| |
|
| |
| THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION |
|
| |
| |
| INTRODUCED BY PYLE, BENNINGHOFF, BURNS, CAUSER, CHRISTIANA, CLYMER, P. COSTA, DENLINGER, ELLIS, GABLER, GEIST, GEORGE, GIBBONS, GROVE, HALUSKA, HARHAI, HARRIS, HESS, M.K. KELLER, KORTZ, OBERLANDER, PICKETT, RAPP, ROAE, TALLMAN, VULAKOVICH, TOBASH AND STEVENSON, FEBRUARY 23, 2011 |
| |
| |
| REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY, FEBRUARY 23, 2011 |
| |
| |
| |
| A RESOLUTION |
| |
1 | Urging the Environmental Protection Agency to stop its unlawful |
2 | application of the Guidance Memo relating to the Federal |
3 | Water Pollution Control Act, which is a substantive change to |
4 | the permitting procedure conferred on the states, and restore |
5 | the regulatory environment that existed prior to the release |
6 | of the Guidance Memo. |
7 | WHEREAS, Under section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution |
8 | Control Act (62 Stat. 1155, 33 U.S.C. § 1342), National |
9 | Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits are |
10 | typically issued by states for discharge of nondredged and |
11 | nonfill material; and |
12 | WHEREAS, Once the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) |
13 | approves a state permitting program, the state has exclusive |
14 | authority to issue NPDES permits; and |
15 | WHEREAS, Through a 1991 Memorandum of Agreement executed |
16 | between the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the EPA, the |
17 | Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) was identified as |
18 | the lead agency with exclusive authority for administering and |
|
1 | granting NPDES permits for mining-related activities in this |
2 | Commonwealth; and |
3 | WHEREAS, In September 2010, the EPA informed the DEP that it |
4 | was altering the Commonwealth's administration of its permitting |
5 | program and would conduct its own additional review of NPDES |
6 | permits; and |
7 | WHEREAS, This abrupt change in the Commonwealth's permitting |
8 | process was not the result of any accompanying Federal statutory |
9 | or regulatory changes; and |
10 | WHEREAS, As a result of this change, the DEP is required to |
11 | provide the EPA's Region 3 field office with all pending mining- |
12 | related NPDES permit applications, whose activity will either |
13 | discharge into the Monongahela River or into any designated |
14 | total maximum daily load impaired stream for its independent |
15 | review; and |
16 | WHEREAS, The EPA's Region 3 field office is not sufficiently |
17 | staffed to perform these types of reviews in a timely manner, |
18 | causing indefinite delays in the permitting process; and |
19 | WHEREAS, The EPA's objections to the issuance of these permit |
20 | applications vary, but generally are based on what the Federal |
21 | agency perceives are inconsistencies between the applications |
22 | and an interim final Guidance Memo that the EPA released in |
23 | April 2010, designed to provide a framework for regional reviews |
24 | of surface mining projects in Appalachia based on conductivity |
25 | levels it associated with adverse impacts to streams; and |
26 | WHEREAS, Although the stated intent of the Guidance Memo is |
27 | to limit its applicability to surface mining projects only, a |
28 | number of the permits being delayed in this Commonwealth are for |
29 | activities other than this type of mining; and |
30 | WHEREAS, The Guidance Memo is based on flawed studies with |
|
1 | limited application and unconfirmed conclusions that cannot be |
2 | used to develop a predictive cause and effect relationship |
3 | between the EPA's established benchmark threshold for |
4 | conductivity levels and healthy streams in this Commonwealth; |
5 | and |
6 | WHEREAS, Despite the representation that the Guidance Memo is |
7 | an interim document, it nevertheless is applied by the EPA in a |
8 | binding manner in its current version, even though the EPA |
9 | continues to receive comments on it; and |
10 | WHEREAS, The EPA's application of the Guidance Memo |
11 | constitutes a substantive change in the basic application of the |
12 | permitting process; and |
13 | WHEREAS, By substituting the issuance of agency guidance for |
14 | formal rulemaking, the EPA circumvents the clear requirements of |
15 | the Administrative Procedure Act (60 Stat. 237, 5 U.S.C. § 551 |
16 | et seq.) for public notice and comments; and |
17 | WHEREAS, This unnecessary extended review of NPDES permit |
18 | applications by the EPA has led to a significant backlog of |
19 | permits that could result in coal contracts being lost, mining |
20 | jobs being destroyed and this Commonwealth losing its major |
21 | source of affordable and reliable electric generation; therefore |
22 | be it |
23 | RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives of the |
24 | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania urge the Environmental Protection |
25 | Agency to stop its unlawful application of the Guidance Memo |
26 | relating to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which is a |
27 | substantive change to the permitting procedure conferred on the |
28 | states, and restore the regulatory environment that existed |
29 | prior to the release of the Guidance Memo; be it further |
30 | RESOLVED, That the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania reassert its |
|
1 | rightful role as the sole agency with permitting authority of |
2 | mining-related National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System |
3 | permits; and be it further |
4 | RESOLVED, That the Chief Clerk of the House of |
5 | Representatives transmit a copy of this resolution to the |
6 | Governor of Pennsylvania, the Environmental Protection Agency |
7 | Administrator and all members of the Pennsylvania Congressional |
8 | Delegation. |
|