Bill Text: NY S04484 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Amended
Bill Title: Relates to identifications by witnesses and providing for the video recording, videotaping or use of other appropriate video recording device of certain interrogations.
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 2-1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-01-08 - REFERRED TO CODES [S04484 Detail]
Download: New_York-2013-S04484-Amended.html
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
4484--A
2013-2014 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
April 3, 2013
___________
Introduced by Sens. NOZZOLIO, HASSELL-THOMPSON -- (at request of the
Office of Court Administration) -- read twice and ordered printed, and
when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes -- committee
discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
to said committee
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, the executive law and the
family court act, in relation to identifications by witnesses and the
video recording of interrogations
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1 Section 1. Section 60.25 of the criminal procedure law, subparagraph
2 (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 as amended by chapter 479 of the
3 laws of 1977, is amended to read as follows:
4 S 60.25 Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recogni-
5 tion, in absence of present identification.
6 1. In any criminal proceeding in which the defendant's commission of
7 an offense is in issue, testimony as provided in subdivision two OF THIS
8 SECTION may be given by a witness when:
9 (a) Such witness testifies that:
10 (i) He OR SHE observed the person claimed by the people to be the
11 defendant either at the time and place of the commission of the offense
12 or upon some other occasion relevant to the case; and
13 (ii) On a subsequent occasion he OR SHE observed, under circumstances
14 consistent with such rights as an accused person may derive under the
15 constitution of this state or of the United States, a person OR, WHERE
16 THE OBSERVATION IS MADE PURSUANT TO AN IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE AS
17 DEFINED IN THIS SECTION, A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED
18 OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF A PERSON whom he OR SHE recognized as
19 the same person whom he OR SHE had observed on the first or incriminat-
20 ing occasion; and
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD08982-02-3
S. 4484--A 2
1 (iii) He OR SHE is unable at the proceeding to state, on the basis of
2 present recollection, whether or not the defendant is the person in
3 question; and
4 (b) It is established that the defendant is in fact the person whom
5 the witness observed and recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
6 ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION THE WITNESS OBSERVED
7 AND RECOGNIZED on the second occasion. Such fact may be established by
8 testimony of another person or persons to whom the witness promptly
9 declared his OR HER recognition on such occasion AND BY SUCH PICTORIAL,
10 PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION.
11 (C) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN "IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE" IS ONE
12 IN WHICH THE WITNESS IDENTIFIES A PERSON IN AN ARRAY OF PICTORIAL,
13 PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTIONS UNDER
14 CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE: (I) AT THE TIME THE IDENTIFICATION IS MADE, THE
15 PUBLIC SERVANT ADMINISTERING SUCH PROCEDURE DOES NOT KNOW WHICH PERSON
16 IN THE ARRAY IS THE ACCUSED PERSON OR, (II) IF, AT SUCH TIME, IT IS
17 IMPRACTICABLE FOR THE PUBLIC SERVANT NOT TO KNOW WHO THE ACCUSED PERSON
18 IS, THE PUBLIC SERVANT DOES NOT KNOW WHERE THE ACCUSED PERSON IS IN THE
19 ARRAY VIEWED BY THE WITNESS.
20 2. Under circumstances prescribed in subdivision one OF THIS SECTION,
21 such witness may testify at the criminal proceeding that the person whom
22 he OR SHE observed and recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
23 ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND
24 RECOGNIZED on the second occasion is the same person whom he OR SHE
25 observed on the first or incriminating occasion. Such testimony,
26 together with the evidence that the defendant is in fact the person whom
27 the witness observed and recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
28 ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND
29 RECOGNIZED on the second occasion, constitutes evidence in chief.
30 S 2. Section 60.30 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap-
31 ter 479 of the laws of 1977, is amended to read as follows:
32 S 60.30 Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recogni-
33 tion, in addition to present identification.
34 In any criminal proceeding in which the defendant's commission of an
35 offense is in issue, a witness who testifies that (a) he OR SHE observed
36 the person claimed by the people to be the defendant either at the time
37 and place of the commission of the offense or upon some other occasion
38 relevant to the case, and (b) on the basis of present recollection, the
39 defendant is the person in question and (c) on a subsequent occasion he
40 OR SHE observed the defendant, OR A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC,
41 FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF THE DEFENDANT, under circum-
42 stances consistent with such rights as an accused person may derive
43 under the constitution of this state or of the United States AND PURSU-
44 ANT TO AN IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH (C) OF SUBDI-
45 VISION ONE OF SECTION 60.25 OF THIS ARTICLE, and then also recognized
46 him OR HER OR THE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO
47 RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF HIM OR HER as the same person whom he OR SHE
48 had observed on the first or incriminating occasion, may, in addition to
49 making an identification of the defendant at the criminal proceeding on
50 the basis of present recollection as the person whom he OR SHE observed
51 on the first or incriminating occasion, also describe his OR HER previ-
52 ous recognition of the defendant and testify that the person whom he OR
53 SHE observed OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR
54 VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED on such second occasion
55 is the same person whom he OR SHE had observed on the first or incrimi-
56 nating occasion. Such testimony AND SUCH PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELEC-
S. 4484--A 3
1 TRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION constitutes evidence in
2 chief.
3 S 3. Subdivision 6 of section 710.20 of the criminal procedure law, as
4 amended by chapter 8 of the laws of 1976 and as renumbered by chapter
5 481 of the laws of 1983, is amended to read as follows:
6 6. Consists of potential testimony regarding an observation of the
7 defendant either at the time or place of the commission of the offense
8 or upon some other occasion relevant to the case, which potential testi-
9 mony would not be admissible upon the prospective trial of such charge
10 owing to an improperly made previous identification of the defendant OR
11 A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPROD-
12 UCTION OF THE DEFENDANT by the prospective witness.
13 S 4. Subdivision 1 of section 710.30 of the criminal procedure law, as
14 separately amended by chapters 8 and 194 of the laws of 1976, is amended
15 to read as follows:
16 1. Whenever the people intend to offer at a trial (a) evidence of a
17 statement made by a defendant to a public servant, which statement if
18 involuntarily made would render the evidence thereof suppressible upon
19 motion pursuant to subdivision three of section 710.20 OF THIS ARTICLE,
20 or (b) testimony regarding an observation of the defendant either at the
21 time or place of the commission of the offense or upon some other occa-
22 sion relevant to the case, to be given by a witness who has previously
23 identified him OR HER OR A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED
24 OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF HIM OR HER as such, they must serve
25 upon the defendant a notice of such intention, specifying the evidence
26 intended to be offered.
27 S 5. Section 840 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
28 subdivision 5 to read as follows:
29 5. (A) THE COUNCIL SHALL, IN ADDITION, IN CONSULTATION WITH SCIENTIFIC
30 EXPERTS IN EYEWITNESS MEMORY RESEARCH AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMUNI-
31 TY, DEVELOP AND, FOLLOWING A PERIOD OF PUBLIC COMMENT, MAINTAIN AND
32 DISSEMINATE TO ALL POLICE AND PROSECUTORIAL AGENCIES IN THE STATE A
33 MODEL POLICY FOR THE PERSONNEL OF SUCH AGENCIES INVOLVED IN CRIMINAL
34 INVESTIGATIONS THAT EMBODIES CURRENT BEST PRACTICES FOR CONDUCTING
35 PHOTOGRAPHIC AND LIVE LINEUPS. THESE BEST PRACTICES MUST BE CONSISTENT
36 WITH RECOMMENDATIONS INCORPORATED IN "BEST PRACTICES FOR THE ADMINIS-
37 TRATION OF IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES" PUBLISHED IN TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN
38 BY THE JUSTICE TASK FORCE ESTABLISHED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE STATE IN
39 MAY, TWO THOUSAND NINE, AND MUST INCLUDE BUT NEED NOT BE LIMITED TO
40 THOSE PRACTICES DESCRIBED THEREIN AS "I. INSTRUCTIONS TO WITNESS," "II.
41 WITNESS CONFIDENCE STATEMENTS," "III. DOCUMENTATION OF IDENTIFICATION
42 PROCEDURES," AND "V. LIVE LINEUPS." FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION,
43 THE "CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMUNITY" SHALL INCLUDE POLICE AND PROSECUTORIAL
44 AGENCIES OF THE STATE AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR.
45 (B) EACH POLICE AND PROSECUTORIAL AGENCY IN THE STATE SHALL ADOPT
46 WRITTEN POLICIES RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF PHOTOGRAPHIC AND LIVE LINE-
47 UPS THAT CONFORM WITH THE MODEL POLICY PRESCRIBED BY PARAGRAPH (A) OF
48 THIS SUBDIVISION.
49 S 6. Section 343.3 of the family court act, as added by chapter 920
50 of the laws of 1982, is amended to read as follows:
51 S 343.3. Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recog-
52 nition in absence of present identification. 1. In any juvenile delin-
53 quency proceeding in which the respondent's commission of a crime is in
54 issue, testimony as provided in subdivision two may be given by a
55 witness when:
56 (a) such witness testifies that:
S. 4484--A 4
1 (i) he OR SHE observed the person claimed by the presentment agency to
2 be the respondent either at the time and place of the commission of the
3 crime or upon some other occasion relevant to the case; and
4 (ii) on a subsequent occasion he OR SHE observed, under circumstances
5 consistent with such rights as an accused person may derive under the
6 constitution of this state or of the United States, a person OR, WHERE
7 THE OBSERVATION IS MADE PURSUANT TO AN IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE AS
8 DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH (C) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 60.25 OF THE
9 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR
10 VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF A PERSON whom he OR SHE recognized as the
11 same person whom he OR SHE had observed on the first incriminating occa-
12 sion; and
13 (iii) he OR SHE is unable at the proceeding to state, on the basis of
14 present recollection, whether or not the respondent is the person in
15 question; and
16 (b) it is established that the respondent is in fact the person whom
17 the witness observed and recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
18 ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION THE WITNESS OBSERVED
19 AND RECOGNIZED on the second occasion. Such fact may be established by
20 testimony of another person or persons to whom the witness promptly
21 declared his OR HER recognition on such occasion AND BY SUCH PICTORIAL,
22 PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION.
23 2. Under circumstances prescribed in subdivision one, such witness may
24 testify at the proceeding that the person whom he OR SHE observed and
25 recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO
26 RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND RECOGNIZED on the second
27 occasion is the same person whom he OR SHE observed on the first or
28 incriminating occasion. Such testimony, together with the evidence that
29 the respondent is in fact the person whom the witness observed and
30 recognized OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO
31 RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED AND RECOGNIZED on the second
32 occasion, constitutes evidence in chief.
33 S 7. Section 343.4 of the family court act, as added by chapter 920 of
34 the laws of 1982, is amended to read as follows:
35 S 343.4. Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recog-
36 nition, in addition to present identification. In any juvenile delin-
37 quency proceeding in which the respondent's commission of a crime is in
38 issue, a witness who testifies that: (a) he OR SHE observed the person
39 claimed by the presentment agency to be the respondent either at the
40 time and place of the commission of the crime or upon some other occa-
41 sion relevant to the case, and (b) on the basis of present recollection,
42 the respondent is the person in question, and (c) on a subsequent occa-
43 sion he OR SHE observed the respondent, OR A PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC,
44 ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF THE RESPONDENT
45 under circumstances consistent with such rights as an accused person may
46 derive under the constitution of this state or of the United States AND
47 PURSUANT TO AN IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH (C) OF
48 SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 60.25 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, and then
49 also recognized him OR HER OR THE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC,
50 FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION OF HIM OR HER as the same person
51 whom he OR SHE had observed on the first or incriminating occasion, may,
52 in addition to making an identification of the respondent at the delin-
53 quency proceeding on the basis of present recollection as the person
54 whom he OR SHE observed on the first or incriminating occasion, also
55 describe his OR HER previous recognition of the respondent and testify
56 that the person whom he OR SHE observed OR WHOSE PICTORIAL, PHOTOGRAPH-
S. 4484--A 5
1 IC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION HE OR SHE OBSERVED
2 on such second occasion is the same person whom he OR SHE had observed
3 on the first or incriminating occasion. Such testimony AND SUCH PICTORI-
4 AL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC, FILMED OR VIDEO RECORDED REPRODUCTION
5 constitutes evidence in chief.
6 S 8. Section 60.45 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding
7 a new subdivision 3 to read as follows:
8 3. (A) WHERE A DEFENDANT IS SUBJECT TO CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION BY A
9 PUBLIC SERVANT AT A DETENTION FACILITY, THE ENTIRE CUSTODIAL INTERRO-
10 GATION, INCLUDING THE GIVING OF ANY REQUIRED ADVICE TO THE DEFENDANT AS
11 TO HIS OR HER RIGHTS AND DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF ANY RIGHTS SHALL BE VIDEO
12 RECORDED, BY VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER APPROPRIATE VIDEO RECORDING DEVICE IF
13 THE CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION INVOLVES: A CLASS A-1 FELONY EXCEPT ONE
14 DEFINED IN ARTICLE TWO HUNDRED TWENTY OF THE PENAL LAW; OR A FELONY
15 OFFENSE DEFINED IN ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE OR ARTICLE ONE
16 HUNDRED THIRTY OF SUCH LAW THAT IS DEFINED AS A CLASS B VIOLENT FELONY
17 OFFENSE IN SECTION 70.02 OF SUCH LAW. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION,
18 THE TERM "PUBLIC SERVANT" SHALL HAVE THE MEANING PROVIDED IN SECTION
19 10.00 OF THE PENAL LAW AND A "DETENTION FACILITY" SHALL MEAN A POLICE
20 STATION, CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, HOLDING FACILITY FOR PRISONERS,
21 PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OR OTHER FACILITY WHERE PERSONS ARE HELD IN
22 DETENTION IN CONNECTION WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES THAT HAVE BEEN OR MAY BE
23 FILED AGAINST THEM.
24 (B) WHERE THE PEOPLE OFFER INTO EVIDENCE A CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR
25 OTHER STATEMENT MADE BY A DEFENDANT IN CUSTODY WITH RESPECT TO HIS OR
26 HER PARTICIPATION OR LACK OF PARTICIPATION IN AN OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN
27 PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION THAT HAS NOT BEEN VIDEO RECORDED AS
28 REQUIRED BY SUCH PARAGRAPH, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER THE FAILURE TO
29 COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT AS A FACTOR IN DETERMINING WHETHER SUCH
30 CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE UNLESS THE
31 PEOPLE SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR SUCH FAILURE, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE
32 LIMITED TO: (I) MALFUNCTION OF THE VIDEO RECORDING EQUIPMENT OR OTHER
33 INADVERTENT ERROR THAT PREVENTS OR INTERRUPTS THE VIDEO RECORDING, (II)
34 UNAVAILABILITY OF SUCH EQUIPMENT BECAUSE IT WAS OTHERWISE BEING USED,
35 (III) THE DEFENDANT'S REFUSAL TO MAKE A CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER
36 STATEMENT IF IT IS VIDEO RECORDED OR HIS OR HER REQUEST THAT IT NOT BE
37 VIDEO RECORDED (AND SUCH REFUSAL OR REQUEST IS IN WRITING SIGNED BY THE
38 DEFENDANT, UNLESS THE DEFENDANT DECLINES TO DO SO), (IV) THE PEOPLE'S
39 REASONABLE BELIEF THAT SUCH VIDEO RECORDING WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SAFETY
40 OF ANY PERSON OR REVEAL THE IDENTITY OF A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT, OR (V)
41 THE PUBLIC SERVANT OR SERVANTS HAVING CUSTODY OF THE DEFENDANT REASON-
42 ABLY BELIEVED, AT THE TIME THE DEFENDANT MADE THE CONFESSION, ADMISSION
43 OR OTHER STATEMENT, THAT SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT
44 WOULD NOT RELATE TO DEFENDANT'S PARTICIPATION OR LACK OF PARTICIPATION
45 IN AN OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
46 (C) VIDEO RECORDING AS REQUIRED BY THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE CONDUCTED
47 IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY RULE OF THE DIVISION OF
48 CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES.
49 S 9. Section 710.70 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding
50 a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:
51 4. IN THE EVENT THAT THE COURT DETERMINES THAT A CONFESSION, ADMISSION
52 OR OTHER STATEMENT SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE, NOTWITHSTANDING THE PEOPLE'S
53 FAILURE TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION THREE OF SECTION
54 60.45 OF THIS CHAPTER FOR FAILING TO VIDEO RECORD IT, THE COURT, IN ITS
55 CHARGE TO THE JURY AND UPON REQUEST OF THE DEFENDANT, MUST INSTRUCT THE
56 JURY THAT THE PEOPLE'S FAILURE TO RECORD THE DEFENDANT'S CONFESSION,
S. 4484--A 6
1 ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 60.45 OF THIS CHAP-
2 TER SHOULD BE WEIGHED AS A FACTOR IN DETERMINING WHETHER SUCH
3 CONFESSION, ADMISSION OTHER STATEMENT WAS VOLUNTARILY MADE OR WAS MADE
4 AT ALL.
5 S 10. Subdivision 3 of section 344.2 of the family court act is
6 renumbered subdivision 4 and a new subdivision 3 is added to read as
7 follows:
8 3. (A) WHERE A RESPONDENT IS SUBJECT TO CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION BY A
9 PUBLIC SERVANT AT A FACILITY SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION
10 305.2 OF THIS ARTICLE, THE ENTIRE CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION, INCLUDING THE
11 GIVING OF ANY REQUIRED ADVICE TO THE RESPONDENT AS TO HIS OR HER RIGHTS
12 AND RESPONDENT'S WAIVER OF ANY RIGHTS SHALL BE VIDEO RECORDED, BY VIDE-
13 OTAPE OR OTHER APPROPRIATE VIDEO RECORDING DEVICE IF THE CUSTODIAL
14 INTERROGATION INVOLVES: A CLASS A-1 FELONY EXCEPT ONE DEFINED IN ARTI-
15 CLE TWO HUNDRED TWENTY OF THE PENAL LAW; OR A FELONY OFFENSE DEFINED IN
16 ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE OR ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED THIRTY OF SUCH
17 LAW THAT IS DEFINED AS A CLASS B VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSE IN SECTION 70.02
18 OF SUCH LAW. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE TERM "PUBLIC SERVANT"
19 SHALL HAVE THE MEANING PROVIDED IN SECTION 10.00 OF THE PENAL LAW.
20 (B) WHERE THE PRESENTMENT AGENCY OFFERS INTO EVIDENCE A CONFESSION,
21 ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT MADE BY A RESPONDENT IN CUSTODY WITH
22 RESPECT TO HIS OR HER PARTICIPATION OR LACK OF PARTICIPATION IN AN
23 OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION THAT HAS NOT BEEN
24 VIDEO RECORDED AS REQUIRED BY SUCH PARAGRAPH, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER
25 THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT AS A FACTOR IN DETERMINING
26 WHETHER SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT SHALL BE ADMISSI-
27 BLE UNLESS THE PRESENTMENT AGENCY SHOWS GOOD CAUSE FOR SUCH FAILURE,
28 WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: (I) MALFUNCTION OF THE VIDEO
29 RECORDING EQUIPMENT OR OTHER INADVERTENT ERROR THAT PREVENTS OR INTER-
30 RUPTS THE VIDEO RECORDING, (II) UNAVAILABILITY OF SUCH EQUIPMENT BECAUSE
31 IT WAS OTHERWISE BEING USED, (III) RESPONDENT'S REFUSAL TO MAKE A
32 CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT IF IT IS VIDEO RECORDED OR HIS
33 OR HER REQUEST THAT IT NOT BE VIDEO RECORDED (AND SUCH REFUSAL OR
34 REQUEST IS IN WRITING SIGNED BY THE RESPONDENT, UNLESS THE RESPONDENT
35 DECLINES TO DO SO), (IV) THE PRESENTMENT AGENCY'S REASONABLE BELIEF THAT
36 SUCH VIDEO RECORDING WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SAFETY OF ANY PERSON OR REVEAL
37 THE IDENTITY OF A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT, OR (V) THE PUBLIC SERVANT OR
38 SERVANTS HAVING CUSTODY OF THE RESPONDENT REASONABLY BELIEVED, AT THE
39 TIME THE RESPONDENT MADE THE CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT,
40 THAT SUCH CONFESSION, ADMISSION OR OTHER STATEMENT WOULD NOT RELATE TO
41 RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION OR LACK OF PARTICIPATION IN AN OFFENSE SPECI-
42 FIED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
43 (C) VIDEO RECORDING AS REQUIRED BY THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE CONDUCTED
44 IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY RULE OF THE DIVISION OF
45 CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES.
46 S 11. This act shall take effect immediately; provided that the
47 provisions of sections eight, nine and ten of this act shall take effect
48 on the first of November in the year next succeeding the year in which
49 this act shall have become a law; provided, further, sections eight,
50 nine and ten of this act shall apply only to confessions, admissions or
51 other statements made on or after the effective date of such sections.
