Bill Text: FL S0824 | 2012 | Regular Session | Comm Sub
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Mitigation
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2012-03-09 - Laid on Table, refer to CS/CS/CS/HB 599 -SJ 1248 [S0824 Detail]
Download: Florida-2012-S0824-Comm_Sub.html
Bill Title: Mitigation
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2012-03-09 - Laid on Table, refer to CS/CS/CS/HB 599 -SJ 1248 [S0824 Detail]
Download: Florida-2012-S0824-Comm_Sub.html
Florida Senate - 2012 CS for SB 824 By the Committee on Transportation; and Senators Dean and Gaetz 596-02035-12 2012824c1 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to mitigation; amending s. 373.4137, 3 F.S.; revising legislative intent to encourage the use 4 of other mitigation options that satisfy state and 5 federal requirements; providing the Department of 6 Transportation or a transportation authority the 7 option of participating in a mitigation project; 8 requiring the Department of Transportation or a 9 transportation authority to submit lists of its 10 projects in the adopted work program to the water 11 management districts; requiring a list rather than a 12 survey of threatened or endangered species and species 13 of special concern affected by a proposed project; 14 providing conditions for the release of certain 15 environmental mitigation funds; prohibiting a 16 mitigation plan from being implemented unless the plan 17 is submitted to and approved by the Department of 18 Environmental Protection; providing additional factors 19 that must be explained regarding the choice of 20 mitigation bank; removing a provision requiring an 21 explanation for excluding certain projects from the 22 mitigation plan; providing criteria that the 23 Department of Transportation must use in determining 24 which projects to include or exclude in the mitigation 25 plan; amending s. 373.4135, F.S.; limiting the 26 circumstances under which a governmental entity may 27 create or provide mitigation for a project other than 28 its own project; specifying certain exceptions; 29 providing an effective date. 30 31 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 32 33 Section 1. Subsections (1) and (2), paragraph (c) of 34 subsection (3), and subsections (4) and (5) of section 373.4137, 35 Florida Statutes, are amended to read: 36 373.4137 Mitigation requirements for specified 37 transportation projects.— 38 (1) The Legislature finds that environmental mitigation for 39 the impact of transportation projects proposed by the Department 40 of Transportation or a transportation authority established 41 pursuant to chapter 348 or chapter 349 can be more effectively 42 achieved by regional, long-range mitigation planning rather than 43 on a project-by-project basis. It is the intent of the 44 Legislature that mitigation to offset the adverse effects of 45 these transportation projects be funded by the Department of 46 Transportation and be carried out bythe water management47districts, includingthe use of mitigation banks and any other 48 mitigation options that satisfy state and federal requirements 49established pursuant to this part. 50 (2) Environmental impact inventories for transportation 51 projects proposed by the Department of Transportation or a 52 transportation authority established pursuant to chapter 348 or 53 chapter 349 shall be developed as follows: 54 (a) By July 1 of each year, the Department of 55 Transportation or a transportation authority established 56 pursuant to chapter 348 or chapter 349 which chooses to 57 participate in the program shall submit to the water management 58 districts a listcopyof its projects in the adopted work 59 program and an environmental impact inventory of habitats 60 addressed in the rules adopted pursuant to this part and s. 404 61 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. s. 1344, which may be impacted 62 by its plan of construction for transportation projects in the 63 next 3 years of the tentative work program. The Department of 64 Transportation or a transportation authority established 65 pursuant to chapter 348 or chapter 349 may also include in its 66 environmental impact inventory the habitat impacts of any future 67 transportation project. The Department of Transportation and 68 each transportation authority established pursuant to chapter 69 348 or chapter 349 may fund any mitigation activities for future 70 projects using current year funds. 71 (b) The environmental impact inventory shall include a 72 description of these habitat impacts, including their location, 73 acreage, and type; state water quality classification of 74 impacted wetlands and other surface waters; any other state or 75 regional designations for these habitats; and a listsurveyof 76 threatened species, endangered species, and species of special 77 concern affected by the proposed project. 78 (3) 79 (c) Except for current mitigation projects in the 80 monitoring and maintenance phase and except as allowed by 81 paragraph (d), the water management districts may request a 82 transfer of funds from an escrow account no sooner than 30 days 83 beforeprior tothe date the funds are needed to pay for 84 activities associated with development or implementation of the 85 approved mitigation plan described in subsection (4) for the 86 current fiscal year, including, but not limited to, design, 87 engineering, production, and staff support. Actual conceptual 88 plan preparation costs incurred before plan approval may be 89 submitted to the Department of Transportation or the appropriate 90 transportation authority each year with the plan. The conceptual 91 plan preparation costs of each water management district will be 92 paid from mitigation funds associated with the environmental 93 impact inventory for the current year. The amount transferred to 94 the escrow accounts each year by the Department of 95 Transportation and participating transportation authorities 96 established pursuant to chapter 348 or chapter 349 shall 97 correspond to a cost per acre of $75,000 multiplied by the 98 projected acres of impact identified in the environmental impact 99 inventory described in subsection (2). However, the $75,000 cost 100 per acre does not constitute an admission against interest by 101 the state or its subdivisions andnoris notthe costadmissible 102 as evidence of full compensation for any property acquired by 103 eminent domain or through inverse condemnation. Each July 1, the 104 cost per acre shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the 105 average of the Consumer Price Index issued by the United States 106 Department of Labor for the most recent 12-month period ending 107 September 30, compared to the base year average, which is the 108 average for the 12-month period ending September 30, 1996. Each 109 quarter, the projected acreage of impact shall be reconciled 110 with the acreage of impact of projects as permitted, including 111 permit modifications, pursuant to this part and s. 404 of the 112 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. s. 1344. The subject year’s transfer 113 of funds shall be adjusted accordingly to reflect the acreage of 114 impacts as permitted. The Department of Transportation and 115 participating transportation authorities established pursuant to 116 chapter 348 or chapter 349 are authorized to transfer such funds 117 from the escrow accounts to the water management districts to 118 carry out the mitigation programs. Environmental mitigation 119 funds that are identified for or maintained in an escrow account 120 for the benefit of a water management district may be released 121 if the associated transportation project is excluded in whole or 122 part from the mitigation plan. For a mitigation project that is 123 in the maintenance and monitoring phase, the water management 124 district may request and receive a one-time payment based on the 125 project’s expected future maintenance and monitoring costs. Upon 126 disbursement of the final maintenance and monitoring payment, 127 the escrow account for the project established by the Department 128 of Transportation or the participating transportation authority 129 may be closed. Any interest earned on these disbursed funds 130 shall remain with the water management district and must be used 131 as authorized under this section. 132 (4) BeforePrior toMarch 1 of each year, each water 133 management district, in consultation with the Department of 134 Environmental Protection, the United States Army Corps of 135 Engineers, the Department of Transportation, participating 136 transportation authorities established pursuant to chapter 348 137 or chapter 349, and other appropriate federal, state, and local 138 governments, and other interested parties, including entities 139 operating mitigation banks, shall develop a plan for the primary 140 purpose of complying with the mitigation requirements adopted 141 pursuant to this part and 33 U.S.C. s. 1344. In developing such 142 plans, the districts shall useutilizesound ecosystem 143 management practices to address significant water resource needs 144 and shall focus on activities of the Department of Environmental 145 Protection and the water management districts, such as surface 146 water improvement and management (SWIM) projects and lands 147 identified for potential acquisition for preservation, 148 restoration, or enhancement, and the control of invasive and 149 exotic plants in wetlands and other surface waters, to the 150 extent that thesuchactivities comply with the mitigation 151 requirements adopted under this part and 33 U.S.C. s. 1344. In 152 determining the activities to be included in thesuchplans, the 153 districts shallalsoconsider the purchase of credits from 154 public or private mitigation banks permitted under s. 373.4136 155 and associated federal authorization and shall include thesuch156 purchase as a part of the mitigation plan when thesuchpurchase 157 would offset the impact of the transportation project, provide 158 equal benefits to the water resources than other mitigation 159 options being considered, and provide the most cost-effective 160 mitigation option. The mitigation plan shall be submitted to the 161 water management district governing board, or its designee, for 162 review and approval. At least 14 days beforeprior toapproval, 163 the water management district shall provide a copy of the draft 164 mitigation plan to any person who has requested a copy. The plan 165 may not be implemented until it is submitted to and approved by 166 the Department of Environmental Protection. 167 (a) For each transportation project with a funding request 168 for the next fiscal year, the mitigation plan must include a 169 brief explanation of why a mitigation bank was or was not chosen 170 as a mitigation option, including an estimation of identifiable 171 costs of the mitigation bank and nonbank options and other 172 factors such as time saved, liability for success of the 173 mitigation, and long-term maintenanceto the extent practicable. 174 (b) Specific projects may be excluded from the mitigation 175 plan, in whole or in part, and areshallnotbesubject to this 176 section upon the electionagreementof the Department of 177 Transportation,ora transportation authority if applicable, or 178andthe appropriate water management districtthat the inclusion179of such projects would hamper the efficiency or timeliness of180the mitigation planning and permitting process.The water181management district may choose to exclude a project in whole or182in part if the district is unable to identify mitigation that183would offset impacts of the project.184 (c) When determining which projects to include or exclude 185 from the mitigation plan, the department shall investigate using 186 credits from a permitted private mitigation bank before those 187 projects are submitted to, or are allowed to remain in, the 188 plan. 189 1. The investigation shall include the cost-effectiveness 190 of private mitigation bank credits. 191 2. The cost-effectiveness analysis must be in writing and 192 consider: 193 a. How the nominal cost of the private mitigation bank 194 credits compares with the nominal cost for any given project to 195 be included in the plan; 196 b. The value of complying with federal transportation 197 policies for federal aid projects; 198 c. The value that private mitigation bank credits provide 199 as the result of the expedited approvals by the Army Corps of 200 Engineers when private mitigation banks are used; and 201 d. The value that private mitigation banks provide to the 202 state and its residents as a result of the state and federal 203 liability for the success of the mitigation transferring to the 204 private mitigation bank when credits are purchased from the 205 private mitigation bank. 206 (5) The water management district shall ensurebe207responsible for ensuringthat mitigation requirements pursuant 208 to 33 U.S.C. s. 1344 are met for the impacts identified in the 209 environmental impact inventory described in subsection (2), by 210 implementation of the approved plan described in subsection (4) 211 to the extent funding is provided by the Department of 212 Transportation, or a transportation authority established 213 pursuant to chapter 348 or chapter 349, if applicable. During 214 the federal permitting process, the water management district 215 may deviate from the approved mitigation plan in order to comply 216 with federal permitting requirements. 217 Section 2. Present paragraphs (b) through (e) of subsection 218 (1) of section 373.4135, Florida Statutes, are redesignated as 219 paragraphs (c) through (f), respectively, and a new paragraph 220 (b) is added to that subsection, to read: 221 373.4135 Mitigation banks and offsite regional mitigation.— 222 (1) The Legislature finds that the adverse impacts of 223 activities regulated under this part may be offset by the 224 creation, maintenance, and use of mitigation banks and offsite 225 regional mitigation. Mitigation banks and offsite regional 226 mitigation can enhance the certainty of mitigation and provide 227 ecological value due to the improved likelihood of environmental 228 success associated with their proper construction, maintenance, 229 and management. Therefore, the department and the water 230 management districts are directed to participate in and 231 encourage the establishment of private and public mitigation 232 banks and offsite regional mitigation. Mitigation banks and 233 offsite regional mitigation should emphasize the restoration and 234 enhancement of degraded ecosystems and the preservation of 235 uplands and wetlands as intact ecosystems rather than alteration 236 of landscapes to create wetlands. This is best accomplished 237 through restoration of ecological communities that were 238 historically present. 239 (b) Notwithstanding subsection (5), a governmental entity 240 may not create or provide mitigation for a project other than 241 its own unless the governmental entity uses land that was not 242 previously purchased for conservation and unless the 243 governmental entity provides the same financial assurances as 244 required for mitigation banks permitted under s. 373.4136 and 245 regional offsite mitigation areas permitted under subsection 246 (6). This paragraph does not apply to: 247 1. Mitigation banks permitted before December 31, 2011, 248 under s. 373.4136; 249 2. Offsite regional mitigation areas established before 250 December 31, 2011, under subsection (6); 251 3. Mitigation for transportation projects under ss. 252 373.4137 and 373.4139; 253 4. Mitigation for impacts from mining activities under s. 254 373.41492; or 255 5. Mitigation provided for single-family lots or homeowners 256 under subsection (6). 257 Section 3. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.