Maryland Code | Chapter Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article 10

Maryland Dashboard - Maryland Legislation - Maryland Datasets - Maryland Roster - Maryland Trends

Filter View [Reset All]
Syndicate content
StateBillStatusSummary/TitleLast Actionsort icon
MDHB281Intro
25%
Providing that during the trial of a criminal case in which a defendant is charged with an assault in the second degree, a certain statement is not excluded by the hearsay rule if the statement is offered against a party that has engaged in, directed...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-25
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
MDHB1226Intro
25%
Authorizing the use of stop sign monitoring systems in school zones in Baltimore City if authorized by local law; providing that the owner or driver of a motor vehicle recorded failing to obey a stop sign is subject to a citation and a certain civil ...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-25
[Hearing: Mar 7 @ 1:00 pm]
To House Environment and Transportation Committee
MDSB1001Intro
25%
Establishing that the creative expression of a criminal defendant or juvenile respondent is not admissible against the defendant or respondent unless the court makes certain findings; establishing that the creative expression of a defendant or respon...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-25
[Hearing: Mar 11 @ 1:00 pm]
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDHB1409Intro
25%
Providing for an exception to the prohibition against willfully intercepting wire or electronic communication for a resident in a medical care facility under certain circumstances; requiring a medical care facility to allow electronic monitoring of a...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-12
[Hearing: Mar 6 @ 1:00 pm]
To House Health and Government Operations Committee
MDHB669Intro
25%
Authorizing a recording of a body-worn camera worn by a law enforcement officer to be used as evidence in certain proceedings; requiring a custodian to deny inspection of a recording made with the use of a body-worn camera used by a law enforcement o...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-10
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB954Intro
25%
Providing that certain evidence obtained through the use of an unmanned aircraft is inadmissible in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding; prohibiting a unit of State government or a political subdivision of the State from deploying or oper...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-10
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB1346Intro
25%
Establishing that the creative expression of a criminal defendant or juvenile respondent is not admissible against the defendant or respondent unless the court makes certain findings; establishing that the creative expression of a defendant or respon...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-10
[Hearing: Mar 6 @ 1:00 pm]
To House Judiciary Committee
MDSB1007Intro
25%
Providing that the contents of a certain intercepted communication and evidence derived from the communication may be received in evidence in a certain proceeding under certain circumstances.
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-10
To Senate Rules Committee
MDSB507Intro
25%
Providing that certain evidence of certain diagnoses is admissible in a criminal proceeding if the evidence tends to show that the defendant, at the time of the alleged offense, did or did not have the mental state required for the offense charged an...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-06
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDSB512Intro
25%
Establishing a certain rebuttable presumption that a statement made by a minor during a custodial interrogation is involuntary and is inadmissible in a juvenile or criminal proceeding against the minor if the law enforcement officer intentionally use...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-06
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDHB1032Intro
25%
Authorizing the use of stop sign monitoring systems in school zones in Montgomery County, if authorized by local law; establishing that certain provisions of law relating to the inspection of recorded images apply to recorded images produced by a sto...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-02-05
To House Environment and Transportation Committee
MDHB978Intro
25%
Authorizing the State Highway Administration to place and use not more than four speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 and three systems on Interstate 83 in Baltimore County, subject to notice requirements; requiring that fines collected in Balt...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-31
To House Environment and Transportation Committee
MDHB908Intro
25%
Establishing a pilot program to authorize the use of distracted driving monitoring systems in Montgomery County and Prince George's County to enforce certain prohibitions regarding the use of certain devices while operating a vehicle; and requiring t...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-31
To House Environment and Transportation Committee
MDSB600Intro
25%
Authorizing the use of stop sign monitoring systems in school zones in Baltimore City, if authorized by local law; providing that the owner or driver of a motor vehicle recorded failing to obey a stop sign is subject to a citation and a certain civil...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-30
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDSB613Intro
25%
Establishing a pilot program to authorize the use of distracted driving monitoring systems in Montgomery County and Prince George's County to enforce certain prohibitions regarding the use of certain devices while operating a vehicle; and requiring t...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-30
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDHB206Intro
25%
Replacing references to a bus lane monitoring system with references to a bus obstruction monitoring system; prohibiting a person from stopping, standing, or parking a vehicle in a bus stop zone; and clarifying that a person may not stop a vehicle in...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-29
To House Environment and Transportation Committee
MDHB348Intro
25%
Authorizing the State Highway Administration to use speed monitoring systems in areas determined to be of high risk to vulnerable road users and priority corridors in the Administration's Pedestrian Safety Action Plan; and requiring the Comptroller t...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-29
To House Environment and Transportation Committee
MDSB549Intro
25%
Establishing an immunity from liability for a person who discloses information about allegations of sexually assaultive behavior if the person acts in good faith; establishing a presumption of good faith unless it is shown by clear and convincing evi...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-28
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDSB520Intro
25%
Authorizing the State Highway Administration to use speed monitoring systems in areas determined to be of high risk to vulnerable road users and priority corridors in the Administration's Pedestrian Safety Action Plan; and defining "vulnerable road u...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-28
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDHB629Intro
25%
Establishing an immunity from liability for a person who discloses information about allegations of sexually assaultive behavior if the person acts in good faith; establishing a presumption of good faith unless it is shown by clear and convincing evi...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-27
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB706Intro
25%
Altering the statute of limitations applicable to a certain offense relating to the prohibition against intercepting and disclosing any wire, oral, or electronic communications and reclassifying the offense as a misdemeanor instead of a felony; and p...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-27
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB703Intro
25%
Providing that certain evidence of certain diagnoses is admissible in a criminal proceeding if the evidence tends to show that the defendant, at the time of the alleged offense, did or did not have the mental state required for the offense charged an...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-27
To House Judiciary Committee
MDSB1Intro
25%
Altering the definition of "legally protected health care" to include certain reproductive, fertility preservation, and contraceptive treatment, including medications and supplies, for the purposes of certain provisions of law that prohibit health oc...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-21
To Senate Finance Committee
MDSB338Intro
25%
Authorizing the State Highway Administration to place and use not more than four speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County subject to notice requirements; requiring that fines collected in Baltimore County as a ...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-20
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDHB314Intro
25%
Providing that the contents of a certain intercepted communication and evidence derived from the communication may be received in evidence in a certain proceeding under certain circumstances.
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-17
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB392Intro
25%
Providing that it is lawful for a person to intercept an oral communication if the person is working as a fair housing tester for a fair housing testing program operated by the federal government, the State, a local government, or a nonprofit civil r...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-17
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB165Intro
25%
Establishing a certain rebuttable presumption that a statement made by a minor during a custodial interrogation is involuntary and is inadmissible in a juvenile or criminal proceeding against the minor if the law enforcement officer intentionally use...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-10
To House Judiciary Committee
MDHB130Intro
25%
Reclassifying, as a misdemeanor instead of a felony, a certain offense relating to the prohibition against intercepting and disclosing any wire, oral, or electronic communications.
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-10
To House Judiciary Committee
MDSB61Intro
25%
Establishing that it is lawful for a person to use a cellular telephone or another device to intercept an oral communication in public if the speaker should reasonably anticipate that the oral communication would be overheard or intercepted; and est...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-09
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDSB38Intro
25%
Reclassifying, as a misdemeanor instead of a felony, a certain offense relating to the prohibition against intercepting and disclosing any wire, oral, or electronic communications.
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-09
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDSB107Intro
25%
Providing that it is lawful for a person to intercept an oral communication if the person is working as a fair housing tester for a fair housing testing program operated by the federal government, the State, a local government, or a nonprofit civil r...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-09
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
MDSB146Intro
25%
Providing that during the trial of a criminal case in which a defendant is charged with an assault in the second degree, a certain statement is not excluded by the hearsay rule if the statement is offered against a party that has engaged in, directed...
[Detail][Text][Discuss]
2025-01-09
To Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee
Syndicate content
feedback