OR SB764 | 2015 | Regular Session

Status

Completed Legislative Action
Sponsorship: Partisan Bill (Republican 1)
Status: Failed on July 6 2015 - 100% progression
Action: 2015-07-06 - In committee upon adjournment.
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF]

Summary

Requires agency to include comparative analysis of costs and benefits of rule in notice of proposed rulemaking. Requires agency to appoint advisory committee if association or group of 10 or more individuals objects to comparative analysis of costs and benefits stated in notice.

Tracking Information

Register now for our free OneVote public service or GAITS Pro trial account and you can begin tracking this and other legislation, all driven by the real-time data of the LegiScan API. Providing tools allowing you to research pending legislation, stay informed with email alerts, content feeds, and share dynamic reports. Use our new PolitiCorps to join with friends and collegaues to monitor & discuss bills through the process.

Monitor Legislation or view this same bill number from multiple sessions or take advantage of our national legislative search.

Title

Relating to administrative rules.

Sponsors


History

DateChamberAction
2015-07-06SenateIn committee upon adjournment.
2015-06-10SenateMotion to withdraw from committee on Rules failed.Ayes, 12; nays, 18--Bates, Beyer, Burdick, Dembrow, Devlin, Edwards, Gelser, Hass, Johnson, Monnes Anderson, Monroe, Prozanski, Riley, Roblan, Rosenbaum, Shields, Steiner Hayward, President Courtney.
2015-03-03SenateReferred to Rules.
2015-02-26SenateIntroduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.

Oregon State Sources


feedback