Bill Text: CA SB557 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session | Introduced
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Criminal proceedings: mental competence: expert reports.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Passed) 2019-09-05 - Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 251, Statutes of 2019. [SB557 Detail]
Download: California-2019-SB557-Introduced.html
Bill Title: Criminal proceedings: mental competence: expert reports.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Passed) 2019-09-05 - Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 251, Statutes of 2019. [SB557 Detail]
Download: California-2019-SB557-Introduced.html
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2019–2020 REGULAR SESSION
Senate Bill | No. 557 |
Introduced by Senator Jones |
February 22, 2019 |
An act to add Section 1369.5 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal procedure.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 557, as introduced, Jones.
Criminal proceedings: mental competence: expert reports.
Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law establishes a process by which a defendant’s mental competency is evaluated, which includes requiring the court to appoint a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist, and any other expert whom the court may deem appropriate, to examine the defendant.
This bill would make an expert report presumptively confidential, except as otherwise provided by law. The bill would require a report to be retained in the confidential portion of the court’s file, and would require counsel for the defendant and the prosecution to maintain the report as confidential. The bill would authorize the court to consider a motion, application, or petition to unseal the report, as specified.
Existing
constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 1369.5 is added to the Penal Code, to read:1369.5.
(a) A report prepared by a court-appointed psychiatrist, psychologist, or other expert pursuant to this chapter, including, but not limited to, Section 1369, is presumptively confidential, except as otherwise provided by law.(b) A report described in subdivision (a) shall be retained in the confidential portion of the court’s file. Counsel for the defendant and the prosecution shall maintain the report as confidential.
(c) (1) The defendant, counsel for the defendant, and the prosecution may inspect the report.
(2) The court may consider a motion, application, or petition to unseal the report
pursuant to subdivision (h) of Rule 2.551 of the California Rules of Court.
SEC. 2.
The Legislature finds and declares that Section 1 of this act, which adds Section 1369.5 to the Penal Code, imposes a limitation on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:In order to protect the privacy of defendants with respect to personal information contained within expert reports that are prepared as part of mental competency examinations, it is necessary that those expert reports be presumptively confidential,
except as otherwise provided by law.