Bill Text: TX HB2647 | 2015-2016 | 84th Legislature | Enrolled
Bill Title: Relating to a limitation on the authority to curtail groundwater production from wells used for power generation or mining.
Sponsorship: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 5-2)
Status: (Vetoed) 2015-06-20 - Vetoed by the Governor [HB2647 Detail]
Download: Texas-2015-HB2647-Enrolled.html
| H.B. No. 2647 | ||
|
|
||
| relating to a limitation on the authority to curtail groundwater | ||
| production from wells used for power generation or mining. | ||
| BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
| SECTION 1. Subchapter D, Chapter 36, Water Code, is amended | ||
| by adding Section 36.1175 to read as follows: | ||
| Sec. 36.1175. POWER GENERATION EXEMPTION. (a) This | ||
| section applies to a well that produces groundwater used to support | ||
| the operation of a power generation facility or a mine that provides | ||
| fuel to a power generation facility, including production for | ||
| boiler makeup water, fire suppression, dewatering, potable water, | ||
| and depressurization. | ||
| (b) An owner or operator of a well to which this section | ||
| applies is entitled to petition the district for a delay in the | ||
| effective date of any district action that would reduce or curtail | ||
| production from a well or limit the groundwater production rate of a | ||
| well to an amount that is less than: | ||
| (1) the maximum annual amount of withdrawal as of | ||
| September 1, 2014, authorized by the permit, regardless of whether | ||
| the permit was issued by the district or the Railroad Commission of | ||
| Texas; or | ||
| (2) the maximum annual historical amount of withdrawal | ||
| recorded before September 1, 2014, if the well was in operation on | ||
| that date and no permit from any entity was required for the | ||
| operation of the well. | ||
| (c) The owner or operator of a well subject to this section | ||
| may petition for a delay described by Subsection (b). The petition | ||
| must include evidence that the owner or operator is engaging in good | ||
| faith efforts to identify practicable, readily available | ||
| alternative sources of water with comparable quality. After | ||
| receipt of the petition, the district shall hold a public hearing | ||
| and after the hearing shall make a final determination as to whether | ||
| the proposed reduction or curtailment in groundwater production | ||
| would threaten public health or safety or the reliability of the | ||
| electric grid. The proposed reduction or curtailment for which the | ||
| owner or operator is seeking a delay may not take effect until the | ||
| district has made a final determination under this subsection. | ||
| (d) If the district determines under Subsection (c) that a | ||
| proposed reduction or curtailment in groundwater production would | ||
| threaten public health or safety or the reliability of the electric | ||
| grid, the district shall delay the effective date of the reduction | ||
| or curtailment to a date not earlier than seven years after the date | ||
| that the final determination is made. | ||
| (e) If an owner or operator receives a delay under | ||
| Subsection (d), the owner or operator may petition the district at | ||
| any time before the delayed effective date of the proposed | ||
| reduction or curtailment to delay the effective date a second time | ||
| for an additional three years as provided by this subsection. After | ||
| receiving the petition, the district shall hold a public hearing | ||
| and after the hearing shall make a final determination to approve | ||
| the additional three-year delay if the district determines that: | ||
| (1) the owner or operator has engaged in good faith | ||
| efforts to identify and begin implementing strategies to comply | ||
| with the proposed reduction or curtailment; and | ||
| (2) implementation of the proposed reduction or | ||
| curtailment in groundwater production on the date set under | ||
| Subsection (d) would threaten public health or safety or the | ||
| reliability of the electric grid. | ||
| (f) In making a final determination described by Subsection | ||
| (c), (d), or (e), the district shall request, obtain, and give great | ||
| weight to an opinion issued by the Public Utility Commission of | ||
| Texas. | ||
| SECTION 2. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to | ||
| a reduction or curtailment in groundwater production ordered by a | ||
| groundwater conservation district on or after the effective date of | ||
| this Act. A reduction or curtailment in groundwater production | ||
| ordered by a groundwater conservation district before the effective | ||
| date of this Act is governed by the law in effect at the time the | ||
| reduction or curtailment in groundwater production was ordered, and | ||
| the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. | ||
| SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives | ||
| a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as | ||
| provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this | ||
| Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this | ||
| Act takes effect September 1, 2015. | ||
| ______________________________ | ______________________________ | |
| President of the Senate | Speaker of the House | |
| I certify that H.B. No. 2647 was passed by the House on May 4, | ||
| 2015, by the following vote: Yeas 139, Nays 2, 1 present, not | ||
| voting. | ||
| ______________________________ | ||
| Chief Clerk of the House | ||
| I certify that H.B. No. 2647 was passed by the Senate on May | ||
| 26, 2015, by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 10. | ||
| ______________________________ | ||
| Secretary of the Senate | ||
| APPROVED: _____________________ | ||
| Date | ||
| _____________________ | ||
| Governor | ||
