Bill Text: NY S07159 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Relates to the use of expert medical testimony; creates the health care courts pilot program; creates a new element of professional misconduct for providing expert witness testimony that is without reasonable medical foundation.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 5-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2010-03-17 - REFERRED TO CODES [S07159 Detail]

Download: New_York-2009-S07159-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         7159
                                   I N  S E N A T E
                                    March 17, 2010
                                      ___________
       Introduced  by  Sens.  HANNON, VOLKER -- read twice and ordered printed,
         and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
       AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules and the education  law,
         in relation to the use of expert medical testimony; to amend the civil
         practice law and rules, in relation to creating the health care courts
         pilot  program; and to repeal certain provisions of the civil practice
         law and rules relating thereto
         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section  1.  Subparagraph  (i)  of  paragraph  1 of subdivision (d) of
    2  section 3101 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by  chapter
    3  184 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
    4    (i) Upon request, each party shall identify each person whom the party
    5  expects  to  call  as  an  expert witness at trial and shall disclose in
    6  reasonable detail the subject matter on which each expert is expected to
    7  testify, the substance of the facts and opinions on which each expert is
    8  expected to testify, the qualifications of each  expert  witness  and  a
    9  summary of the grounds for each expert's opinion. However, where a party
   10  for  good  cause  shown retains an expert an insufficient period of time
   11  before the commencement of trial to give appropriate notice thereof, the
   12  party shall not thereupon be precluded  from  introducing  the  expert's
   13  testimony  at  the  trial  solely  on grounds of noncompliance with this
   14  paragraph. In that instance, upon motion of any party, made before or at
   15  trial, or on its own initiative, the court may make whatever  order  may
   16  be  just.  In an action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice, [a
   17  party, in responding to a request, may omit the names of medical, dental
   18  or podiatric experts but shall be required to disclose all other  infor-
   19  mation  concerning such experts otherwise required by this paragraph] NO
   20  INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE QUALIFIED TO TESTIFY AS  AN  EXPERT  WITNESS  UNLESS
   21  SUCH  INDIVIDUAL  IS  A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL WHO: (A) IS LICENSED TO
   22  PRACTICE IN AT LEAST ONE STATE IN THE SAME PROFESSION AS THE  DEFENDANT;
   23  (B) IS ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OR TEACHING AND EXPERIENCED
   24  IN  THE  CARE  AT ISSUE; AND (C) IF THE DEFENDANT IS BOARD CERTIFIED AND
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD08640-01-9
       S. 7159                             2
    1  THE STANDARD OF CARE AT ISSUE INVOLVES HIS OR HER SPECIALTY, THE  EXPERT
    2  MUST BE BOARD CERTIFIED IN THE SAME SPECIALTY.
    3    S  2.  Subparagraph  (ii) of paragraph 1 of subdivision (d) of section
    4  3101 of the civil practice law and rules is REPEALED and a new  subpara-
    5  graph (ii) is added to read as follows:
    6    (II) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE OR OF ARTICLE
    7  THIRTY-TWO  OF  THIS CHAPTER, IN AN ACTION FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR PODIA-
    8  TRIC MALPRACTICE, AT THE TIMES AND  IN  THE  SEQUENCE  DIRECTED  BY  THE
    9  COURT,  SUCH  TIMES  TO  BE PRIOR TO THE SERVICE AND FILING OF A NOTE OF
   10  ISSUE UNLESS THE COURT DIRECTS OTHERWISE  AND  PRESERVES  THE  RIGHT  OF
   11  EVERY PARTY TO DEPOSE A PERSON WHOSE DISCLOSURE OCCURS SUBSEQUENT TO THE
   12  FILING  OF  A  NOTE  OF  ISSUE,  EACH  PARTY SHALL DISCLOSE TO THE OTHER
   13  PARTIES THE IDENTITY OF ANY PERSON WHO MAY BE USED AT TRIAL  TO  PROVIDE
   14  EXPERT  TESTIMONY IN THE CASE AND EACH SUCH DISCLOSURE SHALL BE ACCOMPA-
   15  NIED BY A WRITTEN REPORT PREPARED AND SIGNED BY SUCH PERSON. THE  REPORT
   16  SHALL  CONTAIN  A COMPLETE STATEMENT OF ALL OPINIONS TO BE EXPRESSED AND
   17  THE BASIS AND REASONS THEREFOR; THE DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION CONSIDERED
   18  BY SUCH PERSON IN FORMING THE OPINIONS; ANY EXHIBITS TO  BE  USED  AS  A
   19  SUMMARY  OF  OR  SUPPORT  FOR  THE  OPINIONS;  THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE
   20  PERSON, INCLUDING A LIST OF ALL  PUBLICATIONS  AUTHORED  BY  THE  PERSON
   21  DURING  THE  PRECEDING  TEN  YEARS;  THE COMPENSATION TO BE PAID FOR THE
   22  PERSON'S CONSIDERATION OF DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION AND FOR HIS  OR  HER
   23  TESTIMONY;  AND  A  LISTING  OF  ANY OTHER CASES IN WHICH THE PERSON HAS
   24  TESTIFIED AS AN EXPERT AT TRIAL OR BY ORAL DEPOSITION WITHIN THE PRECED-
   25  ING FOUR YEARS. EACH PARTY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PRODUCE EACH  PERSON  SO
   26  IDENTIFIED BY SUCH PARTY AS AN EXPERT WITNESS, FOR EXAMINATION UPON ORAL
   27  DEPOSITION  UPON  RECEIPT OF A NOTICE TO TAKE ORAL DEPOSITION IN ACCORD-
   28  ANCE WITH RULE THIRTY-ONE HUNDRED SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE. UNLESS MANIFEST
   29  INJUSTICE WOULD RESULT, THE COURT SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE PARTY  NOTICING
   30  AN  ORAL DEPOSITION OF SUCH AN EXPERT WITNESS PAY SUCH WITNESS A REASON-
   31  ABLE FEE FOR TIME SPENT IN ATTENDING SUCH ORAL DEPOSITION. IF ANY  PARTY
   32  FAILS  TO  IDENTIFY A PERSON AS AN EXPERT WITNESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
   33  PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH, OR IF  ANY  PARTY  FAILS  TO  MAKE  ANY
   34  PERSON  IDENTIFIED  BY THE PARTY AS AN EXPERT WITNESS AVAILABLE FOR ORAL
   35  DEPOSITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH,  SUCH
   36  PARTY  SHALL  BE  PRECLUDED FROM OFFERING SUCH EXPERT'S TESTIMONY AT THE
   37  TRIAL OF THE ACTION.
   38    S 3. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new arti-
   39  cle 44-A to read as follows:
   40                                ARTICLE 44-A
   41                      HEALTH CARE COURTS PILOT PROGRAM
   42  SECTION 4410. CREATION.
   43          4411. HEALTH CARE COURT JUDGES; SELECTION.
   44          4412. JUDICIAL TRAINING.
   45          4413. COURT APPOINTED MEDICAL EXPERTS.
   46          4414. PROCEDURE.
   47          4415. APPELLATE REVIEW.
   48          4416. REPORTS.
   49          4417. DISCLAIMER.
   50    S 4410. CREATION. THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION MAY SELECT UP  TO
   51  FIVE  COUNTIES,  EACH WITHIN A SEPARATE JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN THIS STATE,
   52  TO ESTABLISH SPECIALIZED HEALTH CARE COURTS WITHIN THE SUPREME COURT  OF
   53  SUCH COUNTIES TO GOVERN CLAIMS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR PODIATRIC MALPRAC-
   54  TICE AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION. ONCE A SUPREME COURT WITHIN A PARTIC-
   55  ULAR  COUNTY  HAS  ESTABLISHED  A HEALTH CARE COURT AS SET FORTH IN THIS
   56  SECTION, SUCH COURT SHALL  HAVE  EXCLUSIVE  JURISDICTION  OVER  ALL  THE
       S. 7159                             3
    1  CLAIMS  FOR  MEDICAL, DENTAL OR PODIATRIC MALPRACTICE BROUGHT WITHIN THE
    2  SUPREME COURT OF SUCH COUNTY.
    3    S  4411. HEALTH CARE COURT JUDGES; SELECTION. JUDGES SHALL BE SELECTED
    4  TO SERVE IN THE HEALTH CARE COURT DIVISION FROM AMONG THOSE  JUDGES  WHO
    5  ARE  ELECTED  OR  APPOINTED TO THE SUPREME COURT IN A COUNTY SELECTED TO
    6  PARTICIPATE IN THE HEALTH CARE COURTS PILOT PROGRAM.   FOR THE  PURPOSES
    7  OF THIS ARTICLE, "JUDGE" SHALL MEAN A JUDGE OF THE HEALTH CARE DIVISION.
    8    S  4412. JUDICIAL TRAINING. (A) UPON SELECTION OF A PARTICULAR SUPREME
    9  COURT JUDGE TO HEAR CASES IN THE COUNTY'S HEALTH CARE COURT AND PRIOR TO
   10  HEARING SUCH CASES,  EACH  JUDGE  SHALL  COMPLETE  A  JUDICIAL  TRAINING
   11  PROGRAM  ON  THE  LAW  AND SCIENCE OF MEDICINE THAT MAY BE THE BASIS FOR
   12  CASES FALLING UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF  THE  HEALTH  CARE  COURT.  SUCH
   13  PROGRAM SHALL BE ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION.
   14    (B)  A  COMMITTEE  SHALL  BE  CREATED TO DEVELOP THE CURRICULUM OF THE
   15  JUDICIAL TRAINING PROGRAM. A TASK FORCE  SHALL  BE  COORDINATED  BY  THE
   16  OFFICE  OF  COURT  ADMINISTRATION AND SHALL INCLUDE EQUAL REPRESENTATION
   17  FROM THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND THE NEW YORK STATE
   18  BAR ASSOCIATION.
   19    (C) THE CURRICULUM TO BE CREATED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (B)  OF  THIS
   20  SECTION SHALL INCLUDE BOTH IN-CLASSROOM CLINICAL TRAINING AND AN INTERN-
   21  SHIP.  THE  IN-CLASSROOM  CLINICAL TRAINING SHALL INCLUDE AT THE MINIMUM
   22  THE FOLLOWING: AN OVERVIEW OF  THE  MAJOR  BODY  SYSTEMS,  PHARMACOLOGY,
   23  COMMON DISEASE PATHOLOGY, ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE THERAPIES, AND THE EDUCA-
   24  TION AND TRAINING REQUIRED FOR VARIOUS HEALTH PROFESSIONALS. THE INTERN-
   25  SHIP  SHALL  PROVIDE JUDGES AN OPPORTUNITY TO FOLLOW A PRACTICING PHYSI-
   26  CIAN AND OTHER  HEALTH  CARE  PROFESSIONALS  IN  DIFFERENT  HEALTH  CARE
   27  SETTINGS.  THE TRAINING PROGRAM MAY ALSO INCLUDE A LEGAL COMPONENT WHICH
   28  SHALL INCLUDE A REVIEW OF MEDICAL LEGAL ISSUES THAT MAY BE THE BASIS  OF
   29  CASES FALLING UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE HEALTH CARE COURT.
   30    S  4413.  COURT  APPOINTED  MEDICAL EXPERTS. (A) THE HEALTH CARE COURT
   31  SHALL MAINTAIN A LIST OF QUALIFIED MEDICAL EXPERTS WHO MAY  BE  UTILIZED
   32  BY  THE  COURT TO PROVIDE INDEPENDENT EXPERT OPINIONS TO THE JUDGE. SUCH
   33  EXPERTS MAY PROVIDE OPINIONS IN WRITING TO THE JUDGE OR MAY BE CALLED BY
   34  THE JUDGE TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE COURT TO CLARIFY  OR  INTERPRET  MEDICAL
   35  TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE THE JUDGE DEEMS RELEVANT
   36  TO THE PROCEEDINGS.
   37    (B)  A  COURT APPOINTED MEDICAL EXPERT MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM
   38  EXPERT WITNESS REQUIREMENTS:
   39    (1) HOLDS AN ACTIVE LICENSE IN THE SAME PROFESSION AS  THE  DEFENDANT.
   40  IF  THE  DEFENDANT  IS A LICENSED NEW YORK PHYSICIAN OR DOCTOR OF OSTEO-
   41  PATHIC MEDICINE, THE EXPERT WITNESS MUST ALSO BE LICENSED  IN  NEW  YORK
   42  STATE AS A DOCTOR OF MEDICINE OR OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE;
   43    (2)  IS  TRAINED  AND  EXPERIENCED IN THE SAME DISCIPLINE OR SCHOOL OF
   44  PRACTICE AS THE DEFENDANT AND  CAN  DEMONSTRATE  BY  COMPETENT  EVIDENCE
   45  THAT,  AS A RESULT OF TRAINING,  EDUCATION, KNOWLEDGE, AND EXPERIENCE IN
   46  THE EVALUATION, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF THE DISEASE OR INJURY  WHICH
   47  IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, THE INDIVID-
   48  UAL WAS SUBSTANTIALLY FAMILIAR WITH THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF CARE AND
   49  PRACTICE  AS  THEY RELATE TO THE ACT OR OMISSION WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF
   50  THE LAWSUIT ON THE DATE OF THE INCIDENT;
   51    (3) IF THE DEFENDANT IS CERTIFIED BY A BOARD RECOGNIZED BY THE  AMERI-
   52  CAN  BOARD  OF  MEDICAL SPECIALITIES OR THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCI-
   53  ATION, THE EXPERT MUST BE CERTIFIED IN THE SAME  SPECIALTY  BY  A  BOARD
   54  RECOGNIZED BY THE AMERICAN BOARD OF MEDICAL SPECIALITIES OR THE AMERICAN
   55  OSTEOPATHIC  ASSOCIATION AND MUST HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED EXPERTISE AND TRAIN-
       S. 7159                             4
    1  ING DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PARTICULAR HEALTH CARE OR MATTER  AT  ISSUE;
    2  AND
    3    (4)  WITHIN  FIVE  YEARS  OF THE DATE OF THE ALLEGED OCCURRENCE GIVING
    4  RISE TO THE CLAIM, WAS IN ACTIVE MEDICAL PRACTICE IN THE SAME DISCIPLINE
    5  OR SCHOOL OF PRACTICE AS THE DEFENDANT OR DEVOTED A SUBSTANTIAL  PORTION
    6  OF  HIS TIME TEACHING AT AN ACCREDITED MEDICAL SCHOOL, OR IN UNIVERSITY-
    7  BASED RESEARCH IN RELATION TO THE MEDICAL CARE AND TYPE OF TREATMENT  AT
    8  ISSUE.
    9    (C)  A  COURT APPOINTED MEDICAL EXPERT SHALL HAVE NO FINANCIAL TIES OR
   10  FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH ANY PARTY TO THE LAWSUIT, ANY  EXPERT  CALLED
   11  TO TESTIFY, OR ANY ATTORNEY REPRESENTING ANY PARTY TO THE LAWSUIT.
   12    (D) THE COURT APPOINTED MEDICAL EXPERT SHALL HAVE NO EX PARTE COMMUNI-
   13  CATIONS WITH ANY PARTY TO THE LAWSUIT, EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY THE COURT.
   14    (E)  THE  PLAINTIFF  AND  DEFENDANT SHALL EQUALLY COMPENSATE THE COURT
   15  APPOINTED MEDICAL EXPERT BASED ON THE PREVAILING FEE FOR MEDICAL EXPERTS
   16  WITH SIMILAR QUALIFICATIONS.
   17    S 4414. PROCEDURE. CLAIMS ADJUDICATED THROUGH THE  HEALTH  CARE  COURT
   18  SHALL  ADHERE  TO  THIS CHAPTER EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR IN THIS
   19  ARTICLE.
   20    S 4415. APPELLATE REVIEW. ANY PARTY TO AN  ACTION  IN  A  HEALTH  CARE
   21  COURT  MAY AVAIL THEMSELVES OF ALL APPEAL RIGHTS THAT OTHERWISE WOULD BE
   22  AVAILABLE UNDER THIS CHAPTER.
   23    S 4416. REPORTS. THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION  SHALL  SUBMIT  AN
   24  ANNUAL REPORT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF
   25  THE  SENATE,  THE  MINORITY LEADER OF THE SENATE, THE MINORITY LEADER OF
   26  THE ASSEMBLY AND THE GOVERNOR DESCRIBING THE FUNCTIONING OF  THE  HEALTH
   27  CARE  COURTS,  INCLUDING  THE NUMBER OF DISPUTES HEARD BY THE COURTS AND
   28  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE ABILITY  OF  SUCH  COURTS  TO  RESOLVE
   29  CLAIMS INVOLVING MEDICAL, DENTAL OR PODIATRIC MALPRACTICE.
   30    S  4417.  DISCLAIMER.  NOTHING  IN  THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO
   31  REMOVE THE JURY AS THE ULTIMATE FINDER OF FACT IN AN ACTION FOR MEDICAL,
   32  DENTAL OR PODIATRIC MALPRACTICE.
   33    S 4. Section 6530 of the education law is  amended  by  adding  a  new
   34  subdivision 50 to read as follows:
   35    50.  PROVIDING  EXPERT  MEDICAL  TESTIMONY THAT IS FALSE OR COMPLETELY
   36  WITHOUT REASONABLE MEDICAL FOUNDATION IN ANY ACTION FOR INJURY OR  DEATH
   37  ARISING  OUT  OF  THE  PROVISION  OF  OR  FAILURE TO PROVIDE HEALTH CARE
   38  SERVICES. AS USED IN THIS SUBDIVISION, TESTIMONY MAY BE CONSIDERED FALSE
   39  OR COMPLETELY WITHOUT REASONABLE MEDICAL FOUNDATION IF  IT  WAS  WITHOUT
   40  FOUNDATION IN ACCEPTED PEER REVIEWED SCIENCE-BASED MEDICAL RESEARCH.
   41    S  5.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
   42  have become a law.
feedback