Bill Text: FL S0130 | 2023 | Regular Session | Introduced
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Domestic Violence
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 28-12-2)
Status: (Passed) 2023-05-25 - Chapter No. 2023-112 [S0130 Detail]
Download: Florida-2023-S0130-Introduced.html
Bill Title: Domestic Violence
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 28-12-2)
Status: (Passed) 2023-05-25 - Chapter No. 2023-112 [S0130 Detail]
Download: Florida-2023-S0130-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2023 SB 130 By Senator Berman 26-00331-23 2023130__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to domestic violence; providing a 3 short title; amending s. 61.13, F.S.; requiring the 4 court with jurisdiction over the proceeding to 5 consider certain factors in deciding whether shared 6 parental responsibility is detrimental to the child; 7 making technical and conforming changes; providing 8 additional conduct regarding domestic violence which 9 the court must consider when ordering a parenting 10 plan; amending s. 741.30, F.S.; providing an 11 additional factor that the court must consider in 12 determining whether a petitioner of a domestic 13 violence injunction is in imminent danger; providing 14 an effective date. 15 16 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 17 18 Section 1. This act may be cited as “Greyson’s Law.” 19 Section 2. Paragraph (c) of subsection (2) and paragraph 20 (m) of subsection (3) of section 61.13, Florida Statutes, are 21 amended to read: 22 61.13 Support of children; parenting and time-sharing; 23 powers of court.— 24 (2) 25 (c) The court shall determine all matters relating to 26 parenting and time-sharing of each minor child of the parties in 27 accordance with the best interests of the child and in 28 accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and 29 Enforcement Act, except that modification of a parenting plan 30 and time-sharing schedule requires a showing of a substantial, 31 material, and unanticipated change of circumstances. 32 1. It is the public policy of this state that each minor 33 child has frequent and continuing contact with both parents 34 after the parents separate or the marriage of the parties is 35 dissolved and to encourage parents to share the rights and 36 responsibilities, and joys, of childrearing. Except as otherwise 37 provided in this paragraph, there is no presumption for or 38 against the father or mother of the child or for or against any 39 specific time-sharing schedule when creating or modifying the 40 parenting plan of the child. 41 2. The court shall order that the parental responsibility 42 for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court 43 finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental 44 to the child. In determining detriment to the child, the court 45 shall consider: 46 a. Evidence of domestic violence, as defined in s. 741.28; 47 b. Whether either parent has or has had reasonable cause to 48 believe that he or she or his or her minor child or children are 49 or have been in imminent danger of becoming victims of an act of 50 domestic violence as defined in s. 741.28 or sexual violence as 51 defined in s. 784.046(1)(c) by the other parent against the 52 parent or against the child or children whom the parents share 53 in common regardless of whether a cause of action has been 54 brought or is currently pending in the court; 55 c. Whether either parent has or has had reasonable cause to 56 believe that his or her minor child or children are or have been 57 in imminent danger of becoming victims of an act of abuse as 58 defined in s. 39.01(2), abandonment as defined in s. 39.01(1), 59 or neglect as defined in s. 39.01(50) by the other parent 60 against the child or children whom the parents share in common 61 regardless of whether a cause of action has been brought or is 62 currently pending in the court; and 63 d. Any other relevant factors. 64 3. The following evidence creates a rebuttable presumption 65 that shared parental responsibility is detrimentalof detriment66 to the child: 67 a. A parent has been convicted of a misdemeanor of the 68 first degree or higher involving domestic violence, as defined 69 in s. 741.28 and chapter 775; 70 b. A parent meets the criteria of s. 39.806(1)(d); or 71 c. A parent has been convicted of or had adjudication 72 withheld for an offense enumerated in s. 943.0435(1)(h)1.a., and 73 at the time of the offense: 74 (I) The parent was 18 years of age or older. 75 (II) The victim was under 18 years of age or the parent 76 believed the victim to be under 18 years of age. 77 78 If the presumption is not rebutted after the convicted parent is 79 advised by the court that the presumption exists, shared 80 parental responsibility, including time-sharing with the child, 81 and decisions made regarding the child, may not be granted to 82 the convicted parent. However, the convicted parent is not 83 relieved of any obligation to provide financial support. If the 84 court determines that shared parental responsibility would be 85 detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental 86 responsibility and make such arrangements for time-sharing as 87 specified in the parenting plan as will best protect the child 88 or abused spouse from further harm. Whether or not there is a 89 conviction of any offense of domestic violence or child abuse or 90 the existence of an injunction for protection against domestic 91 violence, the court shall consider evidence of domestic violence 92 or child abuse as evidence of detriment to the child. 93 4.3.In ordering shared parental responsibility, the court 94 may consider the expressed desires of the parents and may grant 95 to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects 96 of the child’s welfare or may divide those responsibilities 97 between the parties based on the best interests of the child. 98 Areas of responsibility may include education, health care, and 99 any other responsibilities that the court finds unique to a 100 particular family. 101 5.4.The court shall order sole parental responsibility for 102 a minor child to one parent, with or without time-sharing with 103 the other parent if it is in the best interests of the minor 104 child. 105 6.5.There is a rebuttable presumption against granting 106 time-sharing with a minor child if a parent has been convicted 107 of or had adjudication withheld for an offense enumerated in s. 108 943.0435(1)(h)1.a., and at the time of the offense: 109 a. The parent was 18 years of age or older. 110 b. The victim was under 18 years of age or the parent 111 believed the victim to be under 18 years of age. 112 113 A parent may rebut the presumption upon a specific finding in 114 writing by the court that the parent poses no significant risk 115 of harm to the child and that time-sharing is in the best 116 interests of the minor child. If the presumption is rebutted, 117 the court mustshallconsider all time-sharing factors in 118 subsection (3) when developing a time-sharing schedule. 119 7.6.Access to records and information pertaining to a 120 minor child, including, but not limited to, medical, dental, and 121 school records, may not be denied to either parent. Full rights 122 under this subparagraph apply to either parent unless a court 123 order specifically revokes these rights, including any 124 restrictions on these rights as provided in a domestic violence 125 injunction. A parent having rights under this subparagraph has 126 the same rights upon request as to form, substance, and manner 127 of access as are available to the other parent of a child, 128 including, without limitation, the right to in-person 129 communication with medical, dental, and education providers. 130 (3) For purposes of establishing or modifying parental 131 responsibility and creating, developing, approving, or modifying 132 a parenting plan, including a time-sharing schedule, which 133 governs each parent’s relationship with his or her minor child 134 and the relationship between each parent with regard to his or 135 her minor child, the best interest of the child shall be the 136 primary consideration. A determination of parental 137 responsibility, a parenting plan, or a time-sharing schedule may 138 not be modified without a showing of a substantial, material, 139 and unanticipated change in circumstances and a determination 140 that the modification is in the best interests of the child. 141 Determination of the best interests of the child shall be made 142 by evaluating all of the factors affecting the welfare and 143 interests of the particular minor child and the circumstances of 144 that family, including, but not limited to: 145 (m) Evidence of domestic violence, sexual violence, child 146 abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect or evidence that a 147 parent has or has had reasonable cause to believe that he or she 148 or his or her minor child or children are in imminent danger of 149 becoming victims of an act of domestic violence, regardless of 150 whether a prior or pending action relating to those issues has 151 been brought. If the court accepts evidence of prior or pending 152 actions regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child 153 abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, the court must 154 specifically acknowledge in writing that such evidence was 155 considered when evaluating the best interests of the child. 156 Section 3. Paragraph (b) of subsection (6) of section 157 741.30, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 158 741.30 Domestic violence; injunction; powers and duties of 159 court and clerk; petition; notice and hearing; temporary 160 injunction; issuance of injunction; statewide verification 161 system; enforcement; public records exemption.— 162 (6) 163 (b) In determining whether a petitioner has reasonable 164 cause to believe he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a 165 victim of domestic violence, the court shall consider and 166 evaluate all relevant factors alleged in the petition, 167 including, but not limited to: 168 1. The history between the petitioner and the respondent, 169 including threats, harassment, stalking, and physical abuse. 170 2. Whether the respondent has attempted to harm the 171 petitioner or family members or individuals closely associated 172 with the petitioner. 173 3. Whether the respondent has threatened to conceal, 174 kidnap, or harm the petitioner’s child or children. 175 4. Whether the respondent has intentionally injured or 176 killed a family pet. 177 5. Whether the respondent has used, or has threatened to 178 use, against the petitioner any weapons such as guns or knives. 179 6. Whether the respondent has physically restrained the 180 petitioner from leaving the home or calling law enforcement. 181 7. Whether the respondent has a criminal history involving 182 violence or the threat of violence. 183 8. The existence of a verifiable order of protection issued 184 previously or from another jurisdiction. 185 9. Whether the respondent has destroyed personal property, 186 including, but not limited to, telephones or other 187 communications equipment, clothing, or other items belonging to 188 the petitioner. 189 10. Whether the respondent has or had engaged in a pattern 190 of abusive, threatening, intimidating, or controlling behavior 191 composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however 192 short, which evidences a continuity of purpose and which 193 reasonably causes the petitioner to believe that the petitioner 194 or his or her minor child or children are in imminent danger of 195 becoming victims of any act of domestic violence. 196 11. Whether the respondent engaged in any other behavior or 197 conduct that leads the petitioner to have reasonable cause to 198 believe that he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a 199 victim of domestic violence. 200 201In making its determination under this paragraph, the court is202not limited to those factors enumerated in subparagraphs 1.-10.203 Section 4. This act shall take effect July 1, 2023.