Bill Text: PA SR215 | 2009-2010 | Regular Session | Amended


Bill Title: Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to study the costs to achieve the Chesapeake Bay Program nutrient load reductions required from this Commonwealth's agricultural sources and to evaluate programs and funding strategies that enhance cost-effective nutrient reductions while protecting the economic viability of this Commonwealth's agricultural sector.

Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill

Status: (Passed) 2010-03-11 - Transmitted as directed [SR215 Detail]

Download: Pennsylvania-2009-SR215-Amended.html

  

 

PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 1542

PRINTER'S NO.  1725

  

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA

  

SENATE RESOLUTION

 

No.

215

Session of

2009

  

  

INTRODUCED BY BRUBAKER, BOSCOLA, ARGALL, RAFFERTY, O'PAKE, WASHINGTON, MUSTO, COSTA, M. WHITE, TARTAGLIONE, YAW, LEACH, FERLO, ALLOWAY, D. WHITE, EARLL, WAUGH, VANCE AND PICCOLA, DECEMBER 14, 2009

  

  

AS AMENDED, MARCH 8, 2010  

  

  

  

A RESOLUTION

  

1

Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to study

2

the costs to achieve the Chesapeake Bay Program nutrient load

3

reductions required from this Commonwealth's agricultural

4

sources and to evaluate programs and funding strategies that

5

enhance cost-effective nutrient reductions while protecting

6

the economic viability of this Commonwealth's agricultural

7

sector.

8

WHEREAS, The Chesapeake Bay is the nation's largest estuary,

9

with its watershed spanning 64,000 square miles, including parts

10

of six states and the District of Columbia; and

11

WHEREAS, The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found,

12

through numerous studies of the Chesapeake Bay, that excess

13

nutrients from agricultural development, population growth and

14

discharges from wastewater treatment plants, along with

15

overharvesting, habitat loss and disease, have contributed to an

16

overall decline in the aquatic health and environmental quality

17

of the bay; and

18

WHEREAS, Portions of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers

19

are listed as impaired waters under the Federal Water Pollution

 


1

Control Act (62 Stat. 1155, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), and the

2

EPA is developing a basin-wide total maximum daily load which

3

will take effect December 2010 and which will mandate that the

4

Commonwealth develop a State Implementation Plan to achieve its

5

allocation; and

6

WHEREAS, The Commonwealth's Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy

7

developed by the Department of Environmental Protection

8

describes current nutrient reduction goals, including 25,000,000

9

pounds per year of nutrient reductions from agricultural lands,

10

nearly five times the reductions required of sewage treatment

11

plants; and

12

WHEREAS, Last year, Senate Resolution No. 224, Printer's No.

13

1703 (2008), directed the Legislative Budget and Finance

14

Committee to conduct a Phase One study to estimate the cost of

15

compliance for wastewater treatment plants and assess the

16

methods by which wastewater treatment plants may achieve

17

compliance, including nutrient trading; and

18

WHEREAS, The study revealed that the capital cost of

19

compliance for wastewater treatment plants was $1,400,000,000,

20

well in excess of available funding; and

21

WHEREAS, The study revealed that the nutrient trading program

22

as currently constituted has had, and is likely to have, little

23

impact for a number of regulatory, structural and market

24

reasons; and

25

WHEREAS, The study found that the cost to the agricultural

26

community for meeting "baseline requirements," as variously

27

defined by erosion and sedimentation regulations, nutrient

28

management regulations and concentrated animal feeding operation

29

regulations, is largely unknown; and

30

WHEREAS, The relative cost effectiveness of nutrient

- 2 -

 


1

reductions from agricultural lands and other nonpoint sources is

2

not well quantified, and the Commonwealth would benefit from a

3

determination of these relative costs to guide the wise

4

allocation of limited funding; and

5

WHEREAS, The Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority

6

is currently studying the merits and forms that a Nutrient

7

Credit Exchange may take to encourage participation in nutrient

8

trading by wastewater treatment plants; therefore be it

9

RESOLVED, That the Senate direct the Legislative Budget and

10

Finance Committee to conduct a Phase Two continuation of its

11

study under Senate Resolution No. 224, Printer's No. 1703

12

(2008), to estimate the cost to meet the agricultural source

13

nutrient reduction goals of the Chesapeake Bay Tributary

14

Strategy and agricultural allocations to be defined in the State

15

Implementation Plan; and be it further

16

RESOLVED, That the committee identify methods employed in

17

other states to reduce loads from agricultural sources and make

18

findings as to their applicability and impact to the

19

agricultural community of this Commonwealth; and be it further

20

RESOLVED, That the committee evaluate the potential of new

21

technology and innovative best management practices generally to

<--

22

address nutrient loads from agricultural sources at a reduced

23

cost; and be it further

24

RESOLVED, That the committee make recommendations for

25

preferred programs for the agricultural community that overcome

26

structural obstacles, encourage participation, accelerate

27

bringing agricultural lands to baseline, facilitate the

28

application of cost-effective technology and innovative best

<--

29

management practices and stimulate the generation of nutrient

30

credits that are valued by point sources; and be it further

- 3 -

 


1

RESOLVED, That the committee recommend a schedule for

2

implementation of the preferred programs to be included in a

3

series of two-year milestones for action under the State

4

Implementation Plan as agreed to by the Chesapeake Executive

5

Council and required under EPA administration of the basin-wide

6

total maximum daily load; and be it further

7

RESOLVED, That the committee-preferred programs be shaped to

8

the extent practicable to integrate with a Nutrient Credit

9

Exchange or other selected water quality trading program

10

structure, create income incentives for the agricultural

11

community to generate credits, utilize those credits to reduce

12

the high capital cost of compliance for wastewater treatment

13

plants and make more effective use of public funds; and be it

14

further

15

RESOLVED, That the committee survey the findings and programs

16

of academic institutions and other states with respect to the

17

cost of nutrient reductions from nonagricultural, urban,

<--

18

suburban and other runoff, legacy sediments and air deposition;

19

and be it further

20

RESOLVED, That the committee compare these programs and costs

21

to point source and agricultural source reduction cost estimates

22

developed in Phases One and Two and to the State Implementation

<--

23

Plan; and be it further

24

RESOLVED, That the committee determine whether additional

25

evaluation is appropriate to enhance the Commonwealth's programs

26

in these areas in order to promote overall nutrient-reduction

27

effectiveness and more efficient allocation of public funds; and

28

be it further

29

RESOLVED, That the committee report its findings, conclusions

30

and recommendations to the Senate by November June 30, 2010.

<--

- 4 -

 


feedback