Bill Text: TX SB467 | 2013-2014 | 83rd Legislature | Engrossed


Bill Title: Relating to the regulatory analysis of rules proposed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 3-0)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2013-05-14 - Failed to receive affirmative vote in comm. [SB467 Detail]

Download: Texas-2013-SB467-Engrossed.html
 
 
  By: Hegar, Paxton S.B. No. 467
      Schwertner
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the regulatory analysis of rules proposed by the Texas
  Commission on Environmental Quality.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Subchapter D, Chapter 5, Water Code, is amended
  by adding Section 5.1032 to read as follows:
         Sec. 5.1032.  ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RULES. (a)  In this
  section:
               (1)  "Benefit" has the meaning assigned by Section
  2001.0225, Government Code.
               (1-a)  "Cost" means a reasonably identifiable and
  significant direct or indirect economic effect.
               (2)  "Environmental effect" means a reasonably
  identifiable and quantifiable direct or indirect effect or outcome
  affecting the environment, including air, soil, or water quality.
               (3)  "Environmental rule" means a rule the specific
  intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to
  human health from environmental exposure by the control of
  emissions or contaminants in the air, water, or soil.  The term does
  not include an emergency rule or a rule that provides only
  procedural requirements.
               (4)  "Small business" means a business that employs not
  more than 250 individuals.
         (b)  Before adopting an environmental rule, the commission
  shall conduct a regulatory analysis that considers the costs and
  environmental effects and benefits expected to result from
  implementation of and compliance with the rule.
         (c)  When giving notice of an environmental rule, the
  commission shall incorporate into the fiscal note required by
  Section 2001.024, Government Code, a draft impact analysis
  describing the anticipated effects of the proposed rule. The draft
  impact analysis, at a minimum, must:
               (1)  identify the problem the rule is intended to
  address;
               (2)  identify the environmental effects and benefits
  that the agency expects to result from implementation of and
  compliance with the rule, including the projected level of
  reduction of pollutants or contaminants in air, water, and soil
  media;
               (3)  identify and describe the compliance costs that
  the agency expects that state agencies, local governments, the
  public, and the affected regulated entities, other than small
  businesses, will incur from implementation of and compliance with
  the rule; and
               (4)  identify and describe in a separate economic
  impact analysis the compliance costs that the agency expects that
  small businesses will incur from implementation of and compliance
  with the rule.
         (d)  In identifying the environmental effects and benefits
  of a rule under Subsection (c)(2), the commission shall include the
  modeled improvement for the criteria pollutant design value
  expected from implementation of the rule, if the rule will be
  submitted as a control measure in this state's air quality state
  implementation plan.
         (e)  After considering public comments submitted under
  Section 2001.029, Government Code, and determining that a proposed
  rule should be adopted, the agency shall prepare a final regulatory
  analysis that complies with Section 2001.033, Government Code.
         (f)  A person who submitted a comment in accordance with
  Section 2001.029, Government Code, may challenge the validity of an
  environmental rule that is not proposed and adopted in compliance
  with the procedural requirements of this section by filing an
  action for declaratory judgment as provided by Section 2001.038,
  Government Code, not later than the 30th day after the effective
  date of the rule. If the court determines that an environmental
  rule was not proposed and adopted in compliance with the procedural
  requirements of this section, the rule is invalid provided that a
  rule to be submitted as a control method in this state's air quality
  state implementation plan may not be invalidated for failure of
  compliance if the invalidation will prevent the timely
  implementation of a federal requirement.
         (g)  If a court determines that an environmental rule is
  invalid under Subsection (f), the provisions of Section 2001.040,
  Government Code, apply.
         SECTION 2.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
  to a rule proposed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
  for which notice is given under Sections 2001.023 and 2001.024,
  Government Code, on or after December 1, 2013.
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2013.
feedback