropriate prior authorization response times, including whether a response time of twenty-four hours for urgent care and forty-eight hours for non-urgent care is feasible;

 

     (2)  Valid prior authorizations for medications for a period of at least one year, regardless of dosage changes;

 

     (3)  Valid prior authorizations for the length of treatment for patients with chronic conditions;

 

     (4)  That adverse determinations should only be conducted by providers licensed in the State and of the same specialty that typically manages the patient's conditions;

 

     (5)  The manner in which retroactive denials may be avoided if care is preauthorized;

 

     (6)  Procedures whereby private insurers may publicly release prior authorization data by drug and services as it relates to approvals, denials, appeals, wait times, and other categories;

 

     (7)  Reasonable and appropriate periods of time for a new health plan to honor a patient's prior authorization for a transition period of time; i.e., at least ninety days; and

 

     (8)  Criteria or factors that allow for the reduction of total volume of prior authorization requests, such as exemptions or gold-carding programs; and

 

     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the Regular Session of 2025; and

 

     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to the Legislative Reference Bureau.

 

 

 

Report Title: 

Legislative Reference Bureau; Analysis; Prior Authorization; Health Care Services

feedback